logo
Numerous Chicago employees let go in cuts to U.S. Dept. of Education Office of Civil Rights

Numerous Chicago employees let go in cuts to U.S. Dept. of Education Office of Civil Rights

CBS News13-03-2025
Federal workers are being hit with more cuts — this time targeting the Office of Civil Rights at the U.S. Department of Education.
Several Chicago-based workers were let go in the cut to the office Thursday.
The Office of Civil Rights is tasked with making sure students' liberties are upheld at school. For instance, if a child with disabilities needs extra time on a test and is not getting it, has diabetes and is is being denied breaks to have a snack, or is being mistreated on the basis of gender, religion, or race, the Office of Civil Rights looks into the claims — mostly made by parents.
Now, the concern is those voices will no longer be heard.
"No one can explain to us why they're doing what they're doing," said Sheria Smith, president of the American Federation of Government Employees Local 252. "No one can provide a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason."
In addition to heading up the American Federation of Government Employees, Smith also works for the Department of Education Office of Civil Rights — based in Texas.
The office has multiple hubs in the country. Chicago's outpost in the Kluczynski Federal Building is a hub for schools in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Minnesota, North Dakota, and Wisconsin.
According to documents sent to the American Federation of Government Employees by the Department of Education, there are 55 members of the union who work for the Chicago office — 24 working in the Kluczynski Federal Building office in Chicago, 30 working in other states, and one working in Skokie.
Each and every one was let go.
Office of Civil Rights employees said this means students with open cases will have their claims backlogged even further.
"It's like if they don't receive these services, and their parents our complaints with our offices, what is it going to mean when you already had low staff anyway?" said Brittany Coleman, chief steward for the AFGE Local 252 and an attorney at the Department of Education. "You just cut that down by eliminating our office. What is that going to be for students who are still waiting on outcomes on their cases?"
This is all happening while Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul joined 20 other state attorneys general are suing the Trump administration for trying to dismantle the Department of Education.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Education Department releases $5 billion to schools after monthlong hold
Education Department releases $5 billion to schools after monthlong hold

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Education Department releases $5 billion to schools after monthlong hold

The Department of Education announced Friday the release of more than $5 billion of funding to schools after an almost monthlong pause. At the beginning of July, the Trump administration paused the typical release of almost $7 billion in funding to schools that went toward after-school and summer activities, classes for English learners and adults and teacher preparation programs, among other things. Last week, the administration released more than $1 billion for after-school and summer programs but declined to say when the rest would be released. 'OMB has completed its review of Title I-C, Title II-A, Title III-A, and Title IV-A ESEA funds and Title II WIOA funds, and has directed the Department to release all formula funds. The agency will begin dispersing funds to states next week,' said Madi Biedermann, deputy assistant secretary for communications for the Education Department. Republicans were quick to celebrate the release many had fought for. West Virginia's Republican Sens. Shelley Moore Capito and Jim Justice quickly reacted to the news. 'This supports critical programs so many West Virginians rely on and I made that clear to OMB Director Vought,' Capito said on the social platform X, referring to Russell Vought, director of the White House Office of Management and Budget. 'The release of these funds will undoubtedly have a positive impact on the kids of West Virginia,' Justice, a former governor, said on X. Capito had led an effort among Senate Republicans earlier this month to push for the funding release. 'Exciting news to announce! All frozen education funding for the upcoming school year have been released, following my letter to the OMB! It helps centers like @KidsCanOmaha and our schools!' Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) posted. The White House argued the funds were paused because some money was going to a 'radical leftwing agenda.' An administration official told The Washington Post 'guardrails' have been put on the money to align with the administration's agenda, similar language described in the release of the first $1 billion. It is unclear what these guardrails are or how they will affect the funding. The move received bipartisan pushback, with a letter from 10 Republican senators and a lawsuit from Democratic-led states demanding the funds be released. The pause in funds led to delays and closures in some programs and layoffs at schools in Alaska. 'We are pleased public schools will receive the funding as appropriated by Congress for the 2025-26 school year. On the heels of our survey released Tuesday, detailing how disruptive withholding these funds would be for our nation's students, we thank our members and allies on the Hill. We appreciate their tireless advocacy, communication and outreach to the Administration about the importance of releasing these critical funds,' said David Schuler, executive director of the School Superintendents Association. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword

Federal judge dismisses Trump administration lawsuit against Chicago ‘sanctuary' laws
Federal judge dismisses Trump administration lawsuit against Chicago ‘sanctuary' laws

CNN

time5 hours ago

  • CNN

Federal judge dismisses Trump administration lawsuit against Chicago ‘sanctuary' laws

A federal judge in Illinois dismissed a Trump administration lawsuit Friday that sought to disrupt limits Chicago imposes on cooperation between federal immigration agents and local police. The lawsuit, filed in February, alleged that so-called sanctuary laws in the nation's third-largest city 'thwart' federal efforts to enforce immigration laws. The Trump administration sued officials in Illinois, Chicago, and Cook County. It argued that local laws run counter to federal laws by restricting 'local governments from sharing immigration information with federal law enforcement officials' and preventing immigration agents from identifying 'individuals who may be subject to removal.' Judge Lindsay Jenkins of the Northern District of Illinois granted the defendants' motion for dismissal. 'The individual defendants are dismissed because the United States lacks standing to sue them with respect to the Sanctuary Policies,' Jenkins said in her ruling. Trump officials have repeatedly criticized those policies, often singling out Chicago, where the administration recently conducted an immigration enforcement operation. Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson said he was pleased with the decision and the city is safer when police focus on the needs of Chicagoans. 'This ruling affirms what we have long known: that Chicago's Welcoming City Ordinance is lawful and supports public safety. The City cannot be compelled to cooperate with the Trump Administration's reckless and inhumane immigration agenda,' he said in a statement. Gov. JB Pritzker welcomed the ruling, saying in a social media post, 'Illinois just beat the Trump Administration in federal court.' The Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment. The administration has filed a series of lawsuits targeting state or city policies seen as interfering with immigration enforcement, including those in Los Angeles, New York City, Denver and Rochester, New York. It sued four New Jersey cities in May. Heavily Democratic Chicago has been a sanctuary city for decades and has beefed up its laws several times, including during President Donald Trump's first term in 2017. That same year, then-Gov. Bruce Rauner, a Republican, signed more statewide sanctuary protections into law, putting him at odds with his party. There is no official definition for sanctuary policies or sanctuary cities. The terms generally describe limits on local cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement. ICE enforces US immigration laws nationwide but sometimes seeks state and local help.

Federal judge dismisses Trump administration lawsuit against Chicago ‘sanctuary' laws
Federal judge dismisses Trump administration lawsuit against Chicago ‘sanctuary' laws

CNN

time5 hours ago

  • CNN

Federal judge dismisses Trump administration lawsuit against Chicago ‘sanctuary' laws

Donald Trump Trump legal cases ImmigrationFacebookTweetLink Follow A federal judge in Illinois dismissed a Trump administration lawsuit Friday that sought to disrupt limits Chicago imposes on cooperation between federal immigration agents and local police. The lawsuit, filed in February, alleged that so-called sanctuary laws in the nation's third-largest city 'thwart' federal efforts to enforce immigration laws. The Trump administration sued officials in Illinois, Chicago, and Cook County. It argued that local laws run counter to federal laws by restricting 'local governments from sharing immigration information with federal law enforcement officials' and preventing immigration agents from identifying 'individuals who may be subject to removal.' Judge Lindsay Jenkins of the Northern District of Illinois granted the defendants' motion for dismissal. 'The individual defendants are dismissed because the United States lacks standing to sue them with respect to the Sanctuary Policies,' Jenkins said in her ruling. Trump officials have repeatedly criticized those policies, often singling out Chicago, where the administration recently conducted an immigration enforcement operation. Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson said he was pleased with the decision and the city is safer when police focus on the needs of Chicagoans. 'This ruling affirms what we have long known: that Chicago's Welcoming City Ordinance is lawful and supports public safety. The City cannot be compelled to cooperate with the Trump Administration's reckless and inhumane immigration agenda,' he said in a statement. Gov. JB Pritzker welcomed the ruling, saying in a social media post, 'Illinois just beat the Trump Administration in federal court.' The Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment. The administration has filed a series of lawsuits targeting state or city policies seen as interfering with immigration enforcement, including those in Los Angeles, New York City, Denver and Rochester, New York. It sued four New Jersey cities in May. Heavily Democratic Chicago has been a sanctuary city for decades and has beefed up its laws several times, including during President Donald Trump's first term in 2017. That same year, then-Gov. Bruce Rauner, a Republican, signed more statewide sanctuary protections into law, putting him at odds with his party. There is no official definition for sanctuary policies or sanctuary cities. The terms generally describe limits on local cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement. ICE enforces US immigration laws nationwide but sometimes seeks state and local help.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store