Ohio voters approve ballot issue authorizing $2.5 billion in bonds over 10 years for infrastructure
State Issue 2 called for the renewal of the Ohio Capital Improvement Program, which was first authorized in 1987. Administered by the Ohio Public Works Commission, it relies on existing state revenues as opposed to raising taxes.
Under the measure, up to $250 million of the total general obligation bonds authorized can be issued each year over 10 years, creating an estimated 35,000 construction jobs.
The Strong Ohio Communities Coalition, a gathering of business, labor, agriculture and civic organizations, supported the measure, which attracted no significant opposition.
Coalition spokesperson Sam Rossi thanked voters and the Ohio General Assembly, which placed the measure on the ballot.
The Ohio Chamber of Commerce said in a statement that it looks forward to witnessing all the improvements roll out and the jobs they create, saying voters recognized "the importance of modern, reliable infrastructure to Ohio's quality of life and its economic outlook."
Though it was listed on the ballot as Issue 2, Tuesday's ballot measure was the first and only statewide issue to appear. That's the result of a new numbering system approved by state lawmakers after the elections of 2023 and 2024 featured several ballot issues timed close together and called either Issue 1 or Issue 2. Ohio's next statewide ballot question will be labeled Issue 3.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fox News Host Hits Republican Lawmakers With A Blunt Election Warning
Republican lawmakers on Thursday were in a jubilant mood as they marked the passage of President Donald Trump's signature 'big beautiful bill.' But Fox News host Jessica Tarlov said some of them might not be celebrating next year, when they could face unexpectedly early retirement. Polls show the bill ― which adds trillions to the debt, cuts taxes for the wealthy, and slashes Medicaid ― is deeply unpopular with the American public. With midterm elections looming in 2026, Tarlov ― a rotating co-host of 'The Five' ― wrote on X that moderate Republicans in particular will be at risk next year: By voting for this budget bill, many moderate Republicans are ensuring their retirement will come earlier than expected. — Jessica Tarlov (@JessicaTarlov) July 3, 2025 The bill is so unpopular that CNN data chief Harry Enten earlier this week showed it was underwater in five recent polls by between 19 and 29 percentage points. 'The American public at this particular point hate, hate, hate the 'big, beautiful bill,'' he said. 'As far as they're concerned, it's not a 'big, beautiful bill,' it's a big, bad bill.' Democrats also believe that Republicans who support the bill will pay the price at the polls next year. 'There are House Republicans now, this morning, who are about to sign their political obituary with this vote,' Representative Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.) told Reuters before the final votes were cast. 'They are literally walking the plank for Donald Trump.' The party that wins the White House often suffers in the midterm elections that follow. Former MSNBC host Chris Matthews expects that to be the case next year, as well, and said the passage of the bill won't make things any easier for Republicans. He estimated that Democrats could pick up between 15 and 20 seats ― more than enough to win control of the House.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rocket Lab (NasdaqCM:RKLB) Soars 99% In Last Quarter
Rocket Lab has experienced a significant 99% increase in its share price over the last quarter. The recent addition to multiple Russell indexes, including the Russell 1000 and Midcap Growth benchmarks, highlights the company's rising prominence. This profile elevation coincides with Rocket Lab's successful launch activities, including its 67th and 68th Electron rockets, and a new contract with the European Space Agency. While the S&P 500 and Nasdaq are at all-time highs, Rocket Lab's performance could be seen as aligning with this momentum, enhanced by strong operational and contractual developments in the space sector. You should learn about the 2 risks we've spotted with Rocket Lab. Outshine the giants: these 22 early-stage AI stocks could fund your retirement. The recent developments, including Rocket Lab's successful rocket launches and addition to the Russell indexes, could positively influence its narrative by bolstering investor confidence and enhancing visibility within the space sector. These achievements align with the company's goal to expand its market presence, potentially supporting revenue and earnings forecasts as they show operational strength and capability. Over a longer three-year period, the company's shares have delivered a very large total return of 803.29%, showcasing strong performance beyond the recent quarterly gains. This return surpasses the broader one-year return of 38.5% for the US Aerospace & Defense industry, highlighting Rocket Lab's ability to outpace its sector peers in the past year. The news of successful launches and new contracts might impact revenue and earnings positively, as they reflect Rocket Lab's capacity to secure and execute significant contracts, crucial for its revenue trajectory. The increased Electron launch cadence and the potential Neutron development could further drive long-term growth, leveraging the demand for medium-class launches and large satellite constellations. Rocket Lab's current share price of US$22.4 remains below the consensus analyst price target of US$24.6, indicating a 9% potential upside. This suggests that while the recent achievements have bolstered the company's profile, its valuation still offers room for growth relative to analyst expectations. Investors may view this gap as an opportunity, provided the company continues to meet its operational and financial targets. Learn about Rocket Lab's future growth trajectory here. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include NasdaqCM:RKLB. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How companies are rethinking their vetting of engineering candidates in the age of AI coding tools
When Intuit chief technology officer Alex Balazs was getting his undergraduate mechanical engineering degree at Kettering University more than three decades ago, he recalls the Michigan school's professors being split on whether they'd let students use calculators in class. 'And now, when you think about it, of course you use a calculator,' says Balazs. Similarly, he believes today's AI coding assistants that help developers write software will gain broad acceptance in schools and the workplace. In response, he said Intuit is reevaluating how it tests potential engineering hires during the interviews. One expected change is that the coding exercises will be more complicated, requiring that candidates solve bigger problems, with the expectation that those candidates will use AI tools to complete some of those tasks. 'Because when they arrive inside Intuit, that's how we expect them to work,' says Balazs. AI coding tools like GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Windsurf have rapidly grown in popularity, especially among more junior software developers and engineers. Veteran workers, in contrast, are more pessimistic about the tools and the impact of AI on their jobs, according to surveys. CTOs and chief information officers frequently laud the big productivity gains the coding assistants provide and the help they give employees in getting off to a faster start at their new jobs as they learn company-specific programming languages. Usage rates, which many CIOs and CTOs have been closely monitoring, have increased steadily over time. With new tools comes a rethinking of the skills required for an AI-enabled developer workforce, says Deborah Golden, chief innovation officer at accounting and consulting giant Deloitte. It will be less important for engineers to memorize application programming interfaces (APIs), the rules that let software applications communicate with each other, and more critical for them to show good judgement on the job, including determining if there are any risks or bias in AI-written code. 'AI doesn't just level the playing field, it tilts towards those that can adapt quickly,' says Golden. For both new college graduates and more established working professionals, embracing AI means 'anybody can be left behind the same way that anybody can leap forward,' she adds. Several CEOs of major corporations have said that 20% to 30% of code written within their companies is being done by AI tools. But those claims should be taken with a grain of salt, according to Andrew Rabinovich, the head of AI and machine learning at online freelancer marketplace Upwork. 'The numbers can be highly inflated because it's verbose,' says Rabinovich, referring to AI coding assistants regularly churning out unnecessary lines of code. He also says coding assistants aren't good at personalization, or gearing what they write to the tastes of more senior software engineers. Some of those managers may reject AI-written code if not presented the way they like it. 'The older or the more experienced of a software engineer you are, the more habits and rules you impose on the LLM in order to be satisfactory,' says Rabinovich. 'But if you're a junior software engineer, it's kind of an open playing field, and you're like, 'I'm okay with everything, as long as it gets the job done.'' Brendan Humphreys, the CTO of Australian software maker Canva, says some in the industry have expressed concern about 'cheating' during the interview process, with candidates using AI tools to mask how well they can write code. 'We think that's the wrong framing,' says Humphreys. 'Software engineering as a job has fundamentally changed. And you need to now demonstrate that you can have competency in using these tools to accelerate your output.' With that in mind, Humphreys has changed Canva's assessment criteria to make it tougher, yet more ambiguous—meaning job prospects cannot just feed inputs into LLMs to get a response that would satisfy Canva's expectations. 'You're going to have to work with an AI intelligently and we want to see that competency,' adds Humphreys. Autodesk CTO Raji Arasu points to an AI jobs report published last week by the design software company that found mentions of AI skills in U.S. job listings increased 56% in the first four months of 2025 versus last year's level for the design and make industries, which includes construction, architecture, and engineering. With AI being adopted across more kinds of work, Arasu says she's seen 'the initial fear has been replaced with enthusiasm to try and dabble and experiment in new ways.' That's led Autodesk to embrace more adaptability, actively encouraging software developers to be less siloed on specific projects. 'We're creating an environment within our company where it's okay for you to disrupt another team's work,' says Arasu. Nikhil Krishnan, senior vice president and CTO of data science for the enterprise AI software company C3 AI, says his business almost always conducts in-person interviews, so there's little risk that candidates are cheating with AI tools unless C3 wants to test them on how to solve a problem with an AI coding assistant. He prioritizes problem solving and reasoning skills and is on the hunt for candidates who have curiosity, a passion to learn, can show their ability to absorb new information, and work well on a team. With those skills in mind, Krishnan says C3 AI has a bias toward more senior candidates. 'I do see a world where it becomes harder and harder, as a junior entry-level software engineer, to land that first opportunity,' says Krishnan. 'We certainly find that we are much more careful about who we're hiring.' John Kell Send thoughts or suggestions to CIO Intelligence here. Fortune recently unveiled a new ongoing series, Fortune AIQ, dedicated to navigating AI's real-world impact. Our second collection of stories make up a special digital issue of Fortune in which we explore how technology is already changing the way the biggest companies do business in finance, law, agriculture, manufacturing, and more. These companies are rolling up their sleeves to implement AI. Read more AI avatars are here in full force—and they're serving some of the world's biggest companies. Read more Will AI hold up in court? Attorneys say it's already changing the practice of law. Read more Banking on AI: Firms such as BNY balance high risk with the potential for transformative tech. Read more Recycling has been a flop, financially. AMP Robotics is using AI to make it pay off. Read more AI on the farm: The startup helping farmers slash losses and improve cows' health. Read more Can AI help America make stuff again? Read more This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
