logo
MPs on fence ahead of crunch welfare vote as 'costs facing disabled people soar'

MPs on fence ahead of crunch welfare vote as 'costs facing disabled people soar'

Daily Mirror8 hours ago

Dozens of Labour MPs are still said to be on the fence about whether to support plans to reform the welfare system in a crunch vote on Tuesday, despite major concessions
Disabled people could face extra costs of almost £15,000 a year by the end of the decade, grim research shows, as the row over the Government's welfare cuts drags on.
Dozens of Labour MPs are still said to be on the fence about whether to support plans to reform the welfare system in a crunch vote on Tuesday.

Many MPs spent the weekend mulling over a major package of concessions offered by Keir Starmer last week. In a dramatic climbdown on Thursday, the PM agreed to protect all existing claimants from losing Personal Independence Payments (PIP).

Plans to tighten eligibility will now only apply to new claimants from November 2026, in a reprieve to around 370,000 people who were due to lose around £4,150-a-year. And existing recipients of the health element of Universal Credit will have their incomes protected in real terms.
'PIP reforms are unnerving'
A teenager in remission from cancer said he has found the rows over welfare reforms 'unnerving' and 'worrying'.
Daniel Evans, 19, who was diagnosed with stage four lymphoma when he was 17, is currently having his Personal Independence Payments reassessed. He should be assessed under the old system after the latest concessions but said he fears for those in the future if they do not qualify for PIP.
Daniel said he is no longer able to do things he enjoys, including playing football. 'It's mainly my breathing, my heart, and tiredness. I'm just like a shadow of my former self,' he said. 'I think it's just the new reality. You have to come to terms with it.'
PIP helps him pay for transport, such as taxis, or fuel for his mum to take him back and forth to appointments.
Asked about the potential tightening of PIP eligibility rules, he said: 'It's a bit unnerving, because what I say is, for anyone who has had treatment and gone through it and are technically better, let's say in remission, just because someone is in remission, it doesn't mean they're instantly able to do a lot of things, like being able to go to work instantly.
'So they still have to get support. It's not like things get better and you can just go to work five days a week, things are still difficult.'
Plans for a major review of PIP will also be set out today, which will be co-produced by disabled people, organisations who represent them and MPs. It is hoped that the terms of the review - which will place disabled people at the heart of it - will persuade nervy MPs that the legislation is now heading in the right direction.
Meanwhile, research released by disability charity Scope has estimated the extra monthly costs related to a person's disability have now risen to £1,095. Even for those who receive benefits, there is an average shortfall of £630 every month, as the payments don't go far enough, Scope said.
The Disability Price Tag report, which is released annually by Scope and does not take into account the welfare reforms, estimates this is set to rise to £1,224 by 2029/30, totalling almost £15,000 a year. It would mean those with a disability would see a £704 shortfall in their benefits income by 2029, the study said.
The charity said the Government's concessions 'will just create a two-tier system, where huge numbers of disabled people face the disability price tag with little or no support from PIP'.

Meanwhile Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham told an event at Glastonbury Festival that MPs should still vote against the welfare bill tomorrow. 'It's simply wrong and I will never, ever support what is being proposed,' he said.
'This reminds me why I left Westminster because the default mindset of the two parties is to be tough on benefits. That mentality creates a deficit model that is distrustful of people… a system I know many disabled people fear interacting with."

Mr Starmer faced a humiliating defeat in the Commons after more than 120 Labour MPs signed an amendment to block his welfare plans last week. The Prime Minister this weekend said he wished he had reached a 'better position' with Labour MPs earlier over welfare cuts but was distracted by international affairs, which he admitted was not an 'excuse'.
In an interview with the Sunday Times, he said: 'I'd have liked to get to a better position with colleagues sooner than we did — that's for sure. I'm putting this as context rather than excuse: I was heavily focused on what was happening with Nato and the Middle East all weekend. I turned my attention fully to it [the welfare bill] when I got back from Nato on Wednesday night.'

Health Secretary Wes Streeting stopped short of saying he was confident the Government will win tomorrow's vote. But he said that the changes "have put us in a much better position".
"As a result of the changes, it means anyone watching this morning who's in receipt of personal independence payments now has the peace of mind of knowing that their situation is protected," he said.
Labour MP and former Cabinet minister Louise Haigh meanwhile said she planned to back the Bill but needed to see the full detail of the new plans today. She also said it was a moment for the Government to "reset'.

"I think this is a moment and an opportunity to reset the Government's relationship with the British public and to move forward, to adopt a different approach to our economic policy and our political strategy," she told the BBC.
But disabled Labour MP Olivia Blake said the proposed concessions had been "plucked from the air". Echoing Scope, she told The Guardian: "This could form an unethical two-tier system that treats two people with the exact same injury or illness differently.'
Fresh details on the welfare reforms will be published on Monday, including the terms of reference for a review, led by Disability Minister Stephen Timms, of the PIP assessment.

Alongside the review, draft regulations for the new Right to Try Guarantee will be laid in Parliament. It will enshrine in law the right for people receiving health and disability benefits to try work without fear of reassessment.
The Department for Work and Pensions also said £300million will be brought forward over the next three years to help disabled people and those with health conditions get into work. It will mean the total employment support will have increased by £2.2billion over four years.
Officials say that the Bill, while criticised for having tightened some benefits eligibility, will protect the most vulnerable by uprating of Universal Credit standard rate. Nearly four million households will see an income boost with the main rate of UC set to increase above inflation every year for the next four years - estimated to be worth £725 by 2029/30 for a single household. This is said to be the largest, permanent real-terms increase to basic out of work support since 1980, according to the IFS.

James Taylor, executive director of strategy at Scope, said: 'Life costs an enormous amount more when you're disabled. Whether it's higher electricity bills because of medical equipment to power. Or higher heating bills because of health conditions affected by the cold.
'The concessions put forward by government will just create a two-tier system, where huge numbers of disabled people face the disability price tag with little or no support from PIP. The government must change course on these catastrophic cuts now, and properly co-produce with disabled people on how to reform our welfare system.'
Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said the changes were about 'delivering a fairer, more compassionate system'.

'We must build a welfare system that provides security for those who cannot work and the right support for those who can,' she said. 'Too often, disabled people feel trapped—worried that if they try to work, they could lose the support they depend on.
'That is why we are taking action to remove those barriers, support disabled people to live with dignity and independence, and open routes into employment for those who want to pursue it.
'This is about delivering a fairer, more compassionate system as part of our Plan for Change which supports people to thrive, whatever their circumstances.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Does Starmer read his speeches?
Does Starmer read his speeches?

Sky News

time16 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Does Starmer read his speeches?

👉Listen to Politics At Sam And Anne's on your podcast app👈 Sky News' Sam Coates and Politico's Anne McElvoy serve up their essential guide to the day in British politics. The prime minister has made significant concessions on the welfare bill after the threat of a mass rebellion from his own MPs. The changes have left Chancellor Rachel Reeves with another black hole in the public finances and some MPs are still planning on voting against the bill when it comes in front of the House of Commons tomorrow. Also, as Sir Keir Starmer celebrates his first full year in power, has this latest U-turn left him in a vulnerable position with his party and the wider public?

Labour must get a grip or its entire economic plan could unravel
Labour must get a grip or its entire economic plan could unravel

Times

time18 minutes ago

  • Times

Labour must get a grip or its entire economic plan could unravel

Twelve months on from Labour's general election landslide, it is a good time to ditch the slogans and soundbites — and I am afraid there will be plenty of those this week — and assess what the latest economic data says about Labour's stewardship of the economy. From my standpoint its record is neither disastrous, nor dazzling. There is a credible argument that things could have been considerably worse given the structural challenges inherited from the Conservatives. Yet a series of policy missteps have needlessly sapped momentum. In essence, Labour's first year has been defined less by a transformative economic mission and more by steady progress, punctuated by damaging miscalculation. To give credit where it is due, this government appears to be learning on the job. But it is also true that there has been a lot to learn from — unforced errors on welfare reform, labour market policy and the management of the public finances have blunted early optimism among the UK business community. A persistently tricky international backdrop has not helped either. Let us begin our assessment with GDP ­— that most central, yet blunt, measurement tool. Growth in GDP since Labour entered office in July last year has not collapsed, nor has it accelerated meaningfully. On an international comparative basis, the UK has largely tracked the G7 average, growing by a compound 0.8 per cent in US dollar terms across the last three quarters. GDP per capita, a more revealing metric of national wellbeing, has risen by a modest 0.3 per cent. This is an improvement after two years of declines, but hardly a stirring renaissance. Inflation remains central to household perceptions of the government's economic competency, and its record here is mixed. Headline inflation peaked at more than 11 per cent well before Labour took power and has markedly softened since. However, the core problem, quite literally, lies in 'core inflation' which remains stubbornly high at an annualised 3.5 per cent. Above-inflation increases to the national living wage and public sector pay have added volatility to service prices just as the Bank of England was seeking calm. April's spike in consumer price inflation, though partially driven by regulated costs like air fares and energy levies, has muddied the water for monetary policy. This dissonance — between a government talking up interest rate cuts and simultaneously fuelling wage pressures — has not gone unnoticed at the Bank. We should be wary of attributing lower interest rates as the fruit of government policy. They are being delivered despite it. Turning to fiscal policy and the record is equally chequered. While the cost for the UK government to borrow for ten years — the ten-year gilt yield — has held steady in nominal terms, the interest rate spread that the UK pays compared with its G7 peers has widened to a worrying 1.25 percentage points. This reflects heightened debt issuance pressure after the October budget, and market suspicion about the UK's long-term fiscal sustainability. If rebellious Labour backbenchers think this arithmetic magically improves with a change of chancellor I have some bad news for them. The financial markets see Rachel Reeves as considerably more credible than the vast majority of alternatives within the Labour parliamentary party. Against this backdrop the autumn budget now looms large. Having left herself just £9.9 billion of headroom against her primary fiscal rule back in March, the chancellor now faces slippage on multiple fronts. Public sector borrowing has risen faster than forecast. The headwinds from U-turns on welfare reform and winter fuel payments threaten to eat into nearly half of the existing cushion. Visa reforms that suppress labour force growth and murmurings about the two-child benefit cap could further erode fiscal wriggle room. And the private sector is signalling unease with what is to come on tax. Since the general election, both deposits and the household savings rate have risen. This looks like a quiet vote of no confidence in the economic outlook and shows that speculative fiscal noise has a real cost: muted consumer spending, and deferred investment. But Labour's biggest headache is that it has sowed itself problems in the jobs market. Payroll employment, once a bright spot, has stalled since July 2024. Critics rightly argue that employer national insurance increases, combined with expanded employment rights and minimum wage hikes, have depressed hiring appetite. Two caveats are worth considering. First, payroll data may understate real employment if more workers are now classifying as self-employed to avoid higher employer contributions. Indeed Labour Force Survey data — though statistically compromised — shows overall employment still rising. Nonetheless, qualitative data from the Bank of England's decision maker panel confirms a palpable pullback in hiring intentions. This is consistent with the broader trend: firmer labour market regulation may be well-intentioned, but it is weighing on labour demand. The second caveat is that green shoots are now emerging in labour market participation which has inched upwards — possibly aided by NHS capacity improvements. Yet the metric that matters most for fiscal arithmetic — productivity — remains worryingly flat. If the Office for Budget Responsibility downgrades its productivity assumptions in the coming weeks, the government's already tight headroom could vanish entirely ahead of the budget. So what happens this autumn? The chancellor faces a vexing equation. Maintain fiscal rules, avoid tax rises on working people (her words, not mine!), protect spending pledges, and hold her parliamentary party together. At least one of these constraints looks certain to give. Options are narrowing. Loosening rules risks a bond market backlash. New taxes or spending cuts risk backbench revolt and sap economic momentum. Supply-side tweaks — such as speeding up infrastructure approvals or revisiting the North Sea tax and licencing regime — offer some room, but their fiscal payoff is modest and long term. The chancellor may also be tempted to revisit the policy of interest paid on central bank reserves. This is a potentially lucrative move but one fraught with risks to monetary policy effectiveness as her governor, Andrew Bailey, has recently noted in response to similar proposals from Reform UK. None of these options are easy. Some are not credible. But the current fiscal impasse is even less sustainable. Yet mere policy competence will not be enough. The fiscal debate is increasingly constrained not by in-year numbers, but by a refusal to confront long term trade-offs on healthcare spending and pensions. If the government truly wishes to spark the 'renewal' it promised, it must move from a mindset of management to one of reform. The alternative is a parliament of drift — marked by tactical retreats, fiscal fudge and faster growth that never quite arrives. In the months ahead, the OBR's pen may prove more consequential than the chancellor's speeches. Should productivity assumptions fall, the government's entire economic strategy could yet unravel. The risk, as ever, is not that the centre cannot hold — but that no one dares to grip the centre at all.

Growing mental health crisis among Scottish police officers, Labour warns
Growing mental health crisis among Scottish police officers, Labour warns

STV News

time19 minutes ago

  • STV News

Growing mental health crisis among Scottish police officers, Labour warns

Labour has warned of a 'growing mental health crisis' among Scottish police officers, as figures show the number of officers taking time off because of psychological issues rose by more than 50% over the last three years. The figures, obtained by the party via a Freedom of Information request, show the number of officers off work because of anxiety, depression, stress or post-traumatic stress rose from 814 in 2021 to 1,236 in 2024, an increase of 52%. The figures also show the number of officers taking time off grew each year over the period, with 1,024 in 2022 and 1,102 in 2023. The party said the figures showed officers are at 'breaking point' and called on the government to address the 'mounting pressures' facing officers. Scottish Labour Justice spokesperson Pauline McNeill said: 'It's clear police in Scotland are at breaking point after years of SNP mismanagement and neglect. 'We owe it to police officers to ensure they have the support they need while they work to keep our communities safe, but it's clear that is not the case under the SNP. 'The SNP has let police officer numbers collapse over the last five years, piling pressure on remaining officers and threatening to undermine public safety. 'The SNP must wake up to this growing mental health crisis and work with Police Scotland to support officers struggling with stress, trauma or poor mental health. 'Dealing with this crisis is vital to keeping police officers in work and on duty at a time when we need visible officers in communities. 'Police officers cannot keep bearing the brunt of SNP failure – more must be done to support police and the vital work they do.' Earlier this year it was reported that the number of days taken off by police officers and staff suffering from mental ill health rose from 63,797 in 2019/20 to 96,509 in 2023/24, a 51.3% rise Deputy Chief Constable Alan Speirs said: 'The health and welfare of our officers and staff remains one of Police Scotland's highest priorities with enhanced provisions from both our Employee Assistance and Your Wellbeing Matters programmes. 'This will be further enhanced through the implementation of our new HR structure with increased resource within our Health and Wellbeing team. 'We also have a range of mechanisms in place to support our employees who are absent from work for any reason. 'We continue to work with our occupational health provider to support police officers and staff in their journey back to health and, subsequently, to work.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Police officers and staff do a challenging job and we have welcomed the Chief Constable's commitment to workforce wellbeing. 'Staff and officers can access a range of services to support their physical and mental wellbeing. 'This includes access to a 24/7 employee assistance programme, and direct access to occupational health services. 'We are investing a record £1.64bn for policing in 2025-26, an increase of £90m on 2024-25, and Police Scotland took on more recruits in 2024-25 than at any time since 2013, with more intakes planned this year.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store