Suhakam calls for formal diversion policy for child offenders
The call comes in response to a recent incident involving a 14-year-old student who was remanded for two days for allegedly punching and threatening a teacher after being reprimanded for skipping a physical education class.
While expressing solidarity with the teacher and emphasising that violence in any form is unacceptable, Suhakam Children's Commissioner Dr Farah Nini Dusuki underscored the need to uphold the dignity, rights, and potential for rehabilitation of child offenders, as guaranteed under the Child Act 2001 and Malaysia's international commitments.
"A diversion mechanism allows children accused of minor or non-violent offences to be redirected away from the criminal justice system into community-based programmes focused on education, counselling, and behavioural support.
"This approach would not only reduce the risk of criminalisation and social stigma but also address underlying issues such as trauma, neglect, or mental health," she said in a statement today.
Farah Nini said such a policy is not a denial of accountability, but a shift towards restorative and rehabilitative justice, which is proven to be more effective and humane for children.
She said the incident should serve as a catalyst for reflection on broader systemic issues, prompting urgent consideration of whether schools have sufficient proactive and positive behavioural support systems.
"Suhakam therefore urges the Education Ministry, school administrators, and relevant stakeholders to strengthen holistic, preventive support systems that prioritise the well-being of both students and educators," she said.
She also reminded that Section 15 of the Child Act prohibits the media from disclosing identifying details of any child involved in criminal or custody proceedings, to safeguard their right to privacy and protection from public condemnation.
According to media reports, the student pleaded guilty at the magistrates' Court here on July 30 to a charge of voluntarily causing hurt to his teacher.
The court, however, fixed Sept 11 for the submission of a social report from the Social Welfare Department before sentencing the teenager.
The incident had earlier gone viral on social media, with a video clip showing the student allegedly punching and threatening his teacher at a secondary school here on July 28.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
8 hours ago
- The Star
Cops given instructions to charge Tishant's father
Drugs in disguise: Comm Kumar (centre) showing the drink sachets containing drugs seized during raids to members of the media during a press conference. JOHOR BARU: The police have received instructions to bring charges against the father of A. Tishant, who was initially reported missing and later believed to have died from strangulation, says Johor police chief Comm Datuk M. Kumar. However, he said it will only be carried out once Jempol police headquarters in Negri Sembilan completes the investigation under Section 302 of the Penal Code for murder. 'Our investigation involves the suspect's police report claiming that his son had gone missing, alongside another report made by his wife stating she had been assaulted by him,' he told a press conference at the state police headquarters yesterday. Comm Kumar said the suspect's wife first lodged a police report on July 22 claiming that she was physically abused by the suspect, who also took their only child away. He was then detained. 'The suspect was later released on police bail. He then lodged a police report alleging that he had left the child inside a car before the boy went missing. 'We opened another investigation paper under Section 31(1) of the Child Act for child neglect, and also a missing person's probe.' However, Comm Kumar said the police found inconsistencies in the suspect's recorded statements and re-arrested him. 'Investigations led us to the discovery of the boy's remains in Jempol, Negri Sembilan.' The suspect was then handed over to the Negri Sembilan police for further investigation. Tishant was reported missing in Taman Bukit Indah here on July 24 and four days later, his body was discovered buried in Rompin, Jempol. On July 29, strangulation was identified as the child's cause of death. On a separate matter, Comm Kumar said a 31-year-old Vietnamese woman who had been storing and distributing drugs from two apartment units over the past five months was arrested, with over RM4.9mil worth of drug-related substances seized. He added the suspect, believed to be part of a drug syndicate, had disguised the drugs in coffee and juice sachets. 'The operation was uncovered after two raids on July 25 and 26 at two units in the same gated apartment complex,' he said. 'She is believed to have used one unit as her residence and storage space, and the other for repackaging the drugs.' Each drug-laced drink sachet was sold for around RM250, he added. Comm Kumar said police seized 29.2kg of ecstasy powder, 131gm of ecstasy pills, and 20gm of ketamine, which was enough to supply more than 97,000 drug users. Police also confiscated drug- processing equipment, jewellery, RM3,000 cash, and S$193 (RM638). Comm Kumar said that police are seeking Terrence Ki Kek Ding, 35, to help in the investigation.
The Star
a day ago
- The Star
A. Tishant's father faces murder charges following investigation, says Johor top cop
JOHOR BARU: Johor police have received instructions to charge the suspect in the death of A. Tishant, the boy who was reported missing and believed to have died of strangulation. State police chief Comm Datuk M. Kumar said the suspect, who is the child's father, would only be charged once the Jempol district police headquarters in Negri Sembilan completes its investigation under Section 302 of the Penal Code for murder. He noted that in Johor, the investigations against the suspect were carried out under Section 323 of the Penal Code, Section 18 of the Domestic Violence Act 1994 read together with Section 326A of the Penal Code, for allegedly assaulting his wife, as well as Section 31(1) of the Child Act 2001. 'Our investigation includes the suspect's police report, which states that his son had gone missing, as well as a report from his wife claiming he assaulted her,' Comm Kumar told a press conference at the Johor police headquarters here on Saturday (Aug 3). He said the first police report was lodged by the suspect's wife on July 22, in which she claimed she was physically abused by the suspect, who also took their only child away. Police subsequently opened an investigation paper under Section 323 of the Penal Code and Section 18 of the Domestic Violence Act, leading to the suspect's arrest. 'Upon completing investigations, the suspect was released on police bail. 'He then lodged a police report alleging that he had left the child inside a car before the child went missing, so we opened another investigation paper under Section 31(1) of the Child Act for child neglect, and also began a missing persons investigation,' he said. Comm Kumar added that during the suspect's statement recording, there were inconsistencies and suspicious elements. 'Due to the suspicious nature of his statement, we re-arrested the suspect and obtained a remand order in Johor. 'Further probe later revealed the truth, leading to the discovery of the boy's remains in Jempol, Negri Sembilan,' he added. The suspect was then handed over to the Negri Sembilan police for further investigation under Section 302 of the Penal Code. Tishant was reported missing in Taman Bukit Indah here on July 24. Four days later, his body was discovered buried in Rompin, Jempol. On July 29, strangulation was identified as the cause of death of the child.
Malay Mail
a day ago
- Malay Mail
Government must act on Suhakam's call without delay — Hafiz Hassan
AUGUST 3 — The call by the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) on the government to implement a formal diversion policy for children in conflict with the law is long overdue. As explained by the commission, a diversion mechanism allows children accused of minor or non-violent offences to be redirected away from the criminal justice system into community-based programmes focused on education, counselling, and behavioural support. This approach would not only reduce the risk of criminalisation and social stigma but also address underlying issues such as trauma, neglect, or mental health. Such a policy is not a denial of accountability, but a shift towards restorative and rehabilitative justice which is proven to be more effective and humane for children. Diversion can be defined in different ways, but the term always refers to measures for dealing with children in conflict with the law without resorting to formal judicial proceedings or formal trial. A more comprehensive description of diversion is this: it is the channelling of children who are in conflict with the law away from judicial proceedings through the development and implementation of procedures or programmes that enable many - possibly most - to avoid the potential negative effects of formal judicial proceedings, provided that human rights and legal safeguards are fully respected. (See Unicef, Toolkit on Diversion and Alternatives to Detention, 2009) The purpose of diversion is to avoid instituting judicial proceedings against children in conflict with the law, or to suspend judicial proceedings, as well as to influence a child's proper development; to enhance their personal responsibility; and to promote their reintegration into society. Make no mistake that the use of the term is not recent. The writer says Suhakam is right to push for a child diversion policy — a move long championed by Unicef as key to protecting children's rights and futures. — Picture by Raymond Manuel According to Unicef, the term is already used by the United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (1985), also called 'Beijing Rules'. It can be found in Rule 11 which reads as follows: 11. Diversion 11.1 Consideration shall be given, wherever appropriate, to dealing with juvenile offenders without resorting to formal trial by the competent authority. 11.2 The police, the prosecution or other agencies dealing with juvenile cases shall be empowered to dispose of such cases, at their discretion, without recourse to formal hearings, in accordance with the criteria laid down for that purpose in the respective legal system and also in accordance with the principles contained in these Rules. 11.3 Any diversion involving referral to appropriate community or other services shall require the consent of the juvenile, or her or his parents or guardian, provided that such decision to refer a case shall be subject to review by a competent authority, upon application. 11.4 In order to facilitate the discretionary disposition of juvenile cases, efforts shall be made to provide for community programmes, such as temporary supervision and guidance, restitution, and compensation of victims. The above acknowledges that diversion has been practised on a formal and informal basis in many legal systems. It serves to hinder the negative effects of subsequent proceedings in juvenile justice administration. Four years later in 1989, the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) is also said to have promoted diversion, without using the term. This can be found in Article 40(3)(b) which stipulates that 'State Parties shall seek to promote the establishment of laws, procedures, authorities and institutions specifically applicable to children alleged as, accused of, or recognised as having infringed the penal law, and, in particular … whenever appropriate and desirable, measures for dealing with such children without resorting to judicial proceedings, providing that human rights and legal safeguards are fully respected.' Diversion is also a measure in the United Nations Guidelines for Action on Children in the Criminal Justice System (1997), also called 'Vienna Guidelines'. The Guidelines provide a comprehensive set of measures that need to be implemented in order to establish a well-functioning system of juvenile justice administration, consistent with international standards. Guideline 42 on Diversion states as follows: 'To prevent further overreliance on criminal justice measures to deal with children's behaviour, efforts should be made to establish and apply programmes aimed at strengthening social assistance, which would allow for the diversion of children from the justice system, as appropriate, as well as improving the application of non-custodial measures and reintegration programmes. To establish and apply such programmes, it is necessary to foster close cooperation between the child justice sectors, different services in charge of law enforcement, social welfare and education sectors.' According to Unicef also, European instruments too have incorporated diversion, albeit not comprehensively. The European Rules for Juvenile Offenders Subject to Sanctions or Measures (2008) do not mention diversion, but the Guidelines of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on Child-Friendly Justice (2010) state as follows: 'Alternatives to judicial proceedings such as … diversion (of judicial mechanisms) … should be encouraged whenever this may best serve the child's best interests.' (See Guideline 24). This year is the 40th and 15th anniversaries of the Beijing Rules and the European Guidelines respectively. Do we sit further on diversion? Kudos to Suhakam — especially its Chief Children Commissioner, Dr Farah Nini Dusuki — for highlighting the term. The Madani government must act without delay. For the sake of our children – our greatest treasure and our future. * This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
