
Annual Workforce Plans Are Costing You Millions — Fix It With This Shift
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
For companies, workforce planning isn't about to get any easier. Just ask Intel, which is laying off up to 20% of employees from its chip-making division, after slashing 15% of its workforce last summer. Tens of thousands of roles were eliminated in a matter of months.
This kind of dramatic shift is increasingly the rule, not the exception. AI is a key culprit, causing headcounts to plummet in some areas and surge in others. Geopolitics and tariffs are also increasingly a factor. My company works with an exercise equipment manufacturer whose prices spiked 40% overnight, turning its workforce plans upside down.
All of these points point to a stark conclusion: The way most companies approach workforce planning is no longer viable. Any business that still relies on a rigid annual plan is asking for trouble. In fact, businesses are expected to suffer a staggering $8.5 trillion in unrealized annual revenue by 2030, partly thanks to poor workforce planning.
It doesn't have to be that way.
By taking a much more dynamic approach to workforce planning, companies can match their people with business goals and changing economic conditions in real time. And as it turns out, AI is a key part of the solution. Here's why sticking with the status quo is so risky, and how businesses can break free.
Join top CEOs, founders and operators at the Level Up conference to unlock strategies for scaling your business, boosting revenue and building sustainable success.
The high cost of an outdated workforce planning
If you work at a company where workforce planning is a yearly exercise, you're far from alone.
Traditionally, that's how businesses have anticipated their workforce needs. Managers identify sales and revenue goals, then work backward to set budgets and headcounts across different departments.
Because yearly planning is a guessing game, it isn't very effective. I know this firsthand from coming up through the software industry, where workforce plans often morph as quickly as they're written.
This kind of episodic approach to workforce planning has a number of serious drawbacks:
The typical cadence of workforce planning is ill-adapted to the pace of modern work. Almost 40% of companies create 12-month plans. But digital transformation has already compressed business cycles, and AI is now accelerating change at an even faster pace. Plans made last month may already be obsolete.
People planning tends to be rudimentary and superficial. Only about one-third of HR leaders say their organization is good at using data for workforce planning, while more than two-thirds said their workforce planning is limited to headcount alone, with no analysis of underlying capacity.
More than half of companies lack a clear picture of their employees' current skills and the roles that are likely to face disruption. Planners are still thinking strictly in terms of butts in seats versus a more nuanced assessment of discrete skills needed.
What is the consequence of all that? Companies often end up with way too many people, or way too few. This translates either to bloated payrolls or, even worse, inability to serve surging demand. When we surveyed leaders, three-quarters said talent shortfalls left them unable to meet business objectives. Domino effects of poor planning include diminished productivity, burnout and diminished morale, and loss of business to the competition.
Related: Why Workforce Efficiency Isn't Just Code for Layoffs
How companies can embrace continuous planning
Imagine a nationwide bank in the throes of an AI makeover. That's exactly what's happening at JPMorgan Chase, which plans to use AI to shrink its workforce by 10%. With more than 300,000 employees, how can JPMorgan plan and adapt on the fly?
Here's where continuous workforce planning comes in. A marked departure from annual exercises, this approach incorporates real-time data to create a flexible plan that can be reconfigured in response to changing conditions. Surging demand? Challenges with retention? A spike in costs? Continuous workforce planning adapts instead of waiting to catch up.
The key to that flexibility? Gaining insights into how people drive business results in real-time.
Historically, accessing and understanding the information needed to make that happen has been an obstacle. People analytics platforms change everything by breaking down silos between departments, unlocking data previously trapped in spreadsheets and hard drives. Plus, AI can now connect the dots to business outcomes, while making those insights instantly accessible in plain language.
For companies looking to embrace continuous workforce planning, there are three important steps:
Know who your people are and where they work. People data, which covers things like headcount, seniority, engagement, training and pay, is often surprisingly hard to access. Start by leveraging the latest people analytics tools to weave together data from disparate human capital management systems, as well as email, chat, calendar and other employee apps — providing a clearer picture of your team.
People data, which covers things like headcount, seniority, engagement, training and pay, is often surprisingly hard to access. Start by leveraging the latest people analytics tools to weave together data from disparate human capital management systems, as well as email, chat, calendar and other employee apps — providing a clearer picture of your team. Know how your people work. The next step is to connect that people data with business data, which includes metrics like revenue, profitability and customer satisfaction. Which sales teams generate the most revenue? What's our least profitable division? What kind of training translates to improved customer retention? This shows how employees are contributing to actual business goals. New platforms enable connecting the dots between people and business results, providing a clearer picture of overall productivity.
The next step is to connect that people data with business data, which includes metrics like revenue, profitability and customer satisfaction. Which sales teams generate the most revenue? What's our least profitable division? What kind of training translates to improved customer retention? This shows how employees are contributing to actual business goals. New platforms enable connecting the dots between people and business results, providing a clearer picture of overall productivity. Harness those insights to build a dynamic workforce plan. AI-powered workforce planning tools enable companies to continuously model scenarios and adjust resources based on shifting demands. To hit next year's financial targets, what workforce mix do we need? Given the impact of tariffs on the bottom line, how should we adjust our headcount? What's the most cost-effective way to fill current talent gaps? New platforms use real-time data and predictive capacity to guide companies toward the best plan.
Related: Here's What Leaders Need to Try Before Resorting to Layoffs
Continuous workforce planning in action
Done right, continuous workforce planning can be a game-changer for companies:
One of our clients, a financial services firm with 50,000 employees, needed a plan to navigate changing customer expectations and volatile markets. It was also juggling a mix of in-house employees, remote workers and contractors. Breaking workforce planning out of its silos, the company adopted a more dynamic model that gave it a holistic picture, aligned with business goals and enabled it to react to market fluctuations.
Another customer is a healthcare provider that used our workforce planning tool to forecast job vacancies accurately. By proactively hiring some 2,000 caregivers with the right skills at the right time, it ultimately saved more than $3 million.
Getting the most out of continuous workforce planning
When it comes to continuous workforce planning, I've seen so many companies struggle to get over a few critical obstacles. Here are some key tips to bear in mind:
Continuous planning isn't possible until you overcome siloed thinking, too. Whether it's finance, marketing or HR, executives are often stuck in their own departments. The question they should ask: How can I get a holistic view of understanding people and how they work?}
Whether it's finance, marketing or HR, executives are often stuck in their own departments. The question they should ask: How can I get a holistic view of understanding people and how they work?} Not all businesses can turn on a dime. Ability to change course varies by industry, with manufacturing moving much slower than, say, software. For example, Donald Trump might want Apple to build iPhones in the US, but moving only 10% of its supply chain stateside could take three years.
Ability to change course varies by industry, with manufacturing moving much slower than, say, software. For example, Donald Trump might want Apple to build iPhones in the US, but moving only 10% of its supply chain stateside could take three years. It's important not to confuse plans with reality. As helpful as workforce plans are, they do have limits. So resist the temptation to over-plan and get into the weeds. The best plans are a continually evolving model, not an exact picture of conditions on the ground.
In a time of AI and economic uncertainty, agility is the only option. By shifting from static to continuous workforce planning, businesses can improve their odds of not just surviving but also thriving in turbulent times.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Qualcomm Slides After Posting Lackluster Phone Chip Sales
(Bloomberg) -- Qualcomm Inc., the biggest maker of chips that run smartphones, fell in late trading after reporting lackluster growth in that market, fueling concerns that tariffs will take a toll on the industry. The World's Data Center Capital Has Residents Surrounded An Abandoned Art-Deco Landmark in Buffalo Awaits Revival Budapest's Most Historic Site Gets a Controversial Rebuild San Francisco in Talks With Vanderbilt for Downtown Campus We Should All Be Biking Along the Beach Phone-related sales rose 7% to $6.33 billion in the fiscal third quarter, which ended June 29, Qualcomm said in a statement Wednesday. The average analyst estimate was $6.48 billion, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The results add to broader fears that a chip growth resurgence is under threat. In recent days, chipmakers such as Texas Instruments Inc. and Intel Corp. gave cautious outlooks, triggering concern that a sales rebound will be short-lived. Qualcomm shares fell more than 6% in late trading following Wednesday's announcement. Heading into the earnings report, the chipmaker's stock had already lagged a general rally by semiconductor stocks this year. Arm Holdings Plc, another chip technology provider that serves the smartphone industry, also reported results on Wednesday. Its shares declined after a profit forecast came in below estimates, hurt by spending on new products. Qualcomm's revenue in the quarter ending in September will be $10.3 billion to $11.1 billion, the San Diego-based company said. That compares with an average analyst estimates of $10.6 billion. Third-quarter profit was $2.77 a share, excluding some items. Revenue gained 10% to $10.37 billion. Wall Street had predicted a profit of $2.72 a share and sales of $10.33 billion. Revenue from chips used in vehicles rose 21% to $984 million. Connected-device semiconductor sales, meanwhile, climbed 24% to $1.68 billion. Qualcomm supplies processors and modems that are the main components of the world's most advanced smartphones. The chipmaker also collects fees calculated as a percentage of the cost of a handset, regardless of whether the phone maker uses its chips. An ongoing challenge for Qualcomm is Apple Inc.'s decision to make its own modem chips for the iPhone. Qualcomm has told investors to expect its supplies in the device to be fully replaced, but delays in the development of an Apple part have lengthened this transition. Apple currently has an in-house modem in one of its iPhones, the low-end 16e. (Updates shares starting in fourth paragraph.) Russia Builds a New Web Around Kremlin's Handpicked Super App Burning Man Is Burning Through Cash Everyone Loves to Hate Wind Power. Scotland Found a Way to Make It Pay Off It's Not Just Tokyo and Kyoto: Tourists Descend on Rural Japan Cage-Free Eggs Are Booming in the US, Despite Cost and Trump's Efforts ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Intel Shares Sink. Are There Any Signs That a Turnaround Is Around the Corner?
Key Points Intel once again saw flattish sales in its most recently reported quarter. The company has big plans to try and compete in the AI chip market. The task will not be easy, and the company has been using cash trying to build out its foundry business. 10 stocks we like better than Intel › Intel (NASDAQ: INTC) continues to struggle to gain traction, with the company reporting flat year-over-year revenue growth for the second straight quarter. What makes its results even worse is that many other semiconductor companies are seeing huge benefits from the data center buildout that is coming from artificial intelligence (AI). Intel saw moderate growth in this segment, but continues to be largely left out in the cold. The stock fell roughly 8.5% from before the report to close of trading Monday. Let's take a closer look at Intel's quarterly results (reported last week) to see if there are any signs of a turnaround. Another tough quarter Overall, for Q2, Intel's revenue edged up slightly from $12.8 billion to $12.9 billion. Its product revenue slipped 1% to $11.8 billion. Within product revenue, its client computing group (CCG) product revenue fell 3% to $7.9 billion, while data center and AI (DCAI) product revenue rose 4% to $3.9 billion. However, the company said its Q2 product revenue has likely been helped by customers increasing orders ahead of potential tariffs. Its foundry business, meanwhile, had revenue increase 3% to $4.4 billion. However, the segment continues to post large losses, with an operating loss of $3.2 billion in Q2. That was worse than the $2.8 billion loss it posted a year ago. Revenue from Intel's other businesses, which include subsidiaries Altera and Mobileye, jumped 20% to $1.1 billion. This segment also flipped from an operating loss of $46 million to a profit of $69 million. It is in the processing of selling Altera, and recently sold some of its Mobileye shares. Segment Revenue Revenue Growth (YOY) Product (CCG & DCAI) $11.8 billion (1%) CCG $7.9 billion (3%) DCAI $3.9 billion 4% Foundry $4.4 billion 3% Other (subsidiaries) $1.1 billion 20% Data source: Intel. YOY = year over year. Gross margin remains under pressure, falling by 790 basis points from 35.4% to 27.5%, while adjusted gross margins fell 900 basis points to 29.7%. Intel said that, excluding some charges, its adjusted gross margin would have been 37.5%. The company produced $2 billion in operating cash flow during the quarter, while spending $4.5 billion in capital expenditures (capex) as it continues to invest to scale its foundry business. It ended the quarter with $50.7 billion in debt against $21.2 billion in cash and short-term investments. Looking ahead, it forecast Q3 revenue to be between $12.6 billion and $13.6 billion, with the midpoint above analyst expectations for revenue of $12.65 billion. At the midpoint, that would be a revenue decline of 1.5%. It's looking for about breakeven earnings per share versus analyst expectations for a $0.04 profit. Due to its struggles, Intel is looking to significantly reduce costs. It will reduce its headcount and look to lower its operating expenses to $16 billion next year. It's also started to pull back on some of its capex. It's cancelled planned for fabrication facilities (fabs) in Germany and Poland, and will slow the pace of construction at a new plant in Ohio. A the same time, the chipmaker will look to try and get a foothold in the AI market. It plans to provide a full-stack AI solution that will incorporate software with its central processing units (CPUs) and graphics processing units (GPUs). It will focus its efforts on areas like inference and agentic AI, where it thinks it can differentiate itself. The company is also leaning into its new 18A process at its foundries, which it says will be the foundation for at least three generations of its client and server business chips. It just started wafer production with its 18A technology in Arizona. It also continues to work on its 14A technology, but noted it will need meaningful external customers to drive acceptable returns and that it will only fully invest in the technology if it's confident that clear returns exist. Is a turnaround near? Investors are wondering if the company is close to turning things around. The answer continues to be no. Intel has laid out an ambitious plan, but coming in and competing against the likes of Nvidia, or even Advanced Micro Devices, in the AI data center market isn't going to be an easy task. There isn't anything the company has demonstrated that indicates it can make a big technological breakthrough on this front at this point. And while it is smart to reduce costs, no company has ever cut its way to prosperity. That said, the company does have value to unlock. It's spent hundreds of billions of dollars in capex over the past couple of years building out its foundry business. While that business continues to struggle, there are real assets associated with the buildout. The stock trades at about 1.2 times its tangible book value (TBV), which is the value of its physical assets minus any net debt. As such, investors are able to buy Intel at a valuation just above the value of its physical assets. I think a turnaround will be difficult, but given the value of the company's physical assets, I think owning the stock at current levels has pretty low downside, with solid upside if it can pull off a turnaround. Should you invest $1,000 in Intel right now? Before you buy stock in Intel, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Intel wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $633,452!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,083,392!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,046% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025 Geoffrey Seiler has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Intel, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends Mobileye Global and recommends the following options: short August 2025 $24 calls on Intel. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Intel Shares Sink. Are There Any Signs That a Turnaround Is Around the Corner? was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Is Jerome Powell Just Evil?': Grant Cardone Slams Fed Chair Because ‘High Interest Rates' Are Hurting ‘Regular People'
Grant Cardone, renowned entrepreneur and real estate investor, has reaffirmed his outspoken stance on central banking policy, commenting, "Is Jerome Powell just evil? The only people punished by high interest rates are regular people." This statement, recently shared by Cardone on social media, crystallizes his perspective on the Federal Reserve's current interest rate policy and its real-world impacts. Cardone's viewpoint arises from decades of experience navigating interest rate cycles as a business leader and investor. As the founder of Cardone Capital and author of multiple best-selling guides on real estate and finance, Cardone has built a reputation for championing strategies that provide financial mobility to average Americans. His extensive following stems not only from his investment record but also from his practical guidance targeting working-class wealth creation. This background provides a unique perspective to his blunt critique of monetary policy. More News from Barchart Here's What Happened the Last Time Novo Nordisk Stock Was This Oversold As Nvidia Gets Ready for New China H20 Shipments, How Should You Play NVDA Stock? As SoFi Raises 2025 Guidance, Should You Buy, Sell, or Hold SOFI Stock Here? Markets move fast. Keep up by reading our FREE midday Barchart Brief newsletter for exclusive charts, analysis, and headlines. The Federal Reserve, under the leadership of Chair Jerome Powell, has maintained interest rates within a range of 4.25% to 4.5% through much of 2025, citing inflation rates that remain above its 2% target. Policymakers have emphasized their dual mandate to balance maximum employment with price stability, and have held rates steady despite mounting public and political pressure for cuts. While central bank officials argue that high interest rates are necessary to restrain persistent post-pandemic inflation, particularly as the effects of tariffs work through the economy, critics like Cardone argue that the consequences of a higher-rate regime are most acutely felt by those without significant financial assets. Cardone's assertion that 'regular people' are being punished is rooted in the functioning of interest rates across the economy. Elevated borrowing costs make mortgages, car loans, and business capital more expensive, directly squeezing household budgets and inhibiting access to credit for consumers and small entrepreneurs. This is particularly impactful in an era when wage gains haven't always kept pace with the increased costs of servicing debt or obtaining new financing. Conversely, those with significant wealth or investment portfolios typically have access to more sophisticated means of hedging or even benefiting from shifting rate environments. For Cardone, whose platform is built around encouraging ordinary individuals to build and leverage wealth through education and strategic investment, these conditions highlight the limitations facing the majority of Americans. His criticism, while clearly incendiary, resonates with a segment of the public that perceives central bank policy as disconnected from the daily realities of household finance. Cardone's skepticism of policy decisions also fits within a broader climate of political debate, as fiscal policymakers from both sides of the aisle - and most notably, President Trump - have openly questioned Fed leadership and called for swifter rate cuts. As inflation data continues to influence interest rate policy, the divide between policymakers' macroeconomic objectives and the lived experience of consumers remains a central feature of the economic landscape. Cardone's critique, rooted in his extensive experience helping individuals navigate financial challenges, further highlights the ongoing debate about who truly bears the consequences of central banking decisions — and whose voices are most influential in shaping future policy. On the date of publication, Caleb Naysmith did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Sign in to access your portfolio