Tesco slashes the price of award-winning liqueur that ‘tastes better than Bailey's'
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
TESCO shoppers have heaped on the praise for an award-winning Irish liquer.
And no, it's not the go-to classic Bailey's.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
1
A 700ml bottle of Coole Swan Superior Irish Cream Liqueur for just £26.50 from Tesco
A 700 mililitre bottle of Coole Swan Superior Irish Cream Liqueur is available for just £26.50 from Tesco.
And if you're a Clubcard holder, you can nab this popular drink for £20.
The "smooth and creamy" drink consists of single-malt Irish whiskey, Belgian white chocolate, and fresh dairy cream.
Coole Swan own a family farm in Ireland, where they source the cream that gives the drink its classic "silky" quality.
'Better' than Bailey's
While Baileys is the traditional choice for many, Coole Swan proves to be a popular contender.
Some fans have even compared the two, describing the Tesco buy as "like Baileys, but better".
One shopper claimed it's in a "different league" compared to other cream liqueurs.
Rave reviews
Coole Swan has also garnered prestigious awards, including Double Gold at the San Francisco World Spirits Competition.
It was also named the #1 Irish cream liqueur by Tasting Table, according to the Manchester Evening News.
Tesco customers awarded the liqueur an average of 4.7 out of five stars.
'I'm obsessed with it' says Irish shopper as new drink hits stores for first time – but there are loads of mixed reviews
"This is so beautiful, creamy and a better class of liqueur. Move over, Baileys, there's a new drink in town," said one shopper.
"The most delicious Irish cream liqueur I have ever tasted," agreed another person.
"Creamy, luxuriously smooth and very moreish."
They added: "The taste of alcohol is not overwhelming either, which I find with Baileys and other Irish creams.
"Don't think I could go back to anything else after trying this; the only downside is the price."
NHS guidelines on drinking alcohol
According to the NHS, regularly drinking more than 14 units of alcohol a week risks damaging your health.
To keep health risks from alcohol to a low level if you drink most weeks: men and women are advised not to drink more than 14 units a week on a regular basis
spread your drinking over 3 or more days if you regularly drink as much as 14 units a week
if you want to cut down, try to have several drink-free days each week
If you're pregnant or think you could become pregnant, the safest approach is not to drink alcohol at all to keep risks to your baby to a minimum.
You read more on the NHS website.
The brand has also earned over 1,200 reviews and an impressive 4.7-star average rating on Amazon.
Other drinks deals
And Amazon also has offers available on 24 multi-packs of Pepsi Max.
Another Amazon deal sees a popular gin available for almost half price.
Plus, the top 24 non-alcoholic drinks currently available from UK supermarkets.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
4 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Heineken sells less beer after fraught pricing talks with retailers
The Dutch brewer saw shares dip as it also indicated that US tariffs would act as a drag on company profits. The company, which also makes Birra Moretti and Amstel, reported a 1.2% slump in beer volumes in the first six months of 2025, driven by declines in Brazil, the US and parts of Europe. It said European volumes dropped by 4.7% after a number of retailers, primarily in France, the Netherlands, Germany and Spain, pulled the brand due to planned price increases. Heineken said the talks with retailer groups took longer than expected to be resolved. Sales of Murphy's Irish stout grew in the UK over the past half year, Heineken said (David Parry Media Assignments/PA) Group revenues dropped by 5% to 16.9 billion euros (£14.6 billion) for the half-year. The company said it also saw weaker sales in the US over the period, with beer volumes down by 'high' single digits due to weak consumer sentiment. It comes as the company is set to be impacted by the proposed 15% tariff on all EU products imported into the US. In the UK, net revenues, before exceptional items and amortisation, increased by 'low single digits' over the half. Beers and cider volumes dropped, despite strong growth from its Cruzcampo lager brand. Its Murphy's stout brand also saw further growth after being boosted by improved distribution and new draughts. The brand benefited from supply issues from rival stout brand Guinness late last year following soaring demand. Dolf van den Brink, chief executive and chairman, said: 'We continued to invest in future-proofing our business, strengthening our footprint and brand portfolios, funded by productivity savings. 'Our volume performance improved across all regions in the second quarter and continued to be of high quality.'
Glasgow Times
8 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Tariff of 15% ‘challenging' but avoids a trade war
Peter Burke said that the EU-US deal avoids both a trade war and EU counter-measures, which would have had an effect on the north-south economy. He said 'the devil is in the detail' of the trade agreement finalised on Sunday by Donald Trump and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland. 'We had a lot of modelling carried out on the various different options, and some were very perverse, that would have closed the market if you had over a 30% tariff with a stacking mechanism,' Mr Burke told RTE Radio. 'The key thing is that there will be a number of carve outs. Obviously, aviation has been cited as zero-for-zero, but also in relation to agrifoods and potentially spirits.' The bloc is set to face 15% tariffs on most of its goods including cars, semiconductors and pharmaceuticals entering the US and 'zero for zero' tariffs on a number of products including aircraft, some agricultural goods and certain chemicals – as well as EU purchases of US energy worth 750 billion dollars over three years. Mr Burke said it was his understanding that the 15% tariff on the pharmaceutical sector would be a maximum rate. He added: 'I think the president of the Commission has been very clear that 15% will be a ceiling.' It is still unclear from the deal, agreed five days before Mr Trump's threat of a 30% tariff would have come into effect, will mean Ireland will need to invest in US energy, he added. 'This all has to be worked out yet, as you can appreciate, I'm only hearing this for the first time last night, and we have nothing on paper.' Ireland's premier Micheal Martin and deputy premier Simon Harris welcomed the agreement struck on Sunday, saying that while Ireland 'regrets' the baseline tariff of 15%, it welcomed the certainty for businesses. Mr Harris said further detail was needed around how tariffs would affect sectors including pharmaceuticals. Ireland remains vulnerable to a slow down in trade with the US economy, due to exports of products such as alcohol, dairy and beef. The Irish government has also expressed concern at how tariffs could affect pharma multinationals based in Ireland, which employs about 45,000 people in Ireland, as Mr Trump had signalled he intended to target that industry. In addition, 65% of all aircraft are leased through Ireland globally. Business group Ibec said although the uncertainty may be dissipating, the agreement was 'punishing' for Europe. The group's chief executive Danny McCoy said 'Europe has capitulated on this' and 15% is 'very substantial'. Last week, Finance Minister Paschal Dohonoe said the Irish government would spend 9.4 billion euro on its budget in October, based on a zero-tariff scenario for next year. He and Public Expenditure Minister Jack Chambers said these estimates would need to be revised if there was a shock to the Irish economy. Mr Burke said it was not naive to base the government's economic scenario on a zero-for-zero trade agreement with the US. 'No it wasn't because we didn't know what we were to be faced with,' he said on Monday. 'We do need to find out what happens in other areas, because this is very complex. 'It depends what happens with China, that's a very significant market that a deal hasn't happened yet. 'It really impacts what happens with our exporters here in Ireland as well, because so much product is in danger of being redirected into EU market. 'We also don't know what separate carve outs are going to emerge for the different sectors that are so vulnerable from an Irish perspective. 'Until we get flesh on the bones and all those areas over the coming weeks, we'll be in a better position then to really put forward what budgetary parameters (we) will end up with.'
Leader Live
31 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Tariff of 15% ‘challenging' but avoids a trade war
Peter Burke said that the EU-US deal avoids both a trade war and EU counter-measures, which would have had an effect on the north-south economy. He said 'the devil is in the detail' of the trade agreement finalised on Sunday by Donald Trump and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland. 'We had a lot of modelling carried out on the various different options, and some were very perverse, that would have closed the market if you had over a 30% tariff with a stacking mechanism,' Mr Burke told RTE Radio. 'The key thing is that there will be a number of carve outs. Obviously, aviation has been cited as zero-for-zero, but also in relation to agrifoods and potentially spirits.' The bloc is set to face 15% tariffs on most of its goods including cars, semiconductors and pharmaceuticals entering the US and 'zero for zero' tariffs on a number of products including aircraft, some agricultural goods and certain chemicals – as well as EU purchases of US energy worth 750 billion dollars over three years. Mr Burke said it was his understanding that the 15% tariff on the pharmaceutical sector would be a maximum rate. He added: 'I think the president of the Commission has been very clear that 15% will be a ceiling.' It is still unclear from the deal, agreed five days before Mr Trump's threat of a 30% tariff would have come into effect, will mean Ireland will need to invest in US energy, he added. 'This all has to be worked out yet, as you can appreciate, I'm only hearing this for the first time last night, and we have nothing on paper.' Ireland's premier Micheal Martin and deputy premier Simon Harris welcomed the agreement struck on Sunday, saying that while Ireland 'regrets' the baseline tariff of 15%, it welcomed the certainty for businesses. Mr Harris said further detail was needed around how tariffs would affect sectors including pharmaceuticals. Ireland remains vulnerable to a slow down in trade with the US economy, due to exports of products such as alcohol, dairy and beef. The Irish government has also expressed concern at how tariffs could affect pharma multinationals based in Ireland, which employs about 45,000 people in Ireland, as Mr Trump had signalled he intended to target that industry. In addition, 65% of all aircraft are leased through Ireland globally. Last week, Finance Minister Paschal Dohonoe said the Irish government would spend 9.4 billion euro on its budget in October, based on a zero-tariff scenario for next year. He and Public Expenditure Minister Jack Chambers said these estimates would need to be revised if there was a shock to the Irish economy. Mr Burke said it was not naive to base the government's economic scenario on a zero-for-zero trade agreement with the US. 'No it wasn't because we didn't know what we were to be faced with,' he said on Monday. 'We do need to find out what happens in other areas, because this is very complex. 'It depends what happens with China, that's a very significant market that a deal hasn't happened yet. 'It really impacts what happens with our exporters here in Ireland as well, because so much product is in danger of being redirected into EU market. 'We also don't know what separate carve outs are going to emerge for the different sectors that are so vulnerable from an Irish perspective. 'Until we get flesh on the bones and all those areas over the coming weeks, we'll be in a better position then to really put forward what budgetary parameters (we) will end up with.'
