logo
Kim Kardashian's success in law proves her misogynistic haters wrong

Kim Kardashian's success in law proves her misogynistic haters wrong

Metro22-05-2025
Kim Kardashian has once again found herself at the heart of a tidal wave of criticism – only this time it seems to be totally unwarranted.
Unless you've been living under a rock, you'll know that the reality TV star has just completed California's rigorous law apprenticeship path, passed the 'baby bar,' and graduated from the same legal system she's worked within for years to fight unjust incarceration.
It's a feat that few could accomplish. So why, therefore, instead of applause, is Kim facing mockery and ridicule?
The answer: misogyny, elitism, and resentment of a woman who refuses to stay in the box she was put in.
Her critics on X claim that Kardashian 'paid for her degree' or took a 'run-around' route, but, let's be clear, California's legal apprenticeship path is not a shortcut.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
It's one of the oldest and most grueling routes to becoming a lawyer, requiring thousands of supervised study hours, passage of the First-Year Law Students' Examination (commonly called the 'baby bar'), and ultimately will end in her taking the same Bar Exam as law school graduates.
And she's done all that while simultaneously producing television, running a multimillion-dollar business empire, and raising four children.
Yes, she pursued this from a place of immense wealth and privilege, but isn't it admirable when someone with no financial incentive and nothing to prove chooses to dedicate their time and energy to something larger than themselves, simply to help improve society?
Isn't this exactly the kind of influence we should want celebrities to wield?
We often complain that celebrity culture is shallow or self-serving, but Kim Kardashian has repeatedly used her platform in extraordinary ways to advocate for criminal justice reform in the past.
Through her initiative, she's brought resources to issues that receive far too little sustained attention from politicians (let alone pop culture figures), such as the injustices of mass incarceration, wrongful convictions, and sentencing inequities.
Her work has also led to the release of multiple people serving what I can only describe as unfair prison sentences, including Alice Marie Johnson. She's a grandmother and first-time nonviolent offender who had been sentenced to life in prison without parole for her role in a drug trafficking operation.
How is it then fair that when one of the most famous women in the world chooses to use her fame to fight for the voiceless (and does the intellectual and emotional labour to back it up) she's mocked for not being 'serious' enough?
Much of the criticism reeks of a kind of snobbery. The idea that only those who take the traditional law school route are worthy of respect ignores the long American history of legal apprentices, including Abraham Lincoln, who doesn't normally find himself having much in common with a Kardashian.
Apprenticeship paths are still recognised in multiple states because they allow working people (especially those without access to elite institutions) to enter the profession. That path is especially relevant in a time when law school debt can exceed six figures.
But underneath this criticism is something even more toxic that is often at play when it comes to cultural opinions on the Kardashians: misogyny.
Detractors of this family don't just question her non-traditional route into the legal profession; they question her right to be taken seriously at all.
They reduce her to her body, her beauty, and her brand. There's an unspoken rule here: if you've made your name in reality TV that was originally created after a sex tape made you famous, if you've built a brand around femininity and being a sex symbol, you're not allowed to be serious or smart.
Yet if she were a man – someone who built such a massive business, leveraged fame into political influence, and committed to a years-long educational pursuit – she'd be called a genius and an entrepreneur with brilliant acumen.
We've seen it too many times before. Women in public life are expected to prove themselves in ways men simply aren't.
They are expected to apologise for ambition, downplay their success, and stay in their lane – particularly if they've been culturally positioned as sex symbols.
Angelina Jolie, for example, was a critically acclaimed actress who happened to be beautiful and open about her sensuality. As a result, as she aged, she had to work hard to be taken seriously as a humanitarian and director.
In contrast, male actors transitioning to directing are often immediately treated as auteurs, without seemingly needing to prove moral or emotional 'growth.'
Or take Sydney Sweeney, who is relentlessly accused of dating her male co-stars and hyper sexualised. The idea that her confidence in her appearance somehow diminishes her complexity or credibility is, not only outdated, but also deeply reductive.
When female celebrities are unapologetic about their achievements, the backlash often comes disguised as legitimate critique, when the reality is that a man would never face the same pigeonholing. More Trending
Of course, it's fine to question the role of celebrity in politics and justice reform. Skepticism is healthy, and the Kardashians' brand of hyper-consumerism and perpetuation of unhealthy beauty standards are worth questioning.
But dismissing Kim Kardashian's achievements outright doesn't just undermine her work, it also discourages others – especially women – from using their power to fight for something bigger than themselves.
So yes, this reality star then legal apprentice didn't go to traditional law school, but she still accomplished something – with the intention of making herself better capable of changing a broken system.
And that's far more than her critics have even attempted.
Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing James.Besanvalle@metro.co.uk.
Share your views in the comments below.
MORE: Tom Cruise eats popcorn in the most 'aggressive' way – and it's driving fans mad
MORE: I saw a child in Gaza digging through rubble – the reason broke my heart
MORE: Selena Gomez shows support for Hailey Bieber after ex Justin's savage Vogue comments
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

More than 5,000,000 UK victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault or stalking
More than 5,000,000 UK victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault or stalking

Metro

timean hour ago

  • Metro

More than 5,000,000 UK victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault or stalking

Around one in 10 people have been victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault or stalking, the latest bleak figures reveal. One in eight women and one in 12 men have reported being victims of these types of crimes despite the government promising a clamp down. This is a total of 5.1 million people aged 16 and over in England and Wales, the Office for National Statistics said. Heidi Riedel, CEO of Woman's Trust, told Metro: 'The overwhelming number of abuse survivors are female. 'Survivors deserve better – and the government must do better if it's serious about addressing not only the incidents of VAWG but also the impact. 'What the numbers won't include is people who either don't yet recognise that what they are experiencing is domestic abuse, for example people in coercively controlling relationships or where their partner might be restricting access to finances, for example.' To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Around 100 women are killed by men each year – often ones closest to them. Ministers have promised to halve levels in a decade in its strategy to end violence against women and girls. The latest figures are slightly lower than last year's estimate of 5.4 million people. But the ONS said these estimates are still in development and are subject to change, and caution should be taken when making comparisons. Gemma Sherrington, CEO of Refuge, told Metro: 'We are in an epidemic of violence against women and girls (VAWG), so sadly, the latest ONS estimates around the prevalence of domestic abuse come as no surprise. 'We welcome improvements to data collection, but these figures are likely to represent the tip of the iceberg as VAWG remains severely under-reported. 'The Government must take urgent action if it is to achieve its pledge to halve VAWG within the next decade.' More Trending Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said it is the first time combining reports of domestic abuse, sexual assault and stalking. She said: 'As part of our mission to tackle the national emergency of Violence Against Women and Girls, we have made sure that for the first time the figures are being recorded in a combined way, showing that one in eight women were victims of domestic abuse, stalking or sexual assault last year. 'That is why we have already started to put domestic abuse specialists in 999 control rooms, invested in major new perpetrator programmes, and why we are publishing a transformative cross-government VAWG strategy in September, because everybody has a right to feel safe on our streets.' The figures have been published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) using data collected as part of the Crime Survey for England and Wales. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Officer in Manchester Airport brawl 'was an uncontrolled bully with a badge' MORE: Multiple bodies found in Cornwall woodland during police hunt for missing man MORE: Man in his 60s 'raped in the street outside a church'

Trump says he'll give Epstein associates list and he's allowed to pardon Maxwell
Trump says he'll give Epstein associates list and he's allowed to pardon Maxwell

Metro

timean hour ago

  • Metro

Trump says he'll give Epstein associates list and he's allowed to pardon Maxwell

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video President Donald Trump said he would provide a list of Jeffrey Epstein's associates – and did not rule out pardoning the late sex offender's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell. Trump made the shocking remark as the Justice Department interviews Maxwell for a second day in Tallahassee, Florida, where she is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking. 'You should focus on (Bill) Clinton. You should focus on the president of Harvard, the former president of Harvard, you should focus on some of the hedge fund guys. I'll give you a list,' Trump told reporters as he left the White House for Scotland on Friday morning. The president also acknowledged he has the power to pardon Maxwell, who is seeking a way out of prison. 'I'm allowed to do it, but it's something I haven't thought about,' he said. Trump added that he was not concerned that Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, who is interviewing Maxwell, could be misled by her. Blanche is a 'professional lawyer who's been through things like this before,' Trump said. Got a story? Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ Or you can submit your videos and pictures here. For more stories like this, check our news page. Follow on Twitter and Facebook for the latest news updates. You can now also get articles sent straight to your device. Sign up for our daily push alerts here. MORE: Donald Trump's Scotland visit branded 'cynical circus' by his nemesis in land battle MORE: Starmer should give Trump a warm welcome – then a £14m bill MORE: Trump 'called Epstein 'the greatest' in note inside book he gave to him'

Who is the richest cyclist 2025? Here are the 11 all-time wealthiest professional cyclists
Who is the richest cyclist 2025? Here are the 11 all-time wealthiest professional cyclists

Scotsman

timean hour ago

  • Scotsman

Who is the richest cyclist 2025? Here are the 11 all-time wealthiest professional cyclists

3 . George Hincapie - $40 million Another drugs cheat comes third on our list. American George Hincapie started a record Tours de France, but admitted to doping and was retrospectively disqualified from the 2004, 2005 and 2006 races. Furing his careers he was a key domestique (a cyclist in a road racing team whose role is to help their team leader during a race) for race winners Lance Armstrong, Alberto Contador and Cadel Evans in 2011, when both men won the Tour de France. He was also the owner and general manager of UCI Professional Continental team until it folded in 2020. He has a net worth of around $40 million. | Getty Images

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store