logo
You'd have to be mad to start a business in Labour's Britain

You'd have to be mad to start a business in Labour's Britain

Telegraph19-05-2025
After many, many warnings it is now beginning to dawn on Labour's Treasury team that its assault on non-doms is continuing to cause the departure of thousands of high-net-worth individuals to other countries. We know this because Labour is now exploring what it can now do to try to entice very wealthy people to relocate to Britain or at least invest here.
No other country except China is losing more millionaires and billionaires than Britain. It has meant a consequential loss of billions of pounds in UK tax revenues as well as the jobs and economic activity their spending helped to generate.
But what about entrepreneurs seeking to build businesses here, be they British or foreign investors who once thought the UK was a great place to start up a business? How are they reacting to the policies of the Labour Government? What are their prospects and what does it mean for our economic prosperity?
The news is not good. Labour's tax hikes have led to a significant increase in entrepreneurs voluntarily liquidating viable solvent businesses, reaching the highest level since the pandemic. There were 12,602 members' voluntary liquidations (MVLs) in the 2024-25 tax year – the highest since the pandemic – out of a total of 36,807 liquidations, driven primarily by recent tax policy changes, according to advisers.
There is no single reason Labour is making life difficult for entrepreneurs – that's because there are at least six bad policy choices that Labour is responsible for. The message from Labour couldn't be clearer we don't care if British entrepreneurs find better opportunities in other countries.
1. There is the huge hike in capital gains tax (CGT) levied on entrepreneurs – up eight percentage points from 10pc to 18pc coming in April 2026.
2. Entrepreneurs also face the four percentage point increase in the CGT main rate from 20pc to 24pc which makes it more difficult for companies to raise capital by increasing their cost of capital. A study of cross-border transactions involving countries with differences in capital gains tax rates found that a 1pc point increase in the capital gains tax rate reduces the value of equity by around 0.3pc, suggesting capital gains taxes significantly raise firms' cost of capital.
3. These CGT hikes are just part of Labour's overall tax assault on high-net-worth individuals, – often pivotal investors in early-stage companies – which is driving many of them out of the UK. Indeed, evidence shows Labour's overall tax assault is already making departures happen. There is also the increase in business rates and other tax rises such as on stamp duty that are felt acutely by entrepreneurs.
Another challenge is how an increase in CGT rates makes it more difficult for start-up companies to attract and retain skilled and capable staff, who seek the prospect of a decent capital gain to compensate for the poorer job security offered by start-ups. IR35 means that it's much more difficult to bring in freelancers on a flexible basis to meet short-term needs.
4. Then there's the hugely increased bill for employers' National Insurance contributions. For small businesses, cash flow is crucial, and any increase in employer costs eats into growth potential. Not only has the rate increased it also now starts at a far lower threshold, added to which the minimum wage has increased too.
When added to penal rates of taxes on earnings, 62pc when you reach £100,000; and 47pc above £125,000, entrepreneurs have much less money available for investment.
Serial entrepreneur and investor James Dooley has said: 'I've had to reevaluate hiring plans for the next year. Instead of taking on new full-time staff, I'll likely rely more on contractors or freelancers to control costs. For small tech companies like mine, these changes don't just nibble at the margins, they take a real bite out of hiring capacity.'
5. Then we have the imposition of inheritance tax (IHT) on family firms, which means that if an entrepreneur is successful he or she will have great difficulty in passing on the business to the next generation. Why start a company in Britain if you're going to have to bail out of the country later on to avoid a penal death tax hurting your family?
There is already evidence that family shareholders are exiting now to avoid IHT as the liability remains for 10 years (up from seven) after departure.
6. And it's not just the tax rises that Labour has introduced, there's Angela Rayner's union-led Employment Rights Bill too, bringing changes around gig workers, redundancy costs and compensation that could raise the cost of hiring and slow down growth. Startups thrive on agility, and new laws and regulations that slow development down make entrepreneurs question if the effort is worth it.
The threat to entrepreneurs in Britain is not imaginary but being felt already. A recent survey of 200 business owners, commissioned by Handelsbanken Wealth & Asset Management found nearly two out of five have either left the UK or are considering their imminent departure in the next two years.
Likely destinations included Spain, which came top, followed by the United States, France – and Dubai, amongst others. In a survey by the Federation of Small Businesses the increase in minimum wage, new workers' rights and employers' National Insurance contributions caused a third of companies to expect they would cut back on staff while only one in 10 said they planned to take more people on.
Business advisers report that opening conversations with their clients now often start with exploring the possibility of relocating abroad – and why not? Others say their clients are throwing in the towel, seeking voluntary liquidations of viable businesses so they can take their money and run.
Put together, entrepreneurs face a perfect storm of less capital availability, higher taxes diminishing the business returns and personal rewards, higher overheads making profit harder, a treacly tide of new regulations slowing them down – and the probability that passing the successful business or its value on to the family comes at a high cost that does not have to be paid in other countries.
The brutal truth is the UK is no country for entrepreneurs. It is becoming tougher all the time; the challenges are becoming harder to overcome, the risks of failure greater and the possibility of retaining any financial rewards are diminishing.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I had a gastric sleeve operation and have been taking Mounjaro for ten months but still can't cut out my favourite treats. This is my radical plan for finally tackling the nation's obesity problem: JENNI MURRAY
I had a gastric sleeve operation and have been taking Mounjaro for ten months but still can't cut out my favourite treats. This is my radical plan for finally tackling the nation's obesity problem: JENNI MURRAY

Daily Mail​

time10 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

I had a gastric sleeve operation and have been taking Mounjaro for ten months but still can't cut out my favourite treats. This is my radical plan for finally tackling the nation's obesity problem: JENNI MURRAY

Four years ago, I had to ban myself from entering Marks & Spencer's Food Hall. It used to be my favourite supermarket but I realised I was too weak to resist the many temptations on offer. I vowed I'd only buy my groceries online. But in November, I had to buy petrol and the nearest pumps were attached to an M&S. Oh the horror when I realised I would have to go into the shop to pay for my petrol, to walk past the shelves of cakes and pizzas I'd forbidden myself.

High Court orders investigation into MI5 over false evidence
High Court orders investigation into MI5 over false evidence

Telegraph

time13 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

High Court orders investigation into MI5 over false evidence

MI5 could still face contempt of court proceedings over incorrect evidence provided in a bid for an injunction against the BBC, judges at the High Court have said. In a decision on Wednesday, the Lady Chief Justice Baroness Carr said that a further investigation should be carried out and that it would be 'premature to reach any conclusions on whether to initiate contempt proceedings against any individual'. In 2022, Suella Braverman, the then-attorney general, went to the High Court to stop the BBC airing a programme that would name a man who had allegedly abused two women and was a covert human intelligence source. An injunction was made in April 2022 to prevent the corporation disclosing information likely to identify the man, referred to only as 'X', though Mr Justice Chamberlain said the BBC could still air the programme without identifying him. But at a hearing earlier this year, the London court was told that part of the written evidence provided by MI5 was false. Lawyers for the BBC told the court the 'low threshold' for launching contempt proceedings against MI5 and a number of individuals for not being fully transparent with the court had been met. On Wednesday, Baroness Carr said that a new investigation should be carried out on behalf of the Investigatory Powers Commissioner. The written witness evidence, now accepted to have been false, said the Security Service had maintained its policy of neither confirming nor denying the identities of intelligence sources. However, MI5 disclosed X's status to a BBC reporter, but then claimed it had maintained its policy of neither confirm nor deny. Lawyers on behalf of MI5 apologised earlier this year and carried out two investigations, which concluded the false evidence was given due to a series of mistakes, with no deliberate attempt by any staff member to mislead. 'Serious procedural deficiencies' In Wednesday's 26-page ruling, the three judges said they were not 'satisfied' with the investigations or their conclusions. Baroness Carr, sitting with Dame Victoria Sharp and Mr Justice Chamberlain, also said: 'The investigations carried out by MI5 to date suffer from serious procedural deficiencies. 'Their conclusions cannot presently be relied on.' They added: 'It is regrettable that MI5's explanations to this court were given in a piecemeal and unsatisfactory way – and only following the repeated intervention of the court.' In the programme about X, the BBC alleged the intelligence source was a misogynistic neo-Nazi who attacked his girlfriend, referred to by the pseudonym Beth, with a machete. Beth is bringing related legal action in the Investigatory Powers Tribunal, with the judges finding on Wednesday that the specialist tribunal – which investigates allegations against the UK intelligence services – was also misled. Baroness Carr later said: 'Whilst we accept the genuineness of the apologies proffered on behalf of MI5, the fact remains that this case has raised serious issues. 'MI5 gave false evidence to three courts. This was compounded by inadequate attempts to explain the circumstances.' Full and unreserved apology Following the ruling, Sir Ken McCallum, the MI5 director-general said: 'I wish to repeat my full and unreserved apology for the errors made in these proceedings. 'We take our duty to provide truthful, accurate and complete information with the utmost seriousness. 'Resolving this matter to the court's satisfaction is of the highest priority for MI5 and we are committed to co-operating fully with the Investigatory Powers Commissioner's Office and the court. 'MI5 is now embarked on a programme of work to learn all lessons and implement changes to ensure this does not happen again. This programme will build in external challenge and expertise – with independent assurance to the Home Secretary on our progress. 'MI5's job is to keep the country safe. Maintaining the trust of the courts is essential to that mission.' A BBC spokesman said: 'We are pleased this decision has been reached and that the key role of our journalist Daniel De Simone in bringing this to light has been acknowledged by the judges. 'We believe our journalism on this story has always been in the highest public interest.'

Card Factory selling £4 scented candle dupe of pricey NEOM version – and it's perfect for thank you teacher gifts
Card Factory selling £4 scented candle dupe of pricey NEOM version – and it's perfect for thank you teacher gifts

The Sun

time13 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Card Factory selling £4 scented candle dupe of pricey NEOM version – and it's perfect for thank you teacher gifts

CARD Factory is now stocking some luscious scented candles, which would make the perfect gift for end-of-year teacher presents. As part of its Forest Retreat range, the lavender and chamomile candles retails for just £3.99, much less than the Neom branded ones of which they are a dupe. 3 Neom's lavender and chamomile equivalent, which is pitched as helping users get a good night's sleep, sells for a whopping £20. Card Factory's candle comes in a blue glass jar with a floral design, and features a wooden lid with a seal for keeping the fragrance in. It is available in store and online, but those keen to get their hands on it, need to get in quick as stocks are low. Candle-mania The Neom dupes are not the only bargain scented candles that Card Factory has on offer. It recently launched a Yankee Candles dupe, which is budget-friendly as the branded ones can cost up to around £65 for a gift set. Fans of the fragrant candles rushed to their local Card Factory, after hearing there's a set reduced to just £2. Given that it's a set of six, it works out at just 33p each. Lynsay took to the to share her find, after stumbling across the set in her local high street store. "Great sale on in Card Factory just now," she wrote, adding that she'd found the deal in the Edinburgh store. The same set - containing the soft cotton, pink sand sunset, exotic fruits, cherry vanilla, vanilla frosting and pomegranate coconut votives - retails for £12 in Argos. Candle Safety at Home While candles can be a beautiful addition to the home, it is essential to follow critical safety advice in order to keep your house safe. Candles are the most common cause of house fires, according to the London Fire Brigade, and suggested people switch to LED candles to get the same lighting effect, at a higher safety threshold. The LFB advises people to, never leave candles, incense sticks and oil burners unattended and to make to put them out when leaving a room or before going to sleep. Keep candles in heat-resistant holders on a stable surface and don't put them close to anything that can catch fire, such as curtains, papers, furniture, and clothes. Make sure your candles, including matches and lighters, are out of reach of children and pets.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store