logo
EXCLUSIVE I paid £25 for a quick fix to get a better tan - but I've been left with irreversible damage on my face

EXCLUSIVE I paid £25 for a quick fix to get a better tan - but I've been left with irreversible damage on my face

Daily Mail​2 days ago
A former beauty queen has revealed how using a nasal tanning spray just twice in her 20s left her with permanent marks on her forehead - as she issues an urgent warning to young people going to extreme lengths for a bronzed glow.
Jen Atkins, 32, from Grimsby, won Miss Great Britain in 2020. But after using a £25 nasal spray that arrived with little more than a leaflet for instructions, she was left with dark, patchy marks on her skin that no treatment has been able to reverse.
'I just wanted to look good - no matter what the consequences were,' she told FEMAIL. 'Now I regret it so much.'
Nasal tanning sprays, which are currently illegal in the UK and carry several health warnings, contain an artificial substance called Melanotan II, which stimulates the body's production of melanin and makes the skin look darker.
Jen had tried tanning injections in the past but disliked needles. So when a nasal tanning spray landed in her Instagram inbox, it seemed like an ideal solution - and she had no idea that the spray would have lasting consequences for her body.
'It made me feel important,' she said. 'Especially back then - I didn't used to get offers from companies. Tanning was right up my street.'
The spray came with vague instructions and no real warning. 'I wish I'd looked into it. I never asked anyone, I just accepted it,' she admitted.
'I remember taking it one morning just before work. It said it would work even without sunbeds. But I felt so ill - I could barely drive. I felt like I was going to be sick, my face felt sunburnt.'
Despite the reaction, she tried it again the next day. 'It was even worse,' she said. 'I had to stop using it. It made me feel so funny.'
Soon after, Jen went on holiday to Mexico - and that's when the pigmentation started to appear. 'It developed so quickly. It was such a shock. I tried to do everything to stop it - I wore suncream, a hat. It's never gone since.'
The marks - darkened, uneven patches across Jen's forehead - have now been present for over four years.
'I've tried creams, facials, exfoliants. It's horrific. Even with concealer you can still see it,' she said. 'When I started playing football, this girl said, "You've got some muck on your forehead." That was really hurtful. I had to explain it wasn't muck.'
Jen says she didn't go to a doctor initially - she simply hoped the marks would fade, but they didn't.
'Someone pointed it out to me in a restaurant and said, "Don't worry, it happens." I thought - what happens?' she said. 'I knew straight away it was because of the nasal spray.'
Although she's since made the permanent switch to fake tan, Jen says the damage has been lasting, both physically and emotionally.
However, she's overcoming her embarrassment to share her story with the world in the hope of deterring others from using such sprays to enhance their bronzed hue, and has made television appearances in recent months.
'It took so much for me to go on This Morning and talk about it,' she said of her recent TV appearance. 'It's embarrassing, but I want to spread awareness. I don't even go on sunbeds anymore.'
Jen had built a life in the public eye - as a model, a pageant winner and a country singer. Now, she says, all of that has been put on hold.
'Since I won Miss Great Britain, I've barely done anything,' she said. 'It really affected my confidence. There are points now where I'm just so self-conscious. When something makes you feel that way, it makes you question everything else.'
'Because it's right on my face, I can see people staring. It makes me feel so awkward - I'm not confrontational enough to ask what they're looking at. I used to model all the time. Now I do absolutely none of it, out of fear.'
The impact on her career has been profound. 'I work an admin job now, and I'll probably do that until I die,' she said.
'I used to be a country singer - I released music, I did gigs - but I've just not had the confidence to do that again. I still write songs, but they don't leave my house.'
'I feel like what I achieved in life was because of how I used to look,' Jen continued. 'I do think I've got a good personality, but I think my looks helped me. Meeting people, modelling, travelling for work. Even with singing - it helps.'
Despite her success, Jen says she never thought of herself as particularly gifted. 'I've got little bits of talent that are not great. I'm an okay singer, but I've never been really good at anything. It was just a mixture of stuff that got me places.'
Now, she wants young women to understand the risks of these quick-fix beauty products. Nasal tanning sprays, many of which are illegally sold online and contain Melanotan II, are not approved for use in the UK.
Melanotan II stimulates melanin production and, while it can darken the skin, it's not properly regulated. Users are often unaware of the correct dosage, the long-term side effects or how the chemical might interact with their body.
These sprays can cause nausea, vomiting, increased blood pressure and, as in Jen's case, changes to skin pigmentation.
Because they are largely untested and unregulated, the risk factors remain unknown - particularly when taken without medical supervision.
In May, the Chartered Trading Standards Institute issued an urgent warning against the use of tanning sprays, or any other tanning product that is 'inhaled or ingested'.
The Melanoma Fund has also warned that use of the products 'may also encourage abnormal skin cell changes in response to UV exposure'.
The CTSI also raised the alarm on the growing trend of people using flavoured nasal tanning sprays, drops and gummies.
They warned that 'unscrupulous' sellers on Facebook and TikTok were posting pictures of the products available in child-friendly flavours such as peach, bubblegum, grape, strawberry and lime.
The regulator said it feared they could become the latest 'must have' products among young people 'leading to a youth epidemic as we saw with disposable vapes'.
Susanna Daniels, chief executive of the skin-cancer charity Melanoma Focus, said: 'We're becoming increasingly concerned about the use of both nasal tanning sprays and tanning injections and their potential links with melanoma skin cancer.
'These unregulated and illegal products not only pose serious health risks but also encourage harmful behaviours, particularly among young consumers.
'We urge the public to consider the long-term impacts on their health and avoid using these substances altogether.'
'Don't rush into it,' Jen warned. 'Do your research. We only have one body, and a lot of these products can affect you in irreversible ways. Make sure you know what you're putting into your body.'
Jen also believes social media and influencer culture have played a huge part in fuelling demand for unsafe beauty products.
'One hundred per cent,' she said. 'I used to be a massive fan of Love Island, but I haven't watched it the last three years because it annoys me. I think we've lost the meaning of the word influencer.'
'I always wanted to be an influencer. But people want it now for the wrong reasons. We're supposed to use our following to promote good things.
'These days, people will promote anything if they're paid or get free stuff. They don't care what they're promoting, it's about self-importance, money and fame, and it's a shame.
'I could have promoted that nasal tan,' she added. 'There are so many who will post anything, no matter how damaging it could be to their followers.'
While she's no longer in the spotlight, Jen says the experience has changed her relationship with beauty and how she treats her body.
'I look after myself more now,' she said. 'I haven't used sunbeds in about three years. It's made me realise that things can happen to you - even if you think they won't.'
'More than anything,' she added, 'it's just made me really self-conscious.'
Jen's story, while concerning, is not the only frightening consequence of using tanning nasal sprays.
Last year, Edith Eagle, from King's Lynn, Norfolk, revealed how the £25 spray she bought to enhance her bronze glow almost killed her.
The mother-of-four, who works as a chef, was left unable to breathe when her face ballooned as the tanning spray she bought online 'poisoned' her on holiday.
Ms Egale woke up on the second day of her family holiday last April with a swollen face and struggling to breathe. Hospital staff acted quickly and treated her with a high dose of steroids and discharged later that day. But she said it took more than a week for her symptoms to subside
Edith woke up on the second day of her holiday with a swollen face, which left her unrecognisable to family, and struggling to breathe. The 'frightening' incident saw her rushed to hospital.
She was treated with a high dose of steroids after being rushed to the nearest hospital on the Canary island.
Shocking pictures of the incident show her lying in a hospital bed.
Edith, who also owns a wedding venue with husband Carl Fox, 54, believes she suffered an allergic reaction to something in the spray, and is urging others to avoid using similar products.
She said the ingredients weren't listed on the label of the product, meaning she doesn't know what she was allergic to.
She used the tan after step-daughter Kayla Fox, 33, suggested getting nasal spray as a way of getting a quicker tan.
'I googled it and saw it pop up online and ordered it,' Edith said. 'I think I paid £25 for the bottle. I like being tanned because I prefer not using makeup. I always liked looking fresh-looking with a tan.
'On the first day, we were so brown, I've never experienced anything like it. I was very tanned after one day.
'But the next morning, I woke up and realised I couldn't breathe properly. I then noticed I was completely swollen. I was so out of breath and had to concentrate so much on breathing. It was really difficult to breathe.
'My neck was so swollen that my necklace was tight. I was just swollen everywhere. I realised it must be an allergic reaction.'
She added: 'There's no ingredients on the bottle — you don't know what you're putting in the body.'
Edith contacted the hotel reception who called a taxi to drive her to the nearest hospital, where she was fast-tracked through the emergency department.
Hospital staff have her a high dose of steroids and discharged her later that day.
But she said it took more than a week for her symptoms to fully subside.
'I said to the consultant the only thing I've done differently this week is take this nasal spray,' she said.
'I've never had an allergic reaction in my whole life to any foods or anything. I think it was definitely the spray.
'I wouldn't be standing here if the hospital staff hadn't acted so quickly. I was rushed straight through. It was so frightening.'
Since the incident she has seen other people post about similar reactions to tanning nasal sprays on social media.
Ms Eagle said she could have 'died that day'.
'If they hadn't been so hands-on that day in the hospital, I wouldn't be here to tell the tale,' she said.
'I will never again buy anything like this again - especially from the internet. How they can sell sprays with no ingredients listed is so worrying. I'd rather not have a tan.
'It was frightening for my family to see me like that. I feel grateful to be alive.
'Please don't make the same mistake as me. If this can save someone's life then I would rather suffer for anyone else before they make a stupid decision like me! I blame myself,' she added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Another necrophiliac killer like David Fuller could STILL strike due to 'completely absent' regulation of mortuary care, inquiry finds
Another necrophiliac killer like David Fuller could STILL strike due to 'completely absent' regulation of mortuary care, inquiry finds

Daily Mail​

time13 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Another necrophiliac killer like David Fuller could STILL strike due to 'completely absent' regulation of mortuary care, inquiry finds

The crimes of necrophiliac morgue monster David Fuller - who abused the bodies of more than 100 women and girls - could be repeated elsewhere, an inquiry has found. The twisted father-of-four defiled corpses of dozens of females, aged nine to 100, while employed at the now-closed Kent and Sussex Hospital and the Tunbridge Wells Hospita l, in Pembury, between 2005 and 2020. Fuller was already serving a whole life sentence for the sexually motivated murders of Wendy Knell, 25, and Caroline Pierce, 20, in two separate attacks in Tunbridge Wells, Kent, in 1987, when police uncovered his systematic sexual abuse in hospital mortuaries. The Government launched an independent inquiry in 2021 to investigate how Fuller was able to carry out his crimes undetected, with the first phase of the probe looking at his employer, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust. Now, that inquiry has concluded it is 'entirely possible' Fullers' abhorrent crimes could be repeated by another offender elsewhere. The final report of the inquiry sparked by his crimes also found that 'current arrangements for the regulation and oversight of the care of people after death are partial, ineffective and in significant areas completely absent'. Fuller was able to 'offend undetected' amid failures in 'management, governance' and because standard procedures were not followed, the inquiry found, while senior bosses were said to be 'aware of problems in the running of the mortuary from as early as 2008'. There was 'little regard' given to who was accessing the mortuary, with Fuller visiting 444 times in a year - something that went 'unnoticed and unchecked'. The fiend will die in prison after being sentenced to two life orders in 2021. Speaking as the report was published on Tuesday, chairman Sir Jonathan Michael said the inquiry is the first time that the 'security and dignity' of people after death has been reviewed so comprehensively. He said the weaknesses that allowed Fuller to offend for so long were not confined to Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust where the killer worked. 'I have found examples in other hospital and non-hospital settings across the country. 'The security and dignity of people after death, do not feature in the governance arrangements of many organisations which are caring for the deceased,' Sir Jonathan said. 'I have therefore come to the conclusion that the current arrangements for the regulation and oversight of the care of people after death are partial, ineffective and, in significant areas, completely absent. 'I have asked myself whether there could be a recurrence of the appalling crimes committed by David Fuller. I have concluded that yes, it is entirely possible that such offences could be repeated, particularly in those sectors that lack any form of statutory regulation.' Previously outlining 17 recommendations made in a bid to prevent similar atrocities, Sir Michael, a former NHS hospital consultant and chief executive, said: 'In identifying such serious failings, it's clear to me that there is the question of who should be held responsible. 'Although the failures took place over many years and during various management and regulatory regimes, I expect the current leadership of the Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust and those outside the trust charged with oversight and regulation, to reflect seriously and carefully on their responsibility for the weaknesses and failings that I have identified in this report and to implement my recommendations.' The inquiry previously concluded the trust should install CCTV cameras in the mortuary and post-mortem room, that maintenance staff should always carry out tasks in those areas in pairs and the 'practice of leaving deceased people out of mortuary fridges overnight' or while maintenance is carried out should end. It also called for a review of governance policies by the trust's board. Wendy Knell (left) and Caroline Pierce (right) were beaten and strangled by Fuller before being sexually assaulted An examination of Fuller's computer hard drive at his home in Heathfield, East Sussex, revealed 818,051 images and 504 videos of his abuse as well as evidence of his 'persistent interest' in rape, abuse and murder of women. Nevres Kemal is the mother of Azra Kemal, 24, one of Fuller's victims. Speaking previously, she said: 'The trust and other organisations have been failing for 15 years. Now we know the truth about how Fuller was able to abuse our loved ones. 'Miles Scott is presently the chief executive. He was there since January 8, 2018, and has also failed. He needs to resign. 'I spoke to him personally one to one and suggested he should resign as a matter integrity. I hope Victoria Atkins, the health secretary, will show him the door as he clearly doesn't know where the door is. 'Unless you have experienced this horror you cannot describe the pain that accompanies you night and day, every day. Something needs to be done now so we have some way of saying that lessons have been learnt and this is in the past. We need justice now.' Fuller filmed himself carrying out the attacks inside the hospitals, where he worked in electrical maintenance roles. He stored records of his serial sex offending on computer folders with titles including 'Necro Lord', 'Register', 'Deadly', 'Deadliest' and 'Best Yet'. Fuller was not linked to the murders of Wendy Knell and Caroline Pierce until 2020, which led investigators to search his home and uncover almost 900,000 files of him abusing corpses of females aged between nine and 100. The crimes were committed at the now-closed Kent and Sussex Hospital and the Tunbridge Wells Hospital, in Pembury, where Fuller had worked in maintenance since 1989. An examination of Fuller's computer hard drive at his home revealed 818,051 images and 504 videos of his abuse as well as evidence of his 'persistent interest in rape, abuse and murder of women'. Fuller's victims included nurses, teachers, a pilot, a skier, a war veteran, wives and mothers who had nurtured families. Many were still wearing defibrillators and catheters at the time Fuller abused their bodies. Among those whose bodies were abused by Fuller was a 92-year-old Second World War hero who worked at Bletchley Park. Her daughter previously said he 'has done the most heinous crimes, something our family must live with daily'. In 2020, Fuller admitted murdering Ms Knell and Ms Pierce in 1987 after he brutally bludgeoned and strangled them to death. Both women, who lived alone in bedsits in Tunbridge Wells in Kent, were then sexually assaulted by the former hospital electrician as they were either dying or post-death. Ms Knell's body was discovered in her bed on June 23, 1987, while Ms Pierce, who was attacked just feet from her front door on November 24, was found three weeks later on December 15 wearing just a pair of tights, in a field 38 miles away in Romney, Kent. Their horrific deaths - dubbed the Bedsit Murders - became one of the UK's longest unsolved double homicide cases. Three-times wed Fuller was finally arrested on December 3, 2020, after a major breakthrough in DNA science identified a familial link to a relative on the national database. He was sentenced to two life orders in December 2021, meaning he will never be released. The sentencing hearing heard impact statements from a string of the victims' family members. The mother of Fuller's youngest victim, a nine-year-old girl, addressed him directly, saying: 'David, you know who I am because you read the letter I wrote to my baby.' She added: 'You raped my baby. She couldn't say no to the dirty 66-year-old man who was abusing her body. I feel guilty I left her there. I will not enjoy my life again. This unnatural sick pain I will never get over.' The father of an 18-year-old victim said: 'The only bit of comfort we held on to was how peaceful she looked when we said our goodbyes. 'This was destroyed when we got a knock on the door by the police to say she had been violated by a man my wife had grown up in fear of. 'Fuller has taken our little girl's innocence and destroyed our souls. I am consumed with anger.' The widower of another woman told him: 'David, when you are serving your time behind bars, think carefully about what you have done and thank your lucky stars that I'm not sharing a cell with you.' Ordering Fuller to stand, Judge Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb QC said: 'These were premeditated killings, carefully planned and executed. 'You had no regard for the dignity of the dead. You have spent the last 45 years living an outwardly mild and ordinary life. 'You were described as a man good under pressure while in seclusion you committed acts of the deepest darkness. 'You became a vulture, picking your victims from among the dead within the hidden world of hospital mortuaries which you were free to inhabit simply because you had a swipe card. 'The depravity of what you did reveals your conscience is seared. You will spend every day of the rest of your life in prison.' Morgue rapist David Fuller: A timeline of the heinous offences 1973: Fuller grew up in a terraced house in Angerstein Road, Portsmouth, and was living at the address when he was convicted of 26 counts of burglary. June 23, 1987: Ms Knell is found dead in her apartment in Guildford Road on by her boyfriend. The bed, duvet and pillows were bloodstained, and her bloodstained head was resting on a towel. Police could find no signs of forced entry, and neighbours heard nothing through the flat's thin walls. November 24, 1987: Ms Pierce, manager at a popular restaurant, is murdered by Fuller. However, it is not until three weeks later that her body - naked apart from a pair of tights - is found in a water-filled dyke of a remote field on Romney Marsh in Kent. January 1989: Fuller begins working as an electrical maintenance craftsman at Kent and Sussex and Tunbridge Wells hospitals. 2008: The first evidence of Fuller having filmed and photographed himself sexually abusing the bodies of dozens of women at the mortuaries. 2012: Kent Police reveals it has a full DNA profile of their prime suspect for the murders of Ms Knell and Ms Pierce. 2015: Fuller has to undergo a criminal record check for the first time in the wake of revelations Jimmy Savile sexually assaulted patients. It emerges he had convictions for burglaries in the 1970s that he is understood to have previously lied about. December 2020: Fuller is identified as the prime suspect in the murders after a DNA breakthrough achieved by analysing genetic material found at the crime scenes and searching criminal databases for relatives. Officers arrest him at his home in Heathfield, East Sussex, where he lived with his family, in the early hours of December 3. January 2021: Fuller admits responsibility for both killings at Maidstone Crown Court, but his barrister says he will deny murder on the grounds of diminished responsibility. He is later charged with additional offences relating to the sexual abuse of more than 100 victims. November 4, 2021: After his trial gets underway, Fuller changes his plea to guilty. He also admits a further 51 offences related to sexually abusing at least 102 victims, of which 82 have been identified, in the mortuaries over more than a decade. December 15, 2021: Fuller is sentenced to two whole life orders at Maidstone Crown Court. The Government launches an independent inquiry in 2021 to investigate how Fuller was able to carry out his crimes undetected. November 28, 2023

Westcliff-on-Sea care home 'requires improvement', inspectors say
Westcliff-on-Sea care home 'requires improvement', inspectors say

BBC News

time25 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Westcliff-on-Sea care home 'requires improvement', inspectors say

A care home which was inspected after someone was seriously injured has had its rating downgraded to "requires improvement".St Martins Residential Home in Westcliff-on-Sea, Essex, was visited by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) in March after "a person using the service sustained a serious injury", prompting an unannounced home, which cares for up to 26 older people, including those living with dementia, was found to require improvement in all categories. It had been rated as "good" during its previous inspection in BBC has contacted St Martin's Residential Home for a response. "We found 4 breaches of regulation relating to person centred care, consent, risk management and governance," the CQC found the home did not ensure all risks to people's safety and wellbeing were identified, and did not provide enough detail as to how these risks should be mitigated. In addition, not all care plans accurately reflected all of a person's care and support needs, the CQC inspectors were positive about how medicines were being managed, staff wellbeing and CQC added people and those acting on their behalf were happy with the care and support provided. Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

This £125 eye cream has 'amazed' aestheticians with its ability to target crow's feet and hooded eyes
This £125 eye cream has 'amazed' aestheticians with its ability to target crow's feet and hooded eyes

Daily Mail​

time25 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

This £125 eye cream has 'amazed' aestheticians with its ability to target crow's feet and hooded eyes

Daily Mail journalists select and curate the products that feature on our site. If you make a purchase via links on this page we will earn commission - learn more A £125 eye cream has 'amazed' aestheticians after it was found to help reduce the look of users' crow's feet and hooding in just five weeks. Calecim is a smart skincare brand with a line of skincare products powered by the age-fighting prowess of stem cells. Their Eye Contour Lifting Cream, in particular, has gained much attention thanks to its ability to enhance volume and improve skin quality, thanks to its unique combination of clinically proven active ingredients. Calecim Eye Contour Lifting Cream Loved by beauty insiders and aestheticians alike, the Calecim Eye Contour Lifting Cream uses the power of stem cells to help firm, brighten, and lift with every swipe. And while this all sounds great, the Eye Contour Lifting Cream has impressed in clinical trials. With five to seven weeks of use, users in the clinical trials found noticeable improvements in the firmness, discolouration and puffiness. £125 Shop Fine lines and folds are a natural part of ageing and can be the first to show on the fragile eye area as it's the area of the face with the least amount of sebaceous oil glands. That combined with the fact the eye lid skin is four times thinner than the rest of the face, it's no wonder why many need a little help with maintaining eye shape and contour as we get older. That's where the Calecim Eye Contour Lifting Cream has impressed with its patented technology that penetrates to the deepest layers of the skin to rejuvenate from the inside out. The hero ingredient in the Eye Contour Lifting Cream is Calecim's patented PTT-6®. PTT-6®, is derived ethically from the cord lining of red deer and contains stem cells and exosomes, which have been scientifically validated. It should be noted that the extraction of these stem cells is conducted under extreme ethical considerations with no harm to any animals. The benefits are that it contains over 3,000 proteins, including growth factors, cytokines and exosomes that signal cells to regenerate. Over time, this is proven to increase the production of collagen and elastin, therefore reducing crepiness and translucency by thickening both epidermal and dermal skin layers. In short, this is far from your bog-standard eye cream. Other key active ingredients include caffeine extract, fruit acids and niacinamides, which all help achieve younger-looking skin by aiding in elasticity, reducing crepiness, and improving the look of tired eyes. And while this all sounds great, the Eye Contour Lifting Cream has impressed in clinical trials too. With five to seven weeks of use, users in the clinical trials found noticeable improvements in the firmness, discolouration and puffiness. Tons of Calecim shoppers seem to love this product too, including doctors. 'I am amazed I can already see a difference in texture, tone and pigment after 1 week of using the Eye Contour Lifting Cream! My eyes already look much fresher!' says one verified reviewer. Another agreed, adding: 'I'm a fairly difficult to impress 50 year old hospital consultant. My medical training has left me skeptical of too good to be true claims made about serums and creams... BUT this particular eye serum made a noticeable difference in just a few applications'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store