Will Newsom finally listen to California's clear call for public safety?
My Senate Republican colleagues and I urge the governor to set aside $400 million in his May Revise to implement Prop. 36, passed by California voters in November, which increases sentences for certain drug and theft crimes.
Opinion
Prop. 36's fiscal impacts were transparently spelled out for voters, as the Legislative Analyst made clear that it would lead to 'increased state criminal justice costs, likely ranging from several tens of millions of dollars to the low hundreds of millions of dollars annually.'
Newsom actively campaigned against Prop. 36, claiming it would further 'mass incarceration.'
Having heard both sides, the anti-crime initiative's results were decided by state voters: Almost 70% of California voters voted for the proposition.
From Lassen and Kern to Marin and San Francisco, counties conservative and liberal spoke with a single voice. For the first and only time during Newsom's administration, every single county in California agreed on a ballot measure.
So far, however, the voice of the people has been entirely ignored by Newsom and Democratic leaders in the Legislature: In the governor's January budget, Prop. 36 received zero proposed funding. And as recently as early-April, Senate Democrats rejected an amendment that I introduced to add Prop. 36 funding to the state budget.
I believe public safety should always be the first role of government, and we owe it to the people of California to do better to keep our communities safe.
By passing Prop. 36 with such an overwhelming mandate, Californians proclaimed loudly and definitively that they are fed up with placing the rights of criminals over those of victims. California residents are fed up with increased rates of serial retail theft and drug use and with the ballooning number of homeless individuals on our streets.
Californians want people who need treatment to get it and those who don't to experience the consequence of their crimes. The success of Prop. 36's treatment-focused approach depends heavily on the availability of well-funded mental health and substance abuse services, which are critical for breaking cycles of addiction and reducing recidivism.
By addressing repeat offenses and prioritizing rehabilitation, Prop. 36 has the potential to improve public safety, reduce crime rates and alleviate the long-term strain on our state's criminal justice system.
Beyond just respecting the will of the people and making crime illegal again, there are numerous real benefits we can see by funding the anti-crime initiative reforms. We can make a real impact at making communities safer. Now is the time to stop the rhetoric and take action.
State Sen. Tony Strickland represents California District 36, encompassing parts of Los Angeles and Orange Counties.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
14 minutes ago
- CNBC
European renewable stocks to watch as Trump's megabill hangs in the balance
Among the myriad details stuffed within U.S. President Donald Trump's bumper "big beautiful bill," European investors have been keeping an eye on one in particular — renewable energy policy. Shares of the region's wind power firms gained on Wednesday after Senate lawmarkers narrowly approved a heavily amended version of the package . The move higher continued Thursday as the U.S. House began a final debate on the megabill — after a dramatic night of voting that was nearly derailed by Republican defections. Turbine manufacturer Vestas was 3.4% higher in early trade Thursday after gaining more than 10% in the previous session. Windfarm operator Orsted and turbine maker Nordex , meanwhile, built on Wednesday's gains to both trade over 2% higher early Thursday. The bill's current revisions are a relief to a sector already grappling with funding challenges, competition from China and tariff uncertainty. Among the key amendments to the bill is the removal of a tax on wind and solar projects that use components from "foreign entities of concern" — understood to primarily mean China — which analysts said could have a chilling effect on new orders in the sector more broadly. Another major revisions relevant to European renewables firms is the removal of a controversial cliff-edge deadline that would have required all projects benefiting from tax credits to be in service by the end of 2027. Now, all projects commencing before mid-2026 will be eligible, which analysts at Citi said was likely to spur a flurry of near-term activity, as all a project must do to "start" is spend 5% of capital. U.S. clean energy shares also rose on this news this week. If the bill is voted through in its current form, the change "will lay the foundation for a solid American onshore wind turbine market in the years after 2027 — and not an 'almost complete stop' in 2028, which the previous text has a high inherent risk of. This seems like a gigantic relief for the onshore wind market in the U.S.," Sydbank analysts said. U.S. importance Tancrede Fulop, senior equity analyst and renewables expert at Morningstar, said the bill amendments, along with a resumption of construction work on Equinor's Empire Wind project off the New York coast, "suggests that the worst-case scenario for the renewables sector under the Trump administration may not materialize." The U.S. market plays a pivotal role for Europe's largest renewable developers such as RWE , EDPR and Iberdrola , according to Morningstar's Fulop. It accounts for around 50% of the installed renewable capacity of the former two, and around 40% of the latter. However, while wind developers could potentially offset any phase out of tax credits by selling power at higher prices or pressuring manufacturers to cut their prices, manufacturers such as Vestas — which has 35% of its onshore wind backlog in the U.S. — and Siemens Energy are more vulnerable, Fulop said. Pierre-Alexandre Ramondenc, equity research analyst for utilities and renewables at AlphaValue, told CNBC that the positive market reaction reflected the fact that the Senate's amendments were broadly good news for the sector. But overall, Trump's bill "largely dismantles the core mechanisms supporting clean energy" under President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act, he said. Rather than fully repealing provisions that have been established and generated business activity under the IRA, the new megabill puts fresh constraints on the sector. The primary blow is to the U.S.' efforts to modernize its grid infrastructure and lead in decarbonization efforts, he continued. In Europe, the market has already been revising down its expectations for U.S. renewables since Trump's election, Ramondenc noted, with the main risk now being the cancellation of projects already under construction. European utilities also have "flexibility in deploying capex across different technologies and geographies," he added. — CNBC's Erin Doherty contributed to this report.
CNBC
26 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump's megabill advances in the House after GOP divisions nearly derail it
The U.S. House on Thursday began a final debate on President Donald Trump's megabill, after a dramatic night of voting that was nearly derailed by Republican defections. The House voted 219-213 to move the bill forward, according to NBC News reporting. The vote to begin final debate marks a win for Republican leadership seeking to deliver on Trump's second term policy agenda. After hours of stalemates and maneuvering, they finally managed to corral their razor-thin majorities and quash enough of the opposition from within their own ranks to move forward. The vote to begin debate in the divided House was not without drama, rife with back-room deals, evolving alliances and negotiations until the very end. Ultimately, House Speaker Mike Johnson was able to push the bill forward, losing just a handful of members in a vote that fell along party lines. The debate will be followed by a vote on the final bill, which extends the 2017 tax cuts and commits more money for border security while slashing health insurance and nutrition programs for the poor. Once the bill passes the House one more time, it goes to Trump's desk, where he has long wanted to sign the package into law. The House received the revised bill from the Senate late Tuesday, after the package just squeaked by in the upper chamber with Vice President JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote. The Senate implemented substantial changes to its version of the megabill, including deeper cuts to Medicaid and a $5 trillion debt limit hike, much higher than the $4 trillion increase the House proposed in its version of the bill. These changes were among the provisions that made many House Republicans wary. But leadership refused to introduce new tweaks to the megabill and stretch its timeline out further.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Investment expert harshly criticizes harmful impacts of 'Big Beautiful Bill': 'Biggest tax scam out there'
An investment expert responsible for managing billions of dollars in assets blasted the U.S. Senate's recently passed One Big Beautiful Bill Act, saying the legislation will tank clean energy and transportation while keeping a massive tax loophole for wealthy hedge fund managers. "While the big ugly bill is attempting to destroy clean energy and transportation, not a whiff of taxing carried interest," Ross Gerber, chief executive officer of Gerber Kawasaki Wealth and Investment Management, posted on X on June 30, a day before the bill was passed. "The biggest tax scam out there." The so-called "Big Beautiful Bill," originally introduced in the House to implement President Donald Trump's agenda through a process known as budget reconciliation, has been highly criticized by members of both parties for a number of reasons — from its drastic cuts to Medicaid and Medicare to its huge tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy. Among the bill's more unpopular provisions have been rollbacks to clean energy incentives, largely tied to the Inflation Reduction Act, which represented the nation's largest-ever investment in reducing heat-trapping pollution and addressing rising global temperatures, according to the Department of Energy. Since the IRA's enactment, companies have poured $321 billion into clean energy projects, according to the Clean Investment Monitor, with a total of 2,369 new facilities opened. The federally backed push to advance technology and infrastructure that can mitigate pollution and provide families with cost savings has resulted in over 30,000 jobs across Texas, Georgia, North Carolina, and Michigan. And even more money stands ready to be invested going forward. "Looking ahead, $522 billion of outstanding investment remains to be spent on construction and installation for announced or under-construction facilities," according to the Clean Investment Monitor's Q1 2025 Update, which said the planned but so far unspent financial infusion is intended to build more than 2,000 facilities projected to generate close to 55,000 jobs across five states. But much if not all of this potential growth could be in jeopardy if the "Big Beautiful Bill" becomes law. Having been introduced in the House, the Senate passed an amended version of the legislation on July 1, sending the new draft back to the House, where it could be approved, further revised, or sent back to committee. Meanwhile, as Gerber pointed out, the bill does nothing to address the multi-billion-dollar tax loophole that allows ultra-wealthy fund managers to pay the capital gains rate of 23.8% rather than the income tax rate of 37% on their share of profits, according to Benzinga. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that closing the carried-interest loophole would raise government revenues by around $13 billion over 10 years, meaning the provision could cost an average of about $1.3 billion annually. Essentially, adding up the ways it makes cuts and tax breaks, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act proposes a wealth transfer, trading a future of cleaner, more affordable energy — along with food assistance and health care for millions of low-income Americans — while reducing taxes and increasing subsidies for high-income individuals and big businesses. One of those subsidies, too, is to benefit the coal industry. Despite slashing social and clean energy programs, the CBO has estimated the bill would actually add nearly $4 trillion to the federal deficit, due mostly to the $4.45 trillion in tax cuts, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. Having been introduced in the House and then revised in the Senate to passage, the Senate version of the "Big Beautiful Bill" now sits with the House for potential approval, further revisions, or a return to committee to work out disagreements. Do you think your city has good air quality? Definitely Somewhat Depends on the time of year Not at all Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. After previously passing by only razor-thin margins largely along party lines, the bill appears poised to pass, however. Still, it has not yet become law. And that means there is still time for concerned residents to share their opinions with their elected officials. You can contact your representative about it through a pre-formatted email here or by phone here. While ultimately she voted to approve the Senate version, Senator Lisa Murkowski said she hoped the House would make further changes to the bill. Apart from simply voting yes or no, Congress members might still take on feedback and propose amendments or persuade their colleagues to think differently about the bill's impacts. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Sign in to access your portfolio
