Manufacturing units planned in northeast States for vegan leather developed by CSIR-NIIST
Manufacturing units will be established in the northeast States for the plant-based vegan leather developed by the CSIR-National Institute for Interdisciplinary Science and Technology (NIIST) in Thiruvananthapuram.
CSIR-NIIST on Monday signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with the North East Centre for Technology Application and Reach (NECTAR), an autonomous body under the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, in this regard. NIIST described the MoU as a significant step towards promoting sustainable technologies and a circular economy in the northeast.
'The MoU facilitates the transfer of CSIR-NIIST's plant-based vegan leather technology to NECTAR for establishing common facility centres and manufacturing units in Meghalaya and other northeast States. These centres will support farmers, MSMEs, and women-led self-help groups in converting agro-waste into high-value sustainable products,' NIIST said.
NIIST director C. Anandharamakrishnan and NECTAR director Arun Kumar Sarma exchanged MoU documents in the presence of CSIR director general N. Kalaiselvi at the CSIR Headquarters in New Delhi. By harnessing locally available agro-waste, the partnership aims to promote regional entrepreneurship, create jobs and foster environmentally-responsible manufacturing practices in the northeast region.
Dr. Kalaiselvi said there is a pressing need to address the growing agro-waste challenge in northeast India. Agricultural residues such as rice straw, banana and pineapple waste are typically discarded or burned, leading to air and water pollution, soil degradation, and biodiversity loss, she said.
NIIST said its technology provides a sustainable solution by converting this biomass into plant-based leather, replacing 50–70% of the chemicals used in synthetic leather and significantly reducing the environmental footprint of the leather industry. The initiative, it said, is aligned with national missions such as Atmanirbhar Bharat, Make In India, Innovate India and Swachh Bharat.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Time to polish our public sector ratnas: Creating an Indian sovereign wealth fund to recast jewels
In May 2020, as part of the Atmanirbhar Bharat package, the Indian government unveiled a bold new Public Sector Enterprise (PSE) policy. Building on that announcement, the Union Budget of February 1, 2021, laid out a detailed blueprint, categorising sectors into two: Strategic sectors, where the government would retain only a bare minimum presence, and by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Memperdagangkan CFD Emas dengan salah satu spread terendah? IC Markets Mendaftar Undo Non-strategic sectors, where all Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSEs) would be privatised or closed. This marked a tectonic shift in India's approach to public sector enterprises- a clear intent to significantly reduce the government's footprint in business. While implementation is underway, progress has been uneven. This note proposes a bold, agile framework to fast-track the reform. Traditional Routes of Privatisation: Limited Success For privatisation India has predominantly relied on strategic sales since the 1991 liberalisation era divesting 50% or more equity along with management control. However, another way of privatisation is public market offerings i.e. selling shares of CPSEs to retail and institutional investors. This method was famously deployed by Margaret Thatcher's UK government during its privatisation drive of British Telecom, British Gas, and British Steel. Live Events In India, the strategic sale model has yielded mixed results. The successful sale of Air India came after years of delays. Meanwhile, marquee targets such as BPCL, Shipping Corporation, and IDBI Bank have faced hurdles. BPCL's disinvestment , announced in 2019, was shelved in 2022 as bidders withdrew, the government decided to hit pause to the disinvestment: a prudent decision prioritising value over timelines. Strategic sales are often complex, politically sensitive, and time-consuming, limiting their effectiveness as the default path to reform. Learning from Singapore: The Temasek Model The third approach is Singapore's model: move the ownership to an SWF, then sell publicly. Singapore faced a similar challenge as India in the 1970s, dozens of government-owned enterprises across critical sectors, struggling under state management. The solution was to create Temasek Holdings, the Sovereign Wealth Fund of Singapore which was established in 1974 as a professionally run, wholly government-owned investment company. Temasek operates with full autonomy, managed by an independent board of professionals and free from political interference. It holds and grows equity in state-owned enterprises on commercial principles. Many of these entities are now listed and globally competitive, contributing to a portfolio exceeding US$301 billion. While India is not Singapore, the core principle of insulating commercial decisions from political control is powerful and relevant. A Case for India's Temasek: Transforming NIIF India has attempted some separation by routing disinvestment decisions through DIPAM. However, this still functions within the government's bureaucratic framework. What India truly needs is a Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF) that can own and manage public assets commercially. This is where the National Investment and Infrastructure Fund (NIIF) enters: India's quasi-sovereign investment vehicle, created in 2015, where the government holds a 49% stake. With assets of over $5 billion across infrastructure, growth equity, and fund-of-funds, NIIF already has the structure to become India's Temasek. Even Temasek saw potential in NIIF, investing $400 million in 2018. It now needs a wider mandate that would allow it to become the Indian Temasek. The Model: Ownership Transfer, Commercial Management The government could begin by transferring its stakes in select PSEs to NIIF, receiving fund units in exchange. The state would retain economic interest while stepping away from operational control. These PSEs would then be run under professional governance standards, free from day-to-day political interference. Over time, NIIF could gradually dilute its stake in these enterprises in the market when conditions are favourable creating a steady revenue stream for the government, rather than volatile, one-time windfalls. The government could begin with minority stakes transfer, building credibility and demonstrating value creation, and eventually reduce its holding below 51% as per Atmanirbhar Bharat package. A Pragmatic, Politically Smart Path This stealth-privatisation model i.e. first shifting ownership to NIIF, then progressively privatizing, shields the process from political turbulence while ensuring the commercial interests of the state are protected. It provides PSEs with the time, autonomy, and resources to restructure and become market-ready, aligning with the 2021 policy objective of one strategic PSE per sector. As Thomas Jefferson aptly put it, 'That government is best which governs least.' It's time we let our Ratna shine with the polish of professionalism, and free them from the weight of the state's hand.
Economic Times
2 hours ago
- Economic Times
Time to polish our public sector ratnas: Creating an Indian sovereign wealth fund to recast jewels
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Traditional Routes of Privatisation: Limited Success Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Learning from Singapore: The Temasek Model A Case for India's Temasek: Transforming NIIF Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Model: Ownership Transfer, Commercial Management A Pragmatic, Politically Smart Path (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of .) In May 2020, as part of the Atmanirbhar Bharat package, the Indian government unveiled a bold new Public Sector Enterprise (PSE) policy. Building on that announcement, the Union Budget of February 1, 2021, laid out a detailed blueprint, categorising sectors into two:Strategic sectors, where the government would retain only a bare minimum presence, andNon-strategic sectors, where all Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSEs) would be privatised or marked a tectonic shift in India's approach to public sector enterprises- a clear intent to significantly reduce the government's footprint in business. While implementation is underway, progress has been uneven. This note proposes a bold, agile framework to fast-track the privatisation India has predominantly relied on strategic sales since the 1991 liberalisation era divesting 50% or more equity along with management control. However, another way of privatisation is public market offerings i.e. selling shares of CPSEs to retail and institutional investors. This method was famously deployed by Margaret Thatcher's UK government during its privatisation drive of British Telecom, British Gas, and British India, the strategic sale model has yielded mixed results. The successful sale of Air India came after years of delays. Meanwhile, marquee targets such as BPCL, Shipping Corporation, and IDBI Bank have faced hurdles. BPCL's disinvestment , announced in 2019, was shelved in 2022 as bidders withdrew, the government decided to hit pause to the disinvestment: a prudent decision prioritising value over sales are often complex, politically sensitive, and time-consuming, limiting their effectiveness as the default path to third approach is Singapore's model: move the ownership to an SWF, then sell faced a similar challenge as India in the 1970s, dozens of government-owned enterprises across critical sectors, struggling under state management. The solution was to create Temasek Holdings, the Sovereign Wealth Fund of Singapore which was established in 1974 as a professionally run, wholly government-owned investment company. Temasek operates with full autonomy, managed by an independent board of professionals and free from political interference. It holds and grows equity in state-owned enterprises on commercial principles. Many of these entities are now listed and globally competitive, contributing to a portfolio exceeding US$301 India is not Singapore, the core principle of insulating commercial decisions from political control is powerful and has attempted some separation by routing disinvestment decisions through DIPAM. However, this still functions within the government's bureaucratic framework. What India truly needs is a Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF) that can own and manage public assets is where the National Investment and Infrastructure Fund (NIIF) enters: India's quasi-sovereign investment vehicle, created in 2015, where the government holds a 49% stake. With assets of over $5 billion across infrastructure, growth equity, and fund-of-funds, NIIF already has the structure to become India's Temasek saw potential in NIIF, investing $400 million in 2018. It now needs a wider mandate that would allow it to become the Indian government could begin by transferring its stakes in select PSEs to NIIF, receiving fund units in exchange. The state would retain economic interest while stepping away from operational PSEs would then be run under professional governance standards, free from day-to-day political interference. Over time, NIIF could gradually dilute its stake in these enterprises in the market when conditions are favourable creating a steady revenue stream for the government, rather than volatile, one-time government could begin with minority stakes transfer, building credibility and demonstrating value creation, and eventually reduce its holding below 51% as per Atmanirbhar Bharat stealth-privatisation model i.e. first shifting ownership to NIIF, then progressively privatizing, shields the process from political turbulence while ensuring the commercial interests of the state are provides PSEs with the time, autonomy, and resources to restructure and become market-ready, aligning with the 2021 policy objective of one strategic PSE per Thomas Jefferson aptly put it, 'That government is best which governs least.' It's time we let our Ratna shine with the polish of professionalism, and free them from the weight of the state's hand.
Time of India
11 hours ago
- Time of India
PU plans multi-year expansion of research ecosystem under IDP 2025
1 2 Chandigarh: Panjab University has outlined a multi-stage strategy to expand its research and innovation ecosystem as part of its Institutional Development Plan (IDP) 2025. The roadmap includes the establishment of new research centres, funding support for faculty and scholars, incentives for patents and publications, and integration of undergraduate and postgraduate students into research activity. The plan aims to align university research with societal and industrial needs while supporting India's goals under the Atmanirbhar Bharat initiative. It proposes a phased implementation over five years, beginning with the creation of core infrastructure and research clusters in selected disciplines. In the first phase, the university intends to identify thrust areas and set up laboratories and core facilities. Faculty will be encouraged to take up at least one research project and establish national or international collaborations. Weekly research group meetings involving UG and PG students are planned at the departmental level. Subsequent phases include increasing the intake of research scholars, expanding interdisciplinary PhD programmes, and raising the value and number of fellowships. The plan also recommends the publication of internal research journals, seed funding for new faculty, and the involvement of guest faculty in research activities with mentorship from senior professors. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Research topics outlined span across sciences, engineering, law, environment, social sciences, public health, data science, and AI. The university also proposes dedicated funding for training in patent filing and research commercialisation. The IDP includes creation of incubation centres, support for startups, and a framework for industry-sponsored projects. Panjab University plans to strengthen its consultancy system, develop a web portal for faculty expertise and services, and establish joint research labs with industry partners. Notably, the plan comes at a time when the university has acknowledged areas for improvement in its research output. In the 2024 NIRF rankings, Panjab University's score in the research dropped to 42.01, down from 46.65 in 2023—its lowest in nine years. The plan sets performance benchmarks for each year, including increased publication in indexed journals, filing of patents, organisation of conferences, and the setting up of research databases and monitoring systems. A Research Advisory Council has been proposed to oversee implementation. The university has also identified long-term goals such as participation in international research consortia, hosting global faculty, and establishing research chairs. The IDP was submitted to the Ministry of Education earlier this year.
