Melbourne Demons rocked by Clayton Oliver AFL trade period report, max Gawn responds
Melbourne captain Max Gawn has dismissed reports superstar midfielder Clayton Oliver wants out of the club, again, calling it a 'beat up in May' but couldn't guarantee they would be teammates in 2026.
Oliver didn't make the trip to Perth with his teammates for Saturday's clash with West Coast after being given a break from the club after 'a difficult week personally'.
It moved to reignite speculation the 27-year-old, who is contracted to the Demons until 2030 on a deal worth upwards of $1.5m a year, wanted a fresh start.
Nine's Tom Morris reports Oliver is 'invested' in the Dees and 'loves' the club, but would simply prefer a new beginning.
'My understanding is he does want a fresh start again at the end of the year. This conversation will happen at the end of the season, as it has the last two seasons,' Morris said on Footy Furnace.
Max Gawn (left) and Clayton Oliver (right).
'Then it will be up to Melbourne how they want to deal with it. It's nothing against the Demons, it's just a change of environment and change of scenery he'd prefer. Whether it's Geelong or somewhere else.'
Oliver met with players and officials from Geelong during the off-season but Melbourne had no interest in letting him go and he stated his commitment to the club.
Gawn, who opened his house to Oliver during a turbulent 2024, said things could change at the end of the season but his focus was on his teammate being happy.
'Clayton, there's going to be stories about him until we are done,' Gawn said on Monday.
'He made a very mature decision to spend the week off this week. It's been a big eight weeks for him ... he felt like he was getting a bit overwhelmed and wanted a week off.
Max Gawn is in Clayton Oliver's corner. Picture: Andrew Henshaw
'For his future, I am week by week with Clayton and the club. All I care is about him getting up for Hawthorn, doing it with a smile on his face, and whatever happens at the end of the year happens.'
Gawn said he and his teammates would continue to support Oliver, not react to weekly news items, knowing any decisions made now 'could change by August'.
'I've lived with a lot of these stories. Some stay, some go,' he told Mick in the Morning on Triple M.
'It's all a beat-up in May. I could make a decision … that could change by August. The May story is really nothing.
'I'm going to pretend it hasn't been written. Nothing to see here. He's coming over for a sauna tonight.'
Oliver was given the rest after an 'open dialogue' with the club but is expected to be available for this weekend's clash with Hawthorn.
— with news.com.au
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
25 minutes ago
- ABC News
AFL Tribunal hands Demons' Steven May three-match ban for controversial collision
Melbourne's Steven May has received a three-match suspension for the controversial collision that concussed Francis Evans and left the Carlton forward with a broken nose and a chipped tooth. May's case was sent directly to the AFL Tribunal on Wednesday night, with the rough conduct charge graded as careless, severe impact and high contact. AFL Tribunal counsel Andrew Woods pushed for a three-match ban to be imposed, declaring May should have slowed down or changed direction to either avoid or lessen the collision. It was a position with which the three-person tribunal ultimately agreed, delivering a guilty verdict after deliberating for more than 90 minutes. May had pleaded not guilty, with his lawyer Adrian Anderson arguing his client's actions were not unreasonable. The premiership defender clashed with Evans at speed while attacking a loose ball in the Blues' eight-point win at the MCG on Saturday night. Given the rolling ball popped up during its final bounce, Evans arrived a fraction of a second earlier than his opponent, with a charging May making contact after continuing his trajectory. May was also concussed in the same match, and he thanked the AFL tribunal for pushing the hearing out to Wednesday instead of the usual Tuesday slot. During his evidence, he reiterated the fact he thought he would arrive at the bouncing ball first. "I definitely thought it was my ball given how the previous bounces reacted," May said. "Then it took an unusual bounce given the conditions. It actually bounced up and towards Evans, which I didn't anticipate." May's hands were still in front of him in a collect-the-ball type pose when his shoulder made contact with Evans's head. "I thought it was going to be in my hands. I just can't believe I didn't take possession," May said. "I thought I did everything right. I was shocked." In his findings, tribunal chair Jeff Gleeson said the evidence from the biomechanics expert showed May had only 0.56 seconds from the ball's final bounce until the moment of the collision, and that he would have needed at least 0.2 to 0.25 seconds to react. "We find, however, that May could and should have reacted before the moment of the last bounce of the ball," Gleeson said. "Even if, contrary to our view, May could and should not have reacted until the final bounce of the ball, we find that he had sufficient time to position his body so that he was no longer attempting to gather the ball. "It's important to note in this regard that May had a relatively long period of time to sum up the key features of the contest. "May ran a sufficient distance and had sufficient time with an unimpeded view of what was before him to determine what he could and should do in the likely event he did not reach the ball first or at the same time." AAP
The Advertiser
an hour ago
- The Advertiser
May's three-game ban set to divide the AFL world
Debate is set to rage after Melbourne defender Steven May was handed a three-match ban for his devastating collision with an opponent that has divided the football world. May was found guilty of rough conduct at the AFL Tribunal on Wednesday night for the collision that concussed Francis Evans and left the Carlton forward with a broken nose and a chipped tooth. A biomechanics expert calculated May had only 0.56 seconds from the ball's final bounce until the moment of the collision, and that the premiership defender would have needed at least 0.2 to 0.25 seconds to react. "The time available to him to perceive and react to a complex scenario is not sufficient for him to adapt and avoid contact," AIS biomechanist Daniel Cottam said in his findings, not all of which could be submitted as evidence for the tribunal hearing. May argued he had little time to react, saying he was so sure he was going to get to the ball first that he was left shocked when Evans beat him to it during Saturday's game at the MCG. But AFL Tribunal chairman Jeff Gleeson said May had ample time while running towards the ball to realise there was a big chance he wouldn't arrive there first and to come up with a contingency plan. "The most he could have hoped was that he would arrive at about the same time as Evans," Gleeson said. "It was far more likely that he would reach the ball after Evans. "As he gathered the ball, Evans had time to position his body just slightly so as to turn slightly away from May. "This gives some indication that May had sufficient time to make some attempt to move his body in a way that minimised or avoided the impact limits. "May made no attempt to change his path, his body position or his velocity at any time leading up to or in the contest." Before the hearing, Carlton captain Patrick Cripps questioned how May could have approached things differently. "I felt like both of them were trying to contest the ball," Cripps told the On the Inside podcast. "You never want to see a player get injured but I don't understand what we want players to do. "If that's a grand final and (May) hesitates and Franky gets the ball, what do you do?" The decision to suspend May has set a strong precedent when it comes to players arriving at a loose ball within a split second of each other. May will miss games against St Kilda, West Coast and the Western Bulldogs. Debate is set to rage after Melbourne defender Steven May was handed a three-match ban for his devastating collision with an opponent that has divided the football world. May was found guilty of rough conduct at the AFL Tribunal on Wednesday night for the collision that concussed Francis Evans and left the Carlton forward with a broken nose and a chipped tooth. A biomechanics expert calculated May had only 0.56 seconds from the ball's final bounce until the moment of the collision, and that the premiership defender would have needed at least 0.2 to 0.25 seconds to react. "The time available to him to perceive and react to a complex scenario is not sufficient for him to adapt and avoid contact," AIS biomechanist Daniel Cottam said in his findings, not all of which could be submitted as evidence for the tribunal hearing. May argued he had little time to react, saying he was so sure he was going to get to the ball first that he was left shocked when Evans beat him to it during Saturday's game at the MCG. But AFL Tribunal chairman Jeff Gleeson said May had ample time while running towards the ball to realise there was a big chance he wouldn't arrive there first and to come up with a contingency plan. "The most he could have hoped was that he would arrive at about the same time as Evans," Gleeson said. "It was far more likely that he would reach the ball after Evans. "As he gathered the ball, Evans had time to position his body just slightly so as to turn slightly away from May. "This gives some indication that May had sufficient time to make some attempt to move his body in a way that minimised or avoided the impact limits. "May made no attempt to change his path, his body position or his velocity at any time leading up to or in the contest." Before the hearing, Carlton captain Patrick Cripps questioned how May could have approached things differently. "I felt like both of them were trying to contest the ball," Cripps told the On the Inside podcast. "You never want to see a player get injured but I don't understand what we want players to do. "If that's a grand final and (May) hesitates and Franky gets the ball, what do you do?" The decision to suspend May has set a strong precedent when it comes to players arriving at a loose ball within a split second of each other. May will miss games against St Kilda, West Coast and the Western Bulldogs. Debate is set to rage after Melbourne defender Steven May was handed a three-match ban for his devastating collision with an opponent that has divided the football world. May was found guilty of rough conduct at the AFL Tribunal on Wednesday night for the collision that concussed Francis Evans and left the Carlton forward with a broken nose and a chipped tooth. A biomechanics expert calculated May had only 0.56 seconds from the ball's final bounce until the moment of the collision, and that the premiership defender would have needed at least 0.2 to 0.25 seconds to react. "The time available to him to perceive and react to a complex scenario is not sufficient for him to adapt and avoid contact," AIS biomechanist Daniel Cottam said in his findings, not all of which could be submitted as evidence for the tribunal hearing. May argued he had little time to react, saying he was so sure he was going to get to the ball first that he was left shocked when Evans beat him to it during Saturday's game at the MCG. But AFL Tribunal chairman Jeff Gleeson said May had ample time while running towards the ball to realise there was a big chance he wouldn't arrive there first and to come up with a contingency plan. "The most he could have hoped was that he would arrive at about the same time as Evans," Gleeson said. "It was far more likely that he would reach the ball after Evans. "As he gathered the ball, Evans had time to position his body just slightly so as to turn slightly away from May. "This gives some indication that May had sufficient time to make some attempt to move his body in a way that minimised or avoided the impact limits. "May made no attempt to change his path, his body position or his velocity at any time leading up to or in the contest." Before the hearing, Carlton captain Patrick Cripps questioned how May could have approached things differently. "I felt like both of them were trying to contest the ball," Cripps told the On the Inside podcast. "You never want to see a player get injured but I don't understand what we want players to do. "If that's a grand final and (May) hesitates and Franky gets the ball, what do you do?" The decision to suspend May has set a strong precedent when it comes to players arriving at a loose ball within a split second of each other. May will miss games against St Kilda, West Coast and the Western Bulldogs.
ABC News
2 hours ago
- ABC News
Wallabies look for another golden moment against British and Irish Lions
With the Tom Richards Cup on the line, the Wallabies will be counting on the golden army turning out in Melbourne, where rugby union carved out its own slice of history 24 years ago. In 2001, Australian rugby's governing body was stung into action by the red sea of Lions supporters, who flooded the opening Test in Brisbane, leaving the Wallabies feeling like they were at Cardiff Arms Park rather than the Gabba. Follow the British and Irish Lions tour of Australia on ABC Sport, including live blogs of all three Tests against the Wallabies. And they played like it, with the 1999 World Cup champions crashing down to earth with a 29-13 thud. "I was sitting there looking for glimpses of gold because it was a sea of red and then they started singing … so on and off the field, we got absolutely smashed, which was a massive wake-up call, and the media gave it to us with both barrels and said we'd let Australia down," former ARU (now Rugby Australia) boss John O'Neill told AAP. "We decided we really had to make sure the series was really competitive, at least 1-1 after Melbourne, and we had to make sure Wallabies supporters were seen and heard." With only a week before game two, Australian rugby set about "golding" the Docklands Stadium, and ironically, it was paid for in British pounds. A British tour operator had bought tickets that were meant to be sold in Australia, which the ARU looked to cancel due to the breach of contract. Brian Thorburn, then general manager of commercial operations, told AAP he smartly re-sold the tickets back to the operator at a higher price. "We basically said to the agent, 'Well, we've got sympathy for the 300 people you've sold to, but the facts are that you've got them cheap and outside the contract, so we'll sell them back to you at double the price,'" Thorburn recalled. "The profit we made essentially paid for all of the gold at both the Melbourne Test and the Sydney Test, so it was quite ironic that a British travel agent paid for all the gold." The ARU's marketing team brainstormed ways to make the Melbourne venue feel like home for the Wallabies — even trialling golden goal posts with kicker Matt Burke, before it was decided they were too distracting. "We put 'Go Wallabies' placards on every seat in the lower bowl, and we had 10,000 very flimsy gold scarves, which was all we could secure with three days' notice," Thorburn said. "We ensured every square inch of available signage was gold — we had a catch-cry of 'Be Bold, Wear Gold', and it was really a turning point." While they achieved their gold rush aesthetic, not everyone was happy — in particular the AFL, which was the ground's tenant, now owner. "We got these mylar cannons, and they blasted as the teams ran on and as we scored any try, and the result was gold glitter coming all over the crowd and on top of Poms drinking their beer," Thorburn said. "The CEO of the stadium, Ian Collins, gave me grief for years because they were still getting glitter out of the grass two or three years later because it was so small." The AFL could also be suitably miffed by the size of the crowd at the stadium for the second Test, with 56,605 squeezed into a venue that had a capacity of 56,347 — with the AFL's biggest ever crowd 54,444, set in 2009 at a St Kilda-Geelong match. Rugby's 2001 attendance record stood until the second 2013 Lions match, when 56,771 fans crammed in. This Saturday's second Test will be held at the Melbourne Cricket Ground, with a capacity of 100,024. At least 90,000 fans are expected to pack into the famous stadium, which would surpass the current Wallabies-Lions record of 84,188 set at Stadium Australia in 2001. While swathes of supporters will attend to support the tourists, it is something which this current Lions group is not taking for granted. The last tour was in 2021 to South Africa, played in front of no fans as the COVID-19 pandemic continued to plague the globe. After winning the first Test in Brisbane last Saturday, Irish prop Tadhg Furlong spoke to the media about what it meant to see thousands of people in red, supporting the Lions and rugby. "Class," Furlong said about the support in Brisbane. "Even the town … Thursday it filled up, you can feel it, everyone wears red. "I'm sure Canterbury [the jersey maker] are delighted with the sales of the stuff. Everyone seems to be wearing the kit, they wear their club hat or whatever. "It's why the Lions is special, it's not lost on us." AAP/ABC
