
Court says Trump can't bar refugees from entering US with travel ban
US District Judge Jamal Whitehead ruled late on Monday that Trump's June order barring people from 12 countries from entering the US expressly states that it will not stop people from seeking refugee status.
'In other words, by its plain terms, the Proclamation excludes refugees from its scope,' Whitehead wrote.
The ruling is the latest development in a dizzying number of court cases challenging the Trump administration's efforts to radically restrict immigration through a raft of policies that have stretched the limits of executive power.
The judge ordered the administration to continue processing a group of 80 refugees who had already been through vetting and were 'presumptively protected refugees' who were nonetheless turned back due to the travel ban.
That ban applies to 12 countries and expands on a similar effort pursued by Trump during his first term in office, when his so-called 'Muslim ban' prompted widespread anger and faced legal challenges before being ultimately upheld by the conservative-majority Supreme Court.
The June order applies to countries such as Afghanistan, Yemen, Iran, and Sudan, as well as Haiti and Myanmar, among others.
The administration has also revoked existing legal status for scores of people from countries like Afghanistan and Haiti, throwing their future in the country into doubt and opening them up to the possibility of deportations to countries that experts say remain mired in conflict and unsafe conditions.
A US court temporarily paused an order by the Trump administration ending Temporary Protective Status (TPS) for Afghans living in the US on Monday, several hours before it was set to expire, extending that status by one week as the court deliberates on the issue further.
Trump suspended the US refugee admissions programme upon entering office at the beginning of his second term in January, leaving thousands of people who had already been cleared for admission, sometimes after years of an arduous bureaucratic and vetting process, in a state of limbo.
A handful of refugees and advocacy groups sued, and Whitehead ruled in February that the administration could not suspend a programme created and funded by Congress. A US Circuit court put that decision on hold in March, however, ruling that the president has wide latitude over the question of who may enter the country.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Al Jazeera
How will the US immigration system change?
How will the US immigration system change? By the Numbers Video Duration 02 minutes 28 seconds 02:28 Video Duration 02 minutes 28 seconds 02:28 Video Duration 01 minutes 18 seconds 01:18 Video Duration 01 minutes 40 seconds 01:40 Video Duration 01 minutes 49 seconds 01:49 Video Duration 02 minutes 18 seconds 02:18 Video Duration 01 minutes 51 seconds 01:51


Al Jazeera
an hour ago
- Al Jazeera
US Senate approves cutting billions in foreign aid as Trump demands
United States senators have passed a package of sweeping cuts that would slash Washington's foreign aid expenditures by about $8bn as part of President Donald Trump's pledge to drastically shrink federal spending. The package, which passed in a 51-48 vote early on Thursday, cancels $9bn in spending already approved by Congress, including more than $1bn to be stripped from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Two of the Senate's 53 Republicans voted with Democrats against the legislation. The vote was seen as a test of how easily senators would approve spending cuts recommended by Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). The president, who has made slashing federal spending a domestic priority, established the department and had put billionaire tech mogul Elon Musk at the helm to identify areas for government cost-cutting before the SpaceX and Tesla CEO left in May. A public spat between Musk and Trump over deficit spending erupted a short time later. Food for starving children in Afghanistan, Pakistan to be burned Much of the $8bn in foreign aid cuts under the 'rescissions' package, which now returns to the House of Representatives for final approval, had been allocated to the now-defunct US Agency for International Development (USAID), a prime target for DOGE. The agency, which was established during the Cold War to run aid programmes and project US soft power internationally, closed its doors this month after the Trump administration's announcement in January that it was shutting down USAID. Within the funding that was cut was $4.15bn to boost economies and strengthen democratic institutions in developing countries, The Associated Press news agency reported. The package also cancelled $800m for a programme that assists with emergency shelter, water, sanitation and family reunification for people fleeing their homelands as well as $496m for food, water and healthcare in countries affected by natural disasters or conflicts. A senior US official said on Wednesday that nearly 500 tonnes of high-energy biscuits intended to feed 27,000 starving children in Afghanistan and Pakistan would soon be incinerated due to the Trump administration's decision to shut down USAID. 'A bunch of junk' Democrats argued that weakening foreign aid efforts would diminish the US's global status and leave a vacuum that would be filled by rivals like China. Senator Brian Schatz said cutting food aid and disease prevention measures was having life-and-death consequences, AP reported. 'People are dying right now, not in spite of us but because of us,' he said. But Senator Lindsey Graham, a Republican, told the AFP news agency that while he was a 'big fan' of foreign aid and the soft power it brought, he believed money was being wasted. 'When you start spending money on a bunch of junk and liberal programmes disconnected from the purpose of the aid package, it makes it difficult on a guy like me,' he said. Republican leaders had removed a $400m cut to an HIV prevention programme from the package after requests from its own lawmakers. The programme is credited with saving millions of lives. US Constitution's ideals 'undermined' The cuts to public broadcasting, which Republicans have accused of having a left-wing bias, also met with fierce objections. Democrats said they would remove a key public service that performs a vital role, particularly during emergencies like natural disasters. The package cancels $1.1bn that the Corporation for Public Broadcasting was due to receive over the next two years. It would help fund National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) as well as more than 1,500 local radio and television stations. Democrats said the rescissions package, by cutting $9bn from a $6.8 trillion federal budget, would do little to meaningfully tackle the deficit but would harm important public institutions. 'It is yet another example of the spirit and ideals of our constitution being undermined in a terrible way,' New Jersey Senator Cory Booker told AFP. Others, including Senator Mitch McConnell, the former Republican Senate leader, expressed concerns about ceding congressional spending powers to the president, saying he was worried about handing the White House a 'blank cheque' on spending issues, AP reported. But he ultimately voted to approve the package.


Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Europe assumes financial burden of Ukraine war, angering Russia
The United States and Germany have struck a deal to provide Ukraine with weaponry to protect cities from nightly Russian attacks. Germany was prepared to pay for the systems as part of a broader US deal to sell Europe arms destined for Ukraine. Details began to emerge on July 10 when Chancellor Friedrich Merz said Germany would buy US-made air defence systems. 'We are also prepared to purchase additional Patriot systems from the US to make them available to Ukraine,' Merz was quoted as saying on the sidelines of a Ukraine Recovery Conference in Rome. On Friday, US President Donald Trump told NBC News that the US would sell NATO US-made weapons, including the Patriots, that NATO would give to Ukraine. Adding to the crescendo, US Senator Lindsey Graham told CBS on Sunday: 'In the coming days, you will see weapons flowing at a record level to help Ukraine defend themselves.' Meanwhile, Russia continued to capture Ukrainian villages. On Friday, the Russian Ministry of Defence claimed to have seized Zelyonaya Dolina in the eastern region of Donetsk and Sobolevka in Kharkiv in the northeast. Nikolayevka in Donetsk fell on Sunday, Malinovka in Zaporizhia on Monday and Novokhatskoye in Donetsk on Wednesday. Yet even at this accelerated rate of 15sq km (6sq miles) a day, Russia would need 89 years to capture the rest of Ukraine, The Economist magazine estimated. Russia continued to pound Ukraine's cities with combinations of drones and missiles every night over the past week. The biggest attack came early on Saturday. The Ukrainian air force said it downed or electronically suppressed 577 of 597 drones launched overnight and 25 of 26 Kh-101 cruise missiles. June also saw the highest monthly civilian casualties in three years with 232 people killed and 1,343 injured, the United Nations Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine said. Trump: 'We're getting our money back in full' Trump announced on Monday at the White House that he had approved $10bn in weapons sales to Ukraine, which were to be paid for by Ukraine's European allies. 'We've made a deal today where we're going to be sending them weapons and they're going to be paying for them,' he said. He doubled down on that financial message, telling reporters on Tuesday that after spending billions to help Ukraine, 'we're getting our money back in full.' Graham played on the same theme. 'Stay tuned for a plan where America will begin to sell to our European allies tremendous amounts of weapons that can benefit Ukraine,' he told CBS. Trump said he would send 17 Patriot systems to Ukraine. It was not clear if this meant 17 batteries or 17 launchers. 'It's everything. It's Patriots. It's all of them. It's a full complement with the batteries,' Trump said. A Patriot battery usually contains six launchers, each typically carrying four missiles. The particulars of the deal have remained murky and perhaps deliberately so. German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius, who was in Washington, DC, on Monday, didn't disclose details. 'But one thing is clear – and this is a message to all other European NATO members: Everyone must open their wallets. It's about urgently raising the funds needed, especially for air defence, because Ukraine is under enormous pressure,' Pistorius said. Russia has increased its attacks on Ukraine's cities since the beginning of the year. In June alone, Moscow launched 330 missiles and 5,000 drones against Ukraine. While Patriots are too expensive to use on drones, they are the only weapon in Ukraine that can shoot down ballistic missiles and are also effective against cruise missiles. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said in April that Ukraine needed 10 more Patriot systems to protect its cities – presumably referring to complete batteries. Germany's head of defence planning, Major General Christian Freuding, said on Saturday that Pistorius and his US counterpart, Pete Hegseth, had discussed a German offer to buy two Patriot systems for Ukraine. It was not clear if Pistorius's visit to Washington, DC, was related to that. On Tuesday, Trump told reporters the Patriot systems were 'already being shipped, … coming in from Germany'. Separately, Zelenskyy told Trump's special envoy to Ukraine, General Keith Kellogg, when they met in Kyiv on Monday that Ukraine was ready 'to purchase American weapons, particularly air defence systems'. Russia reacts with fury to US-German deal as Trump weighs sanctions Moscow has balked at the Western deal for Ukraine. 'Mr Merz is a fierce proponent of confrontation on all fronts and of aggressively mobilising Europe,' Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Friday. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said Germany, France and the United Kingdom were 'attempting to raise Europe for war, … a direct war against Russia'. Trump also announced possible secondary sanctions on buyers of Russian oil. 'We are very, very unhappy with Russia – I am,' he said Monday in the White House while sitting next to NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte. 'I am disappointed in President [Vladimir] Putin because I thought we would have a deal two months ago.' Trump said he was putting Putin on 50 days notice. 'We're going to be doing secondary tariffs if we don't have a deal in 50 days. It's very simple. And they'll be at 100 percent.' The tariffs would be levied on goods the US imports from countries that buy Russian oil, an idea Graham has aggressively pursued in recent weeks, naming China, India and Brazil as the worst offenders. 'We would like to understand what is behind this statement about 50 days,' Lavrov said. 'Earlier, there were also the deadlines of 24 hours and of 100 days. We've seen it all and really would like to understand the motivation of the US president.' Lavrov was referring to Trump's campaign boast that he would end the war in Ukraine in a day and Kellogg's self-imposed 100-day goal to bring about a ceasefire. Some observers are sceptical about whether Trump will get tough on Putin, whom he has openly admired. Dmitry Medvedev, the deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, shrugged off Trump's remarks. 'Trump issued a theatrical ultimatum to the Kremlin. The world shuddered, expecting the consequences. Belligerent Europe was disappointed. Russia didn't care,' he wrote on social media. But Peskov on Tuesday called Trump's remarks 'very serious', adding: 'Something in them concerns President Putin personally.' On Wednesday, the normally restrained Peskov sounded even more alarmed that Europe was now willing to foot the bill for the war without US assistance. 'What we are observing so far is that the Europeans are displaying a completely aggressive militarist stance, declaring their intention to spend enormous funds to purchase weapons, to further provoke the continuation of war,' Peskov said. 'Of course, it is very hard to predict anything amid such an emotional state, bordering on irrationality, which reigns on the European continent,' he added. The only thing that assuaged Russian concerns was indecision over sending Ukraine Germany's Taurus missiles, which can strike deep inside Russia with large warheads. That news suggested that Europeans 'still have some sense of reason left', Peskov said on Wednesday. European defence and reconstruction without the US Europe's willingness to spend on defence may also have brought forth the dawn of more independence from the US. Last week, the UK and France announced a scaling-up of their Combined Joint Force to a corps level, a reorientation of that force from overseas expeditions, 'refocusing it on defending Europe' and upgrading it 'to war-fighting readiness'. They announced new procurement of Storm Shadow/SCALP missiles and joint research on a generation of missiles that would 'harness the power of AI'. They also issued the Northwood Declaration on closer nuclear coordination. 'Any adversary threatening the vital interests of Britain or France could be confronted by the strength of the nuclear forces of both nations,' the UK Ministry of Defence said. France and Britain are the only European states with a nuclear deterrent. The US Senate Armed Services Committee, meanwhile, approved $500m in security assistance for Ukraine as part of its draft language for the next fiscal year – the only military aid announced under the Trump administration. Under former President Joe Biden, the US spent $64.6bn on military aid to Ukraine, according to a tracker run by the Kiel Institute for the World Economy. Biden also left $4bn unspent in the form of a presidential authority to draw down weapons from US stockpiles and send them to Ukraine. Trump has not exercised that authority, insisting that the US needs to be paid back. As Trump touted $10bn in weapons sales, the European Commission announced 10 billion euros ($11.6bn) in investments in Ukraine, leveraged through 2.3 billion euros ($2.7bn) in loans and grants from European institutions. The announcement came at the Ukraine Recovery Conference. The money is for rebuilding critical infrastructure and networks and helping small businesses. 'We need a Marshall Plan-style approach,' Zelenskyy declared upon arrival in Rome, referring to the post-World War II system of grants from the US that rebuilt the European economy.