Outsourcing Emotional Intelligence: The Tools We've Built Aren't The Tools We Need
So, what's my point?
I recently had a conversation with a friend. She was frustrated at work. Apparently, since the advent of A.I. all communications she received from her supervisor were written by A.I. 'At first, I didn't care,' my friend told me. 'But, I just celebrated my twenty-year anniversary at the company. The recognition email I received from my boss was not sincere at all. It was obviously written by A.I.'
Think about the difference between employee recognition and employee appreciation. Recognition is an action taken by a boss. Appreciation is an emotion felt by a boss. Both are necessary.
So, what was actually frustrating my friend? Her manager outsourced emotional intelligence to A.I.
Curious about the present and future of humankind's emotional intelligence, I decided to seek answers from an expert.
CEO and Co-Founder of Six Seconds Joshua Freedman
'A.I. is already having an impact on emotional intelligence,' said Joshua Freedman, one of the world's top thought-leaders, and bestselling authors, on the concept of emotional intelligence. 'Every big tech advancement has created a huge impact on our social and emotional wellbeing. Of course, the impact changes depending on how we use the technology.'
'What made you chase the concept of emotional intelligence?' I asked Freedman on our recent video chat.
Without hesitation, Freedman smiled, and responded, 'I was bad at it.' He then told me how he had spent his early career as a teacher. 'My 13 year old students seemed more emotionally intelligent than I was. As I started learning and practicing, I found it made all the difference for me, first as a teacher, then as a leader, husband, father, and person.'
Fast forward to today, Joshua Freedman is the co-founder and CEO of Six Seconds, the global non-profit dedicated to teaching people how to use emotional intelligence (EQ). He owns the million-member EQ Network group on LinkedIN, and is a master certified coach. He teaches professionals all around the world practical tools to measure and create value with emotional intelligence.
'You've created quite the impact since you realized you needed to improve and understand your own emotional intelligence,' I told Freedman. 'You've helped organizations like FedEx, Qatar Airways, the US Navy, P&G, Microsoft, Intel, Amazon, HSBC, and the United Nations, use emotional intelligence to improve results. That's quite a list.'
Again, Freedman smiled. 'It's so far beyond what I imagined 28 years ago,' he replied. 'I feel deeply honored to see the difference this makes in companies and in people's lives. Six Seconds' practical tools and science take emotional intelligence to the next level. When people practice emotional intelligence they improve their outcomes -- you can feel it, and you can measure it. That's why we do this. It's transformational.'
Then, Freedman, a man who loves to laugh, paused. His face turned serious. 'The issue is, our data from 169 countries shows that the world is in a five-year decline of E.Q. Over that time-period, optimism dropped by 8.6%. And, for younger generations, the decline is nearly double that. I could go on with other markers. But, in short: we're in a global emotional recession with sustained declines in our capacity to connect, adapt, and move ahead.'
That last statement caught my attention. A global emotional recession is a scary thought. And, it's no surprise. For the past couple years I've written numerous posts about the record-high increases in anxiety, depression, and even suicide. That matches Six Seconds' research on global emotional intelligence: rising levels of burnout, declines in empathy, trust, motivation, and increased loneliness. A perfect storm that is battering our wellbeing.
'Is A.I. contributing to this recession?' I asked.
'We're already outsourcing so much of our thinking, and even our feelings, to machines. That's only advancing. I don't think it helps to point fingers, but let's be strategic about this: As A.I. grows, we also need to grow. That's why I decided to write my new book, Emotion Rules – a practical guide to using feelings as resources. The real question is, how do we continue to improve our skills with emotions, and help others improve their emotional intelligence?'
He's right. So, I asked him, 'What advice would you give individuals or leaders who want to improve emotional intelligence for themselves, their teams, or for their organizational culture?'
'You get what you measure,' replied Freedman. 'Many leaders overly rely on traditional intelligence, or I.Q., yet now machines have higher I.Q. than most people. We need to shift our focus to Emotional Intelligence (E.Q.) The great news is that E.Q. and I.Q. can work together so we can see and solve the challenges we're facing. I work with a lot of very smart people, and when they take the emotional intelligence assessment and see that EQ is actually logical, measurable, and practical, they love it.'
According to Six Seconds, here's how practice emotional intelligence:
Step 1: Get the Data
'Notice emotions. Name emotions. Track emotional reactions to every aspect of your life, work, relationships,' says Freedman. 'Smart people love data, and companies collect tons of it. We're also suggesting including data about your emotions, your employees emotions, or even your customers emotions. Literally, you're simply collecting emotional data. You felt something. What was it? What do you call it? How did you react to it?'
Step 2: Appraise the Data
'You recorded the data on what you felt and how you reacted,' said Freedman. 'Now your job is to assess it. How did it go? Did you like your reaction and the response you got from others? What other options could you choose? We don't get to choose what happens, but we choose how we respond to it. This is about switching off autopilot and making that response more intentional.'
Step 3: Connect with Purpose
'You've collected and analyzed the data,' said Freedman. 'The final step is connecting with your purpose. What is the impact you really want to have? The point is, we're having an impact every day, and when we use our emotional intelligence, we can make that impact count. It's not easy being human. It's not easy having emotions. But, when we can understand and process them, emotions can actually help us become the best spouse, the best parent, the best friend, employee, leader we can be. When used well, emotions literally give us energy to change, grow and thrive.'
As we concluded our conversation, I circled back to my friend's story. 'Any advice for my friend?' I asked.
'Her feelings matter. They're messages to help her navigate a difficult situation. Now she can use emotional intelligence to move forward.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Annual IRA audit: How to catch the costliest retirement account mistakes
Listen and subscribe to Decoding Retirement on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you find your favorite podcasts. When it comes to individual retirement accounts (IRAs), the opportunities for errors are seemingly endless — and costly. With roughly 58 million US households owning IRAs, even one misstep with rollovers, account types, or required distributions could result in unexpected taxes or penalties. To help prevent that, retirement expert Denise Appleby, CEO of Appleby Retirement Consulting, shared common pitfalls and real-life examples on a recent episode of Decoding Retirement. Questo contenuto incorporato non è disponibile nella tua area geografica. Among the most frequent and overlooked mistakes? Ignoring IRS Form 5498, officially titled "IRA Contribution Information." This form reports IRA activity such as contributions, rollovers, conversions, fair market value (FMV), and required minimum distributions (RMDs). The form is so often overlooked because, in 2024, for instance, custodians weren't required to issue it until May 31 — well after most people file their returns. "So you have already done your tax return, you get this form and you're thinking, 'I'll just file it away because my accountant doesn't need it,'" Appleby said. "But you need it — and maybe you should share it with your accountant." Read more: What is a financial adviser, and what do they do? In one case Appleby highlighted, a woman opened what she believed was a traditional IRA. Years later, after a name change and a custodian update, the word "Roth" was removed from the account title, even though the account remained a Roth IRA. Assuming it was a traditional IRA, she made deductible contributions and even rolled over a 401(k) into it, thinking the rollover was tax-free. "Turned out that it was taxable because she processed a Roth conversion without knowing it," Appleby said. The resulting tax liability? Possibly up to $1 million. The mistake could have been caught earlier had she reviewed Box 7 of Form 5498, which identifies the account type (Traditional, SEP, SIMPLE, Roth). To avoid similar issues, Appleby suggested that every IRA owner conduct a yearly self-audit. With Form 5498, confirm your account type (Traditional, SEP, SIMPLE, Roth) in Box 7 and check your rollover contributions (Box 2) for accuracy. Form 1099-R lists distributions, which you'll also want to review. "If you took a distribution," Appleby said, "is it coming from the correct type of account? Is it reported as a direct rollover when it should be?" If you're 73 or older, you're required to take a required minimum distribution each year. RMDs are based on your account balance and IRS life expectancy tables. While the formula is straightforward, using the wrong table or a misstated balance can cause errors. And you are responsible for the accuracy — even if the custodian made the mistake. "If you took out a million dollars in December and rolled it over in January," Appleby said, "your custodian won't have that on record — and your RMD will be understated." To make sure your RMD is correct, you will need to refigure the amount by adding back the million dollars to your year-end fair market value. You can delay your first RMD until April 1 of the following year — but doing so means you'll need to take two distributions that year, potentially bumping you into a higher tax bracket. "Talk with your CPA about whether it makes sense to split the income across two years or take both RMDs in the same year," Appleby advised. If you fail to take an RMD, you could face a 25% excise tax. But there's good news: If you take the RMD during a correction window, the penalty drops to 10%. And in many cases, the IRS will waive the penalty altogether if the missed RMD was due to reasonable error. To request a waiver, file IRS Form 5329 and attach a letter explaining what went wrong. "They've never denied a request that I consulted on when the reason is reasonable," Appleby said. "Tell the IRS how much you took, how much you didn't take, and ask for a waiver. You attach a nice letter ... and you send it in." Even multiyear errors can be forgiven: Appleby said she's worked on cases where the IRS approved requests for cases with 10, 15, and even 18 years of missed RMDs. Appleby warned that when the IRS denies a request, it's typically because the form was filled out incorrectly, as many CPAs are tripped up by Form 5329's language. "In the spot where it says how much do you owe, you put zero," she said. "If you put any other amount, the IRS will take that as your acknowledgment that you owe them and come after you for that money." Rolling over a 401(k) to an IRA is common but still fraught with pitfalls. "Here's the No. 1 mistake that I see happening," Appleby said. "You tell your custodian, 'Do a direct rollover to my IRA' — and the account turns out to be a Roth IRA instead of a Traditional IRA. So here you have an unintentional Roth conversion." Always verify the destination account type before initiating a transfer. Also, check your 401(k) for after-tax contributions or employer securities — both of which can offer strategic planning opportunities if handled properly. Read more: What is a 401(k)? A guide to the rules and how it works. Many rollovers from retirement accounts must be completed within 60 days to avoid taxation. But if you miss that deadline, you may still have options. "Usually, you do a rollover because you want to have the amount excluded from income," Appleby said. If the error was due to something beyond your control, you can use the self-certification process — a no-fee, do-it-yourself fix — as long as you meet the requirements. The key: Act within 30 days of when the circumstance (e.g., illness, disaster) ends, and don't have a prior denied IRS waiver on record. Got questions about retirement? Email Robert Powell at yfpodcast@ and we'll do our best to answer it in a future episode of Decoding Retirement. Each Tuesday, retirement expert and financial educator Robert Powell gives you the tools to plan for your future on Decoding Retirement. You can find more episodes on our video hub or watch on your preferred streaming service. Sign up for the Mind Your Money newsletter Effettua l'accesso per consultare il tuo portafoglio
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Chevron Stock's 4.6% Dividend Yield and 1.67% One Month Short Put Yield Make CVX a Buy
Chevron Corp (CVX) stock boasts a handsome 4.6% yield, significantly higher than its historical average. As this article will show, CVX stock could be worth between 11% to 20% more. Moreover, selling short put options expiring in just over one month can provide investors a 1.67% monthly yield at out-of-the-money strike prices. The Saturday Spread: Using Markov Chains to Help Extract Profits From DPZ, AKAM and DOCU Our exclusive Barchart Brief newsletter is your FREE midday guide to what's moving stocks, sectors, and investor sentiment - delivered right when you need the info most. Subscribe today! With CVX's closing price on July 3 of $148.37, CVX is still well off its recent highs in mid-April. But it could still have room to rise further. This article will show how to play this. I discussed CVX stock's average yield in my last article on June 16 ("Chevron Stock Looks Cheap Based on Its Average Yield - Shorting Puts Works"). For example, with its annual dividend per share (DPS) of $6.84 (i.e., $1.71 quarterly x 4), the yield is 4.61%. But this is higher than its 5-year average. As a result, CVX is worth between $165 and $181. Let's see why. Over the next 12 months (NTM), an investor can likely expect Chevron will raise its quarterly dividend rate. Let's estimate that the next rate will be $1.78 per share, +4% YoY. That means the NTM DPS rate will be $6.98 per share, and so today's NTM yield is actually over 4.7%: $6.98 / $148.37 = 0.04704 = 4.704% (NTM Yield) That is well over its 5-year average yield: Yahoo! Finance.……4.36% Seeking Alpha …….4.21% Morningstar ……….4.17% Average 5-yr Yield 4.25% As a result, we can project CVX stock's value should it revert to its historical mean, using the NTM dividend per share (DPS): $6.98 NTM DPS / 0.0425 = $164.24 target price That is almost 11% higher than the July 3 closing price: $164.24/$148.37 = 1.1069 -1 = +10.7% upside This also coincides with analysts' target prices. Analysts surveyed by Yahoo! Finance (25) have an average price target of $163.23 per share, or +10% higher than today. Similarly, Barchart's mean price target is $161.73, and says the average from 15 analysts is $164.79 (close to my price target). However, which covers recent analyst write-ups, shows that 21 analysts have an average of $181.20 per share. That is +22% higher than today. The bottom line is that the median of these surveys is $164.01, very close to my dividend-yield-based target of $164.24. As a result, there seems to be +10-11% potential upside in CVX stock, and potentially up to 22% more. But there is no guarantee this will occur over the next 12 months. Therefore, one way to play this is to set a lower potential buy-in price. Investors can do this by selling short out-of-the-money (OTM) put options in a near-term expiry period (usually one month is ideal). The upside here is that investors can make a good one-month yield with this play. My last article on June 16 pointed out that the $140 strike price put option expiring July 18 had a midpoint premium of $2.07, a one-month yield of 1.48% ($2.07/$140.00). This strike price was 3.3% below the trading price (i.e., out-of-the-money or OTM). Today, the price is just 39 cents, so the short-put investor has made most of the yield. They can roll this over (i.e., 'Buy to Open') and do a new trade further out. For example, look at the August 8 expiration period, which is just over one month away. The $144.00 put option, 3% below the trading price, has a midpoint premium of $2.41. That gives the short put investor a one-month yield of 1.67% (i.e., $2.41/$144.00). Note that this trade has a low probability of being assigned, less than one-third chance, since the delta ratio is -32.7%. In addition, the annualized potential return is attractive at 16.7% (i.e., 365/36 days to expiry). Moreover, even after rolling the prior trade over, $2.41-$0.39 = $2.02/$144.00 = 0.014 = 1.40%. In other words, the investor can make the same yield as before. The beauty of this type of trade is that the investor does not have to wait for the full expiration period to make good money. For example, the net income since June 16 is: $2.07 - $0.39 +$2.41 = $4.09 or $409 per put contract (with 100 shares per put contract) But the average investment would have been $14,200 (i.e., $140 strike price in the first trade and $144 in the second). Therefore, the net yield has been 2.88%: $409/$14,200 = 0.0288 = 2.88% This is over 53 days between June 16 and August 8 (and potentially shorter if the investor covers before then). Let's assume that most of the yield is made over the next 21 days. The investment period would be 40 days. So the annualized expected return (ER) is as follows: 365/40 = 11 periods x 2.88% = 31.68% That is a very high expected return, assuming that the investor can repeat this play every 40 days. The point is that these out-of-the-money puts are a very attractive way to play CVX stock. Moreover, the investor's breakeven point, should CVX stock fall 3% to the $144.00 strike price, makes this a good investment: $144.00-$2.41 = $141.59 $164.24 / $141.59 = 1.16 -1 = +16% The bottom line is that by shorting puts expiring in one month, the short-put CVX investor can make a potential +16% upside. Even if CVX doesn't fall, the short-put yield is 1.67% for slightly over one month. That works out to 16.7% annualized, and potentially up to almost 32% if these trades are duplicated every 40 days. On the date of publication, Mark R. Hake, CFA did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Accuray Incorporated (NASDAQ:ARAY) is a favorite amongst institutional investors who own 60%
Institutions' substantial holdings in Accuray implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price A total of 21 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership Recent purchases by insiders AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. If you want to know who really controls Accuray Incorporated (NASDAQ:ARAY), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 60% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn). Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Accuray. See our latest analysis for Accuray Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index. We can see that Accuray does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Accuray's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story. Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Accuray. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 8.7% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 5.4% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.2% by the third-largest shareholder. Furthermore, CEO Suzanne Winter is the owner of 0.7% of the company's shares. After doing some more digging, we found that the top 21 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company. While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too. While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO. I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions. Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Accuray Incorporated. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$5.4m worth of the US$146m company. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board, though we generally prefer to see bigger insider holdings. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling. The general public-- including retail investors -- own 36% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies. I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Accuray you should be aware of, and 1 of them is potentially serious. If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
