Trump says Israel will have to decide on next steps in Gaza, pledges more aid
TURNBERRY, Scotland - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Sunday Israel would have to make a decision on next steps in Gaza, adding that he did not know what would happen after the collapse of ceasefire and hostage-release negotiations with the Hamas militant group.
Trump underscored the importance of securing the release of hostages held by Hamas in Gaza, saying they had suddenly "hardened" up on the issue, and said the U.S. would provide more aid to the war-torn Palestinian enclave.
"They don't want to give them back, and so Israel is going to have to make a decision," Trump told reporters at the start of a meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at his golf property in Turnberry, Scotland.
"I know what I'd do, but I don't think it's appropriate that I say it. But Israel is going to have to make a decision," he said, while also claiming, without evidence, that Hamas members were stealing food coming into Gaza and selling it.
Dozens of Gazans have died of malnutrition in recent weeks, according to the Gaza Health Ministry in the Hamas-run enclave. The ministry reported six new deaths over the past 24 hours due to malnutrition, bringing the total deaths from malnutrition and hunger to 133 including 87 children.
Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu both appeared on Friday to abandon Gaza ceasefire negotiations with Hamas, saying it had become clear that the Palestinian group did not want a deal.
Netanyahu said Israel was now mulling "alternative" options to achieve its goals of bringing its hostages home from Gaza and ending Hamas rule in the enclave, where starvation is spreading and most of the population is homeless amid widespread ruin.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore Sewage shaft failure linked to sinkhole; PUB calling safety time-out on similar works islandwide
Singapore Tanjong Katong Road sinkhole did not happen overnight: Experts
Singapore Workers used nylon rope to rescue driver of car that fell into Tanjong Katong Road sinkhole
Asia Singapore-only car washes will get business licences revoked, says Johor govt
World Food airdropped into Gaza as Israel opens aid routes
Sport Arsenal beat Newcastle in five-goal thriller to bring Singapore Festival of Football to a close
Singapore Benchmark barrier: Six of her homeschooled kids had to retake the PSLE
Asia S'porean trainee doctor in Melbourne arrested for allegedly filming colleagues in toilets since 2021
Trump said he believed Hamas leaders would now be "hunted down", telling reporters: "Hamas really didn't want to make a deal. I think they want to die. And it's very bad. And it got to be to a point where you're going to have to finish the job."
US TO PROVIDE MORE AID, TRUMP SAYS
Trump on Sunday said the U.S. would provide more humanitarian aid to Gaza, where concerns are mounting about the worsening hunger, but wanted other countries to participate as well. He said he would discuss the issue with von der Leyen.
"We're giving a lot of money, a lot of food, a lot of everything," he said. "If we weren't there, I think people would have starved, frankly. They would have starved, and it's not like they're eating well."
He said he had spoken with Netanyahu and discussed a number of issues, including Iran. He said and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer would also discuss Israel when they meet at Trump's golf property in Turnberry on Monday.
Trump also noted said the United States was not acknowledged for earlier food aid for Gaza.
"No other country gave anything," he said, calling out European countries in particular. "It makes you feel a little bad when you do that and, you know, you have other countries not giving anything... Nobody gave but us. And nobody said, Gee, thank you very much. And it would be nice to have at least a thank you." REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Trump's Brazil trade squeeze gives tariff challengers fresh legal ammunition
U.S. President Donald Trump threatened Brazil with 50% tariffs this month, venting his anger over the country's prosecution of his political ally, former President Jair Bolsonaro, but the move may provide ammunition to plaintiffs aiming to bring down the centerpiece of the White House's tariff agenda. Trade law experts and plaintiffs in a federal court challenge to Trump's sweeping tariffs, which are backed by the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), say the president's outburst against Brazil is another prime example of him far exceeding any legal authority to levy tariffs. "It just shows that the president really thinks that he has unconstrained power to tariff. That's a big problem for our clients, but also it's a big problem for the rule of law," said Jeffrey Schwab, senior counsel and interim director of litigation at the nonprofit Liberty Justice Center. Schwab is representing five small businesses that won the first round of a legal challenge to Trump's use of IEEPA to impose sweeping "reciprocal" and fentanyl-related tariffs on nearly all U.S. trading partners. Schwab said he expects the threatened U.S. tariffs on Brazil to come up during oral arguments before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington on Thursday. The New York-based Court of International Trade found in May that Trump exceeded his legal authority by using IEEPA, but the appeals court has allowed the tariffs to remain in place while the case plays out - likely all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. The ruling, if it stands, could blow a hole in Trump's tariff blitz, which so far has extracted concessions from a number of major trading partners, including Japan, the European Union, Indonesia, Vietnam and Britain. South Korea, Canada and Mexico are racing to negotiate deals with Trump to avoid steep tariff hikes on August 1. 'THIS BRAZIL NONSENSE' The 50% tariff that would apply to Brazil on August 1 is the highest "reciprocal" rate announced by Trump, matched only by tiny Lesotho. Brazil is hoping to negotiate a deal to reduce the duties but has acknowledged that may not happen before the deadline as Trump focuses on larger trading partners. The stakes are high for Brazil because the U.S. is the country's second-largest trading partner after China. Trump announced the Brazilian tariffs after a week of public feuding with President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, the leftist leader who narrowly defeated Bolsonaro in a 2022 election. A week after Lula's inauguration, Bolsonaro supporters stormed government buildings in Brasilia in an alleged plot to reinstate the right-wing former military officer as president. Bolsonaro is currently on trial in connection with the alleged coup and has been forced to wear an electronic ankle bracelet restraint. He has denied all the charges. In a July 9 letter to Lula announcing the tariffs, Trump said the trial was a "Witch Hunt that should end IMMEDIATELY!" The U.S. president cited Brazil's "insidious attacks on Free Elections and the fundamental Free Speech Rights of Americans" and "unlawful censorship orders" on U.S. social media platforms. The letter did not specify whether the tariffs would be imposed under the IEEPA national emergency that Trump declared over the large and growing global U.S. trade deficit. Trump has not issued a formal executive proclamation and a White House spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment on the matter. But the letter contained some language identical to tariff letters issued to other countries, explaining that the import levies were necessary to correct "unsustainable Trade Deficits against the United States." The U.S. has had consistent goods trade surpluses with Brazil since 2008, with a $6.8 billion surplus in 2024. Brazil was initially subjected to a 10% tariff as part of Trump's "Liberation Day" tariff announcement in early April. "The bottom line for me is, yes, I believe the plaintiffs can and will use this Brazil nonsense as further evidence that these tariffs are being imposed at the absolute whim of the president," said Jennifer Hillman, a trade law professor at the Georgetown University Law Center. The 50% Brazil duties "bear no relationship to a national emergency in the United States," Hillman said. "They have nothing to do with a trade deficit, even if you can define a trade deficit that we've been running consistently for 50 years as unusual and extraordinary." Daniel Esty, a professor at Yale Law School, said that even if an argument can be made for trade deficits as a national emergency under IEEPA, Trump's tariffs to punish Brazil for acting against a former president are not legal. "That is so clearly outside the bounds of the law as to be shocking," Esty added. Hillman served as counsel to a group of 191 Democratic lawmakers who filed an amicus brief in the appeals case, arguing among other things, that Congress never intended for IEEPA to delegate tariff authority to the president, as there were other laws in place to deal with it. The Court of International Trade followed this reasoning, and found that the fentanyl-related tariffs levied against China, Canada and Mexico failed to deal with an IEEPA national emergency that Trump declared over the deadly opioid. MORE DURABLE ALTERNATIVES In his letter to Lula, Trump also ordered a Section 301 unfair trade practices investigation into Brazil's tariff and non-tariff barriers, including on digital trade. Brazil's Solicitor General Jorge Messias, the top judicial official for Lula's executive branch, said last week he believes Trump launched the probe because the case for IEEPA tariffs is weak. Daniel Cannistra, a partner with the law firm Crowell & Moring, said there was a growing consensus among Washington trade lawyers that the IEEPA-based tariffs are at significant risk of being struck down. But that process could take months, allowing the Trump administration time to use them to apply maximum pressure on trading partners. At the same time, the administration is pursuing tariffs under well-established trade laws, including under Section 301 and through sectoral tariffs on autos, steel, aluminum and copper under the Section 232 national security trade law. Other duties on pharmaceuticals, semiconductors and lumber are in the process of being applied. For some of the biggest U.S. trading partners including Japan, relief from these tariffs - especially the prohibitive 27.5% automotive tariff - may be a bigger motivator to make trade concessions that would continue regardless of the IEEPA rulings. "By threatening more legally sound tariffs, the administration can continue negotiating with little regard to the legality of the IEEPA tariffs," Cannistra said. REUTERS
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Libyan coast guards train in Greece under plan to stem migrant flows
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox FILE PHOTO: Children play by the tents, as recently arrived migrants shelter at the temporary migrants' camp staged on a soccer pitch in the region of Rethymno in Crete island, Greece, June 24, 2025. REUTERS/Stefanos Rapanis/File Photo ATHENS - Libyan coast guard officers have started training on the Greek island of Crete as part of a plan to strengthen cooperation and help the two countries stem a surge in migrant arrivals, Greek sources said on Wednesday. Relations between Greece and Libya have been strained by a maritime boundary agreement signed in 2019 between the Tripoli-based Libyan government and Turkey, Greece's long-standing foe. A tender that Greece launched this year to develop hydrocarbon resources off Crete revived those tensions, while a spike in migrant flows from North Africa to Europe has prompted Athens to deploy frigates off Libya and pass legislation banning migrants arriving from Libya by sea from requesting asylum. The division of Libya by factional conflict into eastern and western sections for over a decade has further complicated relations. Greece says it is determined to continue talking to both the Tripoli-based government and a parallel administration based in Benghazi to the east. So far, coast guard officers from eastern Libya have been training in Greece, including areas such as patrolling and search and rescue operations. Coast guard officers from western Libya are expected to also participate in the training, the sources said. As part of efforts to improve relations, Athens last week invited Libya's internationally recognised government in Tripoli to start talks on demarcating exclusive economic zones in the Mediterranean Sea. Missions from both countries are expected to hold talks on maritime zones in the coming months, the Greek sources said. REUTERS
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Israeli rights groups break taboo with accusations of genocide
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox JERUSALEM - When two human rights groups became the first major voices in Israel to accuse the state of committing genocide in Gaza, breaking a taboo in a country founded after the Holocaust, they were prepared for a backlash. B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights Israel released reports at a press conference in Jerusalem on Monday, saying Israel was carrying out "coordinated, deliberate action to destroy Palestinian society in the Gaza Strip". That marked the strongest possible accusation against the state, which vehemently denies it. The charge of genocide is deeply sensitive in Israel because of its origins in the work of Jewish legal scholars in the wake of the Nazi Holocaust. Israeli officials have rejected genocide allegations as antisemitic. So Sarit Michaeli, B'Tselem's international director, said the group expected to face attacks for making the claim in a country still traumatised by the deadly Hamas-led attacks of October 7, 2023 that triggered the war in Gaza. "We've looked into all of the risks that we could be facing. These are legal, reputation, media risks, other types of risk, societal risks and we've done work to try and mitigate these risks," said Michaeli, whose organisation is seen as being on the political fringe in Israel but is respected internationally. "We are also quite experienced in attacks by the government or social media, so this is not the first time." It's not unrealistic "to expect this issue, which is so fraught and so deeply contentious within Israeli society and internationally to lead to an even greater reaction," she said. Israel's foreign ministry and prime minister's office did not immediately reply to a request for comment. Shortly after the reports were released on Monday, government spokesperson David Mencer said: "Yes, of course we have free speech in Israel." He strongly rejected the reports' findings and said that such accusations fostered anti-semitism abroad. Some Israelis have expressed concern over Israel's military campaign in Gaza that has killed more than 60,000 Palestinians, destroyed much of the enclave and led to widespread hunger. An international global hunger monitor said on Tuesday a famine scenario was unfolding in the Gaza Strip, with malnutrition soaring, children under five dying of hunger-related causes and humanitarian access severely restricted. "For me, life is life, and it's sad. No one should die there," said nurse Shmuel Sherenzon, 31. But the Israeli public generally rejects allegations of genocide. Most of the 1,200 people killed and the 251 taken hostage to Gaza in the October 7 attacks in southern Israel were civilians, including men, women, children and the elderly. In an editorial titled "Why are we blind to Gaza?" published on the mainstream news site Ynet last week, Israeli journalist Sever Plocker said images of ordinary Palestinians rejoicing over the attacks in and even following the militants to take part in violence made it almost impossible for Israelis to feel compassion for Gazans in the months that followed. "The crimes of Hamas on October 7 have deeply burned – for generations – the consciousness of the entire Jewish public in Israel, which now interprets the destruction and killing in Gaza as a deterrent retaliation and therefore also morally legitimate." ISRAEL DENIES THERE IS A GENOCIDE Israel has fended off accusations of genocide since the early days of the Gaza war, including a case brought by South Africa at the International Court of Justice in the Hague that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu condemned as "outrageous". While Israeli human rights groups say it can be difficult working under Israel's far-right government, they don't experience the kind of tough crackdowns their counterparts face in other parts of the Middle East. Israel has consistently said its actions in Gaza are justified as self-defence and accuses Hamas of using civilians as human shields, a charge the militant group denies. Israeli media has focused more on the plight of hostages taken by Hamas, in the worst single attack on Jews since the Holocaust. In this atmosphere, for B'Tselem's Israeli staff members to come to the stark conclusion that their own country was guilty of genocide was emotionally challenging, said Yuli Novak, the organisation's executive director. "It's really incomprehensible, it's a phenomena that the mind cannot bear," Novak said, choking up. "I think many of our colleagues are struggling at the moment, not only fear of sanctions but also to fully grasp this thing." Guy Shalev, executive director of Physicians for Human Rights Israel, said the organisation faced a "wall of denial". It has been under pressure for months and is expecting a stronger backlash after releasing its report. "Bureaucratic, legal, financial institutions such as banks freezing accounts including ours, and some of the challenges we expect to see in the next efforts will intensify," he told Reuters. REUTERS
