30% electricity tariff increase is a reality, says Erasa
Resellers play an important role in the electricity value chain, especially in sectional title schemes – and households using less electricity are now being hit the hardest. Picture: Supplied
The Electricity Resellers Association of South Africa (Erasa) will this week decide on a strategy to address members' concerns about a looming 30% increase in electricity tariffs for most of the end-users they serve in Eskom distribution areas, according to chair Johan Hopley.
These are households that rent or own sectional title units and use on average 400kWh of electricity per month. They are generally already financially struggling, and such a sharp increase in electricity costs will drastically increase the risk of non-payment.
A change in Eskom's tariff structure poses a further threat to the resellers' business model as it limits their ability to recover a loss on higher winter tariffs during the summer months, says Hopley.
Electricity resellers play an important role in the electricity value chain, especially in sectional title schemes. In most cases, Eskom or the municipal distributor brings the electricity to one bulk connection point at the gate, so to speak, of the premises. The internal distribution is then done by the developer and managed in the long run with the assistance of a reseller.
The reseller buys from Eskom or the municipality at a bulk rate but is legally not allowed to sell it to end users at more than the approved retail tariffs of the local electricity distributor, be it Eskom or the municipality.
ALSO READ: Johannesburg's 2025/26 tariff increases — Here is how much more you could pay
Impact already being felt
According to Hopley, the first Eskom bills based on the new tariffs that were implemented on 1 April show an increase of 30% in buildings' bulk purchase cost.
A building in the East of Pretoria, for example, paid R357 921 (excluding Vat) to Eskom in May last year.
Based on the same number of units in May this year, the bill runs to R464 081 – a 30% increase.
Resellers must pass this on to end users who are expecting an increase of no more than the 12.74% that energy regulator Nersa approved for Eskom from 1 April.
That widely quoted number is, however, an average and does not reflect the much higher increases for those using less electricity every month.
ALSO READ: Nersa approves 12.7% electricity tariff hike for Eskom
A tenant or unit owner who used 400kWh in May last year and paid R1 177, will now have to pay R1 547 – an increase of 31%.
This may be a huge shock to smaller households that are already struggling to make ends meet, says Hopley, and may result in lower payment rates – which poses a huge risk for resellers.
If they use more electricity, the increase moderates. However, at 600kWh per month it is 28%, which is still pretty steep.
Even if they try to use less electricity, the impact will be limited due to Eskom's structural changes as the fixed monthly charges have increased from R195 to R367 per household.
The corresponding decrease in the price per kWh is small – from R2.95 to R2.45 (17%).
ALSO READ: Electricity tariffs: Ramokgopa reveals how much Eskom customers pay for usage per month
Seasonal hurdle for resellers
Hopley says the added complication is that Eskom's bulk tariffs are seasonal.
This means the reseller pays much more for electricity when winter tariffs apply – in June, July and August – than in the rest of the year.
The retail tariffs they must charge end users are however the same throughout the year.
Resellers, therefore, used to sell at a loss during the winter months but were able to make up for it during the nine summer months.
With the new tariffs, the loss in winter will be much bigger and in summer, the reseller may only break even, which is not at all sustainable.
This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
Rate cuts save homeowners thousands per year as housing demand rebounds in 2025
Today's announcement by the South African Reserve Bank (SARB) sees the repo and prime lending rates cut by 25-basis points for a second consecutive time. Now at 7% and 10.50% respectively, borrowing costs are officially 1.25% lower than they were a year ago – a welcomed result that Rhys Dyer, CEO of the ooba Group, believes will continue to support homebuyers and homebuying activity. 'At the current prime lending rate of 10.50%, the monthly repayment on a home priced at our Q2 '25 average approved bond size of R1,455,712 equates to R14,534 over 20 years – down from R15,776 just a year ago. Savings like these add up to almost R15,000 extra in a homeowner's pocket over the course of a year.' Dyer adds that consumers' improved affordability is reflected in ooba Home Loans' latest figures. 'In Q2 '25 we saw an 11% year-on-year increase in home loan applications and a 18.5% increase in the total value of these applications,' he shares. 'This points to ongoing market recovery, increased buying power and growing buyer confidence.' Interestingly though, deposits – a key indicator of consumer liquidity – have drifted lower, down by 13.5% year-on-year for the average homebuyer and 1.9% for first-time homebuyers (as at Q2 '25). 'We do however believe that these figures are reinforced by strong bank lending activity, including attractive incentives like zero-deposit loans and some of the highest discounts to the prime lending rate seen in years,' says Dyer, highlighting an average interest rate of prime less 0.67% for its customers in Q2 '25 – a 0.11% reduction year-on-year. Economic Outlook in Support of Further Potential Rate Cuts While the country has five rate cuts under its belt since September 2024, Dyer believes that there is still scope for a further reduction. 'Today's news is certainly welcomed by the residential property sector,' he says. 'As it stands, South Africa's economic outlook provides room for monetary easing. Inflation remains anchored at the lowest levels seen in four years (currently 3%) and the country has benefitted from a series of petrol price cuts, with another anticipated in August.' And despite global uncertainty, Dyer believes that the demand for homes will build in light of today's news and the prospect of a stable, lower interest rate environment. 'The market has responded positively this year – even in the face of trade policy volatility – and we expect this to continue.' Fuelling the positive momentum is news of a second consecutive year of real salary growth, with increases of 5% to 6% outpacing last year's inflation rate of 4.4% and the projected 3.5% for this year. 'This is reflected not only in the higher value of home loan applications in Q2 '25, but also in our January – June 2025 salary data, which shows year-on-year growth in excess of inflation in average monthly gross income across four of the nine regional housing markets.' Will Rate Cuts Further Entice First-Time Homebuyers? Fuelled by recent rate cuts, first-time homebuyers are making a cautious but steady return to the market. 'While this segment has only experienced marginal year-on-year growth in Q2 '25 – up just 1% to 46% – they're spending 3.5% more on homes year-on-year,' shares Dyer. Notably, first-time homebuyers appear to be more financially prepared than in the past. 'In Q2 '25, the average deposit rose to 10.4%, a significant increase compared to Q2 '20 at 8.45%. This indicates that they are prioritising savings and are actively taking steps to pay down their home loans.' For those struggling to save, the good news is that the banks are stepping in. 'In Q2 '25, 59% of first-time homebuyers secured a home without a deposit, while 10.5% purchased a home without a deposit or access to funds for transfer and bond costs,' says Dyer. Reflecting on whether this group could return to their May 2020 peak, Dyer remains measured. 'That surge was driven by a record-low 7% interest rate – a level that we're unlikely to see again anytime soon. Still, the banks remain committed to supporting first-time homebuyers and we expect their presence in the market to continue strengthening' he concludes. Issued by Jess Gois
The Citizen
7 hours ago
- The Citizen
GDE settles 99.95% of municipal debt
The GDE said R1.489 billion of the R2 billion is dedicated to the construction of new and replacement schools. The Gauteng Department of Education on Thursday revealed that it paid R426.27 million of the R426.45 million owed to municipalities and Eskom. This leaves only a small outstanding balance that, according to the department, will be cleared by early August 2025. The department also allocated R2.8 billion for school infrastructure in the current financial year to address overcrowding across the province's public schools. GDE's near-complete municipal debt settlement The GDE successfully settled 99.95% of all outstanding municipal debts owed by schools as of 31 March 2025. GDE spokesperson Steve Mabona said the payment covered schools without section 21(1)(d) functions. 'The small outstanding balance of R175,853.61 (0.05%) was due to a delay resulting from updates to the Standard Chart of Accounts (SCOA), a reform implemented by the Provincial Treasury to improve public financial management systems,' said Mabona. The department confirmed that the remaining balance would be paid during scheduled payment runs between 25 July and 8 August 2025. This payment will bring the total settlement to 100%, thereby closing the commitment made in April 2025. ALSO READ: Municipality granted time to challenge R700k employee payout order Ongoing financial oversight According to Mabona, the department maintains direct financial oversight of 40 schools across the province that have not been granted Section 21 functions. As of 30 June 2025, these schools collectively owed R105,391.24 in municipal debt. Mabona said the department confirms that none of these schools experienced any water or electricity disconnections and continues to monitor and manage service payments on their behalf. The department reaffirmed its commitment to ensuring no public school in Gauteng is or will be disconnected from water and electricity due to unpaid accounts. The department provided annual allocations to schools in accordance with the Amended National Norms and Standards for School Funding. Mabona said school governing bodies (SGBs) are guided through circulars and compliance workshops to ensure appropriate usage of these funds and are expected to supplement state resources to ensure sustainability. ALSO READ: Fixing SA's water woes means curtailing municipalities' free-spending ways R2.8 billion infrastructure investment for overcrowding In addressing the broader challenge of overcrowding in Gauteng schools, the department allocated R2.8 billion in the 2025-26 financial year toward school infrastructure. According to Mabona, R1.489 billion is dedicated to the construction of new and replacement schools. He said R615 million will support upgrades and additions, including mobile classrooms and self-build projects. Meanwhile, R166 million is earmarked for refurbishment and rehabilitation, and R476 million is allocated for maintenance interventions. 'The GDE's approach to overcrowding combines various infrastructure strategies, including the construction of new schools on available sites, brick-and-mortar self-build classroom projects within existing schools, and the provision of mobile classrooms where immediate relief is required,' he said. The department confirmed that mobile classrooms are procured directly and not through monthly lease agreements, ensuring cost-effectiveness in their deployment. ALSO READ: Overcrowding and shortage of toilets: Here's how many pupils share a classroom in Gauteng GDE public-private partnership model The department said it is exploring a public-private partnership model to accelerate school infrastructure delivery in high-pressure areas. Under this model, private sector partners would finance, design, build, and potentially operate or maintain public schools for a defined period, with the department amortising payments over time. Mabona said this model aims to unlock private capital, fast-track delivery timelines, and ensure long-term sustainability while maintaining public oversight and accountability. 'As the department, we remain committed to ensuring sound financial governance, transparency, and service continuity in all public schools. 'We call on all education stakeholders, particularly parents, communities, and school governing bodies, to continue working closely with the department to deliver quality learning environments across Gauteng,' said Gauteng Education MEC Matome Chiloane. NOW READ: Gauteng schools scale down private security and anti-bullying programme amid budget cuts
The Citizen
10 hours ago
- The Citizen
How Ekurhuleni under-charged Tembisa for electricity
The council must find a solution to the tariff mess. Ekurhuleni mayor Nkosindiphile Xhakaza is expected to present a report to council on Thursday about the suspension of certain fixed charges for electricity. But the mess might be bigger than the city's communications indicate. Xhakaza recently suspended the fixed charge of R109.78 (excluding Vat) for specifically single-phase non-indigent households (A2 tariffs) following violent protest in Tembisa, where residents were furious about the charge. This was already an 54% increase compared with the previous year. The suspension was meant to: Enable comprehensive, inclusive and orderly engagement with affected communities. Ensure that legitimate concerns raised by residents were systematically and effectively addressed. Mitigate the risk of recurrence of destructive and violent events such as those experienced in Tembisa during 2022. In a press release issued on 22 July, Xhakaza explains at great length that Ekurhuleni is compelled by the energy regulator Nersa to levy fixed charges 'aimed at ensuring adequate investment in infrastructure maintenance, long-term sustainability of electricity supply and equitable distribution of operational costs across all communities.' He further emphasises that the charges are informed by a cost-of-supply (CoS) study. ALSO READ: Traffic delays after residents shut down Thembisa over electricity tariff hike [VIDEO] What Xhakaza failed to admit, is that the only fixed charge Ekurhuleni could lawfully have implemented is much higher, at R142.51 and that these consumers are not the only ones who are lawfully required to pay considerably more than the amount implemented. To complicate matters further, on 1 July Ekurhuleni implemented the higher tariffs Nersa approved. After a storm of protest from councillors who relied on the numbers they approved with the budget, the city 'corrected its mistake' and reverted to the lower council-approved tariffs a day later. The amounts in the budget, which are currently implemented, and those Ekurhuleni asked Nersa to approve, differ substantially regarding residential customers in terms of fixed charges as well as the unit cost. ALSO READ: Ekurhuleni mayor to suspend electricity tariff hike after protests in Thembisa Nersa approved exactly what Ekurhuleni applied for. Schedule F – approved by council A2 Residential – non-indigent Nersa approved: Source: A resident of Ekurhuleni with a single-phase connection that is on this tariff, currently pays R627 (excluding Vat) if he uses 200 kWh/m according to the council-approved tariffs, while the tariffs approved by Nersa would have resulted in a bill of R708.25 for the same amount of electricity. The difference is more than 12% for single-phase customers. Those with a three-phase connection using the same amount of electricity would see an even bigger difference of 15%. That means Ekurhuleni added a considerable mark-up to the tariffs it consulted the public on and approved in council. Whether it was a mistake or a deliberate effort to mislead council and consumers about the extent of the increase, is not clear. ALSO READ: Experts warn of unintended consequences of giving in to Thembisa demands Moneyweb tried to engage the city about the matter, but was told by a spokesperson that the electricity tariffs are expected to be discussed in council on Thursday. Following Xhakaza's statement that the tariffs are based on a CoS study, the question arises how the city then arrived at two different sets of tariffs and if the council-approved tariffs that he quoted are indeed cost-based, why it would submit higher tariffs to Nersa that would result in an over-recovery. Further, did Nersa interrogate how the city arrived at the numbers? Electricity pricing expert Deon Conradie confirms that Ekurhuleni is not permitted to implement a different charge than was approved by Nersa, unless it goes back and applies for a change in the approved rates. He is of the opinion that the council as implementor can decide not to implement the tariff charge and take the loss of income on the chin, or stop the implementation temporarily until they have received approval from Nersa to change the tariff. How big that loss will be, is not clear at this stage. In the statement announcing the suspension, the city however states that the decision was taken after 'assessment of potential risks.' Several sources told Moneyweb they are trying to engage Nersa on the matter. Moneyweb sent questions to Nersa on 8 July, but has not received a response, despite several efforts to follow up on the enquiry. Nersa for the first time this year published both the tariff applications it received from municipalities as well as the approved tariffs. Conradie advises consumers in all municipalities to check these tariffs against those approved by council to make sure there are no discrepancies. This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
