logo
Almost 50% of Latinos voted for Trump in 2024. Experts have theories

Almost 50% of Latinos voted for Trump in 2024. Experts have theories

Behold, the elusive Latino Vote: often sought after but never fully understood by politicians or pollsters.
Every four years, the general media tries (and fails) to encapsulate what exactly the second-largest ethnic group in the U.S. seeks in a presidential candidate.
Do they want someone tough on borders or soft on borders? A politician or an outsider? A white man or a person of color? A peacemaker or an agitator? A Catholic or a Protestant?
A new study from the Pew Research Center shows that, in the 2024 presidential election, a slight majority of Latinos voted for former Vice President Kamala Harris — but they also voted for President Donald Trump at a much higher rate than they did in 2020.
Trump managed to garner 48% of the Latino vote compared to Harris' 51% share and significantly jumped past the 36% clip that he got during in the 2020 presidential election. The study's results reveal that the initial 2024 exit polls actually underestimated Latinos' Trump support, with the Republican candidate tracking at 46% of the Latino vote on Election Day.
Additionally, 47% of naturalized citizens of all ethnic backgrounds voted for Trump in 2024, compared with 38% in 2020. In that same voting bloc 51% voted for Harris in 2024, a notable drop from the 59% who voted for Joe Biden in 2020.
Hispanic naturalized citizens recorded a 12% bump in voting for Trump, jumping from 39% in 2020 to 51% in 2024.
Mike Madrid — a political consultant and founding member of the Republican political action committee known as the Lincoln Project — authored the 2024 book 'The Latino Century: How America's Largest Minority Is Transforming Democracy.' In his prescient writing, Madrid analyzed the oft-misunderstood and misrepresented Latino electorate and highlighted the issues of top priority for the community.
Though not surprised that Latinos as a whole shifted toward the right, Madrid was caught off guard by the size of the political shift from one election cycle to the next.
'I still thought this was probably two or four years away,' Madrid told The Times of the Pew Research findings. 'There's an overwhelming feeling from all the polling work I've done that both parties have failed the [Latino] community. There is very little evidence that there's a shift to being more conservative. There's a lot of evidence that Latinos are becoming more populist.'
Journalist Paola Ramos, who authored the 2024 book 'Defectors: The Rise of the Latino Far Right and What It Means for America,' mirrored Madrid's lack of surprise at the results.
'It's not shocking. I think there is this tendency within the Democratic Party to not want to confirm reality,' Ramos told The Times in a phone interview. 'I hope that this does serve as a real wake up moment for the Democratic Party, because there's been this historic reluctance not to confront what seems to me a very dynamic and evolving Latino community.'
In Madrid's view, the Democratic Party built the disdain for itself through immigration policies — which he points to as one of the main reasons why naturalized citizens may have flipped their party in 2024.
'Biden and Harris adopted a very permissive, very progressive position on the border,' Madrid argued. 'There was backlash to it, because [naturalized citizens] were — after having waded many years through a very broken system and playing by the rules — seeing people being rewarded, in their eyes, for coming in around the system that they just navigated.'
Ramos saw that sense of betrayal with the Democratic Party's false promises on immigration reform as leading to 'deep disillusionment' among Latinos, which might have led them to find solace in Trump's anti-immigrant rhetoric.
She also examined the psychosocial side of why Latinos have leaned into Trump's political tactics.
'I think many people tried to run away from being lumped in with immigrants, particularly when Trump was obviously making an entire campaign around criminalizing immigrants,' Ramos said. 'If you have a candidate that is spending his entire campaign in demonizing you, then you want to prove as much as you can that you don't belong to that group. ... [There's also] the idea that once you've 'made it' in this country, you don't want others to climb up the same ladder. That is a very real phenomenon.'
Madrid believes the situation to be much more cut-and-dry than Ramos. In his view, Latinos shifted Republican because of the Democratic Party's lack of messaging on the economy.
'I think what happened was you had a whole new generation of Latinos getting elected to office with no history of it ... and they started to toe the line of the wealthy, white, college-educated, homeowning face of the Democratic Party that that cared more about climate change and marriage equality and gun control and all these cultural issues that animate wealthier constituencies,' Madrid said. 'They forgot about developing a working class agenda. They didn't focus on economic mobility at all.'
However, Madrid and Ramos both pointed to the surprise victory of Zohran Mamdani in last month's New York City mayoral Democratic primary as a sign that the Latino vote can be swayed in any direction when presented with a charismatic, populist message and figure.
'A Democratic socialist just picked up all the voters that voted for Trump six months ago, who are the same voters that voted for Eric Adams, a centrist Democrat, four years before that,' Madrid said. 'You have a Latino, working class of people that will vote for a centrist Democrat, a far-right populist or a Democratic socialist, as long as somebody will listen to them and their economic concerns. This is not ideological. It's economic populism — it couldn't be more clear than that.'
Ramos is unsure whether Mamdani's historic win will point to a larger national moment for a unifying, populist message within the Democratic Party, but she notes that his approach has addressed some of the major problems that could rejuvenate the party's momentum across voting blocs.
'His message is resonating across the board, and that is part of what I see as as a big problem in the Democratic Party — it's in the middle of this identity crisis,' Ramos said. 'You don't know if they're pro-immigrant or not. You don't know they're pro-trans rights or not. You don't really know what they're for. With Zohran, his message is very clear-eyed. You know what he's for. And I think people like that.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why it may be too late for Jim Tressel, Sherrod Brown to join governor's race
Why it may be too late for Jim Tressel, Sherrod Brown to join governor's race

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why it may be too late for Jim Tressel, Sherrod Brown to join governor's race

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) — The race for Ohio governor in 2026 is already well under way, more than a year before the election. 'This is really early for a governor's race to sort of start and almost end,' Republican strategist Matt Dole said. 'It's just been a combination of the party wanting to see the primary over earlier and a candidate coming in and using sort of a national name for himself.' Here's where things stand: On the Republican side, businessman Vivek Ramaswamy is the frontrunner. Ramaswamy is endorsed by President Donald Trump and the Ohio GOP. He has raised $9.6 million already for his campaign. Small business owner Heather Hill is also vying for the Republican nomination. Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost and Ohio Treasurer Robert Sprague both were part of the Republican primary but ultimately dropped out at varying points. Former Ohio Health Director Dr. Amy Acton remains the only Democrat currently in the race. With only one major candidate on each side, both parties are waiting to see who else will jump in. Lieutenant Governor Jim Tressel (R-Ohio) still will not say what his plans are. 'No news on this front,' Tressel said on Tuesday. Dole said Tressel's time to jump in has long passed and said it would have needed to happen before the Ohio Republican Party endorsed Ramaswamy. Ohio woman hopes BOOM! will help her win national music competition 'Jim Tressel can't get in the race at this point,' he said. 'Vivek Ramaswamy just announced $9.5 million raised in four and half months. Jim Tressel is a universally known name in the state of Ohio, but he still has to build a campaign, which he's never done, he's never been a candidate for office. And I think as the former head coach of Ohio State, he can read a scouting report and knows that it's probably past the opportunity.' 'Vivek Ramaswamy has done a pretty good job of rallying all the troops on his side, both in state and then of course with his support from Trump and the MAGA movement at large,' Democratic strategist Morgan Harper said. Harper agreed with Dole – that Tressel has the name ID on lock, but the timing may have gotten away from him. Democrats are waiting to see if people like former Senator Sherrod Brown or former U.S. Rep. Tim Ryan throw their hats into the race. 'No denying that they would still have the ability to enter, but the clock is ticking for them too,' Harper said. 'For a Democrat to be competitive in the 2026 governor's race, they are going to have to raise a lot of money. And it's tough to raise money at any time for democrats at this point in Ohio, but particularly in an off-cycle race for an in-state election like governor.' Harper said for Democrats to be competitive in the 2026 race, they need to focus on grassroots efforts, 'to connect with people directly and really drive turnout.' She said they also need to have a strong message. 'Getting started on that early, really showing that you have a message that's going to change the trajectory for Ohio democrats that unfortunately we've been seeing a lot of losses over the last few cycles,' Harper said. 'That isn't going to happen overnight and so that's really the time pressure here is making sure that we have enough runway to raise the big sums that Vivek Ramaswamy has already shown. He has the personal resources and the MAGA movement behind him to generate a lot of resources.' And Dole said the next steps for Ramaswamy will be deciding on a running mate who will help him reach more Ohioans. 'I think his team is looking at the general election math, right, I think he sees that he has the primary election sown up. He's looking at general election math and if he sees an area, whether its geographically, whether its diversity. Whatever it is that he feels he needs to fill, he will do that,' Dole said. Not only will Ohio elect a new governor in 2026 but all executive branch office holders in Ohio are also term limited. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

The 2 House Republicans who voted no on Trump's sweeping domestic policy bill
The 2 House Republicans who voted no on Trump's sweeping domestic policy bill

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The 2 House Republicans who voted no on Trump's sweeping domestic policy bill

President Donald Trump's major tax cut and spending bill passed the House on Thursday, but not without some Republican opposition. Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania voted against the legislation alongside the entire House Democratic Caucus. While Massie and Fitzpatrick were the only GOP members to vote no, several House GOP hardliners were angered by the changes made to the bill by the Senate and there was an overnight scramble by Speaker Mike Johnson to secure the necessary support to proceed. Some of the hardliners who ultimately voted yes say President Trump made promises to get their votes, including that he'd make the bill "better" in the future. On Thursday, Massie said he did not vote for the bill because of its projected impact on the national debt. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated the bill could add $3.4 trillion to the deficit over the next decade. "Although there were some conservative wins in the budget reconciliation bill (OBBBA), I voted No on final passage because it will significantly increase U.S. budget deficits in the near term, negatively impacting all Americans through sustained inflation and high interest rates," Massie wrote on X. Massie also opposed the House version of the megabill that passed back in May. MORE: Trump admin live updates: House narrowly passes megabill, sending it to president's desk Trump's been a vocal critic of Massie, lambasting him last month in a lengthy social media post as not being "MAGA." "Actually, MAGA doesn't want him, doesn't know him, and doesn't respect him," Trump wrote at the time. The president accused Massie of being a "grandstander" who routinely votes no on key Republican-led legislation. Trump suggested Massie should be challenged in the upcoming Republican primary, even before this latest vote. "The good news is that we will have a wonderful American Patriot running against him in the Republican Primary, and I'll be out in Kentucky campaigning really hard," Trump wrote. Rep. Fitzpatrick did vote for the House bill in May, but said on Thursday that the Senate changes to the bill (which resulted in deeper cuts to Medicaid) as the reason for his change in position. As I've stated throughout these negotiations, with each iteration of legislative text that was placed on the House Floor, I've maintained a close and watchful eye on the specific details of these provisions, and determined the specific district impact, positive or negative, on our PA-1 community," Fitzpatrick said in a statement. "I voted to strengthen Medicaid protections, to permanently extend middle class tax cuts, for enhanced small business tax relief, and for historic investments in our border security and our military," he added/ "However, it was the Senate's amendments to Medicaid, in addition to several other Senate provisions, that altered the analysis for our PA-1 community. The original House language was written in a way that protected our community; the Senate amendments fell short of our standard." MORE: How Trump's megabill could affect Medicaid and who could lose coverage "I believe in, and will always fight for, policies that are thoughtful, compassionate, and good for our community. It is this standard that will always guide my legislative decisions," Fitzpatrick said. The Pennsylvania congressman, who also faces reelection in 2026, represents a swing district that went blue in 2024 for Kamala Harris.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store