logo
Letters: Medicaid supports my daughter's 24/7 care. What will happen if Congress cuts funding?

Letters: Medicaid supports my daughter's 24/7 care. What will happen if Congress cuts funding?

My 35-year-old daughter, Flannery, is severely disabled and receives primary care from a Federally Qualified Health Center in San Rafael. As a way of giving back for the incredible work it has done for Flannery, I have served on the board of Marin Community Clinics for the past seven years.
I understand that under the Senate version of the tax and spending bill, Marin Community Clinics and 1,400 other health centers stand to lose 30% of their Medicaid and block grant funding. Millions of Americans will lose access to health care. People are going to die. It's that simple.
Flannery was born with cerebral palsy, is nonverbal and quadriplegic. She requires round-the-clock assistance. She is also supported by the state Regional Centers system, which indirectly receives funding from Medicaid.
I do not know what these cuts will mean for Flannery, but I know they will be disastrous. All to provide large tax cuts to the super wealthy.
Martin Weil, Sonoma
Pay too low
Regarding 'S.F. gave these homeless nonprofits nearly $2 billion. The salaries of their execs might surprise you' (San Francisco, SFChronicle.com, June 27): I found the story surprising, but not because of the shock promised. Rather, I noted the effort to put nonprofit leaders on blast with backward speculation, troubling.
Capitalism creates homelessness. And our region's contributions to free enterprise have been particularly egregious, with wealth gaps enabling some of the highest rents in the country.
Our tech industry flourishes by selling fitness apps, payroll software, cryptocurrency, and refrigerators with computer screens on the door. We venerate commodities, claiming innovation, judgment-free. But if you opt out of (or are not privileged to) a tech career, the assumption is that you should not have equal access to this economy.
The story notes one nonprofit's wage differential between executives and workers. Had they been asked, I'm sure the organizations would have thoughtful responses about values and wage philosophies. Because nonprofits pay attention to wealth equity — and attitudes that conflate this work with self-sacrifice require us to bring the receipts.
This story shows we need to reevaluate our collective values. Given the Bay Area's staggering homelessness crisis, if anything, our nonprofit leaders — and all workers in this industry — deserve higher pay.
Kristin Hatch, development director, Homeless Prenatal Program, San Francisco
Don't misuse CEQA
Regarding 'This rich California city is losing its mind over a housing project — and it shows why new rules are needed' (Emily Hoeven, SFChronicle.com, June 28): Emily Hoeven's column on Menlo Park highlights how the California Environmental Quality Act and local resistance can stall needed housing. But in South San Jose, we face the opposite: The law is being manipulated to fast-track dangerous sprawl.
A developer is proposing 173 market-rate homes on a hillside previously zoned for 54 units at the end of Harry Road in an area with no sidewalks, narrow roads, high wildfire danger, and known landslide risk. This is not infill. It's speculative development disguised as a housing solution.
Even worse, the developer is attempting to bypass a full environmental impact report, under 2019's SB330, despite the parcel bordering wildlife corridors that support biodiversity and provide natural buffers in an already climate-sensitive area.
This is exactly the kind of CEQA misuse that reform should prevent — not enable. If California is serious about climate, safety and equity, then it must protect the public's right to question unsustainable projects — not gut the laws that give us a voice.
Lisa Lubliner, San Jose
Bicoastal emissions
Regarding 'Bicoastal living isn't just for the ultra wealthy. Here's how creatives make it work' (Bay Area, SFChronicle.com, June 24): The story struck me as remarkably tone deaf. Airline flights are major contributors to greenhouse gas emissions. Ignoring this aspect in the reporting was a missed opportunity to discuss the repercussions of a bicoastal lifestyle.
Liz Eva, Castro Valley
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Final megabill votes are secured, GOP leaders say
Final megabill votes are secured, GOP leaders say

Politico

time9 minutes ago

  • Politico

Final megabill votes are secured, GOP leaders say

Mike Johnson is staring down the legislative challenge of his career. As soon as this morning, the speaker will attempt to ram the Senate-passed megabill through the House as dozens of Republicans threaten to vote it down. The detractors come from across the Republican conference after the Senate sent over a bill with deeper Medicaid cuts, steeper deficit hikes and less onerous clean-energy provisions than expected. And he's gunning to deliver by President Donald Trump's self-imposed July 4 deadline, as severe thunderstorms in Washington threaten full attendance. 'We'll see. I've got to play the cards that are dealt to me,' Johnson said Tuesday, after admitting he was 'not happy' with the Senate's changes to the bill. 'And we're working through that. … But we remain optimistic we're going to land it at this point.' Johnson has 24 to 48 hours to persuade reluctant fiscal hawks and Medicaid moderates to swallow the Senate's bill. He spent Monday on calls with concerned lawmakers and caucuses, scrambling to figure out how to pass it this week without making changes to the bill. (John Thune and Johnson have been in contact through much of the process but did not speak in the hours leading up to the Senate vote, the majority leader told POLITICO.) But the Senate bill will be tough to sell. House Freedom Caucus members like Reps. Chip Roy (R-Texas) and Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) blasted the Senate's bill Tuesday for adding to the deficit and softening clean energy tax credits. Roy and Norman both voted against the bill in the Rules Committee overnight. House moderates are worried about the steep cuts to Medicaid, which Johnson has privately said could cost Republicans the House in 2026. Sen. Thom Tillis' (R-N.C.) speech torching the Senate's Medicaid provisions for similar reasons shook many vulnerable Republicans. And a substantial cross section of the two groups of holdouts would rather take time to rework the package and send it back to the Senate, instead of jamming the Senate version through the House under a self-imposed deadline. Norman said the House should go back to the original bill, leave town and come back when Senate Republicans are 'serious.' Some signs of progress for Johnson: Rep. Nick LaLota (R-N.Y.) appeared more likely to support the bill Tuesday night after previously refusing a deal on a state and local tax deduction. Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R-N.J.), previously a strong no on the bill over the Medicaid provider tax, told POLITICO a local provider tax tweak in the wraparound amendment for New Jersey and other states has him feeling better about the bill. But it would still be a gamble for Johnson to put it on the House floor: Many Republicans think the bill would fail without additional changes. However, the speaker has previously succeeded in putting bills on the floor without the votes — and relying on Trump to pressure holdouts to fold. What else we're watching: — Weather problems could delay House vote: Over 200 flights into Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport were either canceled or delayed Tuesday amid thunderstorms in Washington, according to the flight-tracking service FlightAware. Johnson said Tuesday night that the travel issues could push back the House vote on the GOP megabill, which is expected as early as Wednesday. — More reconciliation packages: As the House looks to pass the current reconciliation package without further tweaks, Johnson is suggesting there could be future opportunities for lawmakers to get their priorities into party-line packages. In an interview on Fox News on Tuesday night, Johnson said the House will plan to do two more reconciliation bills during this session of Congress, which ends in 2026. Jordain Carney, Meredith Lee Hill and Benjamin Guggenheim contributed to this report.

'Totally Unhinged': Trump Ripped After Bizarre Attack On Lawmaker's 'Ugly Face'
'Totally Unhinged': Trump Ripped After Bizarre Attack On Lawmaker's 'Ugly Face'

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'Totally Unhinged': Trump Ripped After Bizarre Attack On Lawmaker's 'Ugly Face'

President Donald Trump on Wednesday launched a wild attack on Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), calling the lawmaker a 'DOPE,' TOTAL LOSER,' and a 'bad politician.' He also said Raskin has an 'ugly face.' Trump's tirade came shortly after Raskin appeared on MSNBC, where he spoke about a report indicating that the president wasn't aware that his signature 'big beautiful bill' would cut Medicaid until a Republican lawmaker pointed it out to him earlier in the day. Raskin said there's a lot of discussion on the floor of the House over just how much Trump knows about his own bill and whether he's 'out of it.' Yet most GOP lawmakers support the bill anyway, even those who aren't happy with it themselves. 'All of these people have gotten in line despite their own misgivings because Trump is leading the way ― but Trump might not even understand what's in the bill,' Raskin said. 'So it's a very dangerous moment when you think about what democracy is, and it doesn't speak well for what has become of the Republican Party.' Yet not everyone in the Republican caucus has backed the bill ― and as a key vote stalled late Wednesday, Trump attacked Raskin on Truth Social: Raskin brushed it off during an MSNBC interview. 'I suppose I don't mind being called a loser several times by Donald Trump given that he's our only president who has lost the popular vote for president in two different elections,' he told Lawrence O'Donnell. 'And the last time, when he lost by more than 7 million votes to Joe Biden, it upset him so much that he incited an insurrection against the Constitution, against his own vice president, and against the Congress of the United States.' He also had a response to Trump calling him 'ugly.' 'I suppose I don't like being called ugly by Donald Trump, but not everybody can live up to his exquisite levels of handsomeness and personal physical grace,' he said. Trump's critics on X also fired back at the president: Donald Trump lashes out at Congressman Jamie Raskin, calling him a 'dope,' a 'total loser,' and mocking his 'ugly face.'Totally unhinged — Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) July 3, 2025 Just a really disturbed person. Media has normalized his insanity to a ridiculous degree. This (and most of what he does) is not normal. healthy human behavior. — Centrism Fan Acct 🔹 (@Wilson__Valdez) July 3, 2025 Can you remember another time in modern American history where the president of the country attacked an opponent of his for his 'ugly face'? (Also, do you remember when Republicans with clutch their pearls about civility and etiquette?) — Mehdi Hasan (@mehdirhasan) July 3, 2025 MAGA is a movement by jerks, for jerks — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) July 3, 2025 Trump is projecting — again. No world leader speaks about their own officials with such venom. His unhinged rants aren't strength, they're a warning isn't leadership. It's emotional instability wrapped in delusion. America deserves better. — Shahn Khalfan (@ShahnKhalfan) July 3, 2025 When you point your finger at someone else, you point three fingers at yourself. Jesus said to 'love your neighbor as yourself.' Hard, isn't it, Mr. President? Cong. Raskin is a Constitutional expert, the real reason you attack/resent him. @realDonaldTrumphttps:// — Representative Joy Garratt, NM HD29 (@joyousgarratt) July 3, 2025 .@RepRaskin is one of the smartest, kindest, most principled leaders we have - and he has continued to lead through some of the most profound loss a human being can endure. Unlike those who are clinging to cruelty, ego and self interest right now - he has never lost his compass. — Kyra Ellis-Moore (@KyraEllisMoore) July 3, 2025 'I love watching his ugly face.' - the president of the United States of America — Alex Jewell 🧢 (@bestfoodalex) July 3, 2025 The functional illiterate calls the constitutional scholar a dope. — Robert (@avjagfan) July 3, 2025 The walls are red with tomato based products. — The Dr. - ❤️'s Educated Women (@gatesisthedevil) July 3, 2025 Jamie Raskin would eat Donald Trump for lunch in a debate. Raskin is a constitutional lawyer who has taught constitutional law for over 25 years. — Denison Barb (@DenisonBarbs) July 3, 2025 Shame on republicans — On A Bender (@on_bender) July 3, 2025 Trump's tirade isn't just petty—it's part of a pattern. His rhetoric leans hard into violence, personal attacks, and sugar-coated distortions dressed up as 'truth.' Political scientists have tracked a sharp rise in his use of violent language over the years, often rivaling… — SleuthyFella (@SleuthyFella) July 3, 2025 — Tucker&Otis (@Tucker_and_Otis) July 3, 2025

Everyone Is Absolutely Losing It Over This Republican Senator's Face After Voting For The "Big Beautiful Bill"
Everyone Is Absolutely Losing It Over This Republican Senator's Face After Voting For The "Big Beautiful Bill"

Yahoo

time19 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Everyone Is Absolutely Losing It Over This Republican Senator's Face After Voting For The "Big Beautiful Bill"

On Tuesday, after a long vote with JD Vance as the tiebreaker, the Senate passed Donald Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill." Now, the bill heads to the House, with Republicans trying to race to Trump's self-imposed July 4 deadline. Of the most notable in the proposal, the bill proposes sweeping tax cuts for businesses and the country's wealthiest Americans. To offset the lost revenue, the bill would slash funding for healthcare programs like Medicaid, potentially leaving up to 17 million Americans uninsured. The bill would also cut SNAP, the food aid program relied on by 40 million Americans, by about 20 percent; roll back clean energy initiatives and student loan relief; and increase spending on the military and deportations. According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the bill is projected to add at least $3.3 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. Related: Rep. Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska cast the last "yes" vote before JD's tiebreaker, which she later called an "agonizing" decision. While Murkowski supported the tax cuts in the bill, she raised concerns about the spending cuts to Medicaid and SNAP food assistance. Nearly one-third of Alaskans depend on Medicaid, and food insecurity remains a problem as many communities are too remote, requiring food to be barged or flown in, an inaccessible and expensive process. To convince Murkowski, Republicans stuffed the bill with provisions specifically designed to help win over her vote, including doubling a fund to help rural hospitals from $25 billion to $50 billion over five years, exemptions on work requirements for food assistance, and a tax break for whalers. After the vote, an NBC News reporter asked Murkowski if she thought her vote was "a bailout for Alaska at the expense of the rest of the country." These words, the reporter said, were spoken by Republican Sen. Rand Paul. However, Murkowski quietly stared him down, seething. "Do I like this bill? No," she said, admitting, "Because I tried to take care of Alaska's interests. But I know that in many parts of the country, there are Americans that are not going to be advantaged by this bill." Lisa Murkowksi just admitted that Trump's bill will hurt people even after she voted for it 'I know that in many parts of the country, there are Americans that are not going to be advantaged by this bill.' The Republicans are spineless cowards. — Harry Sisson (@harryjsisson) July 1, 2025 Twitter: @harryjsisson Related: Murkowski was also seen looking in an image after the vote. Naturally, it's gone viral. "tfw you've just stripped healthcare from 17 million Americans and ensured the closure of rural hospitals," one wrote. Related: "if I send you this pic it means I've made yet another horrible decision and abandoned my standards and morals," another said. "She knows what she did," this viral tweet read. People also reacted to her calling the decision "agonizing." "That pain you feel is in your conscience," one wrote. Related: "'Agonizing' for Lisa Murkowski? 17 million Americans will lose health care as a result of her vote. Be so serious," said Arizona Rep. Yassamin Ansari. Everyone's pretty much asking the same thing: "Then why did you vote for it?" Welp, as the bill heads to the House to be deliberated and voted on, we will wait to see if it heads to Trump's desk to be signed into law. In the meantime, in the comments, let us know your thoughts about the bill, and if it passes, how it will impact you. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store