logo
Fire on fourth floor of Beaver Tower of Southend

Fire on fourth floor of Beaver Tower of Southend

BBC News8 hours ago
Fire crews were called to a 12-storey block of flats after a tumble dryer caused an early-hours blaze in the fourth floor.Six crews were sent to Beaver Tower, in the Eastwood area of Southend-on-Sea, at 03:45 BST.A working smoke alarm ensured nobody was hurt, but people have been urged not to not tumble dryers overnight or when unattended.Essex Fire and Rescue Service's station manager Steve Osborn said: "A tumble dryer had caught fire in an internal balcony and spread to the lounge."
The fire was dealt with by 04:30 and has been recorded as accidental.Mr Osborn continued: "Fortunately the smoke alarm alerted occupants and they were able to get out and call 999."The incident highlights the importance of having a working smoke alarm to give you and your family an early warning if there is a fire in your home."Thermal imaging cameras were used to ensure the blaze had not spread.Mr Osborn added the flat had been "left uninhabitable"."It's important to make sure you take extra care when using tumble dryers," he said."Don't use them at night or while unattended, clean the filters after every use and remove items immediately after the cycle has finished."
Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Parents criticise school skirt ban that restricts girls' ‘femininity'
Parents criticise school skirt ban that restricts girls' ‘femininity'

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Parents criticise school skirt ban that restricts girls' ‘femininity'

Parents at a secondary school have pushed back against a new uniform policy they say does not treat boys and girls equally. Newhouse Academy, in Greater Manchester, announced earlier this year that it would ban skirts. Parents complained, and a consultation was held, but the school is going ahead with its trousers-only policy, despite the objections. One parent told the Manchester Evening News that 'parents should challenge this ruling'. The parent said: 'This ban disregards the female students and their right to express their femininity. 'Schoolgirls as young as 11 forced to wear trousers and look like a boy is not embracing the two genders equally.' Another parent added she 'would never have considered this school' for her daughter, who starts in September, had she known about the change. The school told families that from the autumn, both 'boys and girls will be expected to wear plain black school trousers' as it intends to 'move away from skirts being a part of the girls' uniform'. It said: 'While there is no legal demand for us to consult on uniform changes, we wholly recognise that it is important that any such decisions are not made in isolation. We had a formal listening period that anyone was able to respond to. 'We have worked closely with the student council, staff have been given an opportunity to have their say and it has been discussed at the relevant levels in our governance structure. 'We even extended our original listening period to allow more parents to share their views. In fact, the type of trousers that students will wear has also been decided by the students themselves. 'We are sorry that a small number of people do not agree with this uniform change, but it is a decision that we have had significant support for. It is also something that has worked well at other schools.' The move towards trousers for all students is not uncommon, and several other schools have faced backlash for the policy. The Telegraph reported in 2019 that Priory School in Lewes, East Sussex, had introduced a similar change, requiring all students to wear trousers from Year 7 in order to create a gender-neutral uniform. Similarly, Huttoft Primary and Nursery School in Lincolnshire removed a red gingham dress from its uniform, originally saying it was to create a gender-neutral uniform. Following a backlash, it claimed it was to 'reduce costs for parents'.

Council confirms Ryhall library will remain open
Council confirms Ryhall library will remain open

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Council confirms Ryhall library will remain open

A councillor has confirmed that a previously under-threat library in Ryhall is to remain open. Christine Wise told a Rutland County Council meeting that the authority would continue to run Ryhall Library in its current form after "careful consideration" of alternative options. The Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) said the library in Coppice Road came under threat in January when the council stated on budget papers that closure may be an option. An action group was then set up which called on the council to take a vote on any decision to close the library. Wise said: "I can confirm that Rutland County Council will continue to operate Ryhall Library service in its current form from its existing premises."This follows careful consideration of a range of alternative options. "It has always been our intention to maintain library services in the east of the county. The question we've been wrestling is how best to do this." The Liberal Democrat councillor said Arts Council funding awarded for upgrade work was not enough to complete extensive repairs found to be necessary, and instead this money would be used to upgrade added: "Having weighed all the factors and with no alternative venues immediately available to support a move of the library service, we have concluded that a prolonged process to relocate the library service and then dispose of the building would not be in the interests of library users."However, Wise said if the building falls into serious disrepair, the council may need to look at is a process under way to register the building as a community asset, which means it would have extra protection.

Waste disposal practices are harming the environment
Waste disposal practices are harming the environment

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Waste disposal practices are harming the environment

Your article (Millions of tonnes of toxic sewage sludge spread on UK farmland every year, 7 July) gives some insight into the environmental impact of the practice and the paucity of regulatory control. The legal case had been made as far back as 2015 that the spreading of sewage sludge – which the water industry prefers to call 'biosolids' – should be brought under the potentially much tighter environmental permitting system that applies to the spreading of other industrial wastes applied to land for agricultural benefit. Not surprisingly, the very mention that sewage sludge be treated as a 'waste' drew strong resistance from water companies that feared a collapse in the market. However, this is only part of the story. The ban on dumping at sea, coupled with the move away from landfill, has seen a huge shift from putting waste in one place to smearing it in ever more discrete parcels over farmland and elsewhere, purportedly for ecological improvement. In additional to sewage sludge, there are construction waste soils, waste compost and anaerobic digestate, plus a range of non‑waste soil improvers deposited. Examples such as pig carcasses in compost on farmland testify to what some people will try to get away with if not properly regulated. While there may well be good examples of using treated waste to improve soil, the cumulative environmental burden of the range of practices is largely unchecked and GalvinFormer policy adviser, Environment Agency and Defra There is a £6m research project studying the use of pyrolysis on sewage sludge that should assist in sequestering carbon in the soil and which may reduce pollutants like Pfas – so-called 'forever chemicals'. The project undertaken by Thames Water, Ofwat and other collaborators aims to deliver a continuous flow system that could be widely deployed, and the research is due to complete in 2027. If successful, this technology would allow our sewage sludge to be used as an agricultural input while meeting our wider needs to reduce pollution and climate emissions. However, we will need to further invest in our water-treatment system. Can the privatised water industry meet the challenge?Andrew WoodOxford Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store