logo
New rail service connecting Carlisle with London and Scotland set to launch in 2026

New rail service connecting Carlisle with London and Scotland set to launch in 2026

ITV News02-06-2025

New rail services between London and central Scotland are expected to launch in mid-2026, providing more rail services connecting Cumbria and the south of Scotland to the UK's capital.
Transport giant FirstGroup said it has secured a deal with rolling stock company Eversholt Rail in relation to its planned new route between London Euston and Stirling.
Services will also call at Milton Keynes Central, Nuneaton, Crewe, Preston, Carlisle, Lockerbie, Motherwell, Whifflet, Greenfaulds and Larbert.
There will be four return services a day (three on Sundays) on the full route, with an additional daily return service between Euston and Preston, providing more competition to LNER and Avanti West Coast.
FirstGroup holds track access rights from regulator the Office of Rail and Road (ORR) for the route on the West Coast Main Line until 2030.
Trains will be operated under FirstGroup's Lumo brand, which currently runs only on the East Coast Main Line between London King's Cross and Edinburgh.
The new West Coast services were initially planned to start this year, but FirstGroup said they are 'currently expected to commence mid-2026 following the delivery of the trains and staff training'.
The company said the agreement with Eversholt Rail is for five Class 222 diesel trains, each with a capacity for about 340 standard-class seats.
It expects the services will achieve annual sales of about £50 million and a 'low double-digit' operating profit margin.
The Government started the process of renationalising all remaining franchised train services last month when it brought South Western Railway into public ownership.
Lumo runs on a separate open access basis, meaning it sets its own fares, takes on all revenue risk and receives no taxpayer-funded subsidies.
In January, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander wrote to ORR chairman Declan Collier expressing concerns that the open access model can cause 'potential congestion' and result in taxpayers being 'left to fill shortfalls' in maintenance costs.
She stated it is her 'expectation' that 'the impacts on the taxpayer and on overall performance' are 'given primacy' by the regulator when it analyses proposals.
FirstGroup chief executive Graham Sutherland said: 'The mobilisation of our new service between London and Stirling is another important step towards rolling out Lumo as a nationwide operator and growing our open access capacity, a key priority for the group.
'Our investment and capabilities in open access rail have delivered reliable, value-for-money services, grown rail demand and helped to spur economic growth and connect communities.
'We look forward to doing the same on our new services.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Private rail firms face probe over ‘super' profits
Private rail firms face probe over ‘super' profits

Times

time16 hours ago

  • Times

Private rail firms face probe over ‘super' profits

A major row has erupted after ministers ordered a review into privately owned train companies extracting 'super normal profits' that risk costing taxpayers more than £200 million a year. An 'extremely late' intervention by transport secretary Heidi Alexander to clamp down on 'open access' train operators has this weekend sparked recriminations from FirstGroup, one of the country's biggest transport companies. It also threatens to derail Sir Richard Branson's bid to return the Virgin name to Britain's railways. Open access services have proved popular with consumers, with the likes of FirstGroup-owned Lumo offering fares from London to Edinburgh for as little as £19.99. Labour is pressing ahead with plans to bring the railways into full public ownership as the contracts to run services on behalf of the state expire. Alexander has insisted that open-access operators, which are not tied to timetables set by the government and compete with state-contracted firms, will be allowed to continue on the railways. Other popular operators include Grand Central and Hull Trains. But the government's top transport official is now urging a tougher stance on open-access firms. Richard Goodman, director-general for Rail Reform & Strategy, last week wrote to the Office of Rail and Road (ORR), the transport regulator, to raise the bar for granting licences to new open access operators. New analysis by the Department for Transport (DfT) had found that the annual 'abstraction' cost to the Exchequer would be up to £229 million if all the open-access operator licence applications were granted. 'This represents significant additional cost to taxpayers and would materially affect the funds available to the secretary of state. We therefore believe it is critical that the ORR immediately takes steps to fully understand and consider the cumulative scale and impacts of abstraction when it assesses open access applications,' Goodman continued. 'The secretary of state considers that this analysis should be undertaken in respect of all live applications as well as existing services in order for the ORR to fully discharge its duty to consider impacts to the secretary of state's funds.' Whitehall sources singled out FirstGroup, the FTSE 250 company behind London and Edinburgh service Lumo, and Hull Trains, which achieved a 32 per cent operating profit of £34.1 million in 2024-25. 'These super normal profits come about because [open-access operators] do not pay the full cost of accessing the track, nor do they have to meet public service obligations that require them to put on the services people need,' they said. FirstGroup this weekend hit back with a strongly worded letter of its own. Bosses raised concerns about the 'extremely late-stage' intervention by government officials. Steve Montgomery, FirstGroup managing director, said that Goodman's 'openly hostile' letter included claims that were 'demonstrably untrue' such as suggestions that open-access operators were an 'unwelcome drain on the DfT budget'. Sources close to the firm added that FirstGroup's open-access operations had been lossmaking during the pandemic and would soon be paying more in track access charges than contracted operators such as east coast main line firm LNER. South Western Railway was the first to be nationalised under Labour in May. It will be followed by c2c next month and Greater Anglia in October. They will join LNER, Northern, Southeastern and TransPennine Express, which were brought back into public ownership by the Conservatives after operational or financial failings. Others will be nationalised between now and 2028 and will ultimately be rebranded as Great British Railways. There has been an influx of open-access applications to the ORR since Labour swept to power last July. Among them is Branson, the billionaire whose operator Virgin Trains ran services on the west coast mainline between 1997 and 2019. Virgin has applied to start an open-access service on the same line. Alexander has previously voiced concerns about open-access operators luring customers that would otherwise travel on the incumbent state-contracted, or state-owned, operator. Fare income would go into the pockets of private companies that would otherwise be paid to the Exchequer. Politicians and civil servants refer to this as 'abstraction'. In a major blow to Branson's ambitions, Goodman said that the south part of the west coast main line was already 'severely constrained'. 'Additional open-access services would both prevent development of revenue-generative contracted services and increase performance risks to existing services due to perturbation,' he concluded. The government reiterated that there will be a place for open-access operators, even once all contracted services are brought under full public ownership. In May, the prime minister backed a new open-access service running from north Wales, the West Midlands and London called the Wrexham, Shropshire & Midlands Railway.

UK may ban airlines from charging for hand luggage – but it could hike your flight price, experts warn
UK may ban airlines from charging for hand luggage – but it could hike your flight price, experts warn

Scottish Sun

timea day ago

  • Scottish Sun

UK may ban airlines from charging for hand luggage – but it could hike your flight price, experts warn

The EU are due to discuss the new law next month PACK IT IN UK may ban airlines from charging for hand luggage – but it could hike your flight price, experts warn AIRLINES could be banned from charging British passengers bringing hand luggage on flights, it is claimed. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander is understood to be considering proposals to change the rules after the EU Parliament transport and tourism committee put forward a new law to allow two carry-on items free as standard. Advertisement 5 Heidi Alexander, Transport Secretary, is reported to be considering the proposals Credit: Alamy 5 New rules could mean everyone gets a free carry-on bag Credit: Getty 5 But the new rules could drive up air fares for passengers Credit: Alamy If the new law is approved, passengers flying on any EU airline will be allowed a free cabin bag to put in the overhead locker - as long as it weighs no more than 7kg and measures up to 100cm. Ryanair and Wizz Air introduced fees for large cabin bags in 2018, and easyJet followed suit in 2021. However, the likes of British Airways and already include two pieces of cabin baggage as standard in their base fairs. But there are fears some airlines will put up ticket prices to claw back revenue losses - with some claiming the proposals are unworkable due to lack of space and warn flights maybe delayed. Advertisement A transport source spoke to the i newspaper after the EU committee voted to introduce the standardised allowance. Due to varying rules across airlines, the European Parliament hopes to create a common standard across the board for carry-on luggage. The proposals are still under discussion by member states and a time frame for implementation are unclear, though a meeting is scheduled for July. The UK source told the i the Government was also looking at changing the law in the coming months, although policy development is at an early stage. Advertisement A Department for Transport spokeswoman said: 'We do not comment on speculation but continue to closely monitor the EU's proposals on air passenger rights reforms. 'We want to make sure passengers can travel with ease, which is why we landed a deal with the EU to allow millions more British nationals to use e-gates at airports in time for the summer holidays.' Primark launches new range of cabin bags on wheels - they're approved by all budget airlines & there's matching carry-ons too Airlines have warned they may need to increase ticket prices which would impact all passengers, including those travelling with smaller bags. Airlines for Europe Managing Director Ourania Georgoutsakou told Politico: 'The European Parliament should let travellers decide what services they want, what services they pay for and, importantly, what services they don't.' Advertisement Airlines for Europe also warned that its members won't be able to comply with the new rule due to lack of space. A typical cabin seats 180 passengers but has room for only 90 trolley bags in the overhead lockers. Airlines for Europe also warned that its members won't be able to comply with the new rule due to lack of space. A typical cabin seats 180 passengers but has room for only 90 trolley bags in the overhead lockers. Advertisement Last year, there were reports that there were going to be changes to the hand luggage rules - but these did not change. Speaking to The Independent at the time, Michael O'Leary, chief executive of Europe's biggest budget carrier, Ryanair said: "We do think there should be a standardised agreement on what can be brought on board. "We're working with the other airlines in A4E to try to agree standardised sizes, but we haven't reached an agreement with them yet." While the rules continue to be discussed, check out this popular travel bag that's allowed on Ryanair flights for free. Advertisement Plus the travel bags, plane outfits and accessories we can't live without – and they start from just 99p. Expert opinion on what the new rules mean for you Head of Travel Lisa Minot weighs in. EUROPEAN plans to force all airlines to allow passengers to bring a bag weighing less than 7kg into the cabin as well as an under-seat bag seem on the face of it to be a good outcome for travellers. But there could be a sting in the tail for flyers going forward. Low cost airlines have for years been keeping the price of base fares low by adding on an ever more dizzying array of extra charges. And these ancillary charges now make up an increasing percentage of their profits. These extra charges now make up more than 30per cent of Ryanair's revenue. Between October and December last year, Ryanair's ancillary revenues were worth £884million. Airlines argue that if they are forced to comply with the new laws, the base fares will have to rise for every passenger across the board, including those flying smaller bags. They also point out many airlines won't be able to comply with the new rules as typically planes that carry 180 passengers only have room for 90 trolley bags. But on the plus side, forcing all airlines to adhere to the same rules can only be a good thing. Right now, the disparity between the size and weight of bags and the prices airlines charge is hideously complicated and can often lead to passengers being caught out. 5 Potential new rules could mean all passengers can bring a free carry-on bag onboard Credit: Alamy

UK may ban airlines from charging for hand luggage – but it could hike your flight price, experts warn
UK may ban airlines from charging for hand luggage – but it could hike your flight price, experts warn

The Sun

timea day ago

  • The Sun

UK may ban airlines from charging for hand luggage – but it could hike your flight price, experts warn

AIRLINES could be banned from charging British passengers bringing hand luggage on flights, it is claimed. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander is understood to be considering proposals to change the rules after the EU Parliament transport and tourism committee put forward a new law to allow two carry-on items free as standard. 5 5 5 If the new law is approved, passengers flying on any EU airline will be allowed a free cabin bag to put in the overhead locker - as long as it weighs no more than 7kg and measures up to 100cm. Ryanair and Wizz Air introduced fees for large cabin bags in 2018, and easyJet followed suit in 2021. However, the likes of British Airways and already include two pieces of cabin baggage as standard in their base fairs. But there are fears some airlines will put up ticket prices to claw back revenue losses - with some claiming the proposals are unworkable due to lack of space and warn flights maybe delayed. A transport source spoke to the i newspaper after the EU committee voted to introduce the standardised allowance. Due to varying rules across airlines, the European Parliament hopes to create a common standard across the board for carry-on luggage. The proposals are still under discussion by member states and a time frame for implementation are unclear, though a meeting is scheduled for July. The UK source told the i the Government was also looking at changing the law in the coming months, although policy development is at an early stage. A Department for Transport spokeswoman said: 'We do not comment on speculation but continue to closely monitor the EU's proposals on air passenger rights reforms. 'We want to make sure passengers can travel with ease, which is why we landed a deal with the EU to allow millions more British nationals to use e-gates at airports in time for the summer holidays.' Airlines have warned they may need to increase ticket prices which would impact all passengers, including those travelling with smaller bags. Airlines for Europe Managing Director Ourania Georgoutsakou told Politico: 'The European Parliament should let travellers decide what services they want, what services they pay for and, importantly, what services they don't.' Airlines for Europe also warned that its members won't be able to comply with the new rule due to lack of space. A typical cabin seats 180 passengers but has room for only 90 trolley bags in the overhead lockers. Airlines for Europe also warned that its members won't be able to comply with the new rule due to lack of space. A typical cabin seats 180 passengers but has room for only 90 trolley bags in the overhead lockers. Last year, there were reports that there were going to be changes to the hand luggage rules - but these did not change. Speaking to The Independent at the time, Michael O'Leary, chief executive of Europe's biggest budget carrier, Ryanair said: "We do think there should be a standardised agreement on what can be brought on board. "We're working with the other airlines in A4E to try to agree standardised sizes, but we haven't reached an agreement with them yet." While the rules continue to be discussed, check out this popular travel bag that's allowed on Ryanair flights for free. Plus the travel bags, plane outfits and accessories we can't live without – and they start from just 99p. Head of Travel Lisa Minot weighs in. EUROPEAN plans to force all airlines to allow passengers to bring a bag weighing less than 7kg into the cabin as well as an under-seat bag seem on the face of it to be a good outcome for travellers. But there could be a sting in the tail for flyers going forward. Low cost airlines have for years been keeping the price of base fares low by adding on an ever more dizzying array of extra charges. And these ancillary charges now make up an increasing percentage of their profits. These extra charges now make up more than 30per cent of Ryanair's revenue. Between October and December last year, Ryanair's ancillary revenues were worth £884million. Airlines argue that if they are forced to comply with the new laws, the base fares will have to rise for every passenger across the board, including those flying smaller bags. They also point out many airlines won't be able to comply with the new rules as typically planes that carry 180 passengers only have room for 90 trolley bags. But on the plus side, forcing all airlines to adhere to the same rules can only be a good thing. Right now, the disparity between the size and weight of bags and the prices airlines charge is hideously complicated and can often lead to passengers being caught out. 5 5

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store