logo
Silicon Valley's enthusiasm for Pentagon is just beginning

Silicon Valley's enthusiasm for Pentagon is just beginning

New York Post20-06-2025
In the span of a few years, Silicon Valley executives have shifted from viewing Pentagon collaboration as war-mongering to joining the US Army Reserve.
And if the response Palantir chief technology officer Shyam Sankar — who has joined the newly formed Detachment 201: Executive Innovation Corps — has received is any indication, the tech industry's enthusiasm is just beginning.
Sankar told me he has been inundated with messages from people in the industry who want to do the same. 'Hundreds of people have reached out to me,' he said. 'Service is contagious and people respond.'
Advertisement
7 Palantir chief technology officer Shyam Sankar he has been inundated with messages from people in the tech industry interested in serving in the Army Reserve: 'Hundreds of people have reached out to me.'
Getty Images for 137 Ventures/Founders Fund/Jacob Helberg
Last Friday, Sankar was sworn into Detachment 201, along with Meta CTO Andrew Bosworth, OpenAI Chief Product Officer Kevin Weil and Bob McGrew, OpenAI's former Chief Research Office. The four will serve part-time as senior advisors.
The purpose of the new initiative, the Army said in a statement, 'is to fuse cutting-edge tech expertise with military innovation.'
Sankar envisions a future where the Department of Defense will prioritize recruiting in the Bay Area.
Advertisement
'You need to be where the innovative talent is,' he said. 'We have the facilities they don't have.'
7 OpenAI chief product officer Kevin Weil is joining the US Army Reserve as a part-time senior advisor.
Getty Images for HumanX Conference
This surge of patriotism marks a dramatic change for an industry that has, in recent years, shunned defense tech firms.
Scale CEO Alexandr Wang told me his company's decision to work with the Department of Defense five years ago was enormously controversial at the time.
Advertisement
7 Meta Chief Technology Officer Andrew Bosworth is joining Sankar at the newly formed Detachment 201: Executive Innovation Corps.
REUTERS
'We were a bit of a pariah in the AI industry because all the other AI companies were were going the other way. They were moving away from working with on defense or security applications,' Wang said. 'And now I'm seeing that pendulum swing back where, even in Silicon Valley, there's a clear recognition and moral imperative that we need to be utilizing AI to support, support our war fighters, support our natural security mission.'
Over the past year, OpenAI secured a $200 million contract with the DoD to develop AI capabilities for national security, marking its first major government contract.
Advertisement
7 In the last year, OpenAI — where Sam Altman is CEO — secured a $200 million contract with the Department of Defense.
Getty Images
Meta partnered with Anduril Industries to develop augmented reality (AR) products for US military use. Google has re-entered the defense sector by reversing earlier AI policies that prevented it from supporting national security.
That's a big switch from 2018, when Google walked away from the Pentagon's Project Maven (which used AI and machine learning for military targeting) after thousands of employees — touting the company's 'Don't be evil' mantra — signed a letter demanding the company abandon the project.
David Ulevitch founded a16z's American Dynamism firm, which invests in founders and companies that support the national interest, including in the fields of aerospace, defense, public safety, education and housing.
He told me that Google's overreaction was a 'watershed moment' that spurred others in the industry to return to working on defense and warfare.
7 In 2018 Google walked away from the Pentagon's Project Maven after thousands of employees — touting the company's 'Don't be evil' mantra — signed a letter demanding the company abandon the project.
JOHN G MABANGLO/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock
'The history of Silicon Valley is rooted in supporting the national interest ,' he said, 'but somewhere along the way, many lost sight of that.
'Founders have realized that building in the national interest doesn't just feel good and patriotic — which it is — but represents a generational opportunity to build the iconic companies that will power and advance our country for decades to come.'
Advertisement
During World War II, Frederick Terman, the Stanford engineering dean often called the 'father of Silicon Valley,' built a defense tech ecosystem at the university, securing government contracts and establishing the Stanford Industrial Park. And companies like Hewlett-Packard, Varian Associates, Shockley Semiconductor and Fairchild Semiconductor supplied critical electronics for military radar, missiles and communication systems.
7 Alexandr Wang said concerns over China and the geopolitical tensions have pushed tech leaders to work with the US government.
REUTERS
This story is part of NYNext, an indispensable insider insight into the innovations, moonshots and political chess moves that matter most to NYC's power players (and those who aspire to be).
The stakes might be higher now, with AI's potential to transform governance or even create an extinction event. And many tech leaders have worked with China — and recognize how that country doesn't play fair.
Advertisement
Wang warned: 'If China gets ahead and America's brightest minds don't tackle national security, what does that world look like?'
Silicon Valley's embrace of patriotism coincides with a cultural shift as companies crack down on all things 'woke,' decreasing DEI requirements and curtailing climate pledges.
Of course, along with patriotism comes the potential for enormous profit.
7 The Department of Defense, headquartered in the Pentagon, has a budget of nearly a trillion dollars each year.
Getty Images/iStockphoto
Advertisement
Palantir, which relies on the government for more than 40% of its revenue, has come under scrutiny — with lawmakers asking the company to share details of a project that could help the government create a database of Americans, according to a New York Times report.
Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) has concerns about data privacy and tech companies getting too close to the government, emphasizing the need for a balance between innovation and security. 'You can innovate while safeguarding information,' he told me. He said technologies like blockchain, which could track access to American data, offer a promising solution to enhance privacy protections.
Relying on American companies is arguably the best way to do that.
Advertisement
'Ninety percent of all tech is American… it's one of our greatest assets,' Sankar said. 'This is about the importance and primacy of people. When we look at history, innovators like John Boyd, who created the F-16, [have from] the private sector.'
Send NYNext a tip: nynextlydia@nypost.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Zuck Bucks Are Back -- And This Time They're Fueling Meta's AI Comeback
Zuck Bucks Are Back -- And This Time They're Fueling Meta's AI Comeback

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Zuck Bucks Are Back -- And This Time They're Fueling Meta's AI Comeback

Meta (META, Financials) is diving headfirst into the race for Artificial Superintelligence and this time, it's not holding back. CEO Mark Zuckerberg has reignited the term Zuck Bucks; once a nickname for campaign donations, it's now shorthand for eight- and nine-figure signing packages aimed at luring the best AI minds in the world, according to a Reuters report. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Sign with META. Faced with talent losses and a disappointing release of its Llama 4 model, Meta has ramped up hiring and it's not being subtle. From a $14.3 billion investment in Scale AI to attempts at poaching Safe Superintelligence's Ilya Sutskever, Meta is making one thing clear: it wants back in the lead. Zuckerberg reportedly failed to recruit Sutskever but may be close to landing SSI co-founder Daniel Gross and NFDG's Nat Friedman. These aren't just star names they're magnets; and Meta hopes they'll help rebuild a team that's been bleeding to labs like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google DeepMind. Meanwhile, Meta is forming an elite Superintelligence unit to push the boundaries of what AI can do. But internal divisions remain; Meta's Chief AI Scientist Yann LeCun has publicly questioned the long-term viability of large language models the very thing the company's top rivals are doubling down on. To complicate matters, Meta is betting on a mix of technologies: reasoning-based LLMs, multimodal AI, and even geopolitical hedges. For example, it's developing a new B40 chip tailored for the Chinese market, just in case export restrictions eventually ease. Zuckerberg's bet? Talent first; product later. This isn't classic M&A it's AI land-grabbing. Meta is willing to buy pre-product, pre-revenue startups if it means acquiring breakthrough IP and elite researchers. Profitability can wait; ASI supremacy can't. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio

AT&T Will Pay $177 Million to Settle Two Huge Lawsuits. Learn Who Qualifies and How Much the Payouts Will Be
AT&T Will Pay $177 Million to Settle Two Huge Lawsuits. Learn Who Qualifies and How Much the Payouts Will Be

CNET

timean hour ago

  • CNET

AT&T Will Pay $177 Million to Settle Two Huge Lawsuits. Learn Who Qualifies and How Much the Payouts Will Be

The 2024 hack of AT&T servers was one of the five biggest data breaches of the year. AT&T/CNET AT&T isn't accepting blame for Donald Trump's recent conference call troubles, but it is willing to take accountability for two huge data breaches that happened in 2019 and 2024. While the settlement isn't quite the size of Meta's $725 million privacy settlement, it will likely pay out claimants up to $2,500 or $5,000 each. On Friday, June 20, US District Judge Ada Brown granted preliminary approval to the terms of a proposed settlement from AT&T that would resolve two lawsuits related to the data breaches. The current settlement would see AT&T pay $177 million to customers adversely affected by at least one of the two data breaches. The settlement will prioritize larger payments to customers who suffered damages that are "fairly traceable" to the data leaks. It will also provide bigger payments to those affected by the larger of the two leaks, which began in 2019. While the company is working toward a settlement, it has continued to deny that it was "responsible for these criminal acts." For all the details we have about the settlement right now, keep reading, and for more info about other recent settlements, find out how to claim Apple's Siri privacy settlement and see if you're eligible for 23andMe's privacy breach settlement. What happened with these AT&T data breaches? AT&T confirmed the two data breaches last year, announcing an investigation into the first in March before confirming it in May and confirming the second in July. The first of the confirmed breaches began in 2019. The company revealed that about 7.6 million current and 65.4 million former account holders had their data exposed to hackers, including names, Social Security numbers and dates of birth. The company first began investigating the situation last year after it reported that customer data had appeared on the dark web. The second breach began in April of 2024, when a hacker broke into AT&T cloud storage provider Snowflake and accessed 2022 call and text records for almost all of the company's US customers, about 109 million in all. The company stressed that no names were attached to the stolen data. Two individuals were arrested in connection with the breach. Both of these incidents sparked a wave of class action lawsuits alleging corporate neglect on the part of AT&T in failing to sufficiently protect its customers. Who is eligible to file a claim for the AT&T data breach settlement? As of now, we know that the settlement will pay out to any current or former AT&T customer whose data was accessed in one of these data breaches, with higher payments reserved for those who can provide documented proof that they suffered damages directly resulting from their data being stolen. If you're eligible, you should receive a notice about it, either by email or a physical letter in the mail, sometime in the coming months. The company expects that the claims process will begin on Aug. 4, 2025. How much will the AT&T data breach payments be? You'll have to "reasonably" prove damages caused by these data breaches to be eligible for the highest and most prioritized payouts. For the 2019 breach, those claimants can receive up to $5,000. For the Snowflake breach in 2024, the max payout will be $2,500. It's not clear at this time how the company might be handling customers who've been affected by both breaches. AT&T will focus on making those payments first, and whatever's left of the $177 million settlement total will be disbursed to anyone whose data was accessed, even without proof of damages. Because these payouts depend on how many people get the higher amounts first, we can't say definitively how much they will be. When could I get paid from the AT&T data breach settlement? AT&T expects that payments will start to go out sometime in early 2026. Exact dates aren't available right now. The recent court order approving the settlement lists a notification schedule of Aug. 4 to Oct. 17, 2025. The deadline for submitting a claim is currently set at Nov. 18, 2025. The final approval of the settlement needs to be given at a Dec. 3, 2025, court hearing in order for payments to begin. Stay tuned to this piece in the coming months to get all the new details as they emerge. For more money help, check out CNET's daily tariff price impact tracker.

Zuck Bucks Are Back -- And This Time They're Fueling Meta's AI Comeback
Zuck Bucks Are Back -- And This Time They're Fueling Meta's AI Comeback

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Zuck Bucks Are Back -- And This Time They're Fueling Meta's AI Comeback

Meta (META, Financials) is diving headfirst into the race for Artificial Superintelligence and this time, it's not holding back. CEO Mark Zuckerberg has reignited the term Zuck Bucks; once a nickname for campaign donations, it's now shorthand for eight- and nine-figure signing packages aimed at luring the best AI minds in the world, according to a Reuters report. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Sign with META. Faced with talent losses and a disappointing release of its Llama 4 model, Meta has ramped up hiring and it's not being subtle. From a $14.3 billion investment in Scale AI to attempts at poaching Safe Superintelligence's Ilya Sutskever, Meta is making one thing clear: it wants back in the lead. Zuckerberg reportedly failed to recruit Sutskever but may be close to landing SSI co-founder Daniel Gross and NFDG's Nat Friedman. These aren't just star names they're magnets; and Meta hopes they'll help rebuild a team that's been bleeding to labs like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google DeepMind. Meanwhile, Meta is forming an elite Superintelligence unit to push the boundaries of what AI can do. But internal divisions remain; Meta's Chief AI Scientist Yann LeCun has publicly questioned the long-term viability of large language models the very thing the company's top rivals are doubling down on. To complicate matters, Meta is betting on a mix of technologies: reasoning-based LLMs, multimodal AI, and even geopolitical hedges. For example, it's developing a new B40 chip tailored for the Chinese market, just in case export restrictions eventually ease. Zuckerberg's bet? Talent first; product later. This isn't classic M&A it's AI land-grabbing. Meta is willing to buy pre-product, pre-revenue startups if it means acquiring breakthrough IP and elite researchers. Profitability can wait; ASI supremacy can't. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store