Betrayed with a kiss: How Caravaggio's The Taking of Christ made its way to Ireland
Caravaggio
, including, simultaneously in 1603, Supper at Emmaus, which now belongs to the National Gallery in London, and The Taking of Christ, which is the pride of the
National Gallery of Ireland
.
Francesca Cappelletti, now director of the
Galleria Borghese
in Rome, found the original contract for the commission as a graduate student in the late 1980s. The painting had been misattributed to the Dutch painter Gerard van Honthorst from 1793 until then. Known in Italy as Gherardo delle Notti, van Honthorst was one of many painters who flocked to Rome to imitate Caravaggio's distinctive chiaroscuro style.
[
Caravaggio: the 'boozing, whoring, brawling and bisexual bad boy of baroque'
Opens in new window
]
The painting, which is on loan to the Caravaggio 2025 exhibition at the
Palazzo Barberini
in Rome, stayed in the Mattei family until 1802, when it was sold to the Scottish collector William Hamilton Nisbet. A descendant of Nisbet tried to bequeath it to the National Gallery of Scotland in 1920, but the Edinburgh museum declined, believing the Caravaggio and other pictures given with it to be copies.
Marie Lea-Wilson
, an Irishwoman, purchased the painting in Edinburgh in 1921 and took it home to Dublin, where she was a much-loved paediatrician. In 1930 Lea-Wilson gave it to the Jesuit House at 35 Leeson Street, to thank priests who comforted her when her husband, Capt Percival Lea-Wilson of the Royal Irish Constabulary, was assassinated by the IRA. The painting hung in the Jesuits' diningroom, gathering soot and dust, for 63 years.
READ MORE
The Jesuits asked
Sergio Benedetti
, head curator at the National Gallery of Ireland, to assess their paintings for restoration. Benedetti recognised the lost Caravaggio. The Jesuits put the masterpiece on permanent loan to the NGI.
'My mother and I travelled from Belfast to see The Taking of Christ when it was unveiled in 1993,'
Caroline Campbell
, the director of the NGI, says. 'I felt exalted and astonished ... This painting is really, really, really loved, and that is extraordinary.'
Caravaggio: Supper at Emmaus. Photograph © Pinacoteca di Brera, Milan – MiC
The painting is like a close-up of the crucial moment when Judas betrayed Christ to Roman soldiers by identifying him with a kiss. At the centre of the canvas stand Judas and a Roman soldier, both holding on to Christ. The Saviour looks down at his folded hands with an expression of suffering and resignation. His face is powerfully moving, even to nonbelievers. No reproduction can do it justice. 'This Christ is one of the most beautiful in the history of art,' Thomas Clement Salomon, director of Italy's
National Gallery
, says.
To the left of the canvas John the Evangelist attempts to flee, but a second Roman soldier has grabbed his cloak. To the right is a self-portrait of Caravaggio, illuminating the scene with a lantern.
At the Rome exhibition, Campbell is struck by similarities between The Taking of Christ and The Martyrdom of St Ursula, painted eight years later, shortly before Caravaggio's death. Again, we see two Romans in burnished armour, and the painter himself, as an onlooker. 'Caravaggio must have been thinking about The Taking of Christ just before he died,' Campbell concludes.
Caravaggio 2025 is at
Palazzo Barberini
, in Rome, until July 6th
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Regaled by admirers, reviled by critics: A glimpse inside the André Rieu musical extravaganza
As the evening sun dips behind Maastricht's medieval spires, this summer evening ignites. Once the signature Entry of the Gladiators begins, all eyes turn towards André Rieu and his troupe of Disney princesses at the top of Vrijthof Square. This annual extravaganza, set against the towering Romanesque Basilica of St Sevatius and Gothic St John's that dominate the square, draws thousands of devoted fans from across the globe. But who is this mulleted maestro regaled by admirers and reviled by critics? Rieu was born and raised in Maastricht, his father also a renowned conductor. Rieu jnr was immersed in the world of classical music from his early years; opera houses became his playgrounds and by age five, he could already play the violin. Yet even then, he was unimpressed by the ambience of such rarified cultural shrines. READ MORE 'I remember loving the music,' he recalls. But the atmosphere was so 'snobbish and deathly boring'. And so, alongside his Johann Strauss Orchestra, he has taken a different and at times controversial approach to orchestration, arrangements and staging of classical standards. For those who cannot grasp the idea of symphonic music as fun, you've yet to witness a Maastricht Rieu special: the occasion – and it sure is that – unfolds in ever more elaborate episodes. One moment, you're seduced by 17-year-old Emma Kok's compelling rendition of Voilà and the next, swept along with what seems like an army of octogenarians tearing into the Macarena – led by none other than Los del Rio themselves. Among this lively Macarena mob is Majella from Trim, Co Meath. She is far from a Rieu rookie and knows exactly what to expect; this year, she decided to drag along her husband and two teenage children for the Maastricht pilgrimage. While sceptical at first, by the night's end, they were won over, admitting it was far from their expectation of that musical genre. [ André Rieu lobbied Ursula von der Leyen for €15m to stage world tour Opens in new window ] In part, their surprise could likely be chalked up to this year's special addition: the striptease skit featuring a blacksmith, briefly stealing the limelight from Rieu. The razzmatazz makes Rieu's performances feel a world away from the classical canon, a showbiz approach that has no shortage of critics who remain unimpressed. He has been branded the king of smaltz and McDonald's of Mozart for a presentation that has succeeded in broadening an audience by way of contentious packaging. But his interpretation of that prolific genius has produced yet another following – one that critic Karen Brooks claims the tradition has long sought to exclude. Accusations of crass commercialism do not faze Rieu or his wedded waltzers, who enjoy the adoration of millions worldwide. They will not claim to be custodians of the classical canon, but they know what they like. And what this nightly crowd in Maastricht want is the local boy made good, who lives locally in his 16th century Renaissance castle. One such devoted admirer is Cindy from Tennessee, who is attending her 24th Rieu concert. Despite claiming to be the least 'groupie' person on the planet, she admits to a soft spot for Rieu. . This year she's making the long trip alone as her husband is 'Rieued out'. And determined to make her journey worthwhile, she is spending the entire month in Maastricht to attend all 12 nights of the July concerts. Another couple, Judie and Jeff from Adelaide, are excited to see Rieu perform in his home town. They attended his 2008 Australian tour, which featured an ice rink and a horse-drawn golden carriage, but admit it falls short of the Maastricht magic. For 20 years, Rieu's July concerts have showcased a musical magnetism that never fails to thrill: whether you're a rookie or sceptic, denying his appeal fails to take account of that talent, charm and savvy commercial acumen. Purists will take a dim view, but while they cling to tradition, the magic is in celebration – fun, fiery and unmistakably alive. Is it an occasion of cultural piety? Perhaps not, but it certainly makes for one hell of a night.
Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
Billie Eilish at 3Arena review: weird and bruised and real
Billie Eilish 3Arena, Dublin ★★★★☆ The last time Billie Eilish played Ireland she was battling a nasty virus and had to dig deep to make it through. Two years on from that performance at Electric Picnic , she returns sniffle-free and radiating a cheery charm at odds with her public persona as the grungiest pop star of her generation. That isn't the only way in which things have been flipped on their head for this stunning show. For her new tour, Eilish has brought the stage into the crowd, performing on a huge LED panel set sideways in the middle of the venue. It is 50 per cent boxing ring, 50 per cent Blade Runner neon wonderland – a thunderclap of digital sorcery that elevates the evening beyond just another arena jamboree rolling into Dublin's docklands. The framing gives the LA-born artist room to roam, and she makes the most of it, running back and forth and pogoing enthusiastically. It also provides a fantastic view to fans up front and those in the cheap seats (if 'cheap' applies to a concert where ticket prices start at over €100 and soar as high as €300: this new tour preaches sustainability – except where punters' wallets are concerned). [ Kneecap to play main stage at Electric Picnic in August Opens in new window ] She begins suspended in a blinking cube, from which she belts outbChihiro, a dreamy, rave-influenced stomper from her 2024 third album, Hit Me Hard And Soft. Descending to earth, she turns from pop to raunchy electro-goth with Lunch. The song is a swelteringly suggestive ditty, the carnal undertones of which presumably/hopefully soar over the heads of the many 10-year-olds yelling the lyrics. READ MORE Eilish is a pop A-lister with a twist. Her fashion sense is suburban skate punk – on Saturday night, she wears a baseball cap and a baggy sports top – and she is far too cool for anything as tacky as backing dancers. But she knows how to make a statement. She demonstrates that point when looping her vocals at the start of her brilliant dirge When's The Party Over and then finishing the tune on her back cast in gleaming white light, as if singing from the pits of purgatory. There is some canned banter. Here she comes close to losing her footing. Billie – real name Billie O'Connell – reveals that she is 'Irish'. 'Obviously, I'm not from here, but it's really cool to come somewhere where everyone looks exactly like you,' she observes during an acoustic section where she is accompanied by backing singers and childhood friends Ava and Jane Horner. 'You're all just as pasty as me'. [ Joanna Lumley: 'I love Ireland as much as you can if you're not an Irish person' Opens in new window ] There is, however, a near stumble, with one or two boos ringing out as she says 'being in the UK again is amazing' – though she quickly adds 'being in Europe again is amazing', which appears to mollify the hecklers. She later reveals that her mother and father are in attendance. As is the county Kildare woman after whom she is named (the original Eilish was the subject of a documentary that left a lasting impression on her parents). An outstanding performance from pop's princess of pessimism finishes with perhaps her most atypical hit, the beautifully bittersweet Birds of a Feather – the highest-streaming song in the world in 2024. With confetti swirling, it is a triumphant ending to a show that is elevated by the ingenious staging. But it's Eilish's mix of spiky charisma and brightly burning talent that ultimately makes the evening soar. In a crowded field of high-wattage chart-toppers, she brings something weird and bruised and real. Fuelled by that left-of-field energy, the concert is a masterclass in the dark art of being a pop star with a twist.
Irish Times
14 hours ago
- Irish Times
So many jobs are a laughable waste of time. The greater part of any job is learning to look busy
Lately I've been thinking about Sartre's waiter. You might know the story. The philosopher is sitting in a Parisian cafe sometime in the early 1940s, watching a waiter glide from table to table. There's something creepy about him, Sartre decides, but what? He watches a little longer. It's this: the man is playing at being a waiter in a cafe. It's a memorable observation, like something so obvious it requires an alien observer to notice it. Once seen, it passes into the brain as truth. You see it everywhere: people performing their functions like actors who've learned their parts a little too well. It's a psychotic but undeniably catchy worldview. In Being and Nothingness, where this anecdote appears, the waiter's exaggerated waiterliness becomes a case study in what Sartre calls bad faith: the act of denying one's full, complex, and ever-changing selfhood by overidentifying with a preassigned role. The man isn't just working as a waiter, he has become a waiter. Sartre argues it's more comforting to take refuge in a familiar script than to confront the ongoing anxiety of having to choose, moment by moment, who and what we are. [ How Sartre's theory of 'self' can explain all of humanity - even Elon Musk Opens in new window ] It's easy to criticise Sartre's use of the waiter. Here's a guy who, when not experimenting with polyamory or taking amphetamines to fuel his lengthy philosophical treatises, spends his days in Parisian cafes critiquing the man bringing him coffee for failing to confront the abyss of his radical existential freedom. It's true the waiter could, at any moment, throw his tray like a frisbee, tear off his apron, and walk out into the unknown – but it's also possible he has a family to feed, and that living in good faith might still mean having to find another identical job down the line. READ MORE It's also possible, more importantly, that the waiter's exaggerated waiterliness isn't evidence of a collapsed identity at all, but rather a protective mask. A way of drawing a line between the role he is paid to perform and the person he actually is in the off hours. The reason I've been thinking about Sartre's waiter is that I have a new job. When I'm working, I often have the strange sense that I'm only pretending to work, or pretending to be the kind of person I imagine would be good at the job. Maybe boredom just breeds dissociation. I won't punish anyone with the unspectacular details of my employment, except to say that its meaninglessness boggles the mind, it really does. I can't complain, though; after all, I sought this job out, applied for it, politely accepted when it was offered to me, and now there's nothing left to do but get on with it. The greater part of any job is learning to look busy. In a hotel, you're hired not just to stand behind a desk, but to act like a receptionist. We understand it instinctively and so we develop professional selves that may resemble us but aren't quite us. We do this not only to protect our real selves, but because turning it into a performance helps to pass the hours. My first job was a weekend shift in a jeweller's when I was 15, and at the time, it felt like something close to freedom. Proof that I could rely on myself, that the money I earned, however modest, might translate into real independence. The exciting feeling that it was possible to make my own way in the adult world. More than that, I liked the sense of being a spinning cog in the great, whirring city. Of being a shopgirl in a shop. One of the multitudes making little things happen, pushing forward into the future. I think I approached it enthusiastically because school seemed so irredeemably awful that I wasn't especially concerned about what I was running toward, only what I was trying to escape. It took a while for it to dawn on me that this whole work thing wasn't just a fun little side plot, but something I'd be doing, in one form or another, for the rest of my life. Ruby Eastwood: 'The social contract is falling apart; everybody knows it' Of course, there are all sorts of jobs, and many of them are worthwhile and even ennobling, but the idea that there's any inherent virtue in work for its own sake falls away pretty quickly. It only takes working a few jobs to dispel that myth. I'm reminded of that famous story from the Soviet Union. In an effort to meet productivity quotas, a nail factory was told to maximise output by weight. The factory responded by producing a small number of large, heavy nails; useless for construction but perfect for hitting the target. When the quota shifted to the number of units instead, they switched to making thousands of tiny, fragile pins. Again: useless. The workers did exactly what was asked of them, but none of it amounted to anything. Under capitalism there are perhaps more sophisticated ways of obscuring our futility, but we still find out eventually. The truth is, so many jobs are such a laughable waste of time it's tempting to think dread is what keeps the whole system running. There's always something worse, something more degrading just a rung below, and it's that fear of sliding downward, not any real belief in upward mobility, that keeps everyone stuck where they are. I read an article once about line standers: people who get paid to stand in queues for other people. It's a real job. Apparently it happens a lot in the US, and it's mostly homeless people and students doing it. The article was fascinating because of this one story that happened in Poland. It was actually a kind of beautiful story. During the 1980s, in the late communist era, shortages were so bad that people would queue for hours, sometimes days, for basic goods. A small economy sprang up around this reality. People who didn't have time to stand in line would pay someone else to do it for them. One man had turned it into a profession. In the article the man was talking about the job with real sincerity, talking about the qualities it required: honesty, reliability, patience. He said he once queued for 40 hours straight. He particularly liked queuing in hospitals, holding spots to make sure people could get in-demand specialist care at a time when the healthcare system was overloaded. He saw himself as providing a little bit of security for people who were already struggling with illness. The social contract is falling apart; everybody knows it; you don't need me to tell you What happened was that this man's business eventually collapsed because there was some reform, and he was left facing the threat of destitution. But it turned out that he had become famous through his humanistic work in line standing for all those years, maybe even decades, and that the people knew and loved him, so he ended up having this bizarre odyssey where he became part of a theatre company and someone cast him in an opera and even made a marionette with his likeness. At this late stage in the article they mentioned the fact that the man happened to be a dwarf, and that his distinctive appearance may have contributed to his iconic status as a Polish folk hero. After the stint in theatre he went on to politics, running for mayor in his hometown. All of this happened in the real world. Which proves that it is possible to escape from under the crushing banality of your circumstances and reclaim your radical existential freedom, but it takes a certain alignment of the stars and lots of chutzpah. Anyway, I've always been interested in the things people do to make money, but I also understand the question 'What do you do?' can provoke hostility. We've inherited this strange cultural hangover from better times, the idea that the thing you do to survive should also double as your identity and source of pride. Stable, long-term employment is becoming rarer. Entire industries are being gutted or automated. Many people are cobbling together an income from gigs and freelance scraps, and young people, even ones with degrees, can't seem to secure proper work. Every so often something comes along (Covid, the anti-work movement, quiet quitting, the rise of AI) that seems poised to change the future of work, or to bring the whole thing crashing down. But the moment passes, and things stay more or less the same. And after all our fruitless toil, we hand over more than half of our paycheck to a landlord who's probably chilling with a rum and coke somewhere in the Bahamas. In short, the social contract is falling apart; everybody knows it; you don't need me to tell you. What actually interests me are the quiet, almost heroic ways people carry on as if this weren't the case, and the small psychological tricks we use to get through the working day. I had a drink a few months ago with a friend who was about to start a new job at an AI training company. His role, as it was described to him, would be to interact with a chatbot in order to help it censor harmful content. The example they gave was Romeo and Juliet. Juliet is 13. Say, hypothetically, a paedophile wanted to engage the chatbot in a discussion that drew on the text, citing Juliet's age, the sexual nature of her relationship with Romeo, and so on, as a way to access inappropriate material under the guise of literature. My friend's task would be to think like this hypothetical user, coming up with ever more inventive ways to outwit the filters, so that those filters could then be adjusted accordingly. In essence: he was being hired to think like a paedophile, from nine to five. [ Life as a Facebook moderator: 'People are awful. This is what my job has taught me' Opens in new window ] He was, understandably, disturbed by this, and concerned about what effect it might have on his mental health. It's a good idea to look after one's capacity to see beauty in the world, to preserve hope that life can be fun. Jobs like this pose a serious threat. I agreed with him that the situation sounded far from ideal, pretty bleak really. Then we fell into silence, because what else can you say? A few weeks later I bumped into him again and asked how the job was going. He seemed sort of surprised I'd remembered, as if he himself had already forgotten. It turned out it didn't bother him at all once he'd reconciled himself to doing it. You compartmentalise. You show up. You do whatever weird thing is required of you. You clock out. A job is a job, he'd decided, and there are many worse jobs.
