
Will UK Come Clean On British-Pakistani Grooming Gangs?
For years now, the euphemism 'South Asian" has been used, particularly in the UK, in a vain, although not inexplicable, attempt to hide the culpability of British-Pakistanis in heinous crimes perpetrated there. And nowhere has this been more egregious than in the case of the long-running so-called 'grooming" scandal in which underage white girls in the northern UK were lured, abducted, and then sexually abused by gangs of mostly Brit-Pakistani men, often for years.
Although the specific ethnicity of the criminals was known from the beginning, local councils and even national watchdogs glossed over that detail and even sought to minimise the implications of it. Even though Professor Alexis Jay had conducted a seven-year inquiry into child sexual abuse, grooming gangs were not the sole focus and her recommendations were actually aimed at better supervision of the authorities responsible for the care of abused children.
Now, British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, feigning that he had just gotten wind of the 'real story", has ordered a fresh inquiry into the grooming issue, and the Pakistani angle has finally been brought out of the shadows. After stonewalling for months, Starmer has suddenly accepted the recommendations of Baroness Louise Casey's audit of the data and evidence of group-based child sexual abuse and ordered a national inquiry covering England and Wales.
In April 2023, when Rishi Sunak was PM, the government promised more specific data on those notorious grooming gangs, including their ethnicity, to ensure they could not 'hide behind cultural sensitivities as a way to evade justice". At that time, Sunak and his Home Secretary Priti Patel, were accused of bias, racism, and 'dog whistling" by Labour because they are of Indian ancestry ,even though there was no doubt that the culprits were of Pakistani descent.
So what are the chances that the Labour government will be honest in this matter now, especially given the emergence of a significant and united 'Muslim vote" in the last general elections there? Even Prof Jay had concluded that in Rotherham, most 'known perpetrators were of Pakistani heritage," including five convicted in 2010; in 2012, the men convicted in the Rochdale abuse case were also all British Pakistani. As were the seven men convicted in Telford in 2013.
The effort to water down the 2020 report on grooming gangs is palpable, as is also the coverage of its main findings by mainstream media. The writers of that official report asserted that the majority of child sexual abuse gangs comprise white men under the age of 30, but they do not provide relevant evidence. If that is indeed the case, the fact that most of the men who were tried and convicted for grooming and abusing young girls have not been white should raise questions.
Interestingly, Sarah Champion, Labour MP for Rotherham since 2012, wrote an op-ed in August 2017 averring that 'Britain has a problem with British-Pakistani men raping and exploiting white girls. There. I said it. Does that make me a racist? Or am I just prepared to call out this horrifying problem for what it is?" Just before that, she told BBC Radio 4 that 'more people are afraid to be called a racist than they are afraid to be wrong about calling out child abuse".
She had to resign from her post as Shadow Women and Equalities Minister for her candour that same month. And her party became an avid advocate of the 2020 report's conclusion, supposedly based on the findings of multiple studies on child sexual exploitation, that there was not enough evidence to conclude that grooming gangs were disproportionately made up of 'Asian" offenders. Voices challenging that were dismissed as far-right, racist Islamophobes.
The statutory public inquiry will summon witnesses and examine to what extent the police, local councils, and officials were negligent in their duty towards vulnerable girls by mishandling, downplaying, or ignoring their complaints. It can reinvestigate old cases and demand answers to complaints about wrongdoing. Meanwhile, the National Crime Agency will lead the initiative to reopen grooming gang cases and identify those men who had evaded justice earlier.
Already, 800 cases have been reopened in 2025. Ironically, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper now says the girls had been ignored for 'too long" and this was the way to get 'truth and justice", adding that 'not enough people listened to them then. That was wrong and unforgivable. We are changing that now." Chancellor Rachel Reeves also weighed in, saying, 'PM wanted to assure himself that everything possible was being done. This is about justice—not grandstanding."
Well, these admissions certainly indicate the extent of the cover-up or bungling earlier and the probable reasons for it. There must be a considerable build-up of popular anger around the UK about the whitewashing of these horrific crimes for Starmer to backtrack from his instinctive wariness and announce a wider probe. But has the government really had a change of heart, or is the probe a clever ploy to find the 'evidence" to shift the focus from the British Pakistanis?
After all, as recently as this January, Labour MPs had ensured that an amendment tabled by the opposition Conservative MPs to force a vote on establishing an inquiry did not get passed, leading to suspicions of intentions to cover up official negligence. But now ministers are at pains to convince people that the 'culture of denial" about the grooming scandal will be discarded and there will be an impetus for local-level inquiries with national-level supervision.
The most egregious denial has been the 'over-representation" of men of Pakistani origin. To obfuscate, they were even labelled as 'South Asian", to misleadingly draw Indian-origin men into the equation. At the forefront of that battle to protect Brit-Pakistanis have been Left-oriented academics who accused anyone who pointed at that demographic of being racist, 'demonising" communities, and stereotyping Muslim men as patriarchal, misogynistic religious fanatics.
The Left argument to draw the flak away from Brit-Pakistani men is to aver that the grooming issue is not about the ethnicity—and therefore also not about any obvious cultural disconnect either—of the perpetrators. Instead, the Left wants the focus to be on the 'systemic failures" that led to children being abused. They also refused to accept any Muslim angle, asserting that the 'broader context" is poverty, institutional neglect, and gender inequality.
The near-term political exigency for such a stance by the ruling party is clear, and its stance is given an intellectual heft by slanted academic attacks on any findings that point to significant Brit-Pakistani involvement. One such 'research" concluded that 'Muslim grooming gangs" is just a right-wing trope (never mind the overwhelming evidence in the form of the convicted men), amplified by rogue feminists. They even blame 'partisan" studies by the other cohort.
They even say the term 'grooming gangs" itself is misleading, and crimes singled out under this heading are actually no different from other sex offences involving children. That way, the incriminating ethnic specificity of this genre of crime can be merged into a wider cesspool of child sex offences. Will this latest 'investigation" instituted by the Labour government be an exercise to bolster the Left narrative on this issue or an honest effort to nail culprits, Brit-Pakistani or not?
The author is a freelance writer. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views.
tags :
Britain pakistan sexual abuse UK
view comments
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
June 18, 2025, 21:48 IST
News opinion Opinion | Will UK Come Clean On British-Pakistani Grooming Gangs?
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
18 minutes ago
- First Post
Baloch leader to Trump: You've been ‘gravely misled' by Munir, Balochistan's resources don't belong to Pakistan
Baloch leader Mir Yar Baloch has warned Trump that he was 'gravely misled' by Pakistan about the true location of vast natural resources, saying they belong to Balochistan, not Pakistan. read more Baloch leader Mir Yar Baloch has issued a sharp warning to US President Donald Trump, accusing him of being 'gravely misled' by Pakistan's military leadership about the true ownership of vast natural resources in the region. In an open letter, Mir Yar Baloch stated that General Asim Munir and Islamabad's diplomatic channels had falsely claimed that massive reserves of oil, natural gas, copper, lithium, uranium, and rare earth minerals were part of Pakistan, when in fact, he said, they rightfully belong to Balochistan. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Your recognition of the vast oil and mineral reserves in the region is indeed accurate. However, with due respect, it is imperative to inform your administration that you have been gravely misled by the Pakistani military leadership, particularly General Asim Munir, and by their diplomatic channels regarding the true geography and ownership of these critical resources,' he wrote. He further asserted that these untapped deposits are not located in Punjab—the core territory of Pakistan—but in the 'Republic of Balochistan,' which he described as 'a historically sovereign nation currently under illegal occupation by Pakistan.' 'These untapped reserves of oil, natural gas, copper, lithium, uranium, and rare earth minerals are not located within the territories of Punjab, which is the actual Pakistan. They belong to the Republic of Balochistan, a historically sovereign nation currently under illegal occupation by Pakistan. The claim that these resources belong to Pakistan is not only false, it is a deliberate attempt to misappropriate Balochistan's wealth for political and financial gain,' Baloch added. He also warned that granting Pakistan access to Balochistan's mineral riches would empower its military and intelligence services—specifically the ISI—which he accused of a long record of sponsoring terrorist groups. 'Such access would significantly enhance the operational and financial capabilities of the ISI, enabling it to expand its global terror networks, recruit more militants, and potentially facilitate large-scale attacks reminiscent of 9/11,' he cautioned. Reaffirming Balochistan's stand, he declared the region was not 'for sale.' 'We will not permit Pakistan, China, or any other foreign power to exploit our land or its resources without the explicit consent of the Baloch people. Our sovereignty is non-negotiable, and our struggle for rightful ownership and independence continues with dignity and resilience,' he said in the letter. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The statement came after Trump announced a major energy partnership with Islamabad, under which the US and Pakistan would jointly develop what he described as 'their massive oil reserves.' 'We are in the process of choosing the Oil Company that will lead this Partnership,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. Meanwhile, Pakistan's largest refinery, Cnergyico, claimed to have finalised a deal with Vitol to import 1 million barrels of American oil, according to the company's vice chairman, Usama Qureshi, who spoke to Reuters.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Trumped: Indian basmati may lose out to Pak, as 25% tariff gives neighbour 6% edge
1 2 Amritsar: US President Donald Trump's 25% tariff on all things Indian has dealt a double blow to Indian basmati exporters. Not only does it give Pakistan basmati a 6% tariff advantage, but it also comes at a time when the India-UK Free Trade Agreement talks offered no relief for basmati. US tariff on Pakistan stands at 19%. This widened gap threatens India's competitiveness against its traditional rival in international markets. "Pakistan has already got the 6% edge, which will make it difficult for us (Indian basmati exporters) to compete in the international market," said Tejinder Singh, CEO of Amar Singh Chawla Wala, makers of the Lal Qila basmati brand. "It makes it tough for us to compete globally, erasing any level playing field," he said. The US hardly consumes more than 10% of the basmati that is cultivated and exported from Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, and Rajasthan, he said. But the 6% gap is "significant" in commodity trade and is likely to drive up prices for consumers abroad as Indian exporters will struggle to maintain market share against their traditional rival, he pointed out. Indian basmati trade was on the upswing till now. India exported 52.4 lakh metric tons of basmati, compared to 5.45 lakh metric tons by Pakistan in the 2023-24 fiscal. In 2024-25, Indian exports rose to 60.7 lakh metric tons, while Pakistan's saw a nominal increase, said Taranjit. The 25% traffic may prove to be a speedbreaker. Arvinderpal Singh, president of Punjab Rice Miller Exporters Association, said that the imposition of a 25% tariff by US will have a widespread impact — from growers to consumers. "We are directly competing with Pakistan, and they will be in a position to supply at lower rates than Indian exporters due to the lower tariff," he pointed out, adding that consumer nations are likely to opt for Pakistani basmati, with Thailand as the second preference. "If our sales decline, we will have to reduce our purchases, which will ultimately affect farmers, and they too will bear the brunt," he said. Singh suggested that the Indian govt should urge US administration to reduce the tariff on basmati, or at least ensure a level playing field with Pakistan so that Indian exporters can compete fairly in the international market. Taranjit said that Indian basmati exporters are already suffering with no relief in the India-UK Free Trade Agreement, and the recent imposition of a 25% tariff by the US will only leave a lasting impact on the Indian basmati rice exports. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Pak court sentences Punjab farmer to jail, orders deportation to India after it
1 2 Bathinda: Twenty-three-year-old Punjab farmer Amritpal Singh , who had inadvertently crossed into Pakistani territory from his fields on Zero Line, has been sentenced to a month's imprisonment each under two offences and fined Rs 50,000 for each offence by a court in Chunian, Pakistan. Non-payment of fines will keep him in Pakistan prison for 15 days more on each count. Both sentences will run concurrently. Amritpal is lodged in Kasur district jail. The court also wrote to the Pakistan ministry of interior to arrange for his deportation to India after completion of sentence. The farmer's family in Khere Ke Uttar village of Ferozepur, right next to the Pakistan border, is praying for his safe return. Amritpal is married and has an infant son. Amritpal's father Jagraj Singh told TOI that he has got the Pakistan court's conviction papers and the letter to the interior ministry to deport him. "I am writing to Indian authorities to ensure Amritpal is deported upon completion of his sentence without any delay," he said. The Rs 1-lakh fine in Pakistan currency works out to nearly Rs 31,000 in India. Jagraj Singh said he will seek clarity from the govt as to who will pay the fine and how. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You To Read in 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo "We will ensure my son does not have to spend 15 more days in jail for failing to pay the fine," he said. Farmers who have land across the border fence in what's known as Zero Line between India and Pakistan have to sign in and out at a BSF checkpost every day. Amritpal signed in on June 21 at Rana Panjgrian border post and didn't sign out. BSF officers found footsteps leading across the border and realised he had inadvertently entered Pakistan. His panic-stricken family approached police and district officials. It was on June 27 that Pakistan Rangers confirmed to BSF that Amritpal was in custody of Pakistan Police. After that, Jagraj Singh reached out to various authorities, including Punjab governor Gulab Chand Kataria, to ensure the safe return of his son. Ferozepur MP Sher Singh Ghubaya met BSF DG Daljit Singh Chawdhary. While Indian authorities tapped official channels to get him back, Pakistan police filed a chargesheet alleging that Amritpal entered Pakistan territory around 4.15pm on June 21 without visa. This is an offence punishable under Section 4 of The Pakistan (Control of Entry) Act 1952 — though wrongly mentioned in the FIR as section 3 of The Pakistan (Control of Entry) Act 1952 and Section 14 of The Foreigner Act 1946. On July 28, the court of civil judge class-1, Nasar Mehmood Gondal, convicted Amritpal. His family and Indian officials are trying to ensure that they get him back safely on the completion of his one-month jail term. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !