
Torres to introduce resolution condemning Ogles over Mamdani, Jeffries comments
'I have profound differences of opinion with Assemblymember Mamdani, but we had a mutually respectful conversation last weekend, and we're committed to building a relationship and continuing the dialogue,' Torres said during a Thursday appearance on MSNBC's 'The Briefing Room with Jen Psaki.'
'But I have a deeply felt obligation to speak out against hate, whether it's anti-Jewish bigotry or anti-Muslim bigotry,' he added.
Ogles previously accused Mamdani of supporting terrorism and urged Attorney General Pam Bondi to denaturalize and deport him.
A week later, the Tennessee lawmaker referred to House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) as the 'dollar store Obama' in a social media post on X.
'Dollar Store Obama has been hysterically rambling for over three and a half hours, whining about tax cuts for working Americans, bonuses for our brave law enforcement, and mass deportations of illegals,' Ogles wrote on Thursday.
'He's still droning on like a broken record… Hakeem needs to get off the House floor, take a drug test, and start putting America first – not last.'
Torres said the comments are unacceptable and the behavior should not be condoned in the lower chamber.
'That kind of bigotry has no place in the United States of America. America is and should be a multiracial, multiethnic, multireligious democracy whose creed is e pluribus unum,' he told Psaki.
'That's what we should be celebrating on Independence Day.'
The Hill has contacted Ogles for comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Dems plan for ‘Project 2029' met with skepticism as party continues to divide: Report
New York Times political correspondent Shane Goldmacher detailed the mixed opinions among political strategists on the Democratic Party's plan for Project 2029 — a ready-made agenda for the party's next presidential nominee. Goldmacher revealed on Monday that while many Democratic strategists are on board with the project's vision, some are skeptical that the agenda set forth could upset the left's 'interest-group Borg' and deepen the divide within the party. The creator of Project 2029, former Chair of the Arizona Democratic Party Andrei Cherny, is working on organizing Democratic thought leaders to ensure there is a set-in-stone agenda ready. 'The title is an unsubtle play on Project 2025, the independently produced right-wing agenda that Mr. Trump spent much of last year's campaign distancing himself from, and much of his first few months back in power executing,' Goldmacher noted in the piece. Cherny's plan takes more inspiration from the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 than just its name. Similar to Project 2025, the goal of Project 2029 is to turn Cherny's publication, 'Democracy: A Journal of Ideas,' into a book — and rally the party's presidential candidates behind those ideas during the 2028 primary election season. 3 CEO of Aspiration Andrei Cherny attends a special Washington, DC screening of 'An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power' at The Newseum on July 19, 2017 in Washington, DC. Getty Images for Paramount Pictures 'The undertaking, which has not previously been reported, strikes at the heart of a raging debate consuming Democratic lawmakers, strategists and policymakers: whether the root of the party's problems is its ideas or its difficulty in persuading people to embrace them,' Goldmacher stated. According to Celinda Lake, a prominent Democratic pollster quoted in the story, the party 'didn't lack policies,' but rather 'lacked a functioning narrative to communicate those policies.' She criticized the Democratic Party for offering voters 'agencies and acronyms and statistics' rather than presenting a clear story about 'what we're going to fight for.' On the other hand, some Democrats contend that the party has been faltering due to stale ideas that fail to inspire voters to get behind them. 3 Mallory McMorrow, Michigan State Senator, makes remarks on Project 2025 at the 2024 Democratic National Convention in Chicago, Illinois, USA, at the United Center on Monday, August 19, 2024. Ron Sachs – CNP for NY Post Neera Tanden, CEO of the Center for American Progress and advisor to Project 2029, argued that liberals 'underestimate the power of Trump's ideas' and that the focus has been his personality. 'We get wrapped up in his personality. But he puts forward an idea like 'No tax on tips,' and that's an important signifier that he is championing working-class people,' Tanden told the New York Times. Cherny's plan to assemble 'the Avengers of public policy' — a coalition of Democrats aiming to set the agenda for their party's next presidential candidate — did not sit well with some who believe that coalitions are to blame for the party's current predicament. 3 A scoreboard displays 'DNC 2024' ahead of the Democratic National Convention (DNC) at the United Center on August 16, 2024 in Chicago, Illinois. The United Center will host the DNC, which is officially scheduled to kick off on Monday, August 19 and run through Thursday, August 22. Getty Images 'Developing policies by checking every coalitional box is how we got in this mess in the first place,' stated Adam Jentleson in the piece, the former chief of staff for Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa. 'There is no way to propose the kind of policies the Democratic Party needs to adopt without pissing off some part of the interest-group Borg. And if you're too afraid to do that, you don't have what it takes to steer the party in the right direction.' Even though Democrats were successful in rallying their base against Project 2025, Michael Tomasky, editor of The New Republic, claimed that those efforts will not have a negative effect on Project 2029 because — unlike the Heritage Foundation — their 'ideas aren't radical or extreme.' Tomasky stated that he hoped the project would help rejuvenate the public's view of the Democratic Party among the less fortunate.

Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Rural hospitals brace for financial hits or even closure under Republicans' $1 trillion Medicaid cut
OMAHA, Neb. — Tyler Sherman, a nurse at a rural Nebraska hospital, is used to the area's aging farmers delaying care until they end up in his emergency room. Now, with the Trump administration planning around $1 trillion in Medicaid cuts over 10 years, he fears those farmers and the more than 3,000 residents of Webster County could lose not just the ER, but also the clinic and nursing home tied to the hospital. 'Our budget is pretty heavily reliant on the Medicaid reimbursement, so if we do see a cut of that, it'll be difficult to keep the doors open,' said Sherman, who works at Webster County Community Hospital in the small Nebraska town of Red Cloud just north of the Kansas border. If those facilities close, many locals would see their five-minute trip to Webster County hospital turn into a nearly hour-long ride to the nearest hospital offering the same services. 'That's a long way for an emergency,' Sherman said. 'Some won't make it.' States and rural health advocacy groups warn that cutting Medicaid — a program serving millions of low-income and disabled Americans — would hit already fragile rural hospitals hard and could force hundreds to close, stranding some people in remote areas without nearby emergency care. More than 300 hospitals could be at risk for closure under the 'Big Beautiful Bill Act,' according to an analysis by the Cecil G. Sheps Center at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, which tracks rural hospital closures. Even as Congress haggled over the controversial bill, a health clinic in the southwest Nebraska town of Curtis announced Wednesday it would close in the coming months, in part blaming the anticipated Medicaid cuts. Bruce Shay of Pomfret, Conn., fears he and his wife could be among those left in the lurch. At 70, they're both in good health, he said. But that likely means that if either needs to go to a hospital, 'it's going to be an emergency.' Day Kimball Hospital is nearby in Putnam, but it has faced recent financial challenges. Day Kimball's CEO R. Kyle Kramer acknowledged that the bill passed Thursday — estimated to cut federal Medicaid spending in rural areas by $155 billion over 10 years — would further hurt his facility's bottom line. Roughly 30% of Day Kimball's current patients receive Medicaid benefits, a figure that's even higher for specific, critical services like obstetrics and behavioral health. 'An emergency means I'm 45 minutes to an hour away from the nearest hospital, and that's a problem,' Shay said. And he and his wife wouldn't be the only ones having to make that trip. 'You've got, I'm sure, thousands of people who rely on Day Kimball Hospital. If it closed, thousands of people would have to go to another hospital,' he said. 'That's a huge load to suddenly impose on a hospital system that's probably already stretched thin.' Rural hospitals have long operated on the financial edge, especially in recent years as Medicaid payments have continuously fallen below the actual cost to provide healthcare. More than 20% of Americans live in rural areas, where Medicaid covers 1 in 4 adults, according to the nonprofit KFF, which studies healthcare issues. President Trump's $4.5-trillion tax breaks and spending cuts plan would worsen rural hospitals' struggles by cutting a key federal program that helps states fund Medicaid payments to healthcare providers. To help offset the lost tax revenue, the package includes $1.2 trillion in cuts to Medicaid and other social safety net programs — cuts they insist only root out fraud and waste in the system. But public outcry over Medicaid cuts led Republicans to include a provision that will provide $10 billion annually to buttress rural hospitals over the next five years, or $50 billion in total. Many rural hospital advocates are wary that it won't be enough to cover the shortfall. Carrie Cochran-McClain, chief policy officer with the National Rural Health Assn., said rural hospitals already struggle to break even, citing a recent American Hospital Assn. report that found that hospitals in 2023 got nearly $28 billion less from Medicaid than the actual cost of treating Medicaid patients. 'We see rural hospitals throughout the country really operating on either negative or very small operating margins,' Cochran-McClain said. 'Meaning that any amount of cut to a payer — especially a payer like Medicaid that makes up a significant portion of rural provider funding — is going to be consequential to the rural hospitals' ability to provide certain services or maybe even keep their doors open at the end of the day.' A KFF report shows 36 states losing $1 billion or more over 10 years in Medicaid funding for rural areas under the Republican bill, even with the $50 billion rural fund. No state stands to lose more than Kentucky. The report estimates the Bluegrass State would lose a whopping $12.3 billion — nearly $5 billion more than the next state on the list. That's because the bill ends Kentucky's unique Medicaid reimbursement system and reduces it to Medicare reimbursement levels. Kentucky currently has one of the lowest Medicare reimbursement rates in the country. It also has one of the highest poverty rates, leading to a third of its population being covered by Medicaid. Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, a two-term Democrat widely seen as a potential candidate for president in 2028, said the bill would close 35 hospitals in his state and pull healthcare coverage for 200,000 residents. 'Half of Kentucky's kids are covered under Medicaid. They lose their coverage and you are scrambling over that next prescription,' Beshear said during an appearance on MSNBC. 'This is going to impact the life of every single American negatively. It is going to hammer our economy.' Beck and Haigh write for the Associated Press. Haigh reported from Hartford, Conn.


E&E News
an hour ago
- E&E News
How two Republican senators saved the hydrogen credit
A push from two high-ranking Republican senators, paired with a last-second report from a congressional scorekeeper, appears to have saved the hydrogen industry from disaster in the GOP megabill. Hydrogen energy developers were facing a nightmare scenario in late June, when the Senate followed the House in releasing budget reconciliation text that would phase out the Inflation Reduction Act's 'clean hydrogen' tax credit by year's end. It effectively meant almost no projects could capitalize on the incentive meant to help commercialize the development of hydrogen fuel made with limited carbon emissions. Advertisement But text released over the weekend showed lawmakers had reversed course. The Senate approved the bill Tuesday and the House may clear it as soon as Wednesday.