logo
Return fraud is running rampant

Return fraud is running rampant

Bill Stewart, the owner of LI Toy and Game on Long Island, New York, estimates that he gets "screwed over" by return shenanigans twice a month. Customers falsely claim an item he shipped wasn't as described or doesn't work, or they send back something in much worse condition than how he released it. Recently, a customer returned a Scooby Doo Mystery Machine model kit after two weeks with the box open, the toy half assembled, and pieces missing. Given the condition, there was no way for him to resell it. "Went right into the trash," Stewart says. "The kid played with it, was probably too young for it."
Adding up the price of the item itself, two-way shipping costs, and merchant fees charged by the third-party platform he used to sell the item — Walmart Marketplace, in this case — Stewart estimates the exchange resulted in a net loss of $55. For the big guys, he recognizes that's nothing, but for a small business like his, it's a hit, and one for which he has no recourse. "With Walmart, the customer's always right," he says.
The ability to return an item you've purchased has become a core part of the shopping experience. Customers may buy a few more items than they would otherwise because it's a no-harm, no-foul situation on returns. Backsies are allowed. But retailers say consumers are engaging in too many backsies. Some are committing outright return fraud — shipping back empty boxes, swapping out different items, or claiming a package never arrived. Others are abusing generous return policies by attempting to send back items after days, weeks, and even months of use. And while it's tempting to blame organized criminals, retailers and return logistics operators say a lot of everyday consumers are the culprits, too. People are strapped for cash, they've been trained to expect super loose return policies, and they don't feel bad about pulling one over on a faceless company.
"Consumers who would never go into a physical store and take an item off without paying and stealing are actually being trained socially that it's actually acceptable to take advantage of retailers in these small ways," says David Morin, the vice president of client strategy at Narvar, a retail logistics company. "They think it's OK, right? Stick it to the man."
America is becoming a nation of small-time return fraudsters, one box of fibs at a time.
A recent report from Appriss Retail and Deloitte found that the total value of merchandise returned in the US reached $685 billion in 2024. Fifteen percent of that — $103 billion — was fraudulent, the report said, meaning the product shouldn't have qualified for a refund under the retailer's policies.
America is becoming a nation of small-time return fraudsters, one box of fibs at a time.
Morin says it's hard to suss out who, specifically, is responsible for fraudulent behavior — organized criminals versus everyday consumers — but it's clear that a wider range of people are partaking than you may expect. In 2024, Narvar ran a survey of US consumers that found that more than half of consumers admitted to engaging in fraudulent returns at least once. In a separate 2023 survey of US online shoppers from Loop Returns, a returns management software company, nearly four in 10 people admitted to having engaged in returns policy abuse themselves or knowing of someone who had.
"There seems to be this mentality that consumers feel entitled to do it," says Jessica Meher, the senior vice president of marketing at Loop.
The spectrum of returns mischief is quite broad, and your mileage may vary on what's acceptable versus what's abuse. On the more benign end is " bracketing," when consumers buy the same item in different sizes or colors and send back whatever doesn't work. It's a logistical headache and bad for the environment, but it's generally above board. Inching into the fraud territory is the practice known as " wardrobing," which Thomas Borders, the vice president of operations for Inmar Supply Chain, a reverse logistics company recently acquired by DHL, says is when consumers treat return windows as "free rentals." The practice will sound familiar to a lot of shoppers: You buy a dress or a pair of shoes for a special occasion, you wear it to said special occasion, and then you return it and get your money back.
"In an effort to avoid customer dissatisfaction, retailers will process the consumers' refund before items are properly assessed and any damage identified," Borders says. "This results in premature refunds, leaving retailers with very little recourse."
E-commerce makes this sort of return abuse even easier to engage in than brick-and-mortar shopping — warehouse employees often don't closely scrutinize every single item to make sure it's in tip-top condition like employees at a retail counter might. In a digital world, the retailer will probably see the wine stains on the dress you wore to that wedding only when it's too late, if they ever notice at all.
There seems to be this mentality that consumers feel entitled to do it.
On the more nefarious side of the equation, consumers lie and say a package never arrived or was stolen, or they stick a different product back in the box. Morin says Narvar had a client during the pandemic who started to see a trend of consumers returning three empty CD cases to them. Someone online figured out the cases weighed the same as some of their core items, so when the return box initially got weighed in by the carrier, no red flags went up that it was the wrong item inside. Once the box was actually opened, the refund had already gone out. Another trick is when consumers tamper with return labels in order to send empty packages to the wrong destination, so they can just claim it got lost if the retailer tries to check. They keep the product, and they get an automatic refund when the package gets put in the mail.
Hilary Koziol, who runs the Cellar Sellers, an online consignment business, has dealt with her fair share of dishonest customers. She recently sold a sealed box of trading cards to someone on eBay for hundreds of dollars, and the buyer claimed Koziol actually sent a box with a pair of jeans inside, returned those, and demanded a refund for the trading cards. She wound up opening a case with the US Postal Service over it. On another occasion, a customer bought a $50 dress from her on Depop and, in return, sent back an old, makeup-stained version of the same style. "You find that happens a lot with clothing," she says. When she encounters these problems, she disputes them with the Postal Service and the platforms she's selling on, and it's "kind of a crapshoot" whether she wins or loses, though as she sells more stuff and accumulates more reviews, the platforms tend to side with her more. "Especially if it's a larger-value item," she says, "it's impacting my business a ton."
A lot of people get ideas online and on social media for different return tricks they can pull. It took me about five minutes of searching on TikTok to come across videos with tips and advice for getting free refunds from Amazon. There's tons of content about Target's Cat & Jack kids line's generous one-year return policy that leads many parents to try their hand at returning well-worn clothes. On Reddit, there's a forum where people compare notes on Costco returns, including users asking about the chances the company might accept a furniture return five years after it was purchased or exchange a Christmas wreath after the leaves start to brown. There are also hot debates about which REI returns may count as abuse.
"It's almost like coupon sites where consumers have been trained to look for coupons and discounts," Meher says. "That's starting to happen with what companies offer loose return policies."
I don't think my social circle is the most crime-prone group in the world, but the more I chat with people in my life about return fraud and abuse, especially in online shopping, the more I realize how prevalent it is. A coworker told me about a friend of theirs who'd returned a box of rocks to a retailer instead of a television. A friend told me they'd never steal — only to acknowledge they'd once returned a big-ticket item they broke to Amazon and claimed it arrived broken, while their partner regularly sends back items they've worn. Another friend said that whenever they send back used items to replace new ones and get the refund, they make sure the seller is a big corporation, not a small mom-and-pop shop. I tried to do the bracketing thing with two sets of curtains last summer but failed. I was too lazy to return the set I didn't want within the return window, so it's accumulating dust under my bed.
To many people, low-level return fraud feels like a victimless crime — they're not exactly losing sleep over a giant corporation losing a few dollars here and there. People assume retailers don't really care that much, since they'll often send a refund before getting the item back, if they bother to recollect an item at all. Companies have also given people such a long leash on accepting returns that consumers may not blink at hauling grass shears smeared with clippings back to the Target counter after six months of use.
Megan Wyatt, the owner of Wit & Whimsy Toys, a brick-and-mortar retailer in California, says the lax return policies the big guys offer customers have been a headache for her. "They'll just take pretty much any return, it feels like, these days. And so customers feel like they can do that at small businesses as well," she says. Her store has to essentially "train customers that you can't expect to return things at a small business the way that you would at Target, Walmart, Amazon, places like that."
Retailers big and small aren't having a good time with return fraud and are cracking down. Many are axing free returns, tightening return windows, or otherwise implementing stricter returns policies. Companies such as REI and ASOS have started to ban certain customers over return abuse. Some retailers are using aggregated data to try to identify bad actors, whether they're a previous customer or not. If a consumer is continually taking advantage of return policies at X retailer, Y retailer may know even before they click to buy.
Meher, from Loop, says personalized return policies are starting to become more common, too. "So, being able to incentivize good customers and giving them good return policies and disincentivize bad consumers and people who return a lot and giving them different return windows or different return policies," she says. "That is also starting to become more important as retailers look into, 'How do I make sure that I don't piss off my good customers?'"
Across the consumer economy, there's a pervasive us-versus-them sentiment between companies and their customers. Many consumers feel like businesses — especially the big ones — are swindling them and squeezing them for every penny, so when they have a chance to strike back, why not? Maybe that means putting a brick in a return box and hoping nobody notices it's not an iPad. Or maybe it's just seeing that package you'd already declared stolen arrived three days late and not trying too hard to give back that refund that already came through.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Duke Tobin, Bengals don't agree with advice Shemar Stewart is getting in contract standoff
Duke Tobin, Bengals don't agree with advice Shemar Stewart is getting in contract standoff

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Duke Tobin, Bengals don't agree with advice Shemar Stewart is getting in contract standoff

Cincinnati Bengals owner Mike Brown and director of personnel Duke Tobin addressed a number of topics during the team's annual media luncheon on Monday. The main topics of the day surrounding the contract disputes with Pro Bowl defensive end Trey Hendrickson and rookie Shemar Stewart. Tobin and Brown made their stance clear and that is they expect both players to be in Cincinnati on Wednesday when training camp begins. Whether or not that happens is to be determined. 'We expect all of our guys under contract to be here,' Tobin said. Shemar Stewart has not signed contract with Bengals It's worth noting that Stewart has yet to sign his contract so he is not yet an employee of the club. He can't report to training camp without a signed contract. With Stewart, Brown and Tobin seemed particularly perturbed on the matter. Tobin, who led the charge in selecting Stewart with the No.17 overall pick, is not happy that his first-round pick has yet to practice. 'I think Shemar needs to be here,' Tobin said. 'I'm not going to blame Shemar. He's listening to the advice that he's paying for (from his agent). I don't understand or believe or agree with the advice. But I'm not the one paying for it. If I thought we were treating him unfairly as it relates to all the other draft picks in this year's draft, then maybe it'd be a different story. But we're not.' Shemar Stewart contract language with Bengals Stewart and the Bengals are at odds over the language Cincinnati wants to add into their contracts pertaining to future guarantees. The Bengals have yet to implement this language in any of their previous first-round picks' contracts and that's why Stewart has refused to sign it. Cincinnati wants to add a clause that would allow the team to be off the hook from paying future guaratneed money to Stewart is he defaults in any of the select categories the team outlines. For Stewart, his side of this argument is that they should get the same language that every other first-round pick in Cincinnati has received. Cincinnati's side of this is they should be able to evolve and change their contracts as they see fit. The majority of NFL teams have the same clause the Bengals are putting in Stewart's contract. They believe what they are asking of Stewart is fair and in line with what the rest of the league is doing. 'It really doesn't make any sense to say that Cincinnati doesn't get to evolve their contracts, yet the rest of the league evolves their contracts,' Tobin said. 'I don't buy into that philosophy at all. Contracts evolve. I've been in it 30 years. They've evolved every year for 30 years. We're not asking for anything anybody else isn't already doing. So, do I feel badly about it? I do not.' The Bengals don't appear to be willing to budge on their stance as they feel it's completely justified. Stewart thinks he's done nothing wrong and has publicly stated his desire to receive a contract that mirrors what the most recent first-round picks in Cincinnati have received. 'It's a very peculiar thing, it isn't about money,' Brown said. 'That's been agreed to for months. It's about the guarantee in the case of if you were to do something contrary to the discipline levels of the league. I don't think that's going to happen ever, but that's what's holding it up. It's never happened as long as I can remember." When Will Shemar Stewart show up to Bengals training camp? In order for this deal to get done and for Stewart to get on the practice field, a compromise needs to be reached. An example of this could be the team offering Stewart a higher percentage of his signing bonus upon signing in return for taking the new language. Typically, the Bengals have paid their first-round pick 50 percent of his signing bonus right away and the rest two months later. To this point, Stewart has yet to receive a concession from the team that would make him feel more comfortable taking the new language. It's unclear if or when either side will budge on the subject and until then, the Bengals and Stewart are both at a disadvantage. Cincinnati has Super Bowl aspirations this season and they drafted Stewart in the first-round to help get them where they want to go. This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: Duke Tobin, Bengals comments on Shemar Stewart contract standoff

Jon Stewart Delivers Emotional Defense Of Stephen Colbert
Jon Stewart Delivers Emotional Defense Of Stephen Colbert

Buzz Feed

time3 days ago

  • Buzz Feed

Jon Stewart Delivers Emotional Defense Of Stephen Colbert

Daily Show host Jon Stewart came to the defense of former colleague and fellow late night host Stephen Colbert on Monday after CBS announced last week that it is canceling The Late Show. CBS claimed the move was ' purely a financial decision,' but Stewart wasn't buying it. 'The fact that CBS didn't try to save their number-one-rated network late night franchise, that's been on the air for over three decades, is part of what's making everybody wonder: Was this purely financial, or maybe the path of least resistance for your $8 billion merger?' he pointed out. Paramount, which owns CBS as well as Daily Show network Comedy Central, is trying to complete a merger with Skydance. That deal requires approval from the Federal Communications Commission, the current chair of which was appointed by President Donald Trump, a frequent target of Colbert's jokes who has complained openly about Colbert and other late night hosts. 'Was killing a show that you know rankled a fragile and vengeful president ― so insecure, suffering terribly from a case of chronic penis insufficiency,' Stewart said. 'It's a terrible disease.' He said CBS lost the benefit of the doubt earlier this month when it agreed to pay $16 million to settle a lawsuit with Trump that was widely seen as frivolous. Stewart called that money 'an extortion fee' for Trump. He delivered a stark reminder to CBS. 'The shows that you now seek to cancel, censor and control ― a not-insignificant portion of that $8 billion value came from those fucking shows,' he said. 'That's what made you that money. Shows that say something, shows that take a stand, shows that are unafraid.' And he warned that trying to make content that will please Trump will prove fruitless given that he turns on even his allies in the media, such as the president's new lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal and Rupert Murdoch, who owns the paper as well as Fox News. Stewart said there probably isn't a single email or phone call that proves CBS fired Colbert to please Trump. 'I think the answer is in the fear and pre-compliance that is gripping all of America's institutions at this very moment,' he said. 'Institutions that have chosen not to fight the vengeful and vindictive actions of our pubic-hair-doodling commander in chief. This is not the moment to give in. I'm not giving in. I'm not going anywhere.' Comedy Central / Via Then he delivered an inspirational message to frightened media companies such as Paramount and any other institution ready to bend the knee to Trump. And he did it in the form of a song, complete with a choir: 'Go fuck yourself.'

WNBA players call initial labor talks with league a ‘wasted opportunity'
WNBA players call initial labor talks with league a ‘wasted opportunity'

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

WNBA players call initial labor talks with league a ‘wasted opportunity'

INDIANAPOLIS — It had been nearly 20 hours since dozens of WNBA players engaged in 'spirited' exchanges and debates with league officials while discussing matters pertaining to ongoing collective bargaining agreement negotiations ahead of the All-Star festivities. But after having the time to decompress and reflect, the overwhelming sentiment among players Friday was that the pivotal meeting yielded little to no progress. 'To be frank, it was a wasted opportunity,' Women's National Basketball Players Association vice president Breanna Stewart said. 'We could have really kind of gotten into a deeper dive of everything but it was a lot of fluff that we couldn't get past. And it sucks because situations like that aren't going to happen again because players are playing for different teams in different leagues and this is the only time to have a group together.' The union's executive committee met again 30 minutes before Thursday's negotiations to make sure they had their priorities in order. More than 40 players attended, marking the largest turnout in union history for CBA talks. At one point, the room ran out of chairs for players. The WNBPA believes the record turnout was one of the best ways to send a 'strong message' on how serious the collective is about the new CBA. But what transpired over the next couple of hours in the hotel conference room was not exactly what players had expected. Stewart said it appeared some members on the opposite side of the bargaining table were 'shocked' by how passionately players feel about certain issues, especially revenue sharing. Seattle Storm All-Star Gabby Williams felt the league official 'found a very strategic way to spin everything' and compared them to politicians when players raised questions and concerns. 'I don't think they were aware of how much we did understand of their proposal,' Williams said. 'They thought … that they could just impress us with some fancy numbers and some fancy language and not think that we would actually understand what this meant for us as far as revenue sharing and everything. So I think they heard that we're not to be bamboozled.' Paige Bueckers, this year's No. 1 pick, summed up the meeting by saying it went 'not well.' 'Frustrated' and 'hurt' were other words players used to describe how they felt about it. The WNBPA said it sent proposals as early as February to the league but didn't receive an official counter until last month. The delay was maddening, but the WNBA's proposal was even more upsetting. While players have been calling for a better revenue-sharing model, where players' salaries reflect the league's growth each year, the league's first offer showed just how far apart each side is. 'We were disappointed, for sure, in what they came back with,' WNBPA vice president Napheesa Collier said. 'It was just nowhere near what we asked for. Or even in the same conversation. We asked for something, they came back with something totally different.' The WNBA hasn't issued an official statement on Thursday's meeting. Cathy Engelbert is slated to meet with reporters ahead of Saturday's All-Star Game. While revenue sharing and increased salaries remain the most pinnacle issues for the union, there are many more things that need to be discussed, including but not limited to player amenities, pension, housing stipends and benefits for mothers. With an extended season, there are also questions regarding league prioritization rules that some players, especially international talents, including Williams, have concerns about. The league repeatedly told the union, 'We hear you' throughout Thursday's meeting. But players don't want to just be heard. They want action. '[WNBPA president] Nneka [Ogwumike] did a really great job of making sure [and] Napheesa [Collier] made it abundantly clear, like, 'This is what we are trying to do, so hear that,' ' Fever star Kelsey Mitchell said. 'They stood on business. And it's important to have those kind of leaders supporting the movement because we just want what we deserve.' There's so much ground that still needs to be covered, but a lot of conversations were left 'unfinished' in the meeting, Stewart said. 'There's a lot to be figured out,' Stewart added. The clock is ticking. The current CBA, which was signed in January 2020, expires Oct. 31. While both parties were hoping to avoid a work stoppage, it's a real possibility given how little headway has been made — so much so that Collier said players are preparing for one. '[A work stoppage] is not what anybody wants. But at the end of the day, we have to stand firm,' Collier said. 'We're not going to be moving on certain topics and so, hopefully, the league comes back quickly so that we can have more dialogue, more conversations and we can get the ball rolling.' There's not another in-person meeting on the schedule yet and Stewart said it's unlikely one would happen before the season ends given the WNBA's game schedule, which added to players' frustrations about how little was accomplished. Stewart said a virtual meeting would be the 'next best thing,' though it's still not ideal. Union executives are expected to meet with league officials again 'soon,' but WNBPA executive director Terri Michael Jackson didn't share any details. While the league and players association may remain at odds as of now, both are committed to creating a fair and transformational CBA that makes sense for all parties involved. 'Both sides want to get this done,' Stewart said. 'But at the same time, we need to have a little bit more of a sense of urgency because if we don't have it figured out by end of season, then we have bigger problems and things to worry about.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store