Lawmakers release bipartisan human services budget bill
A bipartisan group of lawmakers released on Thursday the final draft of their plan to cut $270 million over the next two years from programs that serve the elderly and disabled.
The two-year, approximately $17 billion compromise human services budget will cut future spending on nursing homes and home care programs, though it will raise pay for nursing home and home care workers. The bill largely avoids pushing costs on to county governments, which was a core piece of the House plan.
The Department of Human Services currently accounts for around one-third of the state budget, and spending is expected to rapidly grow in the coming years as the population ages and the cost of providing care increases. The majority of the agency's budget goes toward Medical Assistance, Minnesota's Medicaid program.
Agreeing on a DHS budget was one of the biggest hurdles lawmakers needed to clear before they reconvene for a special session to pass the remaining budget bills.
Legislative leaders and Gov. Tim Walz are aiming to hold a special session on Saturday, but there's been no official announcement, and they've missed self-imposed deadlines before. If they don't finish the budget by the end of June, large parts of state government will shut down. Some state workers have already received furlough notices.
Throughout the legislative process, leaders agreed to target DHS for cuts, though both chambers passed very different plans. The DFL-backed Senate budget focused on reducing payments to nursing homes; the House version pushed costs onto counties while cutting spending on programs that provide care to people with disabilities.
The compromise budget bill makes the following cuts over the next two years:
$186 million by capping inflation adjustments for long-term care waivers, which pay for in-home care for people with disabilities, at the federal urban inflation rate (CPI-U) or 4%.
$51 million from changes to 'rate exceptions,' higher-than-usual payments for the care of people with extraordinary needs. The bill would create new limits on what is covered by the rate exception, and introduce new paperwork requirements.
Around $46 million by putting tighter limits on what Medical Assistance covers for day and unit based services, which help people with disabilities maintain life skills and participate in a community and activities. It also would cut pay for caretakers when they are sleeping on an overnight supervision shift.
$41 million from nursing homes by making a series of changes to how patients are classified, removing an incentive to create more single-bed rooms and capping some inflation adjustments.
It also generates more than $56 million in savings by increasing yearly fees paid to the state by nursing homes, and also increasing a reimbursement rate that corresponds to the fees, which pushes some costs onto the federal government.
The budget spends money on raises for nursing home and other care workers ($88 million) and on setting up a new licensing and oversight system for autism service providers ($11 million), some of which are under investigation by the FBI on suspicion of fraud.
The bill does not include a House proposal that would have shifted more than $150 million in costs to counties to pay for rate exceptions.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
8 minutes ago
- New York Post
Speaker Johnson: Epstein drama ‘not a hoax,' Congress wants ‘full transparency'
House Speaker Mike Johnson has insisted that the drama surrounding the case of late child sex predator Jeffrey Epstein 'is not a hoax' and that lawmakers want to see justice for the victims as he grapples with a growing firestorm over the issue. 'We want full transparency,' Johnson (R-La.) told CBS News' 'The Takeout with Major Garrett' Wednesday. 'We want everybody who is involved in any way with the Epstein evils — let's call it what it was — to be brought to justice as quickly as possible.' 'We want the full weight of the law on their heads.' Advertisement A weeks-long controversy has roiled Trump's MAGA movement after the Justice Department and FBI concluded in a July 6 memo that Epstein most likely killed himself in his Manhattan jail cell and didn't have an 'incriminating client list' of rich and powerful people who took part in sex with girls as young as 14. The conclusion has caused headaches for Johnson after House Democrats won over several Republicans in a push to publicly release the full case file. 3 House Speaker Mike Johnson said he hasn't seen the Jeffrey Epstein evidence in question. REUTERS Advertisement 3 Interest in Jeffrey Epstein was revived after a DOJ and FBI memo this week kicked up a firestorm and demands within MAGA world for more transparency. AP On Monday, the House Rules Committee — the lower chamber's gatekeeper for most legislation that gets a floor vote — was forced to adjourn by Republicans who wanted to short-circuit a Democratic effort to force the disclosure of the Epstein files. Johnson then opted to send lawmakers home to their districts Wednesday for the August recess — one day ahead of schedule — due to the House floor effectively being frozen over the Epstein revolt. President Trump has seethed at the controversy, calling out 'past' supporters as 'weaklings' for buying into the 'hoax.' Advertisement 'It's not a hoax. Of course not,' Johnson told Garrett. 3 House Speaker Mike Johnson has been careful not to break with President Trump on the Jeffrey Epstein ordeal. Getty Images 'I've never seen the Epstein evidence; it wasn't in my lane, but I had the same concerning questions that a lot of people do,' he later added. Rank-and-file lawmakers are pushing Johnson to hold a vote to compel the release of outstanding documents once the House returns from its recess Sept. 2. Advertisement Reps. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) are pursuing a discharge petition — a legislative technique to force a vote on a bill without the speaker's blessing — to that effect. Meanwhile, Trump has announced his support for the release of grand jury testimony in the cases against Epstein and his co-conspirator, Ghislaine Maxwell. On Thursday, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche met with Maxwell and her legal team in Tallahassee, Fla. to discuss the case. Additionally, the GOP-led House Oversight Committee has subpoenaed Maxwell for testimony, with an interview tentatively set for Aug. 11.


Fox News
9 minutes ago
- Fox News
WATCH: Texas Dem censured for heckling Trump renews push to impeach presidential 'Goliath'
Progressive Rep. Al Green, D-Texas, is once again renewing his call to impeach President Donald Trump, vowing to drop new articles of impeachment soon. He likened his crusade against Trump to the biblical David versus Goliath and anti-Trump activists as "one million Davids." "This is what's important, President Trump is a Goliath. He has military might. He has persons who are loyal to him in the military and the judiciary and in the Congress. But for every Goliath, there is a David," said Green, adding, "But in this case, we have nearly one million Davids, one million Davids willing to take on and challenge the president for his unconstitutional behavior. And I say to you that this number is growing." In June, the House of Representatives voted along bipartisan lines to quash Green's bid to impeach Trump. Lawmakers agreed to table the measure in a 344–79 vote. A vote to table is a procedural mechanism allowing House members to vote against consideration of a bill without having to vote on the bill itself. A majority of House Democrats joined Republican lawmakers to kill Green's resolution, a sign of how politically caustic the effort appears to be. Just 79 Democrats voted to proceed with the impeachment vote, while 128 voted to halt it in its tracks. Despite this, Green said he was undeterred, telling reporters on Wednesday "we're not going to make this a one-off" and "there's also a set of articles that I have not presented that I will be presenting. This is not the last time." Asked whether he believes pursuing impeachment is productive given the Republican House majority, Green answered, "it is always a good time to impeach." "I think focusing on impeachment is productive whenever there's a breach of the Constitution," he said. "The timing is not associated with when you have a majority in the House, it's not associated with when it feels good, it is always good to impeach when a president violates the Constitution. It really is that simple." Besides being known for repeatedly attempting to impeach Trump, the Texas Democrat is also known for infamously disrupting the president's joint address to Congress in March by shouting and waving his cane at him. Green was removed from the House floor after repeatedly disrupting the beginning of the president's speech, a move that the Democrat called "invidious discrimination." House lawmakers voted to censure Green over the disruption. Ten Democrats joined Republicans in voting for the measure. Green himself voted "present," along with first-term Rep. Shomari Figures, D-Ala. When reached for comment by Fox News Digital, the office of Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., referred to his comments on the censure on X, formerly Twitter, this week. Johnson posted, "Rep. Al Green's shameful and egregious behavior during President Trump's Joint Address disgraced the institution of Congress and the constituents he serves. Despite my repeated warnings, he refused to cease his antics and I was forced to remove him from the chamber. He deliberately violated House rules, and an expeditious vote of censure is an appropriate remedy. Any Democrat who is concerned about regaining the trust and respect of the American people should join House Republicans in this effort."


Politico
39 minutes ago
- Politico
New York's Kathy Hochul opens the door to redrawing House lines
'I'm not surprised that they're trying to break the rules to get an advantage,' Hochul added. 'But that's undemocratic, and not only are we calling them out, we're also going to see what our options are.' Jeffries, in a podcast interview Monday, said Democrats should keep Republicans politically 'on the run.' 'I'm in conversation with members of the New York delegation, as well as the governor, to explore what, if anything else, can be done to ensure that New York does its part with respect to fair maps across the country,' Jeffries said. 'And every single state is going to have to do the same thing because Republicans are desperate.' The potential tit-for-tat move by blue New York would be a heavy lift before the midterm elections — and would almost certainly be subject to legal challenges. The state's constitution stipulates redistricting may only be done once a decade and should be based on the most recent census data. The governor's remarks drew a rebuke from statehouse Republicans. 'Kathy Hochul and Albany Democrats are experts at rigging the rules to protect their power and silence voters,' state Senate Minority Leader Robert Ortt said. A speedy redistricting of New York's House lines would be an unlikely bank shot. Legal challenges forced New York's redistricting commission to redraw the state's House map, which was finalized in early 2024. A court order following another legal challenge to the existing House map could once again reopen that process. But such a development would require an extremely tight turnaround to redraw the map ahead of the 2026 elections.