Numerous Chicago employees let go in cuts to U.S. Dept. of Education Office of Civil Rights
Several Chicago-based workers were let go in the cut to the office Thursday.
The Office of Civil Rights is tasked with making sure students' liberties are upheld at school. For instance, if a child with disabilities needs extra time on a test and is not getting it, has diabetes and is is being denied breaks to have a snack, or is being mistreated on the basis of gender, religion, or race, the Office of Civil Rights looks into the claims — mostly made by parents.
Now, the concern is those voices will no longer be heard.
"No one can explain to us why they're doing what they're doing," said Sheria Smith, president of the American Federation of Government Employees Local 252. "No one can provide a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason."
In addition to heading up the American Federation of Government Employees, Smith also works for the Department of Education Office of Civil Rights — based in Texas.
The office has multiple hubs in the country. Chicago's outpost in the Kluczynski Federal Building is a hub for schools in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Minnesota, North Dakota, and Wisconsin.
According to documents sent to the American Federation of Government Employees by the Department of Education, there are 55 members of the union who work for the Chicago office — 24 working in the Kluczynski Federal Building office in Chicago, 30 working in other states, and one working in Skokie.
Each and every one was let go.
Office of Civil Rights employees said this means students with open cases will have their claims backlogged even further.
"It's like if they don't receive these services, and their parents our complaints with our offices, what is it going to mean when you already had low staff anyway?" said Brittany Coleman, chief steward for the AFGE Local 252 and an attorney at the Department of Education. "You just cut that down by eliminating our office. What is that going to be for students who are still waiting on outcomes on their cases?"
This is all happening while Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul joined 20 other state attorneys general are suing the Trump administration for trying to dismantle the Department of Education.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Exclusive: Trump-ally says he is ‘proud to sue' Powell
Exclusive: Trump-ally says he is 'proud to sue' Powell originally appeared on TheStreet. Azoria Capital, a Miami-based investment firm, has filed a federal lawsuit against Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, alleging that the Fed's closed-door policy meetings violate federal 'transparency laws' — and that the decision not to lower interest rates is politically motivated. The lawsuit, filed on July 24 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, challenges the Federal Open Market Committee's (FOMC) practice of holding private deliberations. Azoria argues these violate the Government in the Sunshine Act, a 1976 law requiring transparency in federal decision-making. 'Azoria is proud to bring this federal lawsuit against Jerome Powell,' CEO James Fishback said in a statement to TheStreet Roundtable. 'We are not going to sit idly by and allow Jerome Powell's Federal Reserve to undermine the duly elected President of the United States and hurt millions of Americans with artificially high interest rates.' Crypto markets watching closely Fed policy shifts ripple across the economy — and crypto markets. Rate cuts tend to boost liquidity and risk appetite, lifting risk assets like Bitcoin. Currently, Bitcoin trades near $119,137.96, up 13% in the past month, per Kraken. Though Powell has called Bitcoin 'digital gold,' he's emphasized it's not a rival to the dollar — and that the Fed is barred from holding it directly. As a result, traders closely monitor every Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting for clues that could impact pricing, leverage, stablecoins, and valuations across the global crypto CEO takes a dig at Powell's leadership "Inflation is now at a four-year low under President Trump's leadership," Azoria CEO James Fishback told FOX Business on July 24. "Yet Jerome Powell refuses to lower interest rates from a 20-year high. That is a life-altering decision that affects Americans all over the country—from families unable to secure a mortgage to small businesses delaying growth." James Fishback has also emerged as a vocal advocate for crypto. In a recent interview, he stated that 'the rising economy of crypto lifts all boats,' emphasizing that greater access to digital assets enables Americans to 'avoid being debanked' or financially penalized by traditional financial institutions. Fishback also warned over the broader economic effects of prolonged high interest rates. "Every percentage point above the natural rate is costing American taxpayers $315 billion a year,' he said. "That's nearly $3 trillion over the next decade — or $31,000 for every U.S. taxpaying household." The Federal Reserve declined to comment when reached by TheStreet anti-DEI ETF strategy Azoria Capital has also drawn attention for its ETF, the Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). The fund tracks companies within the S&P 500 but excludes those with explicit diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) hiring mandates. "We start with the full S&P 500, then kick out companies like Nike, which mandates that 35% of its U.S. corporate workforce must be ethnically diverse,' Fishback added. 'Ethnic diversity has nothing to do with selling a pair of running shoes at a profit.' Fishback, an ardent Trump supporter, also had previously floated the idea of mailing taxpayers $5,000 "DOGE dividend" checks to symbolize the supposed savings from the Department of Governmental Efficiency, briefly led by Elon Musk. He has also formed the Full Support for Donald, a Political Action Committee to support President Trump. Exclusive: Trump-ally says he is 'proud to sue' Powell first appeared on TheStreet on Jul 24, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jul 24, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
CNN
34 minutes ago
- CNN
Federal judge dismisses Trump administration lawsuit against Chicago ‘sanctuary' laws
A federal judge in Illinois dismissed a Trump administration lawsuit Friday that sought to disrupt limits Chicago imposes on cooperation between federal immigration agents and local police. The lawsuit, filed in February, alleged that so-called sanctuary laws in the nation's third-largest city 'thwart' federal efforts to enforce immigration laws. The Trump administration sued officials in Illinois, Chicago, and Cook County. It argued that local laws run counter to federal laws by restricting 'local governments from sharing immigration information with federal law enforcement officials' and preventing immigration agents from identifying 'individuals who may be subject to removal.' Judge Lindsay Jenkins of the Northern District of Illinois granted the defendants' motion for dismissal. 'The individual defendants are dismissed because the United States lacks standing to sue them with respect to the Sanctuary Policies,' Jenkins said in her ruling. Trump officials have repeatedly criticized those policies, often singling out Chicago, where the administration recently conducted an immigration enforcement operation. Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson said he was pleased with the decision and the city is safer when police focus on the needs of Chicagoans. 'This ruling affirms what we have long known: that Chicago's Welcoming City Ordinance is lawful and supports public safety. The City cannot be compelled to cooperate with the Trump Administration's reckless and inhumane immigration agenda,' he said in a statement. Gov. JB Pritzker welcomed the ruling, saying in a social media post, 'Illinois just beat the Trump Administration in federal court.' The Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment. The administration has filed a series of lawsuits targeting state or city policies seen as interfering with immigration enforcement, including those in Los Angeles, New York City, Denver and Rochester, New York. It sued four New Jersey cities in May. Heavily Democratic Chicago has been a sanctuary city for decades and has beefed up its laws several times, including during President Donald Trump's first term in 2017. That same year, then-Gov. Bruce Rauner, a Republican, signed more statewide sanctuary protections into law, putting him at odds with his party. There is no official definition for sanctuary policies or sanctuary cities. The terms generally describe limits on local cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement. ICE enforces US immigration laws nationwide but sometimes seeks state and local help.
CNN
39 minutes ago
- CNN
Federal judge dismisses Trump administration lawsuit against Chicago ‘sanctuary' laws
Donald Trump Trump legal cases ImmigrationFacebookTweetLink Follow A federal judge in Illinois dismissed a Trump administration lawsuit Friday that sought to disrupt limits Chicago imposes on cooperation between federal immigration agents and local police. The lawsuit, filed in February, alleged that so-called sanctuary laws in the nation's third-largest city 'thwart' federal efforts to enforce immigration laws. The Trump administration sued officials in Illinois, Chicago, and Cook County. It argued that local laws run counter to federal laws by restricting 'local governments from sharing immigration information with federal law enforcement officials' and preventing immigration agents from identifying 'individuals who may be subject to removal.' Judge Lindsay Jenkins of the Northern District of Illinois granted the defendants' motion for dismissal. 'The individual defendants are dismissed because the United States lacks standing to sue them with respect to the Sanctuary Policies,' Jenkins said in her ruling. Trump officials have repeatedly criticized those policies, often singling out Chicago, where the administration recently conducted an immigration enforcement operation. Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson said he was pleased with the decision and the city is safer when police focus on the needs of Chicagoans. 'This ruling affirms what we have long known: that Chicago's Welcoming City Ordinance is lawful and supports public safety. The City cannot be compelled to cooperate with the Trump Administration's reckless and inhumane immigration agenda,' he said in a statement. Gov. JB Pritzker welcomed the ruling, saying in a social media post, 'Illinois just beat the Trump Administration in federal court.' The Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment. The administration has filed a series of lawsuits targeting state or city policies seen as interfering with immigration enforcement, including those in Los Angeles, New York City, Denver and Rochester, New York. It sued four New Jersey cities in May. Heavily Democratic Chicago has been a sanctuary city for decades and has beefed up its laws several times, including during President Donald Trump's first term in 2017. That same year, then-Gov. Bruce Rauner, a Republican, signed more statewide sanctuary protections into law, putting him at odds with his party. There is no official definition for sanctuary policies or sanctuary cities. The terms generally describe limits on local cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement. ICE enforces US immigration laws nationwide but sometimes seeks state and local help.
