logo
Inheritance tax rules for anyone who wants to leave grandchildren tax-free cash

Inheritance tax rules for anyone who wants to leave grandchildren tax-free cash

Daily Mirrora day ago

MoneyMagpie Editor and financial expert Vicky Parry explores how grandparents can help their families without large tax bills
Grandparents and parents often want to help out their families with cash gifts – but if they're not careful, a gift can quickly become a financial burden.
Giving money while you're still here might seem like a great way to avoid Inheritance Tax, but you could end up lumping your loved ones with a big bill.

Inheritance Tax threshold
Inheritance Tax (IHT) is paid on the estate you leave behind when you die. Each person has an allowance of £325,000 on their estate before IHT needs to be paid.

But, with the cost of properties these days, that takes many people over the threshold even if they are cash-poor. The allowance doubles when a couple is married, as the surviving spouse takes on the other's allowance.
This increases the threshold to £650,000. If you leave your home to your children or grandchildren, that allowance increases to £500,000 (or £1million between a married couple).
Inheritance Tax seven-year Rule
The IHT rate is 40%. That means anything above the allowance is taxed at 40% before your beneficiaries can receive the money or assets from your estate.
This means many grandparents and parents try to implement a 'living inheritance' by passing money and assets on while they're still alive.
However, if you gift outside of the allowed limits, this money could be subject to IHT even if you gave it several years before you die.

There is a seven-year rule on gifting cash and assets: if you give money or property while you're still alive, it is subject to IHT for the next seven years. So, if you pass away within seven years, IHT is still due on that gift.
There is a taper. If you die within 4 years of the gift, IHT is 32%, 4 to 5 years is 24%, 5 to 6 years is 16%, then 8% for 6 to 7 years. At seven years and one day post-gift date, IHT is not due.
Permitted gifts
There are ways to avoid the seven year rule. First, you can gift up to £3,000 a year to anyone you want (that's the total amount you can give away, either split into several smaller gifts or as a lump sum).

If you didn't give any gifts the previous year, you can roll forward the allowance, to make it £6,000. You can also give birthday and Christmas gifts from your regular income of any amount without incurring IHT. This must be from your regular income and not deprive you of your living standards.
Additional gifts
There are some circumstances when you can gift more than £3,000 in a year. If your child gets married, you can give them £5,000, or £2,500 for a grandchild or great-grandchild. You can give up to £1,000 for anyone else as a wedding gift.
You can combine this gift with your allowances. So, if your child gets married and you didn't make any gifts in the last tax year, that could be a maximum of £11,000 tax-free (£6,000 allowance plus £5,000 wedding allowance).

Regular payments
Another way to support your grandchildren without accidentally lumping them with a large IHT bill is with regular payments. There's no limit to how much you can give.
There are a few rules. First, you must be able to afford the payments after your own standard living expenses. You can't deprive yourself to make the payments.
Second, it has to come from your regular monthly income such as your pension. It can't come from a savings pot. Many people use this option to help grandchildren with things like paying rent, or sending regular payments to a Junior ISA for a grandchild under the age of 18 to establish a safety net when they become an adult.

You can also use it for financial support of a dependent adult child or other relative.
Gifting your house
Be very careful when considering gifting your home or other property to your child or grandchild before you die. First, if you do this shortly before requiring long-term care, it could be seen as deprivation of assets to avoid paying for care.
This could result in the forced sale of the home to recoup funds for your care. Second, if you gift a portion by adding a child to the title deeds as joint property owner, they could face a large Capital Gains Tax bill as the property increases in value over the time they are a joint owner.

If you leave them the property after you die, CGT may not need to be paid if they sell it quickly, as it is only paid on the 'profit' i.e., the property value difference between the inheritance date and sale date.
Finally, giving away some or all of your home puts you at risk of being forced out of your home. It can also leave you in a tricky tax situation if you continue to live there without paying market share rent, as it is considered a 'gift with reservation' and the house value is included in your estate valuation when you die.
A gift with reservation doesn't come under the seven year rule, so could be applied ten, twenty or more years down the line.

Consider paying directly
If you want to help your grandchildren out now, rather than waiting to leave an inheritance, there are ways to help. For example, you could consider paying for your grandchild's university tuition or accommodation fees directly.
Or, if they need support with things like buying their first home, you could help them buy their furniture or pay for contractors for renovations and redecorating. Some grandparents enjoy paying for family holidays to create memories together that their grandchildren may not be able to afford on their own.
This is a good way to provide support to your grandchildren, while having control over what your 'living inheritance' is spent on. Taking these costs away from them helps them to save their own cash, so you're still providing them an opportunity for financial stability – without possibly landing them in hot water with the tax office later on.
Some of the brands and websites we mention may be, or may have been, a partner of MoneyMagpie.com

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Is Keir already lining up his next U-turn? Starmer faces fresh rebellion from Labour MPs over his 'family farm tax'
Is Keir already lining up his next U-turn? Starmer faces fresh rebellion from Labour MPs over his 'family farm tax'

Daily Mail​

time17 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Is Keir already lining up his next U-turn? Starmer faces fresh rebellion from Labour MPs over his 'family farm tax'

Sir Keir Starmer has been put on notice of a fresh Labour rebellion over the Government's 'family farm tax'. More than 40 Labour MPs are said to be considering a bid to water down looming changes to agricultural and business inheritance tax relief. It comes after the Prime Minister performed a trio of embarrassing U-turns in recent weeks. Sir Keir has reversed his position on axing the winter fuel payment for millions of pensioners, a national grooming gangs inquiry, and welfare cuts. This has left Labour rebels feeling emboldened that they can force the Government into further policy changes. According to the Telegraph, a group of Labour backbenchers are considering using amendments to legislation to exempt small family farms from a planned tax raid. At last year's Budget, Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced farmers will pay a 20 per cent rate of inheritance tax on land and property they inherit worth more than £1million. The Government has insisted the measures - dubbed the 'family farm tax' and set to be in place from April 2026 - will only affect the wealthiest quarter of landowners. But the National Farmers' Union (NFU) and others say the impact of Ms Reeves' measures will be much more widespread. Critics claim the move could wipe out family-run farms with tight margins, as they will be forced to sell up in order to pay death duties. There have been months of demonstrations by farmers in response to the Chancellor's tax raid, including tractor protests in Wesminster. A 'rural growth group' of Labour MPs is now proposing the raising of the £1million cut-off point at which estates lose their tax reliefs. They have suggested estates receive full tax relief on the value of agricultural properties up to £10million, 50 per cent to £20million, and nil thereafter. Sam Rushworth, Labour MP for Bishop Auckland, who is a member of the group, told the newspaper they would 'consider what amendments to put down'. Mr Rushworth said: 'We are all keen to avoid amendments. I don't want it to get to that point. I am a Labour MP and I broadly support the Government. 'I would like to see them bring forward different recommendations in the Bill.' Ex-Cabinet minister Louise Haigh, who was a leading rebel over the Government's now partially-reversed welfare cuts, has called for Sir Keir to 'reset' his relationship with the British public. 'I think this is a moment and an opportunity to reset the Government's relationship with the British public and to move forward, to adopt a different approach to our economic policy and our political strategy,' she told the BBC in the wake of the PM's climbdown on welfare changes. 'And I think that has been accepted from within government and a lot of people, both in the parliamentary Labour Party, but crucially, the country will really welcome that.' The Government's original welfare package had restricted eligibility for Personal Independence Payment (PIP), which is the main disability payment in England. It also cut the health-related element of Universal Credit. But, after Sir Keir offered concessions to rebel MPs, the changes to PIP will now only be implemented in November 2026 and apply to new claimants only. All existing recipients of the health element of Universal Credit will also have their incomes protected in real terms. A Government spokesman said: 'Our reforms to agricultural and business property relief are vital to fix the public services we all rely on. 'Three quarters of estates will continue to pay no inheritance tax at all, while the remaining quarter will pay half the inheritance tax that most people pay, and payments can be spread over 10 years, interest-free. 'We're investing billions of pounds in sustainable food production and nature's recovery, slashing costs for food producers to export to the EU and have appointed former NFU president Baroness Minette Batters to advise on reforms to boost farmers profits.'

Radnor Preserves named one of UK's top 25 producers
Radnor Preserves named one of UK's top 25 producers

Powys County Times

time19 hours ago

  • Powys County Times

Radnor Preserves named one of UK's top 25 producers

AN award-winning Powys company is toasting yet another accolade, after being named one of Britain's best regional food and drink producers. Radnor Preserves is one of 25 small-scale businesses that have been hand-picked as flag-bearers for Speciality Food Magazine and Speciality & Fine Food Fair's Regional Stars initiative. Launched by Joanna Morgan in Radnorshire in 2010, Radnor Preserves is one of two Welsh artisan food producers on the list, along with Matthew Rees, of Carmarthen Ham. Radnor Preserves is included in a special feature running in the June issue of Speciality Food Magazine, with the 25 businesses now set to feature at the Speciality & Fine Food Fair, taking place at Olympia London from September 9-10, which will celebrate the best of Britain's regional food and drink. 'Thank you so much to Speciality Food Magazine and Speciality & Fine Food Fair for selecting Radnor Preserves as one of Britain's best regional food and drink star producers,' Joanna said in a post on the Radnor Preserves Facebook page earlier this month. 'So proud to represent Wales as one of the key flagbearers of the region's food scene – such a great honour. 'Congratulations to all the chosen stars including Matthew Rees at Carmarthen Ham, also representing Wales. Wonderful to be in such fantastic company. 'Many thanks indeed, this is amazing.' Radnor Preserves is now based in Newtown, having moved from previous premises in Caersws, but started life as a micro-business in Joanna's kitchen, in and off-grid cottage that had no electricity, in 2010. A producer of marmalades, chutneys, preserves and jellies, Joanna has been described as the maker of the world's best marmalade and her products have won more than 40 awards. The former theatre producer's old cottage in the Forest of Arden, in Warwickshire boasted a garden full of fruit and vegetables but she had no television, phone or electricity and worked by candlelight, from a recipe book given to her by her grandfather. Her crops perished without a fridge, so Joanna taught herself preserve making to prevent her produce going to waste. One year she had made enough jams, chutneys and jellies to create Christmas hampers for all her family and friends. She then moved to Radnorshire, where the landscape offered an abundance of elderflowers, blackberries and other fruit. Now with electricity and a freezer, Joanna began selling at local farmers' markets and Radnor Preserves was born. Speciality Food Magazine feature's feature said: 'A particularly stand-out product in the range is the Welsh Cider & Leek Chutney – a unique combination which celebrates the Welsh heritage at the heart of the business. 'New to the range is an attractive tin filled with Radnor Preserves sweet and savoury preserves, which boasts a stunning image of the region's famous Cambrian Mountains. 'Indeed, the brand is such a passionate advocate of its provenance that the images used on its packaging have inspired holidayers and locals alike to explore the area.' Holly Shackleton, editor of Speciality Food Magazine, said: 'As a nation, we have a proud heritage of excellent produce and it's exciting to see how these 25 businesses have not only joined forces with other producers to create supportive ecosystems in their local area, but worked tirelessly with a pure focus on quality to ensure that what they create is a celebration of the land under their feet. 'I'm proud to profile the following businesses in the pages of Speciality Food and look forward to celebrating them in person at Speciality & Fine Food Fair in September.'

Starmer faces fresh MP rebellion over farmers' inheritance tax
Starmer faces fresh MP rebellion over farmers' inheritance tax

Telegraph

time21 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Starmer faces fresh MP rebellion over farmers' inheritance tax

Sir Keir Starmer is facing a fresh rebellion from Labour MPs over his inheritance tax raid on farmers. The Telegraph understands that more than 40 MPs are considering mounting an attempt to water down the policy, which threatens to bankrupt family farms by landing them with large inheritance tax bills. Rebels have been emboldened after forcing the Prime Minister to climb down on welfare cuts this week, in the third about-turn for the Government in two months. The U-turns – on benefits, winter fuel payment cuts and a national inquiry into grooming gangs – have added to a £40 billion black hole Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, needs to fill at the next Budget. In a sign of fraying party discipline, MPs are plotting further rebellions on immigration and the two-child benefit cap, alongside the farming revolt. A senior rebel told The Telegraph: 'It's obviously a Government in crisis and the back benches are feeling ignored. The whole strategy is not working and we've got to change direction.' The fresh threats to Sir Keir's authority come after more than 100 MPs publicly broke with the Government over its disability benefit cuts, leading to a Number 10 climbdown this week. Backbenchers are considering using rebel amendments to exempt small family farms from changes to inheritance tax announced in the October Budget. Farmers have historically been able to pass down their land tax-free. But from April 2026, full tax relief will be capped for estates at £1 million, above which just 50 per cent tax relief will be available. A so-called 'rural growth group' has proposed that ministers consider the impacts of substantially raising the planned £1 million cut-off point at which estates lose valuable tax reliefs. The back-bench group has suggested estates receive full tax relief on the value of agricultural properties up to £10 million, 50 per cent to £20 million, and nil thereafter. This higher threshold would probably exempt almost all small family farms from inheritance tax, with only the richest paying the levy. The changes will be enacted in a Bill due to be voted on by MPs later this year, when they could be challenged by rebels. Sam Rushworth, Labour MP for Bishop Auckland, who is a member of the group, said they would 'consider what amendments to put down'. Mr Rushworth said: 'We are all keen to avoid amendments. I don't want it to get to that point. I am a Labour MP and I broadly support the Government, [but] I would like to see them bring forward different recommendations in the Bill.' A handful of Labour parliamentarians have publicly criticised the so-called 'tractor tax' plans. Markus Campbell-Savours, Labour MP for Penrith and Solway in Cumbria, a rural seat, said in December that he would vote against the Treasury's plans, telling the House of Commons: 'Let me be clear, if today was the real vote, I would vote against the Government's plans.' Sir Keir is also facing opposition to some of his new immigration rules which are expected to be voted on after the summer break, The Telegraph understands. Many of the immigration changes announced by the Prime Minister last month, including changes to visa routes, can be brought into effect without a vote in the House of Commons. However key parts of the proposals, including a new levy on international student fees, will require the endorsement of Labour MPs. A leading rebel told The Telegraph that the Government should spend the summer recess 'reflecting on an evidence-based approach as to how to build effective policies on immigration'. Another said: 'The leadership have to seriously look at their actions on this policy regarding the lack of consultation with backbench MPs.' A number of refugee charities have been lobbying parliamentarians over the changes after their repeated requests for meetings with Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, were turned down. 'Biggest mistake to date' MPs opposed to the changes were encouraged this week by the Prime Minister's apology for using the term 'island of strangers' in his speech announcing the immigration changes. One rebel Labour MP said: 'Of course it was right for the Prime Minister to apologise for the language that he used and understand the distress that it caused, but similarly, if the Government listened more on policy, this would be stronger'. This week Sir Keir apologised for the language in the speech, saying he had not read it properly before delivery because he had been distressed by an arson attack on his family home. But he gave no indication that the Government would U-turn on any of its immigration reforms. Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, said the apology was Sir Keir's 'biggest mistake to date'. He said: 'This is absolute proof that Keir Starmer has no beliefs, no principles and just reads from a script. 'Only a year into his premiership and he has already made his most fatal error. He has no intention of clamping down on immigration, both legal and illegal. 'This is his biggest mistake to date and one he will not be able to recover from – the public voted for change, instead they're being given more mass immigration and a spiralling crisis at the border. 'We need a leader that has vision and unwavering principles, that man is clearly not Keir Starmer.' Some Labour MPs on the party's Right wing were bewildered by the Prime Minister's sudden apology. One told The Telegraph 'that row-back is the most staggering of all' and said it would further erode discipline. Labour MPs are also bracing for a fight with the Government in the autumn over the two child benefit cap, which many want to see scrapped. The Prime Minister has reportedly committed to scrapping the cap but no announcement has yet been made. In a speech next week, Kemi Badenoch is set to mock Sir Keir's growing roster of U-turns. 'Now that his backbenchers smell blood, there's almost certainly another climbdown on the two-child benefit cap in the offing,' she is expected to tell the Local Government Association on Wednesday. 'Labour told us 'the adults were back in charge', but this is actually amateur hour. The Prime Minister is incapable of sticking to a decision.' A senior Labour party figure said that Downing Street's loss of control over MPs constituted 'an absolute s--- show'. The source said: 'This is an outburst beyond the welfare bill that has broken out. It is from loyal, moderate people who have defended the winter fuel cut for months and then had the rug pulled from under them with the U-turn. 'These are moderate MPs getting constant lobbying from disabled groups and constituents and now they've been told there is money available after all. Those frustrations are largely with Rachel. But they're also with No 10.' 'Now they have lost their patience. It's an absolute s--- show.' Labour MPs have described the past week as a 'deep crisis' with senior government figures forming 'circular firing squads'. One Labour MP said of the Chancellor: 'It's already clear that Rachel Reeves has lost because her whole economic and fiscal strategy is failing on numerous counts. The PM is reversing everything that she wanted to do.' A Government spokesman said: 'Our reforms to agricultural and business property relief are vital to fix the public services we all rely on. 'Three quarters of estates will continue to pay no inheritance tax at all, while the remaining quarter will pay half the inheritance tax that most people pay, and payments can be spread over 10 years, interest-free. 'We're investing billions of pounds in sustainable food production and nature's recovery, slashing costs for food producers to export to the EU and have appointed former NFU president Baroness Minette Batters to advise on reforms to boost farmers profits.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store