Troubled Whyalla steelworks gets $2.4bn government bailout as hunt for new owner begins
The federal and South Australian governments would 'combine dollar for dollar on administration' to ensure the steelworks keep operating, and staff and creditors are paid, while a new owner is found, Anthony Albanese told steelworkers .
'But in addition to that, between our two governments, we have $2.4bn to make sure that this transition occurs,' Albanese said, while visiting the town on Thursday.
A day after the SA government rushed legislation through parliament that allowed it to place steelworks owner GFG Alliance into administration, Albanese said Australia 'cannot just be a quarry that exports things overseas, waits for jobs to be created, waits for value to be added, and then import it back'.
The funding will deliver $100m in immediate support, including creditor assistance payments ($50m), infrastructure upgrades ($32.6m), jobs matching and skills hub ($6m) and stabilising the steelworks ($384m).
The state and federal governments will jointly invest $384m to fund the steelworks' operations during administration, ensuring workers and contractors keep working and continue to be paid.
Another $1.9bn has been allocated to investing in upgrades and new infrastructure to ensure the steelworks has a sustainable future.
GFG had been under intense pressure from the government to pay debts to creditors of the steelworks and the state, which is owed 'tens of millions of dollars', including $15m to SA Water.
Administrators KordaMentha said keeping the steelworks running would 'preserve around 4000 direct and indirect jobs'.
The SA government has deferred plans for a $600m hydrogen plant at Whyalla, and that funding will be directed to the support package, as well as $50m from the Whyalla Steelworks Operational Efficiency Improvements Fund.
The state premier, Peter Malinauskas, said he was 'never going to allow a taxpayer funded bailout of GFG'.
'Now that the steelworks is no longer under the control of GFG, the state government can partner with the federal government and make the long-term investments necessary to secure the future of Whyalla and Australian steel making,' he said.
The federal government also announced a new green iron investment fund to boost green iron manufacturing and supply chains.
Up to $500m from the fund will support the longer term transformation of the steelworks, and make financing available to the future steelworks owner to upgrade the facility to produce green iron.
The opposition leader, Peter Dutton, said the government's approach to the renewable zoning policy has been a disaster.
'There's no greater example of it than in South Australia right now. If the prime minister wants to continue this game, then there are going to be job losses in Whyalla,' he told radio 2GB.
'I think the premier of South Australia realises that the game is up, a lot of taxpayer money has been wasted. If the government's continuing to put good money after bad with green hydrogen, then they will do damage to the economy and those local jobs at the Whyalla steel works will be lost.'
GFG's owner, the UK billionaire Sanjeev Gupta, said the state was on the 'wrong course' in forcing the operation into administration and he was seeking legal advice, according to an internal company memo obtained by The Australian Financial Review.
Gupta last Friday said a debt settlement deal had been reached with creditors of global financier Greensill Capital, which had advanced billions of dollars in credit to GFG before collapsing in 2021.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Australia pays US another $800m for Aukus amid Trump administration review of security pact
Australia made a second $800m payment to America's shipbuilding industry – bringing total payments so far to $1.6bn which was promised before the Trump administration placied the Aukus agreement under review. As part of the Aukus deal – in which Australia would buy nuclear submarines from the US ahead of its own nuclear submarines being built in Adelaide - Australia has agreed to pay about $4.6bn towards boosting US shipbuilding capacity. After decades of under-investment, the US has fewer nuclear submarines than it needs for its own defence, and is building them too slowly to replace its ageing fleet, potentially jeopardising the sale of any submarines to Australia. The office of Australian defence minister Richard Marles has confirmed the second $800m payment was made in the second quarter of 2025 to boost US boat-building, with payments occurring 'in line with Australia's commitment to contribute US$2 billion by the end of 2025'. A further payment is due later this year. 'When the AUKUS pathway was announced in March 2023, Australia was clear that we would make a proportionate contribution to the United States industrial base,' a defence spokesperson said 'Australia's contribution is about accelerating US production rates and maintenance to enable the delivery of Australia's future Virginia class submarines.' Anthony Albanese confirmed the payment was made as part of an agreed schedule, committed to before the US announced its review of Aukus. 'There is a schedule of payments to be made, we have an agreement with the United States as well as with the United Kingdom, it is about increasing the capacity, their industrial capacity, and as part of that, we have Australians on the ground, learning the skills so that when it comes to the SSN Aukus, the submarines being built here in Australia, we have those skills.' Australia is also paying the UK about $4.6bn to assist its shipbuilding industry. In June, US president Donald Trump ordered a review into the Aukus deal signed by his predecessor Joe Biden. The review is being headed by the Pentagon's under secretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby, who has previously declared himself 'skeptical' about the deal, fearing it could leave US sailors exposed and under-resourced. There is speculation the review could demand further financial contributions – or political commitments such as support in a conflict over Taiwan – from Australia in exchange for the sale of nuclear submarines and transfer of nuclear technology. The US defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, has already asked Australia to lift its overall defence spending to 3.5% of GDP, from its current level of 2%. The US has been demanding similar increases from other allies, including Nato countries. One of the most significant concerns over Aukus in the US is the naval superpower's capacity to spare any submarines to sell to Australia: the first sale is forecast for 2032. The Aukus agreement mandates that before any submarine can be sold to Australia, the US commander-in-chief – the president of the day – must certify that America relinquishing a submarine will not diminish the US navy's undersea capability. The US's submarine fleet numbers are currently a quarter below their target and the country is producing boats at half the rate it needs to service its own needs, US government figures show. Marles told parliament in question time that Aukus would deliver Australia a 'long-range submarine capability' required for a more contested region and world. 'We are living in a more volatile world with increasing challenges… we need a defence force which will give pause for thought for any potential adversary which seeks to coerce us.' The head of the Australian Submarine Agency, Vice-Admiral Jonathan Mead, told senate estimates in February this year Australia's funding to the US industrial base was a vital element of the Aukus deal. 'This contribution will help uplift the US submarine industrial base capacity and accelerate sustainment and production to enable the delivery of Virginia class submarines to Australia. 'Australia's contribution to the US submarine industrial base is to benefit both the United States and Australia.'
Rhyl Journal
8 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
Water industry may be added to list of sensitive business sectors, says minister
It comes amid an overhaul of regulation for the troubled sector and as firms including Thames Water and Southern Water face financial woes. Communications, energy and data infrastructure are among the 17 sectors that must notify the investment security unit of certain business deals since the list was created in 2021. Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden has asked for businesses' views on extending this requirement to the water sector. It is not expected to affect large numbers of deals but reflects 'increasing risks to the sector's resilience in a growing threat landscape', the Cabinet Office said. 'Data shows our investment security powers are working well, but there's more we can do to ensure our tool kit keeps pace with the modern economy,' Mr McFadden said. 'We're taking action to hone the type of transactions facing the greatest scrutiny, as well as consulting on updates to the sectors of the economy specified in the legislation.' Thames Water is battling to secure funding to shore up its creaking finances and stave off temporary nationalisation by the Government. Southern Water asked its owner, Australian investment firm Macquarie, for an extra £2.1 billion earlier this month to help boost its struggling finances. Making semiconductors and critical minerals into their own standalone categories and moving computing hardware to fall under semiconductors is also being proposed. Mr McFadden also said he planned to remove some requirements that are 'very unlikely to present risk'. Businesses will no longer need to notify the unit of certain internal reorganisations or when appointing liquidators, special administrators and official receivers. Secondary legislation would be brought to Parliament to put these changes in place.
Glasgow Times
18 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Water industry may be added to list of sensitive business sectors, says minister
It comes amid an overhaul of regulation for the troubled sector and as firms including Thames Water and Southern Water face financial woes. Communications, energy and data infrastructure are among the 17 sectors that must notify the investment security unit of certain business deals since the list was created in 2021. Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden said the Government was taking action to 'hone the type of transactions facing greatest scrutiny' (James Manning/PA) Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden has asked for businesses' views on extending this requirement to the water sector. It is not expected to affect large numbers of deals but reflects 'increasing risks to the sector's resilience in a growing threat landscape', the Cabinet Office said. 'Data shows our investment security powers are working well, but there's more we can do to ensure our tool kit keeps pace with the modern economy,' Mr McFadden said. 'We're taking action to hone the type of transactions facing the greatest scrutiny, as well as consulting on updates to the sectors of the economy specified in the legislation.' Thames Water is battling to secure funding to shore up its creaking finances and stave off temporary nationalisation by the Government. Southern Water sought an extra £2.1 billion from its Australian owner earlier this month (Chris Ison/PA) Southern Water asked its owner, Australian investment firm Macquarie, for an extra £2.1 billion earlier this month to help boost its struggling finances. Making semiconductors and critical minerals into their own standalone categories and moving computing hardware to fall under semiconductors is also being proposed. Mr McFadden also said he planned to remove some requirements that are 'very unlikely to present risk'. Businesses will no longer need to notify the unit of certain internal reorganisations or when appointing liquidators, special administrators and official receivers. Secondary legislation would be brought to Parliament to put these changes in place.
