Steve Irwin's father delivers brutal message to Bob Katter as feud over crocodile cull boils over: 'He's not listening'
Bob Irwin Senior came out swinging on Wednesday to label the outspoken MP a 'd***head'.
Katter's Australian Party (KAP) introduced the Crocodile Control and Conservation Bill 2025 in February to the Queensland Government.
The aim of the proposed law is to 'eliminate crocodiles which pose a threat to human life' while protecting them from going extinct.
The move has prompted outrage from the Irwin family with Bob the latest member to publicly share his opposition to it.
'He's not listening to the people that know. He has no idea of how the environment works and that's his problem,' the Australia Zoo founder told The Courier Mail.
Bob had spoken at state parliament earlier in the day against the legislation.
'Steve and I have learnt from the word go that if you want to be successful with anything you want to do with crocodiles, you've got to get inside their head figuratively,' he said.
'So we spent a lot of time doing nothing else but observing what crocodiles do.'
Bob added there have been previous situations where someone calls for the culling of crocodiles, but said people did not listen to researchers and scientists.
Katter's son and KAP leader Robbie defended the bill while taking aim at the Irwin family.
He claimed they were 'entertainers' with little understanding of regional communities' fears.
He also told state parliament his father's knowledge came from speaking to his constituents in north Queensland.
Although estranged from his son's wife and children, Bob's statements echoed that of Terri, who submitted a letter to the government criticising the proposed law.
His daughter-in-law described the bill as 'more dangerous than previous efforts' to argue in favour of culling crocodile populations.
'It is such a lazy and sloppy attempt to recycle old draft legislation,' Terri said.
In issuing her comments, Terri came under fire from Katter on Friday.
'How would you know all about crocodiles if you live in Brisbane?' he said in a video published to Facebook.
'Oh that's right, she's got them all locked up in a cage in Brisbane.'
KAP MP for Hill Shane Knuth, who submitted the bill, joined the pile-on.
'The Irwin's built a multimillion dollar business off the back of crocodiles,' he wrote on social media.
'And now they're lecturing North Queenslanders on how to enjoy our recreational waterways while they're infested with crocs - and getting worse.
'Spare us the patronising 'Crocwise' slogans. We don't need a zoo telling us how to survive in our own backyard.'
The Irwin family feud began 13 years ago when Bob quit Australia Zoo because he was concerned the wildlife park he'd founded in 1970 was becoming a 'circus'.
Various reports from the time of Bob's exit claim he was worried the Sunshine Coast tourist attraction was becoming 'too commercial - and even feared a then nine-year-old Bindi was being pushed into child stardom.
When Bob left the zoo for good in 2008 - two years after the death of his famous son - Terri was said to be planning a five-year expansion 'to make it Australia's peak tourist destination with a Disneyland feel'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE This high-ranking Australian official has just been found to be corrupt. Here's the outrageous reason why we're BANNED naming and shaming her - as her sleazy texts emerge and she lands a big new job
The Australian government's corruption watchdog has been slammed for being 'more concerned with protecting wrongdoers than exposing wrongdoing' after Daily Mail Australia was prevented from revealing the identity of a corrupt public official. Almost two years since it was set-up, the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) published its first finding of misconduct against a public servant on Monday. The 32-page report revealed a Home Affairs official repeatedly lied to help secure a job for her sister's fiancé, admitting in a series of extraordinary text messages that she would 'talk him through the lie', and even boasting: 'I'm the boss so they will do whatever I say'. The public servant quit before she could be sacked - promptly landing a lucrative role in the private sector - and has faced no punishment for her corrupt conduct. Despite this, the NACC chose not to use her real name out of concern for her 'wellbeing', claiming the 'imperatives of accountability, transparency and education will still be achieved by publishing a detailed report that utilises pseudonyms'. Daily Mail Australia was able to use some of those details to easily work out the corrupt former official's identity, which we intended to reveal as a matter of public interest. But we have been prevented from doing so by an obscure section of the NACC Act, which grants Commissioner Paul Brereton the power to make it a criminal offence to reveal the corrupt official's identity, punishable by up to two years' in prison. Geoffrey Watson KC, Director at the Centre for Public Integrity, said there were valid reasons to make a direction under section 100, such as if children were involved or there was a threat to life. 'There are very good reasons why the NACC should have powers to suppress the identities. But golly, why would they be utilised in this case?', he asked. 'It means that the people involved have escaped really any punishment. And yet NACC thought it was worthwhile spending the taxpayers' resources on pursuing it.' Mr Watson said the NACC 'must have misread transparency to mean opacity, and they must have read accountability to mean no accountability'. The eminent lawyer insisted it was a 'matter of public interest' for the corrupt official's identity to be revealed. 'I might point out that by protecting her name, the people who suffer are the ones employing her now who might be interested that she has a record of abusing her power to do favours for friends and family,' he added. 'That's the sort of thing you might wish to know about somebody before you employ them in a position of responsibility or power.' The NACC, which was founded in July 2023 with a remit to investigate serious or systemic corrupt conduct in government, has 228 staff and $222million over three years. Its report into 'Operation Kingscliff', authored by Mr Brereton, detailed the extraordinary lengths 'Joanne Simeson' - a pseudonym - went to in order to land her sister, Melissa's, soon-to-be husband, Mark, a job. Joanne was found to have praised Mark to colleagues while 'deliberately concealing' her connection to him, before forging a signature to fast-track his onboarding. Mr Brereton said she had abused her office and misused official information, recommending that her position be terminated had she not resigned. 'Nepotism, cronyism and undeclared conflicts of interest in recruitment and promotion is an area of widespread concern,' Mr Brereton stated. She was also found to have leaked interview questions to her Melissa, who still works in the public service. However, the report found no wrongdoing with her Melissa or her now-husband, Mark. 'Talk him through the lie' Joanne, who had worked in the Australian Public Service since 2011, messaged her sister, Melissa, in December 2022 to ask for an updated CV for Mark to be considered for a role in the Freedom of Information section in the Department of Home Affairs. At that point, the couple were living in Varese, northern Italy, where Melissa worked as a coordinator for the Australian Institute of Sport's European training centre, while Mark took a career break and studied. Joanne, who was at that stage a senior official within the Home Affairs Immigration Executive Branch, told her sister the Assistant Secretary was keen to meet Mark. 'We'll talk [Mark] through the lie,' Joanne wrote. Melissa responded: '...he's so bad at lying he's too honest'. Joanne messaged back: 'Well he's gonna have to do better or I'll get in trouble'. Melissa responded: 'Yes good to say that and scare him haha'. The FOI officer application ultimately did not progress because Mark was studying at the time. However, by early 2023, Melissa and Mark were feeling homesick and started to discuss returning to Australia early. In March, Joanne suggested Mark apply for a role alongside her in the Global Initiatives Branch, which Melissa said was 'right up his alley'. 'They will do what I say' Later that month, Joanne copied Mark into an email to two senior directors within Home Affairs to suggest him for the role. But one of the directors responded to ask 'how this person happened on your radar', noting that 'his CV alone does not make him an obvious choice'. Joanne claimed he was a 'friend of a friend'. 'But (he) comes with excellent recommendations and is extremely diligent and hardworking by all accounts, plus ability to pick up subjects extremely quickly and very competent in terms of reviewing documents and providing advice...', she added. Joanne told the NACC she had referred to her future brother-in-law as a 'friend of a friend' because she did not want colleagues to know about their relationship as she was an 'extremely private person'. In a message to her sister, Joanne acknowledged she had been economical with the truth. 'I told them I knew [Mark] through a friend. Technically not not [sic] true he just needs to play along!', she wrote. 'Also I'm the boss so they will do whatever I say.' Joanne told the NACC the message was a 'joke between two sisters'. In a subsequent message, Joanne stressed to Melissa the importance of keeping their relationship secret. 'You are not my sister. He cannot say our surname. Or where you work,' she wrote. Melissa responded: 'the lying is not his strong suit but we will just properly brief him. No [Simeson].' 'Beauty of being a boss' In a subsequent message, Melissa thanked her sister for 'putting yourself on the line for him'. Mark had a meeting with a senior official the following day, which Joanne insisted was not an interview. 'No (it's) a chat,' she responded to her sister. 'I told her to bring him onboard. Beauty of being a boss.' Following the meeting, Melissa reported that it was his 'dream job' and he would 'love to do it'. He was then given clearance to work remotely in Italy before they emigrated back to Australia. Joanne created a recruitment requisition for her brother-in-law, listing herself as an approving delegate before she instructed the HR team to 'please progress (this) as a priority'. The director in charge of hiring told the NACC the process was 'unusual' and had felt like 'a bit of a foregone conclusion'. The director also queried the decision to allow him to work remotely in Italy, claiming there was a 'feeling that it wasn't allowed'. In a subsequent text to her sister, Joanne mentioned getting Mark in to 'meet the team' when they were on a visit back to Australia. 'Just gotta make sure I don't tell people my sister is visiting from Italy at the same time haha,' she added. In May 2023, while preparing for him to visit the office, Joanne forged a witness signature on a temporary access form. 'In her evidence, she admitted to fabricating those aspects of the Temporary Access Form,' the NACC report stated. '(Joanne) said she had never done that before, nor since.' Joanne sent the form on to the security team, requesting it be addressed as a priority due to staffing shortages within the department. But her haste aroused suspicions with one of the directors involved in hiring Mark, who wrote to the other with her concerns. 'I find it a bit unusual that [Joanne] is personally pursuing requirements for this dude in Italy,' the director wrote in a Microsoft Teams message. 'Such a good boy' On May 26, 2023, Mark was formally offered the role with a salary of $101,264. Joanne messaged her sister to ask if this was 'enough', to which she responded: 'it's perfect you're the best. Truly this is a game changer'. He accepted the job three days later and came into the office on 1 June 2023 to collect his laptop and test his log-in. Joanne messaged Melissa: 'HAHAHAHAHA I JUST WENT TO HUG HIM THANK GOD HE STUCK HIS HAND OUT [FIRST]'. Melissa responded: 'GAHAHAHAH … What a good boy he's such a good boy.' Mark told the NACC he found it 'difficult' to have to keep his relationship with Joanne a secret. He worked remotely in Italy from June 5 2023 to October 17, when he and Melissa returned to Australia. During that period, Joanne also helped her sister successfully apply for a role within the Department of Home Affairs, telling her what kind of questions she would be asked at interview and how to answer them. Joanne later admitted that she had provided 'confidential information to her sister to assist her with the interview'. It all unravelled when Mark started working in Canberra and colleagues noticed he did not refer to his partner by name. When one jokingly asked him if she existed, he 'went red'. A superior then asked Mark directly what his relationship was to Joanne, to which he immediately responded: 'I'm engaged to her sister'. The pair then confirmed their relationship when they attended the Home Affairs Christmas party together that year. That same month, Joanne was appointed Chief of Staff to the Secretary of Home Affairs in December 2023. But by that stage an unnamed staff member in the department had raised concerns about the potential conflict of interest and Joanne was stood down in February 2024 pending the outcome of the NACC investigation. She resigned in June of that year, after digital forensic experts combed through her work and personal phones. '[Joanne] explained that she had made the decision to resign from the public service (and take up a more junior position in the private sector), which has resulted in financial loss, including of benefits, and also in the non-fulfilment of her longstanding aspiration to serve her entire career in the public service,' the NACC report stated. 'In addition, her mental health has suffered significantly, and her family members have also suffered as a result of her actions.' Joanne told the NACC she had not received any workplace training or in recruitment and had not obtained any personal advantage from the outcome. But the report noted that Joanne 'accepted the proposed findings and is very remorseful'. The same month she resigned, she started a job at a global cybersecurity firm. In a blog piece she wrote for her new employer in February, Joanne warned of the prevalence of fraud in the hiring process and the importance of ensuring people are who they say they are. She stressed who it was now worryingly common for people to use stolen identities when applying for jobs, especially in tech industries. Daily Mail Australia has approached Joanne for further comment. The NACC report found that neither Mark nor Melissa had engaged in corrupt conduct. Both still work within the public service, according to their LinkedIn profiles. All three deleted their LinkedIn accounts after Joanne was approached for comment. Mr Watson SC, director at the Centre for Public Integrity, also reserved his ire for the apparent triviality of the NACC's first official finding of misconduct, suggesting it should have started with a 'bang, rather than a whimper'. 'Why on earth is the NACC descending into these petty matters? This is an employment issue,' he said. 'The NACC has expensive commercial offices in five capital cities. It has 230 employees and it's producing this sort of triviality. It's just extraordinary.' A spokesperson for the NACC said 'seniority is one of several factors which combined to inform the decision not to name her'. 'Decisions on whether to name an individual involved in a corruption investigation are made on a case-by-case basis,' they added.
The Independent
5 hours ago
- The Independent
British colonisers committed genocide against Australia's first people: landmark inquiry
Australia 's first truth-telling inquiry, the Yoorrook Justice Commission, concluded that British colonisation of Victoria constituted genocide against Aboriginal people. The commission's final report detailed atrocities including mass killings, sexual violence, and cultural erasure, leading to the decimation of the First Peoples population. Key recommendations include financial and non-financial compensation for Victorian First Peoples and redress through a treaty framework for historical injustices. The report also called for the First Peoples Assembly to become a permanent decision-making body and urged truth-telling initiatives in education, health, and memorialisation. Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan welcomed the report and committed to considering its findings, while the Liberal opposition stated it would not support making the First Peoples Assembly permanent or the treaty process.
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Anthony Albanese is slammed as the PM reveals his top ten Australian songs of all time: 'What a disgrace!'
Anthony Albanese has shared his favourite Aussie songs to social media. But it turns out the Prime Minister's constituents are less than enthused with his musical taste - nor his choice to make a fun Instagram post instead of discussing national and international policy. Radio station Triple J is currently calling for votes for their Hottest 100 of Australian Songs and the PM decide to weigh in on Instagram. At number one, Albanese listed The Angels track Am I Ever Gonna See Your Face Again and at number two, Cold Chisel's Flame Trees. At number three was The Fauves with Dogs Are The Best People and at five, The Go-Betweens with Cattle and Cane. From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the DailyMail's new showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop. The rest of the list included You Am I with Purple Sneakers, Hunters & Collectors with Throw Your Arms Around Me, The Triffids with their tune Wide Open Road and Spiderbait's Buy Me a Pony. He also listed off Midnight Oil with Beds Are Burning and at number ten was Paul Kelly's song How To Make Gravy. 'Hard to narrow down to just 10' Albanese wrote in his caption alongside his list. His followers were less than impressed, with many slating the politician for choosing to share a frivolous social media post instead of addressing larger issues like the war in Palestine. 'Your PR team going in overdrive to try and make you seem human / relatable… but there is NOTHING relatable to a PM who has absolutely lost touch with his humanity' wrote one person. 'This post is SO tone deaf it is shocking' wrote someone else while one more commented, 'NO ONE CARES what you picks are.' Another said: 'Seriously??? This is what gets posted??? Far out. What a disgrace. Not everyone was angered by the post, with one fan saying, 'This is the same guy who hosted Rage, he knows what he's doing'. One more commented: 'Well done Albo. How about Treaty by Yothu Yindu? It's time!' It comes after the Prime Minister cane under fire for pushing climate change policy while owning a 'climate criminal' dog by a top columnist. A US study published in June found that not owning a pet was one of the best ways everyday people could keep their carbon emissions low. Taking one fewer flight or eating lower-carbon meats were also effective behaviours identified in the PNAS Nexus report. The finding was leapt on by The Daily Telegraph columnist Tim Blair who suggested Albanese should give up his beloved cavoodle Toto if he is calling for climate action. 'It's time for Albo to turn Toto over to the authorities, because it turns out that little cavoodle of his is an awful climate criminal,' Blair wrote. 'Cavoodle Toto may be way smaller than other "oodle" varieties, such as the Bernese Mountain doodle, the Irish wolfhoodle and the fearsome pit boodle, but she's got one hell of a carbon pawprint. 'That's because Toto occasionally rides on Prime Ministerial flights. 'She's probably racked up more air time than any dog since Snoopy took on the Red Baron.' Blair quipped that 'it should be curtains for the PM's companion critter' in order to help nature balance itself. Toto is regularly photographed with Albanese, including on election day, and has her own X account. The Age even has an an article page dedicated to Australia's first dog.
