Pam Bondi Unleashes On Alleged 'Anti-Christian Bias' — And A Christian Leader Has Thoughts
The task force is an initiative born out of a February executive order by Trump, in which the president accused former President Joe Biden's administration of fostering an 'anti-Christian weaponization of government.' Bondi quoted a part of Trump's order at the beginning of Tuesday's meeting, saying, 'The Biden administration engaged in an egregious pattern of targeting peaceful Christians, while ignoring violent anti-Christian offenses.'
Among the severalexamples of supposed anti-Christian bias Trump listed in his executive order, was the mention of federal cases in which anti-abortion activists had been convicted of violating the federal Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, or FACE Act.
He referenced the federal indictment of 11 anti-abortion protesters who were indicted for violating federal law by physically blocking the entrance of a reproductive clinic outside of Nashville, Tennessee, in 2021. Six were later convicted on felony conspiracy charges — and some sentences included prison time. Trump pardoned them in January.
Trump also falsely suggested in his executive order that Biden declared 2024 Easter Sunday, which fell on March 31 last year, as Transgender Day of Visibility.
International Transgender Day of Visibility has been recognized on March 31 since it was created over a decade ago by trans activist, psychotherapist Rachel Crandall Crocker — and Easter's date changes every year. Biden first recognized Transgender Day of Visibility with a proclamation on a Wednesday in 2021.
The U.S. Department of Justice has additionally released a press release outlining a slew of examples that supposedly show anti-Christian bias, like past COVID-19 vaccine mandates for federal workers.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio, a member of the task force, shared allegations that federal employees have faced retaliation for 'opposing DEI/LGBT ideology that violated their religious conscience,' the release stated.
But Rev. Paul Brandeis Raushenbush, president and CEO of Interfaith Alliance and an ordained Baptist minister, joins the chorus of those who have taken issue with the Trump administration's apparent messaging that Christianity, the largest faith group in the U.S., is under attack.
'If you're not acknowledging as a Christian that you've got a lot of privilege in this country, you're out of your mind,' he told HuffPost, emphasizing the privilege particularly associated with white Christians. (Raushenbush was formerly the executive editor for HuffPost's Religion section.)
Raushenbush said that while there may be 'real Christian persecution' that exists in other parts of the world, the Trump administration is speaking into an 'echo chamber' where some conservative and Christian media platforms are fueling concerns about 'Christian persecution' in the U.S.
'It's always about, 'They're coming for us,'' he said about the messaging on those platforms. He said efforts like the anti-Christian bias task force is the current administration's way to communicate that they're 'coming in and saving the day.'
Raushenbush said he believes, if anything, hostility toward Christians has come from the White House. He referenced Trump's attacks on The Right Rev. Mariann Edgar Budde earlier this year, after she made a plea for him to have 'mercy' on people in the country who are fearful about the future, as well as Vice President JD Vance's clashes with Catholic bishops helping immigrants, among other examples.
Trump's executive order and task force is creating a 'distraction,' and an avenue, to fight 'political ideologies that the Trump administration doesn't agree with, and using religion to further those aims,' he said.
Raushenbugh also charged that much of what the Trump administration really means when they say 'anti-Christian bias,' is 'anti-Christian bias against the Christian nationalists who most fervently supported them.'
'These are largely white protestant groups that insist that America is a Christian nation, and that everyone else who's here is a secondary status,' he said.
Trump's executive order 'cites the First Amendment protection of religious liberty as its guiding principle, but in fact the order itself is a remarkable incursion against the separation of church and state,' said Brian Clites, Archbishop Paul J. Hallinan Professor in Catholic Studies II at Case Western University.
'In crafting the First Amendment's separation clause, our nation's founding fathers were most concerned that the government not intervene in disputes between and among Christians themselves,' he added.
Clites, whose expertise includes the separation of church and state, and the history of Christianity within the U.S., said it's 'with the humble recognition that there is no fixed point that represents 'Christianity' as a whole.'
He said he believes 'George Washington and Thomas Jefferson would cringe in horror' at Trump's executive order since 'it directly inserts the government into disputes between and among various Christian groups.'
'By calling out the protection of women's rights as 'anti-Christian,' the administration is uplifting the views of some Christians over and against the views of other Christians,' he said, later pointing out that research has shown that a majority of American Catholics think abortions should be legal.
'American Christians hold diverse views about reproductive justice and Transgender rights,' Clites said, adding that the administration's actions surrounding its task force is a 'clear violation of the separation of church and state,' rather than it being a protection of 'religious liberty.'
And speaking about the indictments of anti-abortion protesters that Trump mentioned in his executive order, Raushenbush emphasized that those convicted were breaking the law.
'If they were treated differently than anyone else that was breaking the law, then of course, it would be important to look into that. Because no one should be prosecuted more because they're operating out of Christian faith,' he said, before he added: 'But it's also not a get out jail free card.'
Raushenbush said the Trump administration has been vague about the criteria that constitutes 'anti-Christian bias,' and that their examples — like Biden's proclamation honoring International Transgender Day of Visibility — is them 'showing their hand.'
He said he believes the messaging communicates a resistance to treating LGBTQ people with 'dignity and equality.' But as 'a public employee of the government, you have to treat everybody the same.'
'Everyone has a right to their beliefs — and they have a right to have accommodations... [but] make it a welcoming space for everyone,' he later said. 'Don't privilege one rather narrow sect of Christianity over all the other people. That's against the Constitution.'
Trump Administration Urges Workers To Snitch On One Another For 'Anti-Christian Bias'
Judge Blocks Trump Push To End DEI Programs In Public Schools
Some U.S. Lawmakers Want More Christianity In Classrooms. Trump Could Embolden Their Plans.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Our View: Republicans, Democrats scheming on mid-term elections
Two wrongs don't make a right. It's wrong that at the urging of President Trump, Texas Republicans are scheming to redrawn political boundaries to dilute the power of minorities and Democratic voters in next year's mid-term elections. It's wrong that California Democrats, led by Gov. Gavin Newsom, now are scheming to usurp the will of California voters and reshape the state's political boundaries to block Texas Republicans from gaming the congressional elections. For many, this may seem like boring insider political baseball. But the scheming shows how politicians care less about the people they represent at home and more about retaining the power of their political parties — Republican and Democratic — in Washington. The scheming we now see is a shameful corruption of democracy and the electoral system politicians claim they support. At its heart is control of the House of Representatives. The House of Representatives has 435 members — each representing about the same number of constituents. Every 10 years, after completion of a U.S. Census, allocation of a state's share of House seats is decided and the political boundary lines of congressional districts within the states are adjusted. In most states, such as Texas, state politicians and their donor buddies scheme on adjusting district boundary lines to protect incumbents and assure a political party's election. That's called gerrymandering. Texas Republicans are not waiting for the next 10-year census to redraw district lines. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has called the Republican-dominated Legislature back into a special session to consider a new political map that shifts district lines and is designed to elect more Republicans to Congress. If all goes as the schemers hope, Texas Republicans could pick up five additional seats in next year's mid-term elections. That would be a big deal in the House, where Republicans now hold a slim majority. Democratic takeover of the House would apply the brakes on Trump's controversial agenda. And that's where California Gov. Newsom comes in. He's scheming on a plan to fight fire with fire. Redraw California's political boundary lines before next year's mid-term elections to advantage Democratic candidates. That could shrink California's nine-member Republican delegation to three or four. But there is a catch. In 2010, California voters, who were fed up with self-dealing politicians, overwhelmingly passed a ballot measure that created a bipartisan independent redistricting commission. No longer could the state's politicians draw their own district lines. In 2011 and 2021, the commission drew district lines, with a focus on creating competitive districts, within coherent geographic areas, containing voters with shared interests, and providing representations for minority communities. Both Democratic and Republican parties, refusing to quietly give up their power, strongly opposed creation of a bipartisan independent commission in 2010. To accomplish his mid-term scheme, Newsom would have to quickly call a statewide special election — at a cost of what some estimate to be $200 million — and ask voters to return redistricting power to self-serving politicians. Fat chance voters would go along with that. As an alternative, Newsom and his co-conspirators are considering crawling through an imaginary loophole in the law that created the bipartisan independent redistricting commission. They reason that since the law voters created only called for an independent commission to set political district lines after a U.S. Census every 10 years, the Legislature is free to undo the commission's work in the years between — drawing legislators' own self-serving lines. Good luck with that. Let the lawsuits begin! Warning: This threatened gerrymandering war — which could expand to other states — may blow up in both Democratic and Republican party faces. Voters are not as dumb as politicians think they are. They can spot election cheating when they see it. Like it or not, the balance of power in Washington should be decided by voters at the ballot box, not schemers in the backroom. If we believe in the electoral system that is the foundation of our democracy, we must trust voters. California's legislators will return to Sacramento after a summer break in a couple of weeks. Hopefully Democrats then also will return to their good senses.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ukraine officials held in military drone corruption probe
A Ukrainian MP and other officials have been arrested after the country's anti-corruption agencies uncovered what they call a large-scale bribery scheme in the purchase of drones and electronic warfare systems. In a statement on X, President Volodymyr Zelensky said a Ukrainian MP, heads of district and city administrations and several National Guard service members had been exposed for their involvement, which involved state contracts with suppliers being signed at prices inflated by up to 30%. Zelensky wrote that there can be "zero tolerance" for corruption in Ukraine, and thanked the agencies for their work. The independence of Ukraine's anti-corruption agencies was restored on Thursday, following nationwide protests. Zelensky's government faced an extensive backlash after introducing a bill that would strip the National Anti-Corruption Bureau and Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office, known as Nabu and Sap respectively, of their independence. The president claimed the agencies needed to be "cleared of Russian influence", and sought to give the general prosecutor the authority to decide who should be prosecuted in high-level corruption cases. Many saw the move as a step backwards for corruption in Ukraine, resulting in the largest anti-government demonstrations since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of the country in 2022. Zelensky acknowledged public anger and submitted a new bill restoring the agencies' former independence, which was voted through by parliament just nine days after the original bill had been passed. The head of the Ukrainian Defence Ministry's Main Intelligence Directorate (HUR), Kyrylo Budanov, thanked Zelensky for "hearing the public's call" regarding the powers of anti-corruption agencies and "not making a mistake". The move was also praised by EU allies, who had voiced concerns over the implications of the original bill. Young Ukrainians get their way as Zelensky overturns law to defuse crisis Backlash grows after Zelensky strips anti-corruption bodies of independence The fight against corruption is significant in Ukraine's bid to join the EU. The creation of Nabu and Sap was a requirement set by the European Commission and International Monetary Fund in 2014, in order to move towards a relaxation of visa restrictions. As a result, Kyiv was granted EU candidate status in 2022, bringing the nation another step towards closer ties with the West. Since their establishment, Nabu and Sap have been involved in far-reaching investigations into the misappropriation of millions of dollars' worth of assets and bribes across various ministries and sectors. A joint investigation in 2023 resulted in the arrest of the head of Ukraine's Supreme Court, Vsevolod Kniaziev, in connection with a $3m (£2.4m; €2.9m) bribe.


NBC News
22 minutes ago
- NBC News
Senate confirms former Fox News host Jeanine Pirro as U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia
The Senate voted on Saturday to confirm former Fox News host and prosecutor Jeanine Pirro as U.S. Attorney for Washington DC. The vote was along party lines, 50-45, with Senators Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., Roger Wicker, R-Miss., Peter Welch, D-Vt., and Reuben Gallego D-Ariz., not voting. Pirro had been serving as interim U.S. attorney for DC since May, after Trump appointed her to replace conservative activist Ed Martin as the top federal prosecutor in Washington. In a Truth Social post announcing Pirro's appointment, Trump lauded the former prosecutor as a 'powerful crusader for victims of crime" and "incredibly well qualified for the position." Pirro has been among the most prominent and fiercest allies of Trump, previously using her platform as a host of two Fox News programs to push conspiracy theories about voting in the aftermath of Trump's 2020 election loss. She was cited in a defamation lawsuit against Fox News by Dominion Voting Systems for he role spreading the election disinformation. Fox News ultimately reached a $787.5 million settlement with Dominion in 2023. Pirro previously served as an assistant district attorney for Westchester County, New York, ultimately becoming the first woman elected to serve as the Westchester County District Attorney. During her tenure, Pirro started the first domestic violence unit in a prosecutor's office, an accomplishment Trump cited in his decision to appoint her as a U.S. attorney. Following her judicial career, Pirro in 2005 launched an unsuccessful bid for the Republican nomination for Senate in New York, aiming to challenge then incumbent Hillary Clinton. Soon after, she launched a campaign for New York attorney general, but the effort was ultimately derailed by a federal probe over a plot by Pirro to record her then-husband Albert Pirro, who she suspected was having an affair. Pirro's confirmation continues a trend of Trump rewarding supportive Fox News hosts with high-profile appointments, with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy among the former Fox News personnel working in Trump's administration.