logo
Will always strive for social, political justice: CJI-designate Gavai

Will always strive for social, political justice: CJI-designate Gavai

Time of India13-05-2025
CJI-designate Justice BR Gavai
NEW DELHI: True to his steadfast alignment to
Ambedkar's philosophy
of equality and dignity for the downtrodden and a day before taking oath as CJI, Justice Bhushan Ramakant Gavai said he considers his position as a judge and head of judiciary an opportunity to strive for social and
political justice
.
"Justice must be equitable irrespective of a person's social or monetary status," Gavai said. "Timely justice is the ultimate goal," he said.
Interacting with TOI after visiting the Shanti Stupa in Delhi on the occasion of Buddha Purnima, CJI-designate Justice B R Gavai said B R Ambedkar's belief in the principles of liberty, equality and fraternity remains eternally essential for India's democracy and unity.
Legal aid to the poor is dear to his heart. He wants National Legal Services Authority and the Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee to synchronise their activities with state- and district-level legal service authorities to create synergy for making litigation affordable and less tortuous for the poor.
Diversity and inclusivity is also a mantra that has become part of his decision-making process over the years. 'We will attempt to get women judges and give representation to diverse communities in constitutional courts without compromising merit and suitability,' he said.
'Timely justice is the ultimate goal,' the CJI-designate said. 'Reducing pendency at every level of the three-tier justice delivery system through a long-term strategy is the need of the hour. Augmentation of judicial infrastructure and facilities for litigants, especially in district and taluk level courts, will be given priority during my tenure,' Justice Gavai said. During his tenure, the collegium led by him will have the opportunity to fill five vacancies that will arise in the SC.
He will be the
first Buddhist CJI
and second Dalit, after CJI K G Balakrishnan, in the 75-year history of SC. Ahead of taking oath as the 52nd CJI, the man who inspired him with the ideals of Ambedkar, his late politician father R S Gavai's prophetic words played on a loop in his mind.
He also reflected on his journey in formal education that started from a municipal school in a semi-slum area of his native town Amravati, Vidarbha. He studied in Bombay after his father became vice-chairperson and then chairperson of Maharashtra legislative council. After doing first-year law from Govt Law College, Bombay, he had to return to Amravati to complete LLB as his father fell out with Rajiv Gandhi and did not get the position he had enjoyed in legislative council.
After getting his law degree, he started practising in Nagpur, which has a bench of Bombay HC, built a significant practice and shared a professional table with Sharad A Bobde, who went on to become the 48th CJI. Gavai applied for 'senior' designation with the intention to shift his practice to Delhi. At that juncture, Bombay HC Chief Justice C K Thakker sought his consent for recommending his name for appointment as an HC judge.
He was not inclined, but consulted his parliamentarian father, who told him, 'Accept the offer of judgeship. You will contribute more to society. One day, you will become the
Chief Justice of India
. But I will not be there to see that day.' Gavai Sr died in July 2015, much before Justice Gavai was appointed as an SC judge.
Justice Gavai shifted from Nagarapalika Prathamik Vidyalaya, Amravati, to Chikitsak Samuha Madhyamik Shala, Girgaon, Mumbai, when his father became deputy chairperson of Maharashtra legislative council.
His mother Kamalatai thought Gavai would lag in English studying in a Marathi medium school and insisted on his admission to Holy Name High School in Colaba.
His name was recommended for HC judgeship in 2002, but it was returned as he was less than 45 years in age. He took oath as a judge of Bombay HC on November 14, 2003.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SC concerned over ED summoning lawyers for advice, may frame guidelines
SC concerned over ED summoning lawyers for advice, may frame guidelines

Business Standard

timean hour ago

  • Business Standard

SC concerned over ED summoning lawyers for advice, may frame guidelines

The Enforcement Directorate is "crossing all limits", the Supreme Court said on Monday as it expressed serious concern over the agency summoning advocates for offering legal advice or representing clients during investigations. It also called for guidelines on the matter. The remarks from an apex court bench of Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran came during a suo motu hearing initiated by the court to address the implications of such actions on the independence of the legal profession. This comes in the wake of the ED summoning senior lawyers Arvind Datar and Pratap Venugopal. The communication between a lawyer and the clients is privileged communication and how can the notices be issued against them they are crossing all limits, the CJI said. Guidelines should be framed, he said while responding to submissions that recent ED notices to legal professionals like senior advocate Datar could have a chilling effect on the practice of law. Attorney General R Vennkataramani and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said the issue had been taken up at the highest level and the probe agency asked to not issue notices to the lawyers for rendering legal advice. Lawyers cannot be summoned for rendering legal opinions, the solicitor general said. He, however, said there have been attempts to malign institutions by creating false narratives. Advocates stressed that summoning lawyers, especially for giving legal opinions, was setting a dangerous precedent. If this continues, it will deter lawyers from offering honest and independent advice, a lawyer said, adding that even district court lawyers were facing undue harassment. The attorney general acknowledged the concerns and said, What is happening is certainly wrong. The CJI responded that the court had also been surprised by reports it came across. However, the solicitor general cautioned against forming opinions based on media narratives. There is a concerted effort to target institutions. Please don't go by interviews and news, the law officer said. We don't watch the news, haven't seen YouTube interviews. Only last week I managed to watch a few movies, said the CJI, who was indisposed last week. When the solicitor general referred to politicians, accused in scams, attempting to shape public opinion, the CJI said, We said it don't politicise this. The moment I heard about Mr Datar, I immediately brought it to the notice of the highest executive, Mehta said. The bench directed all parties, including the Supreme Court Bar Association(SCBA), represented by its president and senior advocate Vikas Singh, to file comprehensive notes on the issue and allowed intervention applications. The matter is now listed for further hearing on July 29. Ultimately, we are all lawyers, the CJI remarked, adding that arguments in court should not be viewed adversarially. On June 20, the ED said it had directed its investigating officers not to issue summons to any advocate in money laundering investigations being carried out against their clients. An exception to this rule can only be made after "approval" by the agency's director, it added. The ED, tasked with combating money laundering crimes, issued a circular for guidance of its field formations, stating that "no summons" should be issued to any advocate in violation of Section 132 of the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023. "Further, if any summons needs to be issued under the exceptions carved out in proviso to Section 132 of the BSA, 2023, the same shall be issued only with the prior approval of the director, ED," the agency said. The summons issued to these advocates was condemned by the SCBA and the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association, which called the move a "disturbing trend" that struck at the very foundations of the legal profession. The bar bodies had urged the CJI to take suo motu cognisance of the matter. On June 25, an apex court bench of Justices K V Viswanathan and N Kotiswar Singh said allowing police or probe agencies to directly summon lawyers for advising clients would seriously undermine the autonomy of the legal profession and was a "direct threat" to the independence of justice administration. It observed that the legal profession was an integral component of the process of administration of justice. The order came when the top court was hearing a plea of a Gujarat-based advocate, challenging an order of the high court passed on June 12. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

ED crossing all limits: SC on agency summoning lawyers for giving legal advice
ED crossing all limits: SC on agency summoning lawyers for giving legal advice

News18

time2 hours ago

  • News18

ED crossing all limits: SC on agency summoning lawyers for giving legal advice

New Delhi, Jul 21 (PTI) The Enforcement Directorate is 'crossing all limits", the Supreme Court said on Monday as it expressed serious concern over the agency summoning advocates for offering legal advice or representing clients during investigations. It also called for guidelines on the matter. The remarks from an apex court bench of Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran came during a suo motu hearing initiated by the court to address the implications of such actions on the independence of the legal profession. This comes in the wake of the ED summoning senior lawyers Arvind Datar and Pratap Venugopal. 'The communication between a lawyer and the clients is privileged communication and how can the notices be issued against them… they are crossing all limits," the CJI said. 'Guidelines should be framed," he said while responding to submissions that recent ED notices to legal professionals like senior advocate Datar could have a chilling effect on the practice of law. Attorney General R Vennkataramani and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said the issue had been taken up at the highest level and the probe agency asked to not issue notices to the lawyers for rendering legal advice. 'Lawyers cannot be summoned for rendering legal opinions," the solicitor general said. He, however, said there have been attempts to malign institutions by creating false narratives. Advocates stressed that summoning lawyers, especially for giving legal opinions, was setting a dangerous precedent. 'If this continues, it will deter lawyers from offering honest and independent advice," a lawyer said, adding that even district court lawyers were facing undue harassment. The attorney general acknowledged the concerns and said, 'What is happening is certainly wrong." The CJI responded that the court had also been surprised by reports it came across. However, the solicitor general cautioned against forming opinions based on media narratives. 'There is a concerted effort to target institutions. Please don't go by interviews and news," the law officer said. 'We don't watch the news, haven't seen YouTube interviews. Only last week I managed to watch a few movies," said the CJI, who was indisposed last week. When the solicitor general referred to politicians, accused in scams, attempting to shape public opinion, the CJI said, 'We said it… don't politicise this." 'The moment I heard about Mr Datar, I immediately brought it to the notice of the highest executive," Mehta said. The bench directed all parties, including the Supreme Court Bar Association(SCBA), represented by its president and senior advocate Vikas Singh, to file comprehensive notes on the issue and allowed intervention applications. The matter is now listed for further hearing on July 29. 'Ultimately, we are all lawyers," the CJI remarked, adding that arguments in court should not be viewed adversarially. On June 20, the ED said it had directed its investigating officers not to issue summons to any advocate in money laundering investigations being carried out against their clients. An exception to this rule can only be made after 'approval" by the agency's director, it added. The ED, tasked with combating money laundering crimes, issued a circular for guidance of its field formations, stating that 'no summons" should be issued to any advocate in violation of Section 132 of the Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023. 'Further, if any summons needs to be issued under the exceptions carved out in proviso to Section 132 of the BSA, 2023, the same shall be issued only with the prior approval of the director, ED," the agency said. The summons issued to these advocates was condemned by the SCBA and the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association, which called the move a 'disturbing trend" that struck at the very foundations of the legal profession. The bar bodies had urged the CJI to take suo motu cognisance of the matter. On June 25, an apex court bench of Justices K V Viswanathan and N Kotiswar Singh said allowing police or probe agencies to directly summon lawyers for advising clients would seriously undermine the autonomy of the legal profession and was a 'direct threat" to the independence of justice administration. top videos View all It observed that the legal profession was an integral component of the process of administration of justice. The order came when the top court was hearing a plea of a Gujarat-based advocate, challenging an order of the high court passed on June 12. PTI SJK SJK MIN MIN (This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI) First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

'Still A Judge': CJI Gavai Raps Advocate For Not Saying 'Justice' Yashwant Varma
'Still A Judge': CJI Gavai Raps Advocate For Not Saying 'Justice' Yashwant Varma

News18

time2 hours ago

  • News18

'Still A Judge': CJI Gavai Raps Advocate For Not Saying 'Justice' Yashwant Varma

Last Updated: CJI BR Gavai reprimanded advocate Mathews J Nedumpara for referring to Justice Yashwant Varma as only 'Varma' amid a case seeking an FIR against him. Chief Justice of India BR Gavai on Monday objected to advocate Mathews J Nedumpara addressing Justice Yashwant Varma, who is caught up in the controversy related to the discovery of cash notes at his official residence, as only 'Varma". CJI Gavai argued that Justice Varma was still a judge of the High Court, and that he had to be addressed as a 'Justice." The development came after Nedumpara mentioned an urgent listing writ petition, seeking the registration of a First Information Report (FIR) against Justice Varma. 'This is the third writ petition," Nedumpara said. 'You want it to be dismissed right now?" CJI Gavai asked in response. 'It is impossible to be dismissed. FIR has to be registered. Now Varma seems to be asking for that only. There has to be an FIR, an investigation," Nedumpara responded, referring to the writ petition filed by Justice Varma himself challenging the in-house proceedings. 'Is he your friend? He is still Justice Verma. How do you address him? Have some decorum. You are referring to a learned judge. He is still a judge of the court," CJI Gavai said, as he corrected Nedumpara. 'I don't think that greatness can apply to him. Matter has to be listed," Nedumpara responded. 'Don't dictate to the court," CJI Gavai shot back. In March this year, Nedumpara had filed a first writ petition, which was dismissed by the Supreme Court the same month, observing that the in-house inquiry proceedings were going on. He later filed another writ petition, after the then CJI Sanjiv Khanna forwarded the in-house inquiry report to the President and the Prime Minister. In May, the Supreme Court disposed of the said writ petition, asking Nedumpara to first approach the central government authorities for the FIR. A fire incident at Justice Varma's Lutyens' Delhi residence in March, when he was a judge of the Delhi High Court, had led to the discovery of sacks of half-burnt cash in the outhouse. Justice Varma was subsequently repatriated to the Allahabad High Court, but no judicial work was assigned to him. Though Justice Varma denied any wrongdoing, the inquiry panel has concluded that the judge and his family members had covert or active control over the storeroom, where the cash was found, proving his misconduct serious enough to seek his removal. view comments Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store