Israel tells Gaza mediators it plans to create security zone and evict Palestinians in the north
They said Israel has also told the mediators it plans to evict residents of the northern Gaza towns of Jabalia and Beit Lahia and resettle them in Al Mawasi, a narrow strip of coastal land near the southern city of Khan Younis.
Israel also informed them of its intention to gather hundreds of thousands of Palestinians in a ' humanitarian city ' south of Rafah on the border with Egypt, according to the sources.
Hamas has claimed that Israel wants to keep at least 40 per cent of the Gaza Strip under its control as part of any deal to end the war.
'The Israeli plans amount to an attempt to re-demarcate the borders for Gaza,' said one of the sources. 'They want Gaza carved up.'
News of the 'humanitarian city' broke last week when Israel's Hebrew press quoted Defence Minister Israel Katz saying 600,000 Palestinians will be moved there. Palestinians moving into the city will be screened to weed out Hamas operatives, he said. Once in, they will not be able to leave, he added.
Ceasefire talks have continued in Qatar for a second week without a breakthrough. The sources have said the talks stalled over the extent of Israel's withdrawal from Gaza, which Hamas rejects as insufficient.
The main provisions of the proposals under discussion include a 60-day truce, release of hostages held in Gaza, flow of humanitarian assistance into Gaza and discussions on an end to the war.
The Doha talks, according to the sources, have made progress on several key issues amid upbeat comments about the prospects for a deal by US President Donald Trump and his Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff.
Mr Trump was scheduled to meet Qatar's Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani at the White House on Wednesday. The US President said on Sunday he hoped the ceasefire talks would be 'straightened out' this week.
But, besides the issue of Israel's withdrawal from Gaza, the talks could be derailed if Israel stands by its latest plans for after the war.
There was no immediate word from Israel or the US on the plans shared with the mediators. Their general gist has been mentioned previously by US and Israeli officials but never as clear-cut or fully as they were laid out by the sources on Wednesday.
The Gaza war has not had a reprieve since a two-month truce unravelled, with Israel resuming military operations on March 18.
In a move likely to further dim the prospect of a deal, Israel on Wednesday said its military had created a new route in southern Gaza separating several towns east of Khan Younis from the rest of the territory.
Senior Hamas official Basem Naim said the corridor showed Israel was not serious about reaching a ceasefire deal.
'It confirms the occupation's long-term intentions and plans to remain inside the Strip, not to withdraw, and not to end the war. This contradicts everything it claims at the negotiating table or communicates to mediators,' Mr Naim wrote on his Facebook page.
The sources said Israel is also proposing to Egypt and the Palestinian Authority that they jointly run security in postwar Gaza. Egypt has rejected the offer, but said it remains ready to contribute security advisers to a multinational mission to train a new police force, they said.
Israel has also renewed its demands that Hamas leaders leave the strip with their families to live in exile and for the militant group to disarm. Hamas has suggested its readiness for its leaders to leave on condition that Israel pledges not to target them. It has said it is willing to lay down its arms, but only if Israel formally ends the war.
The latest Israel-Hamas war was triggered in October 2023 when Hamas and its allies attacked communities in southern Israel, killing 1,200 people and taking another 250 hostage.
Gaza's health ministry says Israel's subsequent military assault has killed more than 58,000 Palestinians.
It has also caused a hunger crisis, displaced nearly Gaza's entire population and given rise to charges of genocide at the International Court of Justice and of war crimes at the International Criminal Court. Israel denies the accusations.
Israel insists the war will not end before the dismantlement of Hamas's military and governing capabilities and the release of the remaining hostages. Hamas says it will not agree to a deal that does not include Israel's withdrawal from Gaza and an end of the war.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
24 minutes ago
- Khaleej Times
Thailand, Cambodia agree to immediate, unconditional ceasefire, says Malaysia PM
Thailand and Cambodia have both agreed to an immediate and unconditional ceasefire, the Malaysian Prime Minister said on Monday. The truce, which starts at midnight local time, represents a vital first step towards de-escalation and restoring peace, he added.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Thailand and Cambodia begin truce talks as fighting drags on
Thailand and Cambodia's leaders started peace talks on Monday in Malaysia aimed at reaching a ceasefire after five days of fighting along the border that has killed at least 35 people. The latest escalation is the deadliest since violence between 2008 and 2011 over jungle territory that is claimed by both sides, after a vague border demarcation by Cambodia's French colonial administrators in 1907. More than 200,000 people have fled since the fighting began. US President Donald Trump − who both nations are courting for trade deals to avert the threat of eye-watering tariffs − intervened over the weekend, and said both sides had agreed to 'quickly work out' a truce. Thailand's acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai and Cambodia's Prime Minister Hun Manet began their talks in the administrative capital Putrajaya. They met at the residence of Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, serving chair of the Asean bloc, of which Thailand and Cambodia are both members. Mr Ibrahim earlier told media he would focus on an 'immediate ceasefire'. Thailand's leader said there were doubts about Cambodia's sincerity ahead of the negotiations in Malaysia. 'We are not confident in Cambodia, their actions so far have reflected insincerity in solving the problem,' acting Mr Wechayachai told reporters ahead of his departure for Malaysia. 'Cambodia has violated international law, but everybody wants to see peace. Nobody wants to see violence that affects civilians.' On the eve of the talks, Thailand's military said Cambodian snipers were camped in one of the contested temples, and accused Phnom Penh of surging troops along the border and hammering Thai territory with rockets. It said there was fighting at seven areas in the rural region, marked by a ridge of hills surrounded by jungle and fields where locals farm rubber and rice. 'The situation remains highly tense, and it is anticipated that Cambodia may be preparing for a major military operation prior to entering negotiations,' the Thai military said. Cambodia has denied Thai accusations it has fired at civilian targets, and has instead said that Thailand has put innocent lives at risk. It has called for the international community to condemn Thailand's aggression against it. The tensions between Thailand and Cambodia have intensified since the killing in late May of a Cambodian soldier during a brief skirmish. Border troops on both sides were reinforced amid a full-blown diplomatic crisis that brought Thailand's fragile coalition government to the brink of collapse. Mr Ibrahim had proposed ceasefire talks soon after the border dispute erupted into conflict on Thursday, and China and the US also offered to assist in negotiations.
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Trump's strategy for Middle East 'peace' is built on Israeli dominance. It will fail
The Trump administration is attempting to reshape the Middle East after launching strikes on Iran last month, adopting a strategy characterised by "peace through strength" and "commerce, not chaos". While this approach is presented as pragmatic, it risks destabilising the region in favour of maximising US and Israeli military and economic advantage. President Donald Trump considers himself an "expert dealmaker", believing that calculated military strikes create leverage for diplomatic gains - particularly by pressuring Iran back to the negotiating table. His strategy emphasises overwhelming but short-term military force to achieve defined goals, avoiding prolonged entanglements or "forever wars". It also marks a rejection of nation-building, shifting the burden of regional stability onto local partners. Though the strategic value of Middle Eastern energy resources has declined for the US, the region remains crucial - perhaps even more so under the current administration. As Med This Week reports, three primary factors shape recent US actions. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The first is the ideological alliance between far-right governments in the US and Israel, which transcends the traditional "special relationship" and reflects a deeper political and strategic alignment. The administration also views Israeli hegemony as a vehicle for regional stability, envisioning a dominant "Greater Israel", backed by overwhelming US support, capable of unilaterally enforcing peace and marginalising Iran. At its core, the Trump doctrine envisions a Greater Israel, backed by US power, enforcing peace and sidelining Iran Finally, personal financial interests - particularly those of Trump and his family - were prominently on display during his recent Gulf visit. The immediate objective of the 12-day war was to dismantle Iran's nuclear infrastructure and prevent it from acquiring nuclear weapons. Trump declared key sites "destroyed" or "shut down", hailing the campaign as a critical blow against a perceived existential threat. (A recent US intelligence report found that only one of the three targeted nuclear facilities was completely destroyed, with the others expected to be operational again within months.) These military operations have significantly reshaped regional power dynamics, pushing forward the Trump administration's regional strategy: normalising relations between Israel and Arab states, particularly Saudi Arabia, and potentially extending to Oman, Indonesia, Qatar and even Syria. Yet this pursuit of realignment remains constrained by Israel's ongoing war on Gaza. A ceasefire and the release of Israeli hostages are seen as prerequisites for advancing and expanding normalisation. Israel: A hegemonic power? The US has demonstrated its willingness to act unilaterally with overwhelming force - particularly through the use of "bunker-buster" bombs on Iranian nuclear sites. This was portrayed as a show of unmatched American might, aimed not only at Iran but also as a deterrent to rivals like China and Russia. America's costly backing for Israel is enabling China's unstoppable rise Read More » Meanwhile, Israel has sought to project itself as a formidable military force with deep intelligence reach into Iran's nuclear and security infrastructure. Some Israeli officials have even claimed the country has joined the ranks of global powers, though the strikes, which killed large numbers of civilians, have drawn widespread criticism and raised questions about the legitimacy of such claims. Yet the question remains: can Israel truly become a hegemonic power in the region? Despite its recent operations and short-term tactical gains, Israel faces structural and political barriers to sustained dominance. It remains heavily reliant on US military, diplomatic and economic support. Deep-rooted regional conflicts persist, particularly the unresolved Palestinian issue, which continues to inflame public opinion and obstruct meaningful diplomatic engagement. Key regional powers such as Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Egypt are unlikely to accept Israeli expansionism or hegemony. Meanwhile, Iran's political will to pursue its nuclear ambitions appears undiminished, with some analysts suggesting that the recent strikes may ultimately accelerate, rather than deter, its nuclear development. Iran's leadership, especially Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, is unlikely to negotiate from a position of perceived weakness. The recent military escalation follows the US "maximum pressure" campaign and its hostile stance towards Iran after withdrawing from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), or Iran nuclear deal, in 2018. Together, these developments have reinforced Iranian mistrust and further narrowed the space for diplomacy. Furthermore, there is no credible assessment that the recent strikes have permanently crippled Iran's nuclear programme. Many analysts believe any setbacks will last only months, not years, and that Iran will simply shift operations deeper underground. Roadblocks to dominance The unresolved Palestinian question remains the greatest obstacle to expanding the Abraham Accords and achieving regional peace. Saudi Arabia has made its position clear: it demands an unambiguous commitment to establishing a Palestinian state. Yet the Netanyahu government - shaped by ultra-right forces - prioritises military dominance over meaningful negotiations, particularly in Gaza and the West Bank. Israel's military assault on Gaza has inflamed Arab public opinion, making normalisation politically costly for Gulf leaders. Without a clear post-war vision for Gaza and a comprehensive ceasefire, Israeli dominance is unsustainable. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war Regional actors, especially in the Gulf, fear appearing complicit with a state widely viewed as violating Arab rights. Israel's prolonged war in Gaza and lack of a political roadmap have tarnished its global image, leading to growing international condemnation and even weakening support from traditional allies like the EU (though it declined to take any action). Israel's military assault on Gaza has inflamed Arab public opinion, making normalisation politically costly for Gulf leaders The erosion of diplomatic support for Israel - alongside the continued refusal to hold it accountable for its war crimes - has only furthered its isolation, undermining any bid for genuine regional leadership. Meanwhile, Israeli national security doctrine under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu relies on military superiority as the only guarantee of peace. But even claimed military "victories" come at staggering human and economic costs - both for Palestinians and for Israelis. Even if external military actions temporarily consolidate internal support - as seen in Iran - they often fail to trigger regime change or long-term stability. Decades of foreign interventions have shown that externally imposed political transitions are more likely to produce chaos than lasting peace. Regional and internal pressures have compounded the challenges facing Israel's hegemonic ambitions. Gulf states, wary of Iranian collapse, fear the resulting chaos, humanitarian crisis, refugee flows and nuclear proliferation. Domestically, Netanyahu faces mounting pressure amid public frustration over his failure to secure a full ceasefire in Gaza or release all hostages - exposing internal fractures that challenge any coherent long-term strategy. Crucially, Israel has not established a legitimate Palestinian governing authority to assume control of Gaza, nor has it succeeded in imposing external or co-opted leadership. The result is chaos and the emergence of new resistance movements - mirroring US failures in Iraq and Afghanistan. Regional defiance Saudi Arabia has remained unwilling to embrace Israeli ambitions, insisting that any normalisation must be preceded by a concrete commitment to establishing a Palestinian state. However, Israel's aggression has made further agreements politically untenable. Gulf states must act to avoid Israel's war on Iran spiralling into chaos Hadi Kahalzadeh Read More » Some Gulf countries are reassessing their approach to Israel, questioning whether its actions foster stability or provoke further conflict. Many now prefer a long-term weakening of both Iran and Israel, rather than a decisive victory for either, to reduce threats to their own regimes. Saudi and Emirati strategies of hedging - including outreach to Iran - suggest a desire to avoid taking sides in regional conflicts, reducing their willingness to join an anti-Iran alliance led by Israel. Turkey, too, is unlikely to accept Israeli regional dominance. What was once a "golden age" of cooperation in the 1990s has devolved into mutual suspicion. Turkish leaders have grown increasingly vocal in their condemnation of Israel's actions, particularly in Gaza, and Ankara views Israel's deepening alliances with Greece and Cyprus as a threat. Turkey continues to build its own military and missile capabilities and asserts regional influence in Syria. It also positions itself as a potential mediator in Israeli-Iranian tensions - an indication of its desire to act independently. A fragile vision Trump's military campaign may have weakened Iran's nuclear ambitions and its regional allies, but long-term regional stability remains elusive. The current "peace" is more accurately described as a fragile truce than a durable shift. At its core, Israeli military superiority has failed to deliver political solutions. Without addressing the Palestinian question, stabilising Gaza, and navigating complex regional rivalries, lasting peace is impossible. Even if armed groups are temporarily subdued, the region's capacity to generate new forms of resistance endures Even if armed resistance groups such as Hezbollah or Hamas are temporarily subdued, the region's capacity to generate new forms of resistance endures. Israel may maintain its military edge, but it will continue to struggle for legitimacy and leadership in the Middle East. As violations of international law by the US and Israel mount, the message appears clear: "Only the weak follow the rules." Such a precedent erodes collective security and undermines any meaningful regional consensus. Real, enduring peace will not come through dominance alone - it demands diplomacy, justice, and the courage to confront the root causes of conflict. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
