Trump administration sues California over egg prices and blames animal welfare laws
The lawsuit, filed in federal court in California on Wednesday, challenges voter initiatives that passed in 2018 and 2008. They require that all eggs sold in California come from cage-free hens.
The Trump administration says the law imposes burdensome red tape on the production of eggs and egg products across the country because of the state's outsize role in the national economy.
'It is one thing if California passes laws that affects its own State, it is another when those laws affect other States in violation of the U.S. Constitution,' U.S. Agriculture Brooke Rollins said in a statement Thursday. "Thankfully, President Trump is standing up against this overreach.'
Egg prices soared last year and earlier this year due in large part to bird flu, which has forced producers to destroy nearly 175 million birds since early 2022. But prices have come down sharply recently. While the Trump administration claims credit for that, seasonal factors are also important. Avian influenza, which is spread by wild birds, tends to spike during the spring and fall migrations and drop in summer.
'Pointing fingers won't change the fact that it is the President's economic policies that have been destructive," the California Department of Justice said in a statement Friday. "We'll see him in court.'
The average national price for a dozen Grade A eggs declined to $5.12 in April and $4.55 in May after reaching a record $6.23 in March, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. But the May price was still 68.5% higher than a year earlier.
The federal complaint alleges that California contributed to the rise in egg prices with regulations that forced farmers across the country to adopt more expensive production practices. The lawsuit also asserts that it is the federal government's legal prerogative to regulate egg production. So it seeks to permanently block enforcement of the California regulations that flowed from the two ballot measures.
'Americans across the country have suffered the consequences of liberal policies causing massive inflation for everyday items like eggs,' Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement. 'Under President Trump's leadership, we will use the full extent of federal law to ensure that American families are free from oppressive regulatory burdens and restore American prosperity.'
While 2018's Proposition 12 also banned the sale of pork and veal in California from animals raised in cages that don't meet minimum size requirements, the lawsuit only focuses on the state's egg rules.
Humane World for Animals, which was named the Humane Society of the United States when it spearheaded the passage of Proposition 12, says avian influenza and other factors drove up egg prices, not animal welfare laws. And it says much of the U.S. egg industry went cage-free anyway because of demand from consumers who don't want eggs from hens confined to tiny spaces.
'California has prohibited the sale of cruelly produced eggs for more than a decade — law that has been upheld by courts at every level, including the Supreme Court. Blaming 2025 egg prices on these established animal welfare standards shows that this case is about pure politics, not constitutional law,' Sara Amundson, president of the Humane World Action Fund, said in a statement.
The American Egg Board, which represents the industry, said Friday that it will monitor the progress of the lawsuit while continuing to comply with California's laws, and that it appreciates Rollins' efforts to support farmers in their fight against bird flu and to stabilize the egg supply.
'Egg farmers have been both responsive and responsible in meeting changing demand for cage-free eggs, while supporting all types of egg production, and continuing to provide options in the egg case for consumers,' the board said in a statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Buzz Feed
18 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Key Issue Turning Americans Against Trump, CNN Data Shows
CNN's chief data analyst Harry Enten on Monday used just one word to sum up Americans' souring views on Donald Trump's handling of immigration. 'Oof!' said Enten in a segment with CNN's Kate Bolduan. Enten pointed to five separate polls from mid to late June showing the president's net approval rating (percent approval minus percent disapproval) on immigration ranging from -7 (Fox) to -27 (Gallup). He described the range of Trump's net approval ratings as 'bad to just downright terrible.' 'The American people have turned against President Donald Trump on what was his best issue,' Enten said. The segment comes just over a month after Enten spotted how Trump's net approval rating on immigration had shot 'up like a rocket' when comparing polling from early June to data from June 2017. The president's aggressive immigration policies have intensified over the course of his second term, with massive raids of legal cannabis farms in California last week — one of which saw a worker fall from a roof, later dying from his injuries, as hundreds of others were arrested. Enten, when asked if there are signs that the polling trend is affecting Trump's overall net approval rating, turned to how the president's net approval rating with Hispanics dropped by double digits over the past few months. In February, Trump was doing 'pretty gosh darn good for a Republican' as his net approval rating with Hispanics sat at -2, per polling from CBS News/YouGov. By June, less than a year after his 'historic performance' with Hispanic voters in the fall, that figure fell to -26, per Enten. 'Now he's basically back where he was during his first term, which is quite a low approval rating, one which has brought his overall approval rating down amongst the entire electorate,' Enten explained. The data analyst went on to point to how Immigration and Customs Enforcement's net approval rating went from averaging 0 during Trump's first term to reaching -17 last month. He added that the immigration crackdowns haven't just brought Trump down, but they've brought ICE 'down with him.'
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia Stock Is at a Peak - What's the Best Play Here for NVDA?
Three weeks ago, we recommended Nvidia Inc. (NVDA) stock in a June 22 Barchart article and shorting out-of-the-money puts. Now, NVDA is near its target prices, and the short play is successful. What is the best play here? NVDA is at $171.30, up over 4.5% today. Trump OK'd an export license to sell its powerful H20 AI chips to China after Nvidia's CEO, Jensen Huang, met with President Trump. The Wall Street Journal said this has been a top seller for Nvidia in China and was specially designed for the Chinese market. How to Buy Tesla for a 13% Discount, or Achieve a 26% Annual Return Alibaba Stock is Well Off Its Highs - What is the Best Way to Play BABA? Generate Income on MSTR Without Owning The Stock (Yet) Tired of missing midday reversals? The FREE Barchart Brief newsletter keeps you in the know. Sign up now! My prior price target was $178 per share using an estimated 55% forward free cash flow (FCF) margin (i.e., FCF/sales), as well as a 2.85% FCF yield valuation metric (i.e., 35x FCF multiple). Last quarter, Nvidia made a 59% FCF margin. So, if this continues over the coming year, NVDA stock could have further to go. Moreover, analysts have lifted their price targets. Let's look at this. In Q1 ending April 27, Nvidia generated $26.1 billion in FCF on $44.06 billion in sales. That represents a 59.2% FCF margin. Over the trailing months, according to Stock Analysis, it's generated $72.06 billion FCF on $148.5 billion in sales, or a 48.5% FCF margin. So, it seems reasonable to assume Nvidia could make at least a 57% FCF margin going forward. Here's how that would work out. Analysts expect sales to rise to a range between $199.89 billion this year ending Jan. 2026 and $251.2 billion next year. That puts it on a next 12 months (NTM) run rate of $225.5 billion. Moreover, now that it will be able to sell to China again, let's assume this pushes sales at least 5% higher to $236.8 billion: $236.8b NTM sales x 57% FCF margin = $135 billion FCF Just to be conservative, let's use a 55% margin on the lower NTM sales estimates: $225.5 billion x 55% margin = $124 billion FCF So, our estimate is that FCF over the next 12 months could range between $124 billion and $135 billion, or about $130 billion on average Therefore, using a 30x FCF multiple (i.e., the same as dividing by 3.33% FCF yield): $230b x 30 = $6,900 billion market cap (i.e., $6.9 trillion) That is 65% over today's market cap of $4.178 trillion, according to Yahoo! Finance (i.e., at $171.35 p/sh). In other words, NVDA stock could be worth 65% more, or $291.55 per share. $171.35 x 1.65 = $282.73 price target That is what might happen over the next 12 months (NTM) if analysts' revenue targets are hit and its FCF margin averages 56%. Analysts have closer price targets. The average of 66 analysts surveyed by Yahoo! Finance is $173.92. However, that is higher than three weeks ago, when I reported that the average was $172.60. Moreover, which tracks recent analyst recommendations, now reports that 39 analysts have a $200.71 price target, up from $179.87 three weeks ago. One way to play this is to sell short out-of-the-money puts. That way, an investor can set a lower buy-in price and still get paid extra income. In my last Barchart article on June 22 ("Make Over a 2.4% One-Month Yield Shorting Nvidia Out-of-the-Money Puts"), I suggested shorting the $137 strike price put option expiring July 25. The yield was 2.48% over the next 34 days (i.e., $3.40/$137.00). Today, that contract is almost worthless, as it's trading for just 8 cents. In other words, the short seller of these puts has made almost all the money (i.e., the stock has risen, making the short-put play successful). The investor's account has little chance of getting assigned to buy 100 shares per put contract at $137.00 on or before July 25. It makes sense to roll this over by doing a 'Buy to Close" and entering a new trade to 'Sell to Open' at a later expiry period and higher strike price. For example, the Aug. 29 expiry period, 45 days to expiry or DTE (which is after the expected Aug. 27 Q2 earnings release date), shows that $155.00 strike price put has a midpoint premium of $3.93. So, the short-put yield is: $393/$155.00 = 0.2535 = 2.535% over 45 days That works out to an annualized expected return (ER) of +20.28% (i.e., 2.535% x 8). So, even if NVDA stock stays flat, the investor stands to make good money here shorting these puts every 45 days (assuming the same yield occurs). There seems to be a low risk here, given that the delta ratio is just 23%. But, given how volatile NVDA has been, and that the stock is at a peak, it might make sense to use some of the income received to buy puts at lower strike prices. Keep in mind that the breakeven point, i.e., the price where an unrealized loss could occur, is $151.07: $155-$3.93 = $151.07 That is 11.8% below today's price. But it is not uncommon for a stock like NVDA to fall 20% from its peak. That would put it at $137.00. So, using some of the income to buy long puts at $140 or $145 is not unreasonable. That would cost between $144 and $204 ($174 on average) for the $15,500 investment (net of $393 already received): $393 income - $174 long hedge = $219, or $219 / $15,500 invested in short put play = 1.41% New Breakeven = $15,500 = $174 = $15,326 or $153.26 per put contract This means that the investor's potential (unrealized) loss is between $14,250 and $15,326, or -$1,076 net on the $15,326 net investment, or -7%. But keep in mind that this is only an unrealized loss. The investor would have protected himself from a much lower downside by buying long puts from the income received. And, after all, the price target is substantially higher, so the investor might be willing to hold on or even sell out-of-the-money call options to recoup some of the unrealized loss. The bottom line here is that NVDA has room to move higher. Shorting OTM puts with a lower strike price long put hedge is one good way to play this. On the date of publication, Mark R. Hake, CFA did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Sign in to access your portfolio
Buzz Feed
18 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
"Star Wars" Quotes Or American Politics?
If you have kept an eye on the state of American politics, it's feeling more and more like Padme's line about liberty dying in Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith. Well, if you, like me, are struggling to tell the difference, then this quiz is for you. Now, can you tell me, are these quotes from real life, or Galactic Imperial propaganda? Stream everything Star Wars on Disney+.
