Morning Bid: Markets oddly serene
LONDON (Reuters) - What matters in U.S. and global markets today
By Mike Dolan, Editor-At-Large, Finance and Markets
Despite the edgy political and policy backdrop, world markets seem to be doing just fine, eking out new records for stocks as bonds are being bought to boot.
I'll discuss all the market news below, and then I'll explore how the Trump administration's push to reform the Fed might have deeper and longer-lasting impacts than the removal of Jerome Powell.
Today's Market Minute
* Japan's election outcome may put the central bank in a double bind as prospects of big spending could keep inflation elevated while potentially prolonged political paralysis and a global trade war provide compelling reasons to go slow on rate hikes.
* A growing number of European Union member states, including Germany, are considering using wide-ranging "anti-coercion" measures targeting U.S. services if the EU cannot reach a trade deal with U.S. President Donald Trump, EU diplomats say.
* The European Union's latest effort to restrict Russia's oil revenue is unlikely to hurt Moscow's war effort severely, leaving U.S. President Donald Trump's threat of secondary sanctions one of the few remaining economic levers to pressure the Kremlin, writes ROI energy columnist Ron Bousso.
* A key difference in crude oil demand forecasts between this year and 2024 is that both OPEC and the International Energy Agency are being far more cautious in their growth expectations. ROI Asia Commodities columnist Clyde Russell explains why this matters.
Markets oddly serene
U.S. tariff hikes are likely coming next week, public debt is rising and Federal Reserve independence is being questioned - but the U.S. and world economies seem to be chugging on regardless, well through the northern summer.
Annualized U.S. economic growth is running about 2.4% at midyear and U.S. economic surprise indexes are more positive than they have been for a couple of months, with global equivalents at their most positive in more than a year. U.S. financial conditions indexes are the loosest in three years.
With big-tech megacaps due to start reporting Wednesday with Alphabet and Tesla updates, the earnings season just unfolding is already ahead of low-bar expectations. With about 12% of S&P500 firms now reported, the blended estimate of annual profit growth is running at 6.7% - about a point faster than was seen at the start of July.
The new highs for the S&P500 and Nasdaq on Monday were less surprising given all that, even though the daily moves were marginal and futures basically flat ahead of Tuesday's bell.
There's been little new on the trade tariff front, even though European Union warnings late Monday of its willingness to use a range of retaliatory measures if faced with higher levies dampened the equity market mood somewhat on Tuesday.
Relief that weekend Japanese upper house elections did not force an immediate resignation of Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba saw the yen pop higher on Monday and 10-year Japanese government yields fell sharply as Tokyo markets reopened on Tuesday. The Nikkei lost early gains.
The drop in U.S. and European short- and long-term Treasury yields on Monday was perhaps more surprising, pulling the dollar back down in the process as the focus switched to Japan.
While some of that was given back on Tuesday, the buoyancy of the long end of the U.S. curve was remarkable given Fed independence concerns.
Even though Fed policymakers are in a blackout period on policy statements ahead of next week's meeting, embattled Fed boss Jerome Powell is due to give opening remarks to a Fed regulatory conference on Tuesday.
All of which brings us back to the Fed poser, the political pressure on the central bank to accelerate interest rate cuts and threats to Powell's position over anything from historical Fed policy performance and its involvement in non-monetary issues to how he managed rennovations of the headquarters.
Chart of the day
Reuters is tracking how companies are responding to the threat posed by U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs. As of July 22, Reuters has counted 273 companies worldwide that have reacted to the tariffs in some manner. The estimated cost to the companies stood at over $34 billion, as of end May. Our tally is based on various sources, including quarterly financial reports, interviews and statements from company officials.
Today's events to watch
* Richmond Federal Reserve July business survey (10:00 AM EDT)
* Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell gives welcome remarks before hybrid "Integrated Review of the Capital Framework for Large Banks" Conference hosted by the Fed
* U.S. corporate earnings: Lockheed Martin, General Motors, Pentair, Paccar, Halliburton, Texas Instruments, Invesco, MSCI, Capital One, Equifax, Synchrony, Pultegroup, Danaher, Philip Morris, Sherwin-Williams, EQT, RTX, CoStar, Chubb, Intuitive Surgical, DR Horton, Interpublic, Baker Hughes, Enphase, Quest Diagnostics, IQVIA, Genuine Parts, KeyCorp
* UK finance minister Rachel Reeves testifies before House of Lords' Economic Affairs Committee
Want to receive the Morning Bid in your inbox every weekday morning? Sign up for the newsletter here. You can find ROI on the Reuters website, and you can follow us on LinkedIn and X.
Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias.
(by Mike Dolan; editing by Timothy Heritage)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dover Corporation (DOV) Had An 'Unbelievable' Quarter, Says Jim Cramer
We recently published . Dover Corporation (NYSE:DOV) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. Dover Corporation (NYSE:DOV) is an industrial machinery company. Cramer's comments about the firm came in the context of industrial stocks and Honeywell's share price movement after its latest earnings. Honeywell shares dropped as investors wondered whether the firm would experience business health in 2025, and Dover Corporation (NYSE:DOV)'s shares dropped by 2.2% after the firm's second-quarter earnings. The stock fell despite a revenue and earnings beat, which led Cramer to criticize the sellers: 'And I'm going to throw in a third one. Dover. With another unbelievable quarter. Very big guide up. Stock is down. Whoever is selling these, things Carl, they're not trying to paint the tape. They just don't understand how stocks work. Because we have real major industrial companies that are doing incredibly well. And it's almost like if they're not merging, we don't want to own them, if they're not AI, we don't want to. own. They're other things worth owning. . . Dover's worth buying, right here. . . Dover, Honeywell beat and raise.' Cramer recently discussed Dover Corporation (NYSE:DOV)'s exposure to data centers. Here's what he said: 'No I mean data centers are the story again. Pennsylvania data centers. The building of them would be CoreWeave, the President's going to Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania being a hub for all these. Everyone wants to play the parts of data center again. It really cooled in April. No one cared. The stocks got killed. . .I think that you can go back to these stocks. . .You just want to own Dover which is a stock we own for the charitable trust, besides Eaton which is there. You want to be there again, because the building is continuing and I just feel like, wow it's a pretty good time.' While we acknowledge the potential of DOV as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Factbox-Key elements of EU-U.S. trade deal agreed on Sunday
BRUSSELS (Reuters) -The U.S. and the European Union agreed on a framework trade deal on Sunday, ending months of uncertainty for industry and consumers on both sides of the Atlantic. Here are the main elements of the deal: * Almost all EU goods entering the U.S. will be subject to a 15% baseline tariff, including cars, which now face 27.5%, as well as semiconductors and pharmaceuticals. The 15% tariff is the maximum tariff and is not added to any existing rates. * However, the U.S. is to announce the result of its 232 trade investigations in two weeks and decide separately on tariff rates for chips and pharmaceuticals. Whatever U.S. decisions come later on these sectors will be "on a different sheet of paper", European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said. * The U.S. and EU will have zero-for-zero tariffs on all aircraft and their components, certain chemicals, certain generic drugs, semiconductor equipment, some agricultural products, natural resources and critical raw materials. More products would be added. The situation for spirits is still to be established. * Tariffs on European steel and aluminium will stay at 50%, but von der Leyen said these would later be cut and replaced by a quota system. * The EU pledged to buy $250 billion of U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) a year for three years, totalling $750 billion in total, as it replaces Russian gas. The EU will also buy nuclear fuel from the U.S. * Under the deal, the EU pledged to buy U.S. military equipment and European companies are to invest $600 billion in the U.S. over the course of Trump's second term. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Analysis-Out-gunned Europe accepts least-worst US trade deal
By Mark John LONDON (Reuters) -In the end, Europe found it lacked the leverage to pull Donald Trump's America into a trade pact on its terms and so has signed up to a deal it can just about stomach - albeit one that is clearly skewed in the U.S.'s favour. As such, Sunday's agreement on a blanket 15% tariff after a months-long stand-off is a reality check on the aspirations of the 27-country European Union to become an economic power able to stand up to the likes of the United States or China. The cold shower is all the more bracing given that the EU has long portrayed itself as an export superpower and champion of rules-based commerce for the benefit both of its own soft power and the global economy as a whole. For sure, the new tariff that will now be applied is a lot more digestible than the 30% "reciprocal" tariff which Trump threatened to invoke in a few days. While it should ensure Europe avoids recession, it will likely keep its economy in the doldrums: it sits somewhere between two tariff scenarios the European Central Bank last month forecast would mean 0.5-0.9% economic growth this year compared to just over 1% in a trade tension-free environment. But this is nonetheless a landing point that would have been scarcely imaginable only months ago in the pre-Trump 2.0 era, when the EU along with much of the world could count on U.S. tariffs averaging out at around 1.5%. Even when Britain agreed a baseline tariff of 10% with the United States back in May, EU officials were adamant they could do better and - convinced the bloc had the economic heft to square up to Trump - pushed for a "zero-for-zero" tariff pact. It took a few weeks of fruitless talks with their U.S. counterparts for the Europeans to accept that 10% was the best they could get and a few weeks more to take the same 15% baseline which the United States agreed with Japan last week. "The EU does not have more leverage than the U.S., and the Trump administration is not rushing things," said one senior official in a European capital who was being briefed on last week's negotiations as they closed in around the 15% level. That official and others pointed to the pressure from Europe's export-oriented businesses to clinch a deal and so ease the levels of uncertainty starting to hit businesses from Finland's Nokia to Swedish steelmaker SSAB. "We were dealt a bad hand. This deal is the best possible play under the circumstances," said one EU diplomat. "Recent months have clearly shown how damaging uncertainty in global trade is for European businesses." NOW WHAT? That imbalance - or what the trade negotiators have been calling "asymmetry" - is manifest in the final deal. Not only is it expected that the EU will now call off any retaliation and remain open to U.S. goods on existing terms, but it has also pledged $600 billion of investment in the United States. The time-frame for that remains undefined, as do other details of the accord for now. As talks unfolded, it became clear that the EU came to the conclusion it had more to lose from all-out confrontation. The retaliatory measures it threatened totalled some 93 billion euros - less than half its U.S. goods trade surplus of nearly 200 billion euros. True, a growing number of EU capitals were also ready to envisage wide-ranging anti-coercion measures that would have allowed the bloc to target the services trade in which the United States had a surplus of some $75 billion last year. But even then, there was no clear majority for targeting the U.S. digital services which European citizens enjoy and for which there are scant homegrown alternatives - from Netflix to Uber to Microsoft cloud services. It remains to be seen whether this will encourage European leaders to accelerate the economic reforms and diversification of trading allies to which they have long paid lip service but which have been held back by national divisions. Describing the deal as a painful compromise that was an "existential threat" for many of its members, Germany's BGA wholesale and export association said it was time for Europe to reduce its reliance on its biggest trading partner. "Let's look on the past months as a wake-up call," said BGA President Dirk Jandura. "Europe must now prepare itself strategically for the future - we need new trade deals with the biggest industrial powers of the world." (Additional reporting by Jan Strupczewski in Brussels; Christian Kraemer and Maria Martinez in Berlin; Writing by Mark John; Editing by Nick Zieminski) Sign in to access your portfolio
