logo
The West can no longer afford to ignore China's superpower status

The West can no longer afford to ignore China's superpower status

Yahoo26-04-2025
A month or so ago, I was invited to the glamorous Tanner Lecture at Cambridge as a guest of one of the speakers. The topic was what the future holds for the West as Chinese power grows across the board. In my circles, the dominant feelings towards China are suspicion and hostility, rooted in clear evidence of that state's enmity, inhumanity and threat, and the extremely real possibility of a world war in which they utterly devour us.
I therefore felt like a fish out of water as I was reminded just how intensely Cambridge is a hotbed of China love. It has an important contingent of Chinese students (2,000, the largest single foreign country represented), as all UK universities do; research partnerships and a host of schemes that encourage students from China to apply.
I sat next to a very pleasant gentleman at dinner who devotes himself to marketing his Cambridge college to Chinese school pupils.
Of course, Cambridge's close links to and warmth towards China are inseparable from Chinese students' contribution to the powerhouse that is Cambridge science and technology. They do very well in Stem subjects, and a proportionately high number go on to found or work in the start-ups in AI, robotics and genetics that have given the Cambridge region the name 'Silicon Fen'.
These same people act as a bridge between Cambridge and the Chinese heartlands of innovation. Backs on both sides are well scratched.
If my evening at Cambridge was a culture shock, the past few weeks have continued that shock, cacophonous with news about Chinese advances, power and military attempts at king-making.
It is now impossible to look the other way from China's cut-throat, fast-paced and deadly serious incursions into the commercial and geopolitical landscape. The latest foul play from the Ukraine war is that, according to Ukrainian intelligence, China is supplying weapons to Russia, which won't come as a surprise to anyone.
Meanwhile, last week I read about how Jingdong, the massive Chinese rival to Amazon the likes of which you or me may never have heard of but which is nonetheless a giant growing by the day, has its sights set on Britain. With eye-watering revenues of £120 billion per year, it's been poaching staff from Ocado, Lidl, Amazon, even Holland and Barrett.
Chinese electric car companies, such as BYD, are already outmanoeuvring all other makers abroad, and are widely seen on American, if not yet British, roads. As for DeepSeek, China's answer to ChatGPT, it's not going anywhere either. As the political podcaster and former Cambridge politics professor David Runciman wrote recently, 'Wow! … It's mind-blowing.' Despite all of the money invested into market leaders like OpenAI, DeepSeek is able to do all sorts of things Western chatbots can not.
Even, or rather especially, to a China disliker like me, it has become abundantly clear that we have two options: get real about China, or suffer. I listened on a podcast to veteran New York Times columnist Tom Friedman, one of the paper's few sensible people on issues like terrorism and Israel, insist that simply seeing China as an enemy is a 'huge mistake'.
Friedman, who had just been to the country and expressed his amazement at its technological advancement, has long been pro-China, but nevertheless what he said was clearly not untrue.
China should be seen for what it is and dealt with accordingly. We must learn to contort ourselves so that we maintain wariness and frankness about its myriad abuses of the values we hold dear, and its enemy status … but also act as realists. It's no good turning back the clock to a time when we could pretend China wasn't everywhere and everything.
Even as recently as a few years ago, during Covid, the place seemed finally to have stitched itself up with its own authoritarianism and to risk becoming a backwater.
But now, everyone who visits seems to say the same thing. China is leaving the West in the dust. Who can be surprised? Our cultural decadence, after all, has led us to continually die on the hill of stupid issues instead of throwing ourselves into hard work and innovation to win the future. Indulgent, nonsensical governance means our states are poor, which leads to less funding and investment in the areas that have seen China rapidly overtake the West, such as robotics and the manufacturing of chips.
It looks like Trump is rowing back on his insane 145 per cent tariffs on China, apparently realising – as the markets yowled in pain – that the policy was a laughable underestimate of America's economic role in relation to China, and thus an immediate means of impoverishing ordinary Americans and driving commerce to a halt.
For me, taking China seriously does not mean pretending it hasn't put millions of Muslim Uyghurs in camps and treated them sadistically, violently suppressed freedom in Hong Kong, operated numerous enemy spy networks up and down British institutions or embraced all aspects of a totalitarian state. On the contrary. It means knowing your enemy.
Years of ruthless, amoral intellectual property theft combined with a brutal approach to discipline, education and achievement, especially in the sciences, have got China where it is. We cannot just pretend, simply because it's easier and simpler to do so, that it will somehow keep to its own sphere.
The only way to maintain a decent boundary between the inhumane East and the liberal democratic West – and to put our own decline into reverse – is to look, lean, engage and compete.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why American Cars May Not Sell Well In Japan Despite Trade Deal
Why American Cars May Not Sell Well In Japan Despite Trade Deal

Forbes

timea few seconds ago

  • Forbes

Why American Cars May Not Sell Well In Japan Despite Trade Deal

The Jeep is the biggest selling American-made car in Japan. (Photo By)"n President Trump is chuffed about his recent trade deal with Japan calling it the greatest in U.S. history. "I just signed the largest trade deal in history, I think maybe the largest deal in history with Japan," Trump boasted at the White House on Tuesday evening. Japan also agreed to invest $550bn in the U.S. economy although no details were forthcoming as to which industries or sectors would benefit. Trump shakes hands with Japan's PM Shigeru Ishiba. (Photo by Jim WATSON / AFP) (Photo by JIM ... More WATSON/AFP via Getty Images) Meanwhile Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba welcomed the announcement of the 15% reciprocal tariffs—down from 25%, stressing that it was "the lowest figure to date among countries with trade surpluses with the US'. Japan's stock market soared at news of 15% trade deal News of the deal was well-received by the Japanese stock market which saw shares soar with Mazda rising 17%, Toyota swelling by 15%, Mitsubishi up 13%, Honda increasing 11% and Nissan jumping 8%. Mazda, a carmaker who builds the majority of its vehicles in Japan, was particularly concerned about the proposed 25% tariffs. A quarter of Japan's US exports are from its critical automotive sector, which accounts for almost 3% of its economy. And it's with the auto sector that Trump really seems to have no idea what's really happening. The truth is two-fold. Firstly, before Trump started threatening Japan with tariffs, American cars entering the Japanese market, including Jeep, Cadillac and Corvette, were charged a zero tariff. Zilch! Japan has not charged tariffs or imports duties on imported cars from the U.S., or Europe for that matter, since the late 1970s. In contrast, America had imposed a 2.5% tariff on Japanese imports. Corvette sells in small numbers in Japan. (Photo By) But that's only part of the issue. Trump has continually complained that Japan does not take American cars. He has repeatedly said that the Asian nation is not open to U.S. vehicles. After this major trade deal announcement with Japan, Trump is bloating that the country will now open up to U.S. cars, trucks, rice and other agricultural products. Hey, buddy, that is not the reality. Japan is, and always has been open and ready to take all the American cars you wish to export. The bottom line is—apart from Jeep, which is the biggest selling American car in Japan, and a smattering of Cadillac and Corvette models, Japanese motorists, for the most part, don't want to buy American cars. Not even Tesla EVs, which do sell in Japan, but are imported from China, so not really seen as American. The fact is that old impressions die hard. From the 1970s through to the early 21st century, a mixture of U.S. cars were offered in Japan—including Ford, GM, Pontiac and Buick, in addition to Chrysler. But even though some brands delivered more stylish designs or more powerful engines than their Japanese counterparts, most American cars were considered too big for Japanese roads and carparks, and not as fuel-efficient or as reliable as Japanese cars, which were, on average, a little cheaper. Other critical factors that led to several brands exiting Japan, like Ford in 2016, were insufficient product lineups, and a poor dealer network. So, with all that in mind Mr Trump, to be honest, it does not matter how many American cars you force on the Japanese market, I cannot see how U.S. brands will sell here, no matter what Trump says. Japanese don't want them. It's like trying to force-feed sushi with wasabi to blue collar American families in the Rust Belt—it is a really tough sell.

Head of FEMA Search and Rescue resigns over agency's response to Texas floods: Sources

timea few seconds ago

Head of FEMA Search and Rescue resigns over agency's response to Texas floods: Sources

The head of FEMA's Urban Search and Rescue branch, Ken Pagurek, resigned on Monday, multiple sources confirmed to ABC News. Pagurek told colleagues he was frustrated by the Department of Homeland Security's efforts to dismantle FEMA and by new hurdles that slowed the agency's response to the catastrophic flooding in Central Texas earlier this month, according to sources familiar with the matter. Sources said he pointed to a new DHS policy requiring all spending over $100,000 to be personally approved by Secretary Kristi Noem as a key factor behind the delays and, ultimately, his decision to step down. CNN. Pagurek had worked with FEMA's search and rescue operations for more than a decade and had served as its chief for the past year. Pagurek did not respond to a request for comment by ABC News. DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin told ABC News, "The attempt to spin a personal career decision into some big scandal is RIDICULOUS. It is laughable that a career public employee, who claims to serve the American people, would choose to resign over our refusal to hastily approve a six-figure deployment contract without basic financial oversight." "We're being responsible with taxpayer dollars, that's our job," McLaughlin said. "FEMA experienced no delays in deployment of assets, and Texas officials have unequivocally and vocally applauded the federal government and FEMA's response. If anyone is upset by the end of unchecked, blank-check spending under President Trump's administration, that says more about them than it does about us."

Meet The Fashion Executives Who Left The Boardroom To Chase The Sustainability Rainbow
Meet The Fashion Executives Who Left The Boardroom To Chase The Sustainability Rainbow

Forbes

timea few seconds ago

  • Forbes

Meet The Fashion Executives Who Left The Boardroom To Chase The Sustainability Rainbow

Gemma Metheringham, Patrick Frisk and Jane Shepherdson worked for some of the biggest fashion brands ... More on the planet 'I fully accept that I am a huge hypocrite,' Jane Shepherdson CBE, the woman once dubbed the most influential person in British retail, tells me on a video call. Shepherdson transformed British mainstream retailer Topshop into a fashion powerhouse in the 2000s. These days, she is turning her expertise towards building a sustainable future for fashion by supporting disruptors. She is chair of rental platform My Wardrobe HQ, sits on the board of charity Smart Works and is director of the London Fashion Fund which invests in social-purpose startups. 'I was a part of this awful machine. But what can you do? I could have stayed in it, and I could feel even more guilty and full of shame, or you can get out,' Shepherdson says. She's not the only fashion executive turning their boardroom expertise towards sustainability. I spoke with two other industry veterans on their move into remodeling fashion and how they see the future. Patrik Frisk, former CEO of Under Armour and footwear specialists ALDO Group, joined textile recycling company Reju as CEO in 2023. While Frisk was at Under Armour, the brand was finding solutions to make its products recyclable, but, simultaneously, its recycled polyester was sourced from PET bottles. Seeing the need for truly circular, textile-to-textile recycling, Under Armour engaged in a joint venture with IBM and Technip, the parent company of Reju, to scale polyester recycling facilities. As Frisk's tenure at Under Armour came to an end, he was invited to continue the work at Reju. 'I don't need to do it. I want to. I want to make a difference,' Frisk told me in an interview. 'I love the industry, and I want to try to help it transition into something new in a better place.' Is there a part of him that was also motivated by guilt? 'I feel a little bit of regret that I didn't think harder about it earlier,' says Frisk of the environmental impact caused by fashion consumption. Gemma Metheringham spent 17 years at British womenswear label Karen Millen, working her way up to chief creative officer and executive board member. She now works as an educator while studying for a PhD researching the secondhand clothing market. 'What was incredibly painful for me was I fell out of love with the fashion industry,' she told me via Zoom. 'It was a bit like the ending of a relationship.' A shift in market conditions changed how Metheringham saw her job. 'I started feeling like, probably in the early 2000 and 2010s: the market's oversaturated. There's just too much stuff and rather than it being about making beautiful clothes that people need or want, it started becoming more and more about selling stuff to people.' Looking to explore these issues further she turned to Instagram, starting @the_elephant_in_my _wardrobe in 2020 to ask questions and connect with others. She soon realized she had a lot more questions than answers and decided to return to university. 'I wanted a complete break so that I could get some perspective,' she said. Topshop was King of the British High Street in the 2000s with era-defining moments such as its Kate ... More Moss collaboration Shepherdson had a similar realization while working alongside one of Britain's most notorious businessmen, Philip Green, who has been embroiled in numerous controversies across his career. Shepherdson left Topshop amid their growing difference of approach to the business. 'I had been ground down by Philip's desire to constantly be making more and more money out of it and being a thing that was just about commercial success, and not about credibility.' Shepherdson joined midmarket brand Whistles as CEO in 2008. A much smaller brand with a less trend-focussed approach. Shepherdson was keen to try and adopt a sustainable and ethical approach to the business: 'We didn't get as far as we wanted to. I see very, very, very few fashion brands, even nowadays, who have got to that stage. It's a very difficult thing to do, there's a lot of work to be done' she told me. 'I left Whistles in 2016 because I thought: I can't do this anymore. As much as I love it, I can't do this because of the environmental impact.' While all striving to better the industry, Frisk, Metheringham and Shepherdson are each approaching sustainability differently in this new phase of their careers. For Frisk, textile recycling presents an opportunity to not only reduce waste but derisk fashion businesses. He told me: 'If I were CEO for a textile-based brand today, I would be very thoughtful about: how will I be able to grow in the future if I don't have access to materials like this in a constrained world?' Reju launched at the end of 2023 and in October 2024 it opened its first textile-to-textile regeneration hub in Frankfurt, Germany. It has plans to open two further regeneration hubs, one in the Netherlands and one in the US, with capacity to produce 50,000 tons of recycled polyester every year. Their ambition is that by 2034 they will produce between four and five million tons, 4-6% of the world's polyester supply. Reju plans to build facilities capable of processing 50,000 tons of recycled polyester per year After Shepherdson left Whistles, she considered launching her own brand or retail hub for sustainable brands, but thought it would be too challenging to find suppliers that met her standards at that time. Tempted by the allure of rental as a way to maintain fashion's creative side while lowering impact, she joined MyWardrobe HQ. The business has had moderate success but Shepherdson doesn't see it as the sustainable breakthrough she hoped it would be 'Rental isn't the answer. It's there. It exists, but I don't think anyone is going to really crack it at scale,' she says. 'We do okay [at My Wardrobe HQ], but we sell stuff. You can rent, or you can buy stuff, and most people actually want to buy it.' Through the London Fashion Fund, Shepherdson has been able to back innovations for fashion businesses, which she sees as having more impact than trying to shift consumer behavior. Recipients include Mattera, a regenerative cotton programme in India, and green claims compliance company Compare Ethics. Metheringham's studies led her to the conclusion that the secondhand market is key to solving the sustainable puzzle, but it's still not without its challenges 'The secondhand market is really only a source of sustainability if the clothes we buy in the secondhand market actually displace, replace and stop businesses in the first-hand market making more new clothes. That's the tipping point and I don't know how we get there,' she says. Metheringham says her new path in academia has given her the space to develop her critical thinking skills, something she believes more people in the industry could benefit from as it seeks to remodel itself. 'When you're working, you're much more about convincing, communicating, and to some degree, selling your ideas. This idea of critiquing things and looking underneath and around the sides. That's been challenging, but really, really interesting.' In a fast-paced industry like fashion, these executives know all too well that a moment to pause and reflect can be hard to find. There's no one silver-bullet solution to reduce fashion's environmental footprint, it's going to take multiple solutions and multiple talents, from the C-suite to the factory floor, but the first step, as Metheringham says, is taking a step back: 'What we all need to do is open our eyes and think a little bit more about stuff. If we all do that, that's what will make a difference.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store