
Outrage over koala 'massacre': Helicopter marksmen sniper hundreds dead after devastating bushfires
The marsupials are being gunned down as part of a welfare programme but campaigners have hit out at the government and called the actions cruel.
Roughly 750 koalas, some of which are protected, have been killed by aerial snipers from Australia's Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action (DEECA) as part of a euthanasia programme after bush fires left many injured and starving in Budj Bim National Park.
While the government has claimed it is looking out for the koalas best interests, animal welfare groups have reported joeys (baby koalas) plunging from trees still clinging to their dead mothers according to the Sunday Mirror.
Wayne Pacelle, President, Center for a Humane Economy told the paper: 'This isn't mercy. It's a massacre.'
The number of koalas in Australia has declined in recent years due to disease, bush fires and drought with the population in New South Wales down 60 per cent since 2001.
Koalas are listed as endangered in New South Wales, Queensland and the Australian Capital Territory, but they are not in south-west Victoria and South Australia where there are not enough trees to sustain populations.
Following the 2019-20 bush fires, scientists warned that koalas were on borrowed time and could even become extinct by 2050 without urgent action.
Animal rights groups are now calling on the Australian Prime Minister, Anthony Albanese to act to prevent the cruel mistreatment of one of Australia's most famous animals.
Some critics have suggested that the cull is to keep away koalas from commercial eucalyptus plants but Mr Pacelle has said that those in Victoria have simply overlooked the value of the animals.
In a statement from Koala Alliance, the protection group said it was dangerous for people to accept the killing of koalas as necessary and allowing the Australian government to continue would set a 'dangerous precedent'.
Speaking to The Independent, Jess Robertson, president of the Koala Alliance, said that local communities were disgusted with the methods used and added that it wasn't efficient and did not have the welfare of the koalas at heart.
She said: 'There is no way they can tell if a koala is in poor condition from a helicopter.'
But Victoria State Government said 48 per cent of 2,219 koalas had been suffering from injuries and burns from bush fires in a sample collected in March.
Experts have also said that it is important to consider the habitat of koalas and better manage the landscape.
Rolf Schlagloth, from CQUniversity Australia, told Vox: 'We can't eliminate bushfires altogether but more continuous, healthy forests can assist in reducing the risk and severity of fires. Koala habitat needs to be extensive and connected and the management of blue gum plantations needs to consider the koala as these trees are very attractive to them.'
Euthanasia should be used as a last resort when animals are severely injured, he added. But an aerial cull 'appears to be a very indiscriminate method,' Dr Schlagloth said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
43 minutes ago
- BBC News
Australia's toxic algae bloom is 'natural disaster'
An algal bloom catastrophe which has turned usually pristine South Australian waters toxic green and suffocated masses of marine life is a "natural disaster", the state premier has declared. The algal bloom - a rapid increase in the population of algae in water systems – has been spreading since March and is now twice the size of the country's capital territory. The federal government has unveiled an assistance package of A$14m ($9m; £6.7m) but refused to designate the event a natural disaster - a term usually used for cyclones, floods and bushfires and which would trigger a greater response. Authorities say more than 400 species of marine life have died and local industries are suffering. Algal bloom is naturally occurring but is caused by ocean warming, marine heatwaves, and nutrient pollution - all a direct result of climate change. "This is a natural disaster and should be acknowledged as such... I think politicians can do themselves a disservice when they get caught up in technicalities," South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) on Tuesday. He announced his government would match the federal government's A$14m in funding, with money to go towards research, clean up, and industry support measures. EPA Greens Senator for South Australia Sarah Hanson-Young is among those openly criticising the federal government, accusing them of underplaying the situation. "If this toxic algal bloom was wreaking havoc on Bondi Beach or on the North Shore in Sydney, the prime minister would have already been on the beach with a response," she said. However, federal Environment Minister Murray Watt on Monday said while the bloom and its impacts were "incredibly disturbing", the catastrophe did not meet the definition of a natural disaster under the country's laws. The bloom - which now stretches from Coorong to the Yorke Peninsula, an area about double the size of the Australian Capital Territory - is decimating the local environment and lining the coastline with dead wildlife. "It is like a horror movie for fish," Brad Martin - from OzFish, a non-profit organisation that protects fishing habitats - told the BBC in May. But the event is also wreaking havoc on the local economy. Representatives of the fishing industry say some of their members have had no income for at least three months. "I've got fishermen in tears on the phone," Ian Mitchell - who works as a middleman between fishers and retailers - told the ABC.


The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
'Fighting for fair is in my blood': Ali France's poignant first speech as Labor MP
France won the Dickson seat, north of Brisbane, after seven years of electoral battle in May. 'Winning Dickson was very unlikely,' France said, as she described her opponent, Peter Dutton, as 'one of the most prolific politicians of our time'. France credited her family's political engagement and her late son's encouragement for her victory


The Guardian
7 hours ago
- The Guardian
Australian Greens leader says she has not read reasons for party's expelling of co-founder
Greens leader Larissa Waters says she has not read documentation outlining why the party's co-founder, Drew Hutton, was expelled because she has been busy preparing for parliament. The decision to terminate Hutton's life membership of the Greens was upheld by delegates of the state branches on Sunday, over what the party considers his pursuit of debate harmful to trans people but that he has framed as an issue of free speech. Waters, a senator for Queensland, had backed the outcome of the appeal, saying it reflected 'good governance' and sent the message that 'nobody is above the rules'. Speaking to the ABC's 7.30 on Tuesday, Hutton doubled down on his position. He suggested some Greens members 'over the last decade or so' had aimed to 'convert it into the sort of party one of whose main preoccupations is with transgender rights'. He said he had 'no problem with transgender rights' but accused the party of harbouring 'an absolutely rigorous determination to stop any dissent'. Hutton claimed he had been contacted by 40 former party members, 'about half' of whom had been expelled, and the others 'forced out by being subjected to massive complaints'. He suggested a faction within the party – which he described this week as 'a cult' – had 'weaponised the complaint system'. Waters, appearing immediately after Hutton on the program, rejected his description of the party as 'authoritarian, aggressive and doctrinaire'. She insisted people inside the Greens were free to express their opinions – and do. 'You can have a robust debate and there's lots of differences of opinion when party members are actually debating and formulating our policies, but you can do that in a respectful manner,' she said. When host Sarah Ferguson asked whether Waters took issue with Hutton's views or the way he had expressed them – asking why Hutton had been expelled – Waters replied: 'Look, I wasn't part of that process, Sarah. That was a process that the party ran.' Pressed on the reasons for the expulsion, Waters revealed she had not read the documentation, dismissing responsibility for the decision. 'I haven't read the documentation because here I am in parliament hoping to talk tomorrow about introducing a climate trigger into our environmental laws and fixing the gender inequalities in our tax system amongst other things,' Waters said. 'This was a decision that was reviewed by the party, taken by volunteer party members, many of whom uphold the code of conduct on a regular basis.' Any future decision on whether Hutton could return to the party was 'not up to me', she added.