FM Sitharaman takes stock of steps for cybersecurity at banks amid rising border tensions
Senior officials from the Department of Financial Services of the Ministry of Finance, the CERT-In, the RBI, the IRDAI, and the NPCI attended the meeting, which focused on reviewing the banking sector's operational and cybersecurity preparedness, including digital public-facing applications such as internet banking and UPI.
The Managing Directors and CEOs of all the banks and insurance companies apprised the Finance Minister about the measures they are undertaking, given the ongoing tensions at the border.
Bank MDs & CEOs informed that cybersecurity measures have been reinforced throughout the banking system. Anti-DDoS (Distributed Denial-of-Service) systems have been implemented by banks to protect against massive cyber-attacks. To guarantee institutional readiness, mock drills have been held encompassing cybersecurity and disaster recovery scenarios at the highest levels. They apprised that phishing attempts are being actively watched, and staff members have received several internal alerts to increase awareness.
Bank officials stated that their Security Operations Centre (SOC) and Network Operations Centres are fully operational and on high alert. These centres are coordinating closely with CERT-In and the National Critical Information Infrastructure Protection Centre (NCIIPC), facilitating real-time data sharing and threat monitoring.
During the meeting, the Finance Minister stressed the critical role of the banking and financial sector in ensuring economic stability during heightened geopolitical tensions and challenging times.
She directed all banks to remain fully alert and prepared to deal with any eventuality or crisis, ensuring uninterrupted access to banking & financial services for citizens and businesses across the country, especially in border areas.
She remarked that banking services, both physical and digital, must function without disruption and glitches. Emergency protocols should be updated and tested to handle any arising contingencies, she added..
The Finance Minister expressed deep concern about the safety of bank employees and their families working at branches around the border areas. She directed banks to ensure their adequate safety by effectively coordinating with the security agencies.
She asked banks to ensure that citizens and businesses do not suffer under any circumstances, and priority must be given to seamless cash availability at ATMs, uninterrupted UPI and internet banking services, and continued access to essential banking facilities.
The Finance Minister directed banks to conduct regular audits of their cybersecurity systems and data centres and ensure that all digital and core banking infrastructure is fully firewalled and monitored round the clock to prevent breaches or any hostile cyber activity.
She instructed banks to designate two dedicated senior officials identified at the headquarters, one for reporting all cyber-related matters and the other to ensure operational matters, including the functioning of bank branches and the availability of cash in ATMs. Both dedicated officers should report any incident to CERT-In/relevant agencies and DFS on a real-time basis.
In this regard, banks were also asked to coordinate in real time with the RBI, CERT-In and relevant government agencies to ensure robust and agile information exchange and response, according to an official statement.
Besides, the Finance Minister directed insurance companies to ensure timely claim settlements and uninterrupted customer service.
The Finance Minister mentioned that the sponsor banks should ensure that regional rural banks (RRBs) are well-supported during these times and hand-hold them for any issues that they are facing.
Sitharaman reiterated that the government is firmly committed to national security and economic stability, noting that the country's banking and financial system remains robust and resilient.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
25 minutes ago
- Hans India
US set to leave UNESCO again
Paris: The United States announced Tuesday it will again pull out of the UN's educational, scientific and cultural agency because it believes that its involvement is not in the country's national interest, and that the agency promotes anti-Israel speech. This decision comes only two years after the United States rejoined UNESCO after leaving in 2018, during US President Trump's first administration. State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said the withdrawal was linked to UNESCO's perceived agenda to 'advance divisive social and cultural causes.'
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
If you don't ask, you don't get; not even under RTI!
The Union Government should understand that the Right to Information (RTI) is an integral part of Freedom of Expression. The Right to Information Act 2005 mandates a timely response to any citizen's requests for government information. It is an initiative that is aimed to provide quick access to information. This is in addition to access to all RTI-related information and disclosures published on the web by various public authorities under the Union and state governments. The primary objective of the RTI is to empower citizens, promote transparency and accountability in government operations, combat corruption, and ensure democracy works for the people. An informed citizen is better equipped to keep a necessary vigil on the instruments of governance and make the government more accountable to the citizens of the country. Important features of the RTI: The Act applied to all government and public authorities at the central, state, and local levels. People can request information from public authorities regarding the functioning of government departments, policies, programs, and other relevant matters. Public authorities must provide the requested information within 30 days of receiving an application, or 48 hours regarding cases pertaining to life and liberty. The Act defines what constitutes a public authority and makes it mandatory for such organizations to appoint Public Information Officers (PIOs) responsible for handling RTI requests. If a request is denied or not answered satisfactorily, the applicant can appeal to the higher authorities, including the Information Commissioner at the state and central levels. The Act protects whistleblowers, who may face risks or threats for seeking information or exposing corruption. However, there are some exemptions, such as national security, personal privacy, and commercial confidentiality, where information may not be disclosed. The RTI has been instrumental in promoting transparency, accountability, and reducing corruption in India's government and public institutions. It has enabled citizens to actively participate in the democratic process by having access to information that helps them make informed decisions and hold public officials accountable for their actions. With the Right to expression in place, why an RTI? Although the Right to Information is not a fundamental right, it protects the fundamental right to Freedom of Expression and Speech under Article 19(1)(a) and the Right to Life and Personal Liberty under Article 21 guaranteed by the Constitution. Equality is a necessary Fundamental Right under Article 14. The authorities under the RTI Act 2005 are called public authorities. The Public Information Officer (PIO) or the First Appellate Authority performs the quasi-judicial function of deciding on the application and appeal, respectively. The RTI was enacted to consolidate the fundamental right in the Indian Constitution, 'freedom of speech'. Since RTI is implicit in the Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression under Article 19 of the Indian Constitution, it is an implied fundamental right. Liberty of thought, Freedom of expression, right to vote, and right to question depend upon the Right to information. Mahatma Gandhi once mentioned: If you don't ask, you don't get. This captures the spirit of the Act. Information held or controlled by a public authority must be shared. The authorities need not 'own' the information. If the authority controls the information, it must be shared when a citizen makes a request. Not a suggestion, it is a 'Right'' Section 3 states that all citizens shall have the right to information. It is not a suggestion or recommendation but a right. Right to government information was enacted in Sweden in 1949, though the basic principle of access to official information had been recognized there in 1766. Finland adopted a similar law in 1951. The United States introduced the Freedom of Information Act in 1966. Several European countries enacted access-to-information legislation in the 1970s. Australia, Canada, and New Zealand enacted the law in the early 1980s. Enter Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023 Public documents 74. Public and private documents. Certified copies of public documents, 75. Proof of documents by production of a certified copy, 76. Proof of other official documents, 77. There are a few changes in the Evidence Act 1872, as regards BSA. That is why the NDA faced criticism for giving cosmetic colours to the British Law with Hindi names. Scope of RTI: What does the right to information cover? It is explained in detail with the help of the diagram below. It involves inspecting, taking, and obtaining information. What is information: Information includes correspondence, notes, Appendix to correspondence and Appendix to notes. File noting's are an integral part of information. Section 4: At a high level, Section 4 requires every public authority to routinely disclose information about its functions, decision-making norms, documents held, employee contacts, and budgets. Section 4 is important, but it is more of a recommendation. It should be a right. The details are provided below. If this information is made available to people proactively, there is no need for RTI. Why RTI? The main objective of a democracy is good governance. Citizens must have the right to protect themselves from bad governance. The goodness of the government is reflected in the quality of governance. It is a constitutional right, not just an ordinary Act or legislation. It is the most empowering legislation for democracy. Articles 14, 19, and 21 are very important for democracy, including the right to expression. (The writer is Advisor, School of Law, Mahindra University, Hyderabad)
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
IOB's Hong Kong unit fined over compliance breach
Mumbai: Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) on Tuesday has fined the Hong Kong unit of Indian Overseas Bank HK$8,500,000 as penalty for failing to comply with regulations covering money laundering and counterterrorist financing. ADVERTISEMENT It ordered the bank to conduct a review of its past transactions and implement measures to address contraventions and its compliance shortcomings. HKMA stated that the disciplinary actions follow investigations into bank's systems and controls for compliance with the anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing ordinance (AMLO). "The control deficiencies identified related to failures to establish and maintain effective procedures for continuously monitoring business relationships with customers," HKMA stated. (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)
