logo
10 years after apology, '60s Scoop survivors call for support beyond 'grossly inadequate' payout

10 years after apology, '60s Scoop survivors call for support beyond 'grossly inadequate' payout

CBC18-06-2025
Survivors of an infamous Canadian campaign to take Indigenous children from their families are underscoring the need for more action on the 10-year anniversary of the Manitoba's government formal apology for its role.
Lorraine Sinclair and Cindy Munro are grateful they reunited. The sisters say they're from a family of 11 children — nine of whom, including them, were separated and adopted out during the Sixties Scoop.
"We're learning about each other. Our other extended family and our other brothers and sisters, we don't really know them," said Munro. "I don't know who they are. That's not fair — that's not fair to my children, my grandchildren, my siblings."
The sisters were among a group of survivors and supporters at an event at St. John's Park in north Winnipeg on Wednesday to mark a decade since then premier Greg Selinger apologized to families caught in the Sixties Scoop.
The once legal and systematic practice removed thousands of First Nation, Métis and Inuit children from their birth families from the late 1950s into the 1980s. Most were adopted out to non-Indigenous families in Canada and abroad.
Coleen Rajotte, an advocate for Sixties Scoop survivors, said the 2015 apology was an important part of reconciliation but doesn't go far enough.
"It recognizes that we were through genocide, we were taken away from our families and placed far away from our culture and language," she said.
"It's now 2025, and we're asking the federal government and provincial government: what has really been done for us?"
The federal government announced a $800-million settlement for survivors in 2017, though some waited years for payments due to various delays. Over 34,000 claims were submitted by the 2019 deadline.
The sum eventually doled out to those deemed eligible amounted to about $25,000 per survivor.
Rajotte, who served on a Manitoba committee that asked for the 2015 apology, campaigned against that amount. She calls it "pathetic" and "grossly inadequate" compared to similar settlements reached for residential school and day school survivors.
"Not that money is going to fix everything, but we really feel like Sixties Scoop survivors have often been forgotten about," she said. "We don't really have the strong political voices that we need to move our issues forward."
Rajotte said beyond inadequate financial restitution, there are also issues that remain in terms of repatriating Canadian-born survivors that were adopted out internationally.
"Many of our survivors are still out in this world somewhere — Europe, United States, New Zealand, Australia," she said.
"Our children were placed far away, and we don't even know how many more of our Sixties Scoop survivors are still out there."
WATCH | Premier Greg Selinger apologizes for Sixties Scoop in 2015:
RAW: Premier Selinger apologizes for Sixties Scoop
10 years ago
Duration 2:35
Sinclair and Munro say two of their siblings have died. One of their sisters remains in a locked mental health institution in Minnesota, and they want help repatriating her.
"I want a family picture. I don't know what that is," said Sinclair.
Late last month, advocates convened a group of survivors at Anish Healing Centre, which supports Sixties Scoop survivors, to ask them for input on what more needs to be done to support them.
Rajotte said the group penned a letter with recommended supports that they sent to Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew's office. They're hoping to meet with him.
Among other recommendations, Rajotte would like to see governments fund the creation of a centre devoted to helping survivors seek guidance should they wish to repatriate, and to help them access financial and mental health supports for all survivors.
"I stand here as a proud Cree woman who has gone through her own healing journey," said Rajotte. "I feel blessed that we have a voice and I am using our voice today to say more has to be done."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hydro in planning stages of $6.8 billion bipole project
Hydro in planning stages of $6.8 billion bipole project

CTV News

time3 hours ago

  • CTV News

Hydro in planning stages of $6.8 billion bipole project

CTV's Jeff Keele takes a closer look at a planned Manitoba Hydro overhaul of two major transmission projects. Loading the player instance is taking more time than usual Loading the player instance is taking more time than usual Manitoba Hydro is moving ahead with billions of dollars worth of upgrades for two of the province's major transmission lines. The crown corporation said it needs to replace equipment at the converter stations for the Bipole One and Bipole Two transmission lines, which were built in the 1970s and 80s. Hydro media relations officer Peter Chura said 70 per cent of all electricity generated flows from the north to customers in rest of the province. 'It's very important that we maintain the reliability of the system, by replacing aging infrastructure in that system,' said Chura. The project is in the planning phase with a timeline stretching to 2037, according to a rate application document filed by Manitoba Hydro to the Public Utilities Board (PUB). The current cost estimate is $6.8 billion, but Hydro said that figure could change based on the scope, timing and market conditions. 'It's possible the price could go up, the price could go down, the price could change, but we're doing that work right now to establish those facts,' said Chura. Hydro is currently asking the PUB to approve a 3.5 per cent annual rate increases for the next three years for its operations. A long-term projection forecasts the same amounts. Chris Klassen, from the Public Interest Law Centre which represents not-for-profit groups, said Manitoba Hydro needs to prove why this project is so crucial at this time. 'In the upcoming rate hearing, based on Hydro's history, we'll be asking whether Manitoba Hydro's cost estimates are accurate and whether this expensive project is truly needed now,' said Klassen. That history includes the Bipole Three line and the Keeyask Generating Station, that went $3.7 billion over budget. Premier Wab Kinew defended the costly upgrades, saying this is about building Manitoba's future. 'This is exactly the leverage Manitoba has as a low carbon energy power,' said Kinew.

Danielle Smith faces criticism, anger at Edmonton town hall
Danielle Smith faces criticism, anger at Edmonton town hall

Globe and Mail

time3 hours ago

  • Globe and Mail

Danielle Smith faces criticism, anger at Edmonton town hall

After receiving a warm welcome and widespread support just 24 hours earlier, Alberta Premier Danielle Smith faced a more vocally critical and frustrated crowd as she and her hand-picked panel members assembled in Edmonton for the second of a series of summer town halls. 'We sound like bratty children,' said Roberta Stasyk, a resident of Fort Saskatchewan, Alta., who was one of many speakers who showed up to voice their frustration. Smith launched the panel to address public concerns over Prime Minister Mark Carney's election win – concerns that have pushed some to want Alberta to separate from Confederation. The premier's staff said some 500 people attended the Edmonton town hall on Wednesday. Unlike in Red Deer the night before, at least one-third of the Edmonton crowd was there to challenge Smith and the other 15 panel members on topics like creating a provincial police force, amending the constitution, and taking greater control over immigration. Robyn Urback: Danielle Smith isn't trying to be a MAGA leader. She's trying to be the Wildrose one she once was Creating a provincial pension plan was a hot-button issue, with most of those who stood up to share their opinion saying Smith needed to drop the idea once and for all. Stasyk called it a 'horrible idea,' while others challenged the benefits touted in a government-produced video that played before the topic was discussed. 'A much smaller jurisdiction ... would make it much more liable to the ups and downs of the market, for one thing,' said Hans Smit, a professor emeritus from the University of Calgary, who also asked the panel for a guarantee that a provincial pension plan wouldn't be used for ideological means. Another speaker, who only identified himself as Todd, told the panel that at the end of the day, he just wanted a pension, but he didn't trust Smith's government to manage it. 'I can stick with the (Canadian Pension Plan), which is one of the most effective things in the world, or I can gamble with you idiots.' While the majority of speakers who lined up to discuss pension plans said they wanted to maintain the status quo, a show of hands showed the majority of the crowd was in favour. The same occurred when the idea of a provincial police force came up – many spoke against it, but a show of hands had those in favour in a clear majority. The divide in the room was clear, with attendees competing at every chance to make sure their boos or cheers came out on top. While it was less of a regular occurrence than Tuesday's town hall in Red Deer, some speakers in Edmonton did use the opportunity to push for separation. 'Alberta's grievances with Ottawa predate our becoming a province,' said one speaker, Cathy. 'Let's just move forward with a referendum on independence, force that constitution open, and see where those talks take us.' Other Alberta independence supporters gathered outside, making sure those who attended saw a large 'Alberta Sovereignty Now' banner as they walked to their cars. Also in the parking lot were two protesters, one holding a sign saying 'I love (U.S. President Donald) Trump' and wearing a large papier mache head that was a caricature of Smith. Back inside the Edmonton hotel ballroom where the town hall took place, Smith, at times, was forced to defend the topics her panel was assembled to discuss. One proposal, that Alberta create its own immigration permitting system and cut off immigrants not approved under the system from health care and other provincially-run services, led a speaker to ask why the premier was 'punching down on immigrants.' Smith quickly spoke up to say that wasn't the case, adding that her government was just trying to find a solution to high housing costs and 'increasing pressure on our social programs.' 'There has to be a reasonable amount of newcomers that are able to come here, fit into the economy, be able to be self-supporting,' Smith said. 'That is, I think, a bit high at the moment.' Jennifer Long, an anthropology professor at MacEwan University in Edmonton, challenged the premier, saying she and the panel were giving more 'fodder' to issues that are already dividing Albertans. 'If we're worried about having affordable housing, why aren't we putting more policies to make landlords who own empty houses to make them come on the market?' Long said. Earlier in the day, Opposition NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi told reporters in Red Deer that the premier's panel was conjuring up unreliable data to support things her government already wants to do. 'What a debacle. This thing is such a sham,' Nenshi said. Smith's panel will return to Edmonton for the third of 10 in-person town halls next month, with other dates set for Fort McMurray and Lloydminster later in August.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store