logo
Future of THC up in the air at Texas Capitol as store owners call for regulation over bans

Future of THC up in the air at Texas Capitol as store owners call for regulation over bans

Yahoo08-04-2025
AUSTIN (Nexstar) — Members of the Texas House Committee on State Affairs listened to hours of public testimony over the future of THC as lawmakers decide if the hemp-made products will be completely banned or regulated.
As of 5 p.m. Monday, lawmakers were still listening to members of the public about House Bill 28, which would ban all THC consumables, like vapes and edibles, but would regulate THC-infused drinkables. Texas Rep. Ken King, R – Canadian, filed the bill. Also scheduled for testimony on Monday is Senate Bill 3, which would create a complete ban on THC products. It passed the Texas Senate on March 19.
HB 28 calls for many of the regulatory measures that lawmakers and many cannabis industry advocates have been pushing for including 21+ age restrictions on purchases, banning synthetic cannabinoids, more stringent testing of products, packaging that is child-resistant and responsibly marketed, and limits on the milligrams of THC in a serving.
Steve Dye, the Chief of the Allen Police Department, testified against HB 28 because he supports a complete ban on all THC products, including drinkables. Dye testified his 27-square-mile town has 24 shops that sell THC products, and investigations by his department found the potency of current products is far higher than in years past.
'The average THC concentration is 29%,' Dye testified. He also said his department is regularly finding high school-age children with THC consumables.
Mickey and Todd Harris — third-generation Austinites — are brothers and business partners who own The Happy Cactus, a CBD store. They are approaching their four-year anniversary of opening, but they worry with this new legislation will lead to the closure of their business and many like it around the state.
'We're just frustrated that they're trying to attack something that's been so beneficial to our community in Texas,' Harris explained. A complete THC ban would leave their business with just one product eligible to be sold that is currently on their shelf. Their business also sells THC-drinks but that only makes up about 5% of their sales.
They are against both bills and instead are asking lawmakers to require regulations instead of bans on THC products. The brothers say they regularly regulate the products they sell in their own store, and they would appreciate if the state required all businesses to do the same.
'So we could still supply all the products that Texans need, but still make sure that they're safe,' Harris explained.
The Happy Cactus is actually located across the street from Crockett Early College High School, which has became a major concern for those who support a complete ban on THC products. The brothers sent a letter to the principal of the school to work with them on making sure no high school children are even entering their business. In the four years of being opened, the brothers say they have never had an issue with a high school student coming into their store as they always card everyone who comes to make sure they're over the age of 21.
The letters can be read below:
Letter to Crockett Early College High SchoolDownload
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

B.C.‘s independent wood manufacturers decry retroactive U.S. softwood duties
B.C.‘s independent wood manufacturers decry retroactive U.S. softwood duties

Hamilton Spectator

time22 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

B.C.‘s independent wood manufacturers decry retroactive U.S. softwood duties

VANCOUVER - British Columbia's independent wood product makers say hundreds of small- and medium-sized manufacturers may be forced to shut down in light of the latest decision from the United States to raise anti-dumping duties on Canadian softwood. The province's Independent Wood Processors Association says in a release that the U.S. Commerce Department's decision this week to raise duties also includes a requirement for Canadian companies to retroactively remit duties for products shipped to the United States since Jan.1, 2023. Association chair Andy Rielly says in a statement that the requirement to pay duties on products shipped in the last 31 months could not only force small B.C. producers to shut down, but may also threaten operators' personal assets as they may have to risk using their homes as collateral to secure bonds to pay. Rielly is urging the Canadian government to create support programs to make sure B.C.'s independent wood processors can keep workers employed and their companies running. The U.S. Commerce Department said earlier in the week it will raise anti-dumping duties on Canadian softwood to 20.56 per cent, drawing the ire of several B.C. industry groups such as the B.C. Council of Forest Industries and the B.C. Lumber Trade Council. The Independent Wood Processors Association says the the 'all-others' rate affecting its members will be raised from 14.4 per cent to 27.3 per cent, with the possibly of another increase 'in the coming weeks' potentially pushing the duties for their products to as high as 35 per cent. 'Until the Canadian government can negotiate a settlement to this long-festering dispute, we need a government support program to keep our workers employed,' Rielly says, adding an overall duty of 35-per-cent would force members to pay retroactive duties of 27 per cent on products already shipped. Association executive director Brian Menzies describes independent wood product producers as 'collateral damage' in the trade war, and says the only hope they have of avoiding the hit is either 'a favourable appeal from the Canada-US-Mexico Agreement' or 'pursuing a bilateral negotiated resolution.' 'We should not face export taxes or quotas,' Menzies says. 'Our raw materials are not subsidized, and we are too small to 'dump' our products in the U.S. market. 'We acquire logs and lumber at 'arm's length' from various suppliers on the open market, just like claims made by members of the U.S. Lumber Coalition, and yet our Canadian companies along with U.S. consumers must pay these unfair and costly duties.' Prime Minister Mark Carney had previously said that a future U.S.-Canada trade deal could include softwood lumber quotas. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 26, 2025.

VP of Rated Viral, Saan Basha, Now Worth $3.9M: The Canadian Entrepreneur Behind One of the Fastest Growing Review Platforms
VP of Rated Viral, Saan Basha, Now Worth $3.9M: The Canadian Entrepreneur Behind One of the Fastest Growing Review Platforms

Time Business News

time22 minutes ago

  • Time Business News

VP of Rated Viral, Saan Basha, Now Worth $3.9M: The Canadian Entrepreneur Behind One of the Fastest Growing Review Platforms

Canadian businessman Saan Basha has become one of the most talked-about names in digital media. As Vice President and founder of Rated Viral, Basha turned his early success on social media into a fast-growing review and marketing platform that connects people with trending businesses, products, and creators. Today, his estimated net worth has climbed to $3.9 million, and his company is becoming a go-to source for brand discovery in the digital age. But behind the numbers is a story of vision, hard work, and giving back. From Social Media to Starting a Business Before launching Rated Viral, Basha was known for creating viral videos on Vine — the short-form video platform that once dominated the internet. When Vine shut down, Basha saw it not as a setback, but as an opportunity. Q: What made you want to start Rated Viral? Saan Basha: 'I realized people were always looking for what's trending — not just entertainment, but places to eat, products to try, even influencers to follow. I wanted to create a platform that brought all that together in one place, and also helped businesses and creators grow.' What Rated Viral Does Rated Viral allows users to discover trending local businesses, viral products, and rising creators — all powered by community feedback and digital insights. The platform has quickly gained attention for its fresh approach, and now works closely with brands and influencers to build their online presence. Q: What's different about Rated Viral compared to other platforms? Saan Basha: 'We speak the language of the new generation. Our team understands creators and digital culture. We help people find what's hot right now, but we also support the people behind the brand — whether it's a small business owner or a content creator just getting started.' Helping Creators Succeed In addition to running Rated Viral, Basha manages and mentors creators across TikTok, YouTube, and Instagram. He helps them grow their platforms, sign brand deals, and build long-term careers. One of the creators he works with said, 'Saan doesn't just give advice — he builds with you. He's someone who wants to see you win, and he shows up every time.' Giving Back to the Community Basha is also known for his generosity. He regularly donates to animal shelters, supports local causes, and uses his platform to bring attention to important issues. Q: Why is giving back important to you? Saan Basha: 'I've always believed that success means nothing if you're not using it to help others. Whether it's animals in need or people trying to get their business off the ground — if I'm in a position to help, I will.' What's Next for Saan Basha? Rated Viral continues to grow, with new users, partnerships, and creators joining the platform every week. Basha says he's focused on improving the platform, building more tools for creators and small businesses, and expanding internationally. Q: Where do you see Rated Viral in the next few years? Saan Basha: 'I see it becoming one of the top platforms people go to when they want to find something new, honest, and worth their time — whether that's a business, a product, or a creator. We're just getting started.' Final Thoughts Saan Basha's journey from internet comedy to business leadership is a reminder that with the right mindset and purpose, anything is possible. He's building more than just a platform — he's building a community that uplifts, supports, and inspires. In a digital world full of noise, Saan Basha stands out for his vision, heart, and commitment to making a real difference. Facebook: Instagram: Snapchat: @saanbasha Tiktok: TIME BUSINESS NEWS

Drivers vs. cyclists: a battle for the streets in Canada's largest city
Drivers vs. cyclists: a battle for the streets in Canada's largest city

Boston Globe

time2 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

Drivers vs. cyclists: a battle for the streets in Canada's largest city

Then came the backlash. Some of the most popular bike lanes were making Toronto's notorious traffic worse, according to the provincial government. So, Doug Ford, premier of Toronto's province, Ontario, signed a law to rip out 14 miles of the lanes from three major streets that serve the core of the city. Toronto Mayor Olivia Chow arrived for her first day in office two years ago riding a bike. She was not pleased with the law, arguing that the city had sole discretion to decide street rules. Chow did not respond to a request to comment. But in public remarks, she has since softened her tone, suggesting it was possible to have a 'win-win solution' by relocating some bike lanes or keeping them in place while adding more driving lanes. Advertisement 'We could design them better,' Chow told reporters in April. Bike lanes are a sore point for many drivers frustrated by the constant traffic jams in the heart of Toronto. 'There's so much traffic because of bike lanes,' said Nasser Moradman, who has driven a taxi in Toronto for 30 years. The lanes aren't even used much during the long winter, he complained, adding: 'It's miserable. It's very tough to drive in the city.' Advertisement Cycling proponents and others who vehemently oppose Ford's move mounted a legal challenge, and a provincial court has temporarily barred the removal of any bike lanes until a judge decides if the new law is unconstitutional. Cities across the world, including New York and Paris, have added miles of bike lanes to make streets safer for cyclists and encourage drivers to abandon their vehicles and opt for more climate-friendly modes of travel, such as cycling and public transportation. In some places, the lanes have also set off criticism from drivers and others who say that they have made life worse for people who have to drive, including delivery workers and taxi drivers. President Trump called New York's bike lanes dangerous and claimed that cyclists were 'whacking people.' In Canada, government data show that about an average of 2 million people commute to Toronto by car on workdays. And those commuters contribute to the city's congestion, which ranks second behind Vancouver among Canadian cities, according to TomTom, a global traffic index. Toronto's chronic traffic snarls can come as an unwelcome surprise to some visitors. In February, the Carolina Hurricanes hockey team had to abandon a ride because of traffic and walk the remaining blocks to a downtown arena -- not the first time that professional athletes have had to do that. The problems have cost the Toronto region about about $33 billion in lost productivity per year, according to a report by the Canadian Center for Economic Analysis. 'Congestion has reached crisis levels,' said Giles Gherson, president of the Toronto Board of Trade, which suggested in a report that Toronto 'rebalance' its roads by cutting back street-level parking and moving bike lanes. Advertisement Many commuters also argue that driving into Toronto from the suburbs is often faster than using public transportation, with experts saying that the city lacks enough rapid transit to meet its needs. The provincial government has been criticized for long delays to transit projects. The province says only 1.2 percent of workers commute by bike. For comparison, even in New York City, which has a large system of bike lanes, about 1.4 percent of people commute by bike, according to city figures. The conflict in Toronto has resonated with people such as Sharon Danley, a retiree. She recently joined a citizens group opposing a bike lane on her street, which she said was disruptive and unfair. The lane, she said, slows down a transit bus for people with disabilities. 'Now what we're doing is clogging up lean arteries and causing a lot of harm,' Danley said. In Toronto, where the car has long been king, cyclists have been gaining ground. Toronto added 67 miles of bike lanes between 2020 and 2024 and now has 207 miles of them. The city's bike-share service had 6.9 million rides in 2024, up from 2.9 million in 2020. 'Cycling has become more pleasant,' said Chad Mohr, a food-bank volunteer who delivers groceries by bike. 'Now they're talking about ripping tons of that infrastructure out, which would be a tragedy and just a giant, ridiculous, expensive step backward.' The city spent about $20 million to install the bike lanes that Ontario now wants to eliminate. In a report, it estimates that removing them would cost $35 million. Advertisement Last year, Toronto said a half-dozen cyclists were killed in the city, the highest number in two decades. Between 2016 and 2023, 260 cyclists have been seriously injured, with most crashes on streets with no bike lanes. Removing bike lanes would 'cost people their lives,' said Geoffrey Bercarich, a bike-repair technician who installs memorials called ghost bikes in places where cyclists have been killed. Ford has made it clear that he is not opposed to cyclists or cycling. 'I'm not against bike lanes,' he told reporters in May. 'Build all the bike lanes you want, just not on main arterial roads.'' Cycling proponents argue that the province has not shown any evidence that removing bike lanes will ease traffic. 'This idea that they're somehow the cause of Toronto's traffic woes isn't based on any fact,' said Michael Longfield, executive director of Cycle Toronto, an advocacy group. He was speaking by phone from a hospital, where he was recovering from a fractured leg that he said he sustained while cycling when a driver opened a door into a bike lane. The Ontario government has passed a measure that would protect it from lawsuits by cyclists injured on roads where the province tears out bike lanes. Cycling supporters say the move amounts to a tacit acknowledgment that riders will be hurt if the province is allowed to eliminate bike lanes, said David Shellnutt, a personal-injury lawyer in Toronto specializing in cycling cases. 'It is an admission that, yes, we know that what we're proposing here will result in injury and death,' Shellnutt said, 'and so we're going to insulate ourselves from accountability.' This article originally appeared in Advertisement

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store