
Greenpeace Activists Disrupt Industrial Fishing Operation Ahead Of UN Ocean Conference
GreenpeaceAotearoa is calling on the New Zealand Government to ratify the Global Ocean Treaty and help create global ocean sanctuaries, including in the Tasman Sea between Australia and New Zealand. New Zealand signed the agreement in 2023.
PACIFIC OCEAN, Friday, 6 June 2025 – Greenpeace activists have disrupted an industrial longlining fishing operation in the South Pacific Ocean, seizing almost 20 kilometers of fishing gear and freeing nine sharks, including an endangered mako, near Australia and New Zealand.
With an expert team on a small boat releasing more than a dozen animals, crew aboard Greenpeace ship the Rainbow Warrior retrieved the entire longline and more than 210 baited hooks from a EU-flagged industrial fishing vessel, including an endangered longfin mako shark, eight near-threatened blue sharks and four swordfish. The crew also documented the vessel catching endangered sharks during its longlining operation.
The at-sea action follows new Greenpeace Australia Pacific analysis exposing the extent of shark catch from industrial longlining in parts of the Pacific Ocean. Latest fisheries data showed that almost 70% of EU vessels' catch was blue shark in 2023 alone. It comes ahead of next week's UN Ocean Conference in Nice, France, where world leaders will discuss ocean protection and the Global Ocean Treaty.
Georgia Whitaker, Senior Campaigner, Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said:
'These longliners are industrial killing machines. Greenpeace Australia Pacific took peaceful and direct action to disrupt this attack on marine life. We saved important species that would otherwise have been killed or left to die on hooks.'
'The scale of industrial fishing – still legal on the high seas – is astronomical. These vessels claim to be targeting swordfish or tuna, but we witnessed shark after shark being hauled up by these industrial fleets, including three endangered sharks in just half an hour. Greenpeace is calling on world leaders at the UN Ocean Conference to protect 30% of the world's oceans by 2030 from this wanton destruction.'
GreenpeaceAotearoa is calling on the New Zealand Government to ratify the Global Ocean Treaty and help create global ocean sanctuaries, including in the Tasman Sea between Australia and New Zealand. New Zealand signed the agreement in 2023.
More than two-thirds of sharks worldwide are endangered, and a third of those are at risk of extinction from overfishing. Over the last three weeks, the Rainbow Warrior has been documenting longlining vessels and practices off Australia's east coast, including from Spain and China.
3. https://meetings.wcpfc. int/node/22532
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scoop
3 hours ago
- Scoop
Minister Proud Of Potshots In Seabed Mine ‘Culture War'
The oceans and fisheries minister says Supreme Court judges and local body politicians have been cowed by fear in a culture war over seabed mining. Minister Shane Jones was in New Plymouth on Friday to deliver a stump speech for New Zealand First. Afterwards he said confrontation and fear had led to court rulings that blocked would-be seabed miners, and votes by local councils against the mine. 'The Supreme Court, when it got involved, it was confronted with a highly charged atmosphere which is still prevailing, which is what's driving fear in your local government to stand up against this belligerent, well-organised, rowdy bunch of activists,' said Jones. 'I think these natural resource debates have turned into a culture war.' Jones freely admitted taking shots from one side of the battle lines – including calling South Taranaki mana whenua 'pixie-like hapūs'. 'I am never, ever going to take a backward step to the well-drilled, highly-orchestrated, Greenpeace-orientated campaigners who probably operate out of the local iwi office anyway, such is the level of cross-contamination.' Opponents have fought the proposal to mine the seabed off Pātea since before the first official application in 2013, winning in the High Court, Court of Appeal and finally the Supreme Court in 2021. Spearheaded by Ngāti Ruanui, opposition spread to neighbouring Ngaa Rauru Kiitahi and hapū of Ngāruahine. In the Supreme Court tribes were joined by the Taranaki-Whanganui Conservation Board, the government's Environmental Protection Authority, Kiwis Against Seabed Mining, Greenpeace and Forest & Bird. Also party to the court challenge were Fisheries Inshore New Zealand, the New Zealand Federation of Commercial Fishermen, Southern Inshore Fisheries, Talley's Group, Cloudy Bay Clams and Te Ohu Kaimoana. Jones himself chaired Te Ohu Kaimoana before entering Parliament, controversially continuing to earn an annual fee of $70,000 as a director despite being an MP. Taranaki's eight Crown-mandated iwi agencies have collectively declared against the mine. District councils of South Taranaki, Whanganui and New Plymouth voted to oppose seabed mining after hearing from the miners and from community opponents. Jones claimed 'an enormous amount of brouhaha driven by misinformation' and couldn't think why councillors would stand against the mine – except out of fear as local elections loom. As during his last Taranaki visit, the Minister of Oceans and Fisheries, of Resources and of Regional Development demonstrated a loose grip on details – in spite of his repeated vocal support for the mine. He told his party's public meeting seabed mining was like dredging Port Taranaki – an argument made last month by New Plymouth councillor and former NZ First candidate Murray Chong, who was in the audience. 'Where do you put all the dredgings?' asked Jones. 'I'll tell you where you put them: You put them back into the host environment otherwise known as the coastline of Taranaki.' Over the past four years some three million tonnes of blacksand dredgings from Port Taranaki have been dumped in two approved zones near the shoreline, to keep the harbour clear and restore sand drift to New Plymouth beaches reduced by the port's breakwaters. The ongoing port dredging is less than two percent of the proposed seabed mine's waste: every four years Trans-Tasman Resources would discharge 180 million tonnes of seabed sediment – a recognised pollutant – into the abundant waters of the Pātea Shoals. Trans-Tasman's mining ship would take just 18 days to match four years of port dredging, and continue to do so for at least 20 years at the boundary of the 12-mile territorial limit. The subsidiary of Australian company Manuka Resources wants Fast-track approval to suck up 50 million tonnes of blacksand annually to extract iron, titanium and vanadium and then dump 45 million tonnes back into the marine environment. More mining ships are likely if the application sets a Fast-track precedent, with a second bid by Trans-Tasman's former chief financial officer on hold pending the results. Jones challenged the half-dozen journalists probing him about the mine. 'Don't you find this debate amongst yourselves tiresome?" he asked. 'I mean, haven't you got anything to talk about beyond this?'


NZ Herald
7 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Analysis: Several smaller countries are taking a stand about Israel's conduct in Gaza
That includes a bombing campaign last week in Syria, which Israel says is aimed at defending minority Druze from sectarian attacks but analysts also believe is part of a deeper strategy to maintain influence over the country's fragile post-dictatorship transition. Away from the warzones of the Middle East, Israel finds itself fighting other battles. Judges at the International Criminal Court in The Hague rejected Israel's request to withdraw arrest warrants for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defence minister Yoav Gallant. They are both wanted for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity carried out under their watch in the aftermath of Hamas' October 7, 2023, strike on southern Israel. In a bid to pressure the international court, the United States has placed sanctions on some ICC judges and prosecutors. Last week, Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar went to Brussels for meetings with European counterparts. He emerged, in his words, victorious, having achieved 'an important diplomatic feat' of persuading the European Union to avoid adopting punitive measures against Israel. Kaja Kallas, the European Union's top diplomat, said the bloc was keeping 'options on the table' but would not pursue mooted sanctions that it was considering after an earlier EU assessment found Israel possibly in breach of human rights commitments. But rights advocates were frustrated, given the scale of the humanitarian disaster in Gaza and Israel's documented stifling of aid into the flattened territory. The EU's acquiescence, suggested Amnesty International's Agnès Callamard, would be 'remembered as one of the most disgraceful moments in the EU's history' and was 'a cruel and unlawful betrayal of the European project and vision'. The governments of Ireland, Spain, and Slovenia are the three European nations that have been outspoken in their criticism of Israel and spearheaded the attempted reckoning in Brussels. They are pressing ahead with their own measures to show their disapproval of Israel's conduct of the war, which has severely depleted Hamas but also destroyed Gaza and killed tens of thousands of Palestinian civilians, including many children. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez earlier this month accused Israel of carrying out a 'genocide'. Irish lawmakers are advancing legislation banning trade with Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, much to the anger of some US officials. And Slovenia declared two far-right Israeli Cabinet ministers as personae non gratae, banning them from the country. 'This kind of measure is the first of its kind in the EU,' Slovenian Foreign Minister Tanja Fajon said. 'We are breaking new ground.' There's reason to be cynical about the efficacy of such attempts by small countries. In Europe, the governments of Britain, France, and Germany remain far more reluctant to confront Israel in similar fashion, while French President Emmanuel Macron's efforts to revive international momentum toward the creation of a Palestinian state seem to be fizzling out. Israel's boosters in the US can shrug and smirk. 'An unstated reason for Europe's particular animus toward Israel over the decades is that the continent's leaders secretly resent Israel's willingness and ability to regularly defend itself through tough military action,' mused veteran Washington wonk Robert D. Kaplan, 'something Europe's elites never had even to countenance, and arguably couldn't manage.' Kaplan and his ilk were unlikely to be impressed by a summit that took place last week in Bogotá, where delegations from 30 countries convened to pressure Israel to end its war in Gaza, as well as its occupation of the West Bank. The session of The Hague Group was co-hosted by South Africa, which is leading a genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice, and the left-wing government of Colombia. It concluded last Thursday with 12 countries agreeing to implement a set of measures to 'restrain' Israel. These include a denial of arms to Israel, banning of ships transporting such arms and reviews of public contracts with companies linked to Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories. A scan of the list of the countries that immediately signed on may suggest Israel's leadership isn't quite shaking in its boots: Bolivia, Colombia, Cuba, Indonesia, Iraq, Libya, Malaysia, Namibia, Nicaragua, Oman, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, and South Africa. But the conference's backers argued that it's a first step in a global shift. 'For too long, governments have been too afraid of the consequences of angering the US to risk taking action to uphold international law,' Annelle Sheline, a former State Department official who attended the proceedings in the Colombian capital, told me. 'This is about more than Israel and Palestine, this is about a new multilateralism taking shape to replace the old system.'


National Business Review
2 days ago
- National Business Review
EU, Canada slapped with higher tariffs; Ukraine kills agents
Good morning and welcome to your Monday recap of the international business and political stories making headlines. First, The European Union has delayed retaliatory tariffs on US exports until August. Last week, US President Donald Trump wrote a letter announcing his plans to impose 30% tariffs on EU imports from August 1. He warned that if the trade partner retaliated, he would hit back by raising tariffs above 30%, the BBC reported. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said the EU would extend the suspension of its countermeasures. "At the same time, we will continue to prepare for the countermeasures so we're fully prepared." German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said the 30% tariffs would hit exporters in Europe's largest economy 'to the core' if a trade solution can't be reached, Bloomberg reported. He was coordinating closely with other EU leaders to ensure tariffs of that level don't go ahead. 'That requires two things: unity in the European Union and good lines of communication with the American president.' Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. Meanwhile, Trump announced a 35% blanket tariff on imports from Canada, up from 25% announced in February, the ABC reported. Trump justified the tariffs as necessary to manage the opioid crisis, which he said was partly because of fentanyl being smuggled into the US from Canada. In Ukraine, the Security Service said it had killed Russian special service agents suspected of killing a fellow officer in Kyiv last week, claiming Russia's Federal Security Service was responsible, CNN reported. SBU officer Ivan Voronych was shot dead in an apparent assassination. The suspects attempted to keep a low profile after the shooting, however, officers established their whereabouts. 'As a result of covert investigative and active counterintelligence measures, the enemy's lair was discovered. During their arrest, they began to resist, there was an exchange of fire, and the scoundrels were eliminated,' officials said. In the UK, GDP declined again in May and put pressure on Chancellor Rachel Reeves before a tough budget in the autumn, the Guardian said. Stronger-than-expected growth would have helped to alleviate the squeeze on public finances. The 0.1% decline in May followed a 0.3% contraction in April. Economists expect the Bank of England to cut rates in August. 'May's downbeat outturn means a contraction in GDP across the second quarter looks a racing certainty,' said Suren Thiru of the Institute of Chartered Accountants. UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves. In the Middle East, Syria finalised an US$800 million agreement with Dubai-based DP World to redevelop its Tartous Port to help increase post-war reconstruction, Al Jazeera reported. Syrian officials described the deal as a key step towards modernising the country's logistics infrastructure. Since the fall of former President Bashar al-Assad in December, Syria's new leadership had been pushing to re-establish economic ties with international companies. DP World chief executive Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem said Syria's economic potential remained strong. 'Syria possesses valuable assets … and Tartous is an essential hub for trade and exports. We aim to transform it into one of the world's leading ports.' In Italy, the Agnelli family's John Elkann and his siblings agreed to pay about €175m to settle a probe over alleged tax evasion, Bloomberg reported. A spokesperson for the siblings confirmed an agreement with Italy's Revenue Agency. The deal was reached 'with the aim of swiftly and definitively resolving a painful matter on a personal and family level'. The tax investigation focused on allegations the siblings didn't pay Italian taxes on assets they inherited after the death of their grandmother. Elkann is chair of global carmaker Stellantis, the manufacturer of several brands including Fiat and Peugeot.