Conservatives will look to amend Government welfare Bill
The Tories will look to lay amendments to the legislation – set to be renamed the Universal Credit Bill – and party leader Mrs Badenoch is due to deliver a speech on welfare on Thursday.
Among the amendments the Conservatives will propose is a requirement for eligibility for Pip to be determined by a face-to-face meeting, rather than virtually.
As part of the Government's reforms, the Department for Work and Pensions has proposed a new 'severe conditions criteria' for universal credit.
Claimants in this category will be entitled to a higher rate of the benefit, and will not be routinely reassessed to receive money.
Another of the Conservatives' amendments would prevent somebody from being classed as having a severe condition for the purpose of universal credit only by having anxiety, mild depression, or ADHD.
The third amendment would block the increase in universal credit and restrict Pip for some people who are not British citizens.
In her welfare speech, Mrs Badenoch is expected to say that the Conservatives are 'the only party that is prepared to take the tough decisions to get spending under control'.
'I have no doubt that, emboldened by their success in forcing Starmer to U-turn last week, Labour's backbench MPs will now be eyeing up more concessions,' she will say.
The original welfare proposals had been part of a package that ministers expected would save up to £5 billion a year, and economists are now warning that tax rises are likely to plug the gap left by the concessions to rebels.
On Friday, Chancellor Rachel Reeves admitted that the fallout over the Government's welfare Bill had been 'damaging' and did not rule out tax rises in the autumn budget.
Health Secretary Wes Streeting, Chancellor Rachel Reeves and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer at the launch of the Government's 10-year health plan (Jack Hill/The Times/PA)
It came after images of the Chancellor crying during Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday spooked the financial markets and led to questions about her future, although a spokesman said she was upset by a personal matter.
In an interview with The Guardian, Ms Reeves said it would be 'irresponsible' to rule out the idea of tax rises and warned 'there are costs to what happened' with the welfare Bill.
The Sunday Times reported that the two-child benefit cap could be unlikely to be scrapped – as many Labour backbenchers want – as ministers look to balance the finances.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
30 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Monmouthshire council home care review to be discussed
Carers and those they support to remain in their own homes hit out at changes to contracts earlier this year which will see some providers in the south of Monmouthshire change. Due to anger at the changes the council's combined opposition , at a meetng picketed by carers and supporters including clients, forced a review of the contract process and how decisions were made. County councillors will consider a report giving an overview of the process, and lessons already learnt, at a special scrutiny meeting on Wednesday, July 9. The Labour-led council said it retendered domiciliary care contracts as part of a revamp of how care at home is provided and to try better manage costs as well as provide common employment terms for care workers. It divided the south of the county into three areas; Chepstow town and rural, Caldicot town and The Levels and rural with firms awarded one area each as it wanted to move away from buying care packages on an ad-hoc basis. Magor-based Lougher Home Care, which had operated across the area, was awarded the The Levels and rural area which meant it would no longer operate in Caldicot and Chepstow and clients would be allocated new providers. Under the contracts staff are able to transfer with existing terms and conditions protected but many working for Lougher said they didn't want to join either Radis Community Care, that holds the Chepstow contracts, or Care Quality Services that will operate in Calidicot and would likely look for alternative employment outside of care. The council's Conservative opposition also said the changes had resulted in a locally based firm losing contracts to national firms and questioned if the council's procurement process disadvantaged small businesses. No formal challenges to the contract decisions were made under the procurement process by any of the 13 bidders. The council's performance and overview scrutiny committee will consider the report by social services' commissioning manager, Ceri York, at the special meeting. Her report states when contracts were awarded 161 people were written to advising them of a change to their existing provider and 35, or 22 per cent, have since asked about direct payments which allow people to employ the carer of their choice. It also identified ways the procurement process, which was run in partnership with Ardal the body that buys services and products for Monmouthshire, Torfaen, Cardiff and the Vale of Glamorgan councils, could be simplified and run to 'more realistic timescales'. Increased engagement with people using the service could be built into the timeline, the report has suggested, so they would have a say in how the contract process is decided, and it also identified there has been a negative impact on them. It has said earlier engagement with existing providers during the second phase of the process 'may improve cooperation and reduce anxiety'. The report states: 'A robust procurement process has been carried out overseen by Ardal Procurement to ensure that all contract and procurement legislation has been adhered to.' Contracts were awarded in March but service providers aren't due to change until August 19. In line with the full council's decision a review of the council's procurement process in general still has to be carried out.
Reuters
31 minutes ago
- Reuters
Sterling slips with economic data, tariff uncertainty in focus
July 7 (Reuters) - Sterling slipped on Monday in a lacklustre start to a week packed with economic data reports that could offer clues to the interest rate outlook, while globally investors watched the latest deadline on U.S. tariffs. Sterling slipped 0.3% and last fetched $1.3601 against the U.S. dollar , while the pound was broadly unchanged against the euro at 86.23 pence. Last week saw investors in UK assets rattled by ambiguities around the health of public finances, as a number of U-turns by the governing Labour Party over welfare reforms sparked speculation around the future of finance minister Rachel Reeves. Traders are now shifting their focus to a set of data this week, with Monday bringing a report that showed British house prices stagnated month-on-month during June as expected, after an increase in tax on property transactions took effect in April. However, "the post April dip is likely to fizzle out", said Victoria Scholar, head of investment at interactive investor. "Plus, mortgage lending is improving, thanks to four rate cuts from the Bank of England over the last year and two more priced in this year." Later in the week, traders will scrutinize a report on gross domestic product that could offer clarity on the health of the UK economy and determine the outlook on interest rates. Bank of England policymaker Alan Taylor said late on Friday that he thought it would be better to cut interest rates now rather than wait and risk needing to cut them in a hurry. Taylor expects the Bank Rate to fall to "around 3%" by the end of next year. Traders largely anticipate the next 25 basis points interest rate cut by the central bank will be in September, according to data compiled by LSEG. Meanwhile, investors globally were awaiting a Wednesday deadline ahead of which economies scrambled to strike trade deals with the U.S. to avoid sharply higher duties on their exports to the United States. Britain was the first to secure an agreement with the U.S. in May and has avoided the additional tariffs on steel and aluminium. Negotiations are ongoing to remove existing 25% duties on industrial metals altogether. The pound has appreciated about 2% since the deal with the U.S. and is trading close to its highest level since late 2021, also benefiting from a broader dollar weakness. Separately, a Deloitte survey showed British business executives now see greater opportunities closer to home, while the attractiveness of the United States as an investment destination dwindled. In other news, Reeves is expected to announce a 28.6 million pound ($39 million) investment by the National Wealth Fund in a carbon capture project that could create jobs in central and northern England, as the government strives to shore up public support.
Telegraph
36 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour refuses to shield state pension from ‘retirement tax'
Labour has rejected a petition calling for the personal allowance to be raised to protect state pensioners from income tax. The Treasury said the tax-free personal allowance would not be raised for retirees – a move campaigners have called a 'betrayal' of the elderly. Millions of Britain's poorest retirees face being dragged into the tax net when the state pension breaches the £12,570 tax-free threshold in a move which has been dubbed the 'retirement tax'. Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, has committed to keeping income tax thresholds frozen until at least 2028, a policy introduced under the Tories. Last week she refused to rule out extending the freeze beyond this date. However, the new 'full' state pension of £11,973 a year, paid to 12.9 million people aged 66 and over, is set to breach as early as next year. The triple lock ensures that the state pension rises each April by the highest of inflation, average earnings or 2.5pc. If average earnings continue to grow at their current rate of 5.2pc, then the state pension will exceed the tax-free allowance for the first time next year. This will mean pensioners – many of whom rely solely on the state pension for their income – will be taxed at 20pc on the portion above £12,570. In March, the Silver Voices campaign group submitted a petition with 125,000 signatures to Number 10 and the Chancellor calling on the Government to lift the personal allowance threshold for pensioners and to commit to raising it in line with future triple lock rises. However, the Treasury last week rejected the idea of 'exempting the state pension and other benefits' from income tax as doing so would 'add complexity to the tax system'. Dennis Reed, director of Silver Voices, said the 'inadequate' response had 'stuck two fingers up' at pensioners who felt 'insulted and betrayed' by the Government. He added: 'The British state pension isn't a king's ransom and it's very difficult to survive on at the moment, even without getting taxed on it. 'Keeping thresholds frozen is a backhanded way of taxing the state pension and triple lock, which is often people's only source of income. 'Extending the freeze to 2030 will make the situation even worse.' The threshold freeze helped to push an extra 2.5 million pensioners into the tax net under the Tories' 14 years in power. Ahead of the general election last year, the Conservatives proposed raising the personal allowance in line with the triple lock for pensioners to shield them from a 'retirement tax'. Analysis by wealth manager Quilter suggests that an extra one million low-income pensioners would be taxed on their state pension if Labour were to extend the freeze until 2030. 'Giving with one hand and taking with the other' Baroness Altmann, a former Tory pensions minister, said: 'Inevitably, if the state pension keeps going up and the threshold doesn't, more and more pensioners are going to pass the threshold with their state pension income alone. 'Those with no other income are increasingly going to find that the Government is giving with one hand and taking with the other. There's likely to be a lot of upset. 'Also, if you only have the state pension, an increase is only going to take you slightly over the threshold by a few pounds, the cost of administering it could well be more than the amount of tax they will collect.' It comes as the former Labour leader Lord Kinnock said the Party is 'willing to explore' a new wealth tax of 2pc on assets over £10m. In its response to the campaign, a Treasury spokesman said: 'Exempting the state pension and other benefits from income tax would add complexity to the tax system and those paying higher rates of tax would receive the greatest benefit. 'Individuals earning above the higher rate threshold would benefit more than those with incomes below, and those earning below the personal allowance would not benefit at all. 'It would also be expensive at a time when the Government has inherited a very challenging set of fiscal circumstances.'
