
The Right Dosage Of AI For Business
AI can be a great game-changer in nearly any industry. It ushers in massive changes in how we do nearly everything, or in CEO-speak, it leads to 'business process efficiencies.'
But AI doesn't inherently do this: it does it if the applications are balanced and fitted to a business model. I often say that new tech (any new tech) can be either a help or a hindrance to a company depending on the fit.
There are also ambiguities that we have to address in BPE (business process engineering) with AI.
'When we don't have clarity on how the predictions are generated, it becomes very difficult for us to build defensibility or accountability,' writes Lian Parsons at HBS, showcasing the idea of Harvard DCE Professional & Executive Development Mark Esposito. 'The challenge that we have to address is deciding the role of humans and how we make the technology human-centric. Even if humans are largely relieved of a repetitive task, it doesn't mean that we are removing the delegation of power to humans. If we're unclear about that role, then we have to intentionally try to define it.'
And then, what about that fit?
Taking the Medicine
In a recent TED talk, Karim Lakhani, a Harvard Business School professor, discusses this with a different metaphor: in terms of a patient taking a drug.
'We actually don't know the right dose to take, the efficacy of the product, the side effect, the toxicity, or even the right diet to follow when we're using this drug, but this drug has been introduced across hundreds of millions of people,' he says, noting that his organization has been conducting a series of 'clinical trials' of AI, sort of like you would with a new drug, to actually take the temperature of adoption trends and see what happens when people use the AI.
What emerges, he suggests, is a 'jagged technological frontier' – a webwork of systems and processes that evolve at different rates, and all of the challenges that come along with an ecosystem like that.
'There are some things that AI is very good at,' Lakhani says. 'When you use it for (those functions), AI performs incredibly well, and people get better. But when you use AI for a task where it's not good for (that use), your performance drops, and drops dramatically.'
Productivity Gains Measured in AI 'Clinical Trial'
In terms of productivity, he noted that in one study, AI use led to 12.2% more tasks completed, on average, tasks completed 25% more quickly, and tasks completed with 40% higher quality.
But, he mentions, it's important for leaders to avoid 'falling asleep at the wheel' when it comes to the use cases of innovation.
Procter & Gamble's Cybernetic Teammate
Citing randomized outcomes, Lakhani talked about AI transforming itself from a tool into a teammate.
'The first part that we see is a massive productivity boost,' he says.
Then, he notes, things really take off.
'While the performance capabilities of AI models, that's increasing exponentially on an every six months basis, every nine months basis, the absorption capability of most organizations is linear,' he adds. 'It's linear. What that means is that every six months or nine months, you're going to be exponentially behind what the models can really do.'
Companies, he argues, won't be able to absorb the activity quickly enough to tackle an exponential curve. Is that a problem? I guess, in a way. Partially just in competition.
Lakhani described the process of trying to stand out in the crowd. It was interesting when he talked about trying to differentiate your business based on $20 a month, or a basic model subscription price.
In other words, you have to use a bounded value to create enormous value for your organization…
The Four-Act Play
Another key concept that Lakhani brought up late in the game was what he called a 'four-act play' as a roadmap for leadership.
The first stage is to learn all you can about AI – get to know the systems and the models, and what they can do. Understand the context for business. Look at how things are changing over time.
The second step is to do things with AI. This, he says, is where things often get mixed up. He talked about leaders delegating all of the activity to others, where they should be taking on certain tasks themselves.
The third stage is imagining what can happen in the business, and the fourth stage is making those things happen – actualizing your ideas,
Essentially, Lakhani walked us through a lot of the productivity that comes along with AI transformation, as tools become agents, and agents become human-like in their function.
Will we have agents as bosses, and what is that going to look like?
Stay tuned.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)'s CEO Has A Great Relationship With Trump, Says Jim Cramer
We recently published . NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. After bleeding close to $600 billion in market value in January amidst the DeepSeek selloff, Wall Street's AI chip darling, NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA) is once again the most valuable company in the world. The firm has benefited from growing investor bullishness about the long-term prospects of AI. NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA)'s shares closed the week 1% higher after big tech's continued persistence to spend billions of dollars to buy AI chips. Cramer discussed the impact and the CEO's relationship with President Trump: 'All CapEx go up, it's all NVIDIA. . .it's really good for NVIDIA. But of course, NVIDIA, the President talking about breaking them up, we'll get to that later. It was an out of body comment. Previously, the CNBC TV host commented on NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA)'s shares and parabolic moves: 'What is the solution to this? Look, in my forthcoming book, How to Make Money in Any Market, I have banished my antiparabola bias. I have a method I reveal of picking five stocks to go alongside an index fund with some money added each month. I state point blank that if you are in your 30s or older, you should own one speculative situation like an Oklo, okay, or a Joby. Just one. It could fail you after going parabolic. Moreover, if you're under 30, you can pick two speculative names out of five because you've got enough time to make back any potential losses. Photo by Javier Esteban on Unsplash Now, you may think I'm reckless for endorsing any of these even with caveats, but it's time to admit that for many years now, speculative stocks with great growth, they've worked. Oh, and let's not forget, they don't have to stay speculative. NVIDIA stock has had many parabolic moves, including the one that started in April. To keep yourself out of these runs because of a principle that stopped working ages ago, that's to be blind to change, and I don't like it. I don't want to be that way.' While we acknowledge the potential of NVDA as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If Billionaires Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Upper Middle Class
There are many questions that don't have simple answers, either because they're too complex or they're hypothetical. One such question is what it might mean for billionaires to pay taxes at the same rate as the upper middle class, whose income starts, on average, at around $168,000, depending on where you live. Find Out: Read Next: ChatGPT may not be an oracle, but it can analyze information and offer trends and patterns, so I asked it what would happen if billionaires were required to pay anywhere near as much as the upper middle class. Here's what it said. A Fatter Government Larder For starters, ChatGPT said that if billionaires paid taxes like the upper middle class, the government would bring in a lot more money — potentially hundreds of billions of dollars more every year. 'That's because most billionaires don't make their money from salaries like upper-middle-class workers do. Instead, they grow their wealth through investments–stocks, real estate, and businesses–which are often taxed at much lower rates or not taxed at all until the assets are sold,' ChatGPT told me. Billionaire income is largely derived from capital appreciation, not wages. In other words, they make money on their money through interest. And as of yet, the U.S. tax code doesn't tax 'unrealized capital gains' so until you sell your assets, you could amass millions in appreciation and not pay a dime on it, ChatGPT shared. Learn More: What Do Billionaires Pay in Taxes? Right now, many billionaires pay an effective tax rate of around 8% or less, thanks to loopholes and tax strategies. Meanwhile, upper-middle-class households earning, say, $250,000 might pay around 20% to 24% of their income in taxes. (Keep in mind that the government doesn't apply one tax bracket to all income. You pay tax in layers, according to the IRS. As your income goes up, the tax rate on the next layer of income is higher. So you pay 12% on the first $47,150, then 22% on $47,151 to $100,525 and so on). So, if billionaires were taxed at the same rate as those upper-middle-class wage earners, 'it would level the playing field–and raise a ton of revenue that could be used for things like infrastructure, education or healthcare,' ChatGPT said. The Impact on Wealth Equality I wondered if taxing billionaires could have any kind of impact on wealth equality, as well. While it wouldn't put more money in other people's pockets, 'it could increase trust in the tax system, showing that the wealthiest aren't playing by a different set of rules,' ChatGPT said. It would also help curb 'the accumulation of dynastic wealth,' where the richest families essentially hoard wealth for generations without contributing proportionally to the system. But it's not a magic bullet. 'Wealth inequality is rooted in more than just taxes–wages, education access, housing costs, and corporate ownership all play a role,' ChatGPT said. Billionaires paying taxes doesn't stop them from being billionaires, either, it pointed out. Taxing Billionaires Is Not That Simple While in theory billionaires paying higher taxes 'would shift a much bigger share of the tax burden onto the very wealthy,' ChatGPT wrote, billionaires are not as liquid as they may seem. 'A lot of billionaire wealth is tied up in things like stocks they don't sell, so taxing that would require big changes to how the tax code works.' Also, billionaires are good at finding loopholes and account strategies — it might be hard to enforce. What's a Good Middle Ground? We don't live in a black and white world, however. There's got to be a middle ground, so I asked ChatGPT if there is a way to tax billionaires more, even if it's not quite how the upper middle class are taxed. A likely compromise would come from a policy decision, which isn't likely to be forthcoming anytime soon. President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill only offered more tax breaks to the wealthiest. However, policy proposals that have been floated, include: A minimum tax on billionaires where they might pay around 20% of their overall income Limiting deductions and closing tax loopholes that allow them to significantly reduce taxable income Tax unrealized gains (those assets that have only earned but not yet been sold), gradually. ChatGPT agreed that billionaires could pay more than they currently do, even if they don't pay exactly what upper-middle-class workers pay in percentage terms. 'The key is to design policies that are fair, enforceable, and politically feasible.' I asked how realistic such policy proposals are, and ChatGPT told me what I already knew: They're 'moderately realistic' but only with the 'right political alignment.' More From GOBankingRates 9 Downsizing Tips for the Middle Class To Save on Monthly Expenses This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If Billionaires Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Upper Middle Class Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Inicia sesión para acceder a tu portafolio Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información Se produjo un error al recuperar la información
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Not Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) But RTX, Say A Lot Of People According To Jim Cramer
We recently published . Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT) is one of the stocks Jim Cramer recently discussed. Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT) is a key American defense contractor when it comes to the aerospace industry. Its fighter aircraft form the backbone of US air superiority. The shares have lost 11.9% year-to-date on the back of a major 10.8% dip in July after its Q2 profit dipped by a whopping 80% on the back of a classified $1.6 billion loss on a classified aeronautics project. Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT)'s Q2 revenue of $18.16 billion also missed analyst estimates of $18.57 billion. No wonder Cramer made the following remarks about the firm: 'RTX, by the way, pushed by a number of people, saying that's the defense stock you want to be in, not Lockheed Martin.' Source: Pexels Previously, Cramer had advised viewers to stay long on Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE:LMT): 'I like Lockheed Martin too much to tell you to do that. Every time I see Jim Taiclet, I say to myself, why does anyone want to sell that stock with a 3% yield and a great book of business and a terrific CEO? No, you stay long, Lockheed Martin.' While we acknowledge the potential of LMT as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . READ NEXT: 30 Stocks That Should Double in 3 Years and 11 Hidden AI Stocks to Buy Right Now. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data