Fire chief in Colorado makes house calls, goes door-to-door to bring wildfire safety training to Marshall Fire survivors
As we get into the summer season in Colorado, the risk of wildfires increases. While the Marshall Fire -- the most destructive fire in state history -- didn't happen in the summer months, survivors in Boulder County certainly are well aware of the dangers at any time of year.
This summer Louisville Fire Protection Department Chief John Willson is showing some survivors in his community how to fight back before a fire spreads.
Water packs are being given to dozens of Marshall fire survivors, like Kevin Lombardo in Louisville, at left. Fire Chief John Willson is seen at right.
CBS
It's rare to see a fire chief make house calls, but Willson is excited to be bringing wildfire safety training door-to-door. During his visits, Willson is presenting residents with some special gear and showing them how to use it.
"These are tools to help you and your neighbors protect their homes," Willson told Marshall Fire survivor Kevin Limbardo.
His tools include:
- a bladder bag for water with a spray nozzle
- a swatter meant to slow smaller fires
Such tools are meant to be used after a resident has called 911. It's one of the first times in the state that ordinary residents have gotten such training.
"So do we give them confidence enough to fight small fires, but not overconfidence to fight big fires? And that's a fine line that that we all walk," Willson said.
CBS
The program is funded through the community fund and the group Marshall Together. Board member Tawnya Somauroo started working on the program months ago, after seeing success in a California neighborhood.
"When the wind blows, we have a lot of anxiety, and this is something easy we can do. It's just like having a fire extinguisher in your house," she said. "You have the same kind of tool for outside."
The tools are not meant to replace trained firefighters, but they might stop a small fire from spreading further.
"We were hopeless the day of the fire. But, you know, a lot of people find it's very empowering to go out and try to solve problems," Somauroo said.
CBS
More communities nearby are already looking into their own training programs as Willson continues his drive to any survivor in need.
"It makes the community better, to help us a little bit until we arrive," Willson said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
26 minutes ago
- New York Times
Better Half
On Wednesday, we will be exactly halfway through the year — 182 days on either side of July 2, the precise midpoint of 2025. I've never clocked this date before: the year's high noon, the moment when the teeter-totter is perfectly parallel to the pavement. There's something satisfying about having exactly as much road behind you as you have before you. Look over your shoulder. Where have you been? And where on earth are you going? We usually make resolutions for the year on Jan. 1, in the grip of winter. The delirium of the holidays has concluded, it's cold and likely gray outside, we are quite possibly hungover. Here's where we traditionally set our goals for the year to come, in this depleted state. I've long endorsed the Always Be Resolving approach to change — you don't need a special day in order to declare a resolution. But it does feel administratively appropriate to do it on the first day of the calendar year, when the months unfurl before us like an unpainted canvas. This year, I propose July 2 for a sunnier moment at which to take stock of the year so far and, if it feels right, to make some achievable resolutions for the second half of the year. The sun is out. We're in summer mode, a little less coiled up than we might have been in January. Our resolutions might be more self-compassionate, more optimistic than they were in winter. Think of it as a resolution reset. When Dec. 31 arrives, how do you want your life to be a little different? Perhaps there's something you resolved on Jan. 1 that you've fallen behind on and you want to reframe it for the back half of the year. Maybe there's something you've been meaning to do and six months is the perfect window in which to achieve it. I'm skeptical of New Year's resolutions as they're usually executed: Here's a way in which you're falling short. No more horsing around, now it's time to straighten up and fly right. The Summer Reset (if I capitalize it, it feels more official) is a different practice. These pronouncements should be summer-tinged, with an emphasis on possibility over punishment. A friend recently told me she'd resolved to ask 'Does this make my life bigger?' before she made any decision. I might try this one. You might resolve to spend more time with people around whom you feel like the best version of yourself. Let the resolutions be additive, celebratory, exciting. Make them about increasing joy, about being new and radiant and more enthusiastic about the things and people you love. Happy New Half of the Year. Let's make it the best half yet. Yesterday was the final decision day of the Supreme Court's term. The justices made it count, releasing rulings that will affect presidential power, immigrants, schoolchildren, health care and more. German Lopez explains the highlights: Limits on universal injunctions: At face value, this case was about President Trump's attempts to end birthright citizenship. But the court didn't say much on that issue. Instead, it focused on lower courts' ability to stop the president's actions through injunctions that halt presidential policies nationwide. Members of both parties have complained that lower-court judges have too much power. The court agreed, in a 6-3 decision. It cited history: When Congress created the lower courts in 1789, it did not give these judges the power to impose their decisions on the rest of the country. Instead, they can grant relief only to the plaintiffs of the case they're hearing. So a lower court can, for example, stop Trump from imposing his birthright citizenship order on the immigrants or states that file a lawsuit. But everyone who didn't file the suit remains unprotected from the president's orders, with some exceptions. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Fast Company
36 minutes ago
- Fast Company
This accuracy-obsessed weather app does one thing oh so well
Whether weather is always on your radar or merely a passing front of occasional interest, having an on-demand eye on the world around you is one of the most powerful slices of sorcery you can set your sights on today. And this week, I want to introduce you to a worthwhile new weather app I recently encountered that's decidedly different from the others. It isn't meant to replace whatever weather app you're already using, whether that's the one that came preinstalled on your phone or another favorite you've found over time (maybe even one that serves up the forecast with a hilarious side of sass?). Rather, it serves one super-specific purpose—and serves it impressively well. And it might just be worth your while to keep around as a complement to whatever other weather wesource resource you're using. Be the first to find all sorts of little-known tech treasures with my free Cool Tools newsletter from The Intelligence Your personal precipitation station Most weather apps aim to do it all—to be your one-stop spot for every manner of weather info you could possibly wonder about. This week's Cool Tool is more of a specialist. It does just one extremely specific weather-related thing, but good golly, does it do it well. ➜ The app is called Precip. Any guesses about its purpose? If you said it knits you sweaters whilst preparing delightfully steamy stews, (a) excellent guess—but (b) unfortunately, that isn't correct. Precip, as perhaps might've been your next guess following sweaters 'n' stew, measures the rain and other precipitation around you. It isn't offering up a forecast like most weather apps, in other words. It's actually telling you how much moisture came down in any given area—over any time period you want. And it lets you zoom into a narrow area for supremely detailed and precise info, too, even going down as far as to a specific address. There's just one asterisk: Precip's data is limited to the U.S. and Canada, at least for the time being. (Sorry, international pals!) ⌚ If you're in one of those areas, though, it'll take you all of a single minute to start using: For the best and most robust experience, you'll want to snag the mobile app—available on Android as well as on iOS. You can also check rainfall totals by zip code on the Precip website, but you won't be able to zoom in any further to exact locations or to access any of the more advanced data. In the apps, you can search by city, zip code, or street address, and you can see rain totals from the past 12, 24, or 48 hours. You can also save specific locations and then easily track their rain totals over time. Precip offers even more info as a part of its premium subscription, for 20 bucks a year and up. But the app's free version is plenty powerful, and odds are, it'll be all you need. (That version also doesn't even seem to have any ads present, as far as I've seen so far.)
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Woman Kicks Out Mother-in-Law After She Picks New Name for Grandson That ‘Suits Him Better'
A woman says her mother-in-law has taken to calling her child a different name because she thinks it "suits him better" After repeatedly asking her not to, the woman finally told her mother-in-law to leave her home Now, she wants to know if she was overreacting — but Reddit users don't seem to think soA woman says she's kicked her mother-in-law out of her house after she insisted on using the wrong name for her newborn child. In a since-deleted post shared to Reddit, the 31-year-old woman writes that she and her husband recently had their first child — a boy they named Elijah. "We put a lot of thought into his name, we loved the meaning, and it just felt right," she writes. She notes that her mother-in-law "had no strong opinions about it at first. She didn't gush over it, but she also didn't object." Or so the couple thought. "The first time she met Elijah at the hospital, she looked at him and said, 'Oh little David you're so perfect,'" she recalls. "I thought I misheard her, so I ignored it. But then she said it again. I asked her, 'Who's David?' and she just smiled and said, 'Oh it just suits him better.' " The woman was "too exhausted from labor to argue," but over the next few weeks, her mother-in-law continued to call the boy David, even in text messages. "[She] kept calling him David, texting us things like 'How's my little David doing today?' or 'Give David a kiss for me!' I told her, firmly, that his name is Elijah. She laughed and said, 'Oh, I know! But I think he just feels like a David.' " The woman writes that neither she nor her husband knows anyone named David. "It's not a family name. There's no sentimental reason behind it. It's just a completely random name she decided to call my child, despite us telling her not to." At first, the couple tried to let it go, "hoping she'd stop if we ignored it." "But it only got worse," she writes. "When we FaceTimed her, she'd coo at him saying 'Grandma loves you, David!' She even started knitting a baby blanket with the name David embroidered on it." The "final straw" came when her mother-in-law joined them for a family dinner and kept referring to him as David in front of everyone else. "My sister-in-law asked, 'Wait… why do you keep calling him David?' and MIL just laughed and said, 'Because that's his name to me.' " "That's when I lost it. I said, 'No, his name is Elijah, and if you can't respect that, you don't need to be here,'" the woman writes. "She rolled her eyes and tried to wave me off, but I wasn't having it. I told her to leave. She looked shocked, but she left without much of a fight." Now, the woman's husband is upset with her. "He agrees that his mom was being weird and disrespectful, but he thinks kicking her out was 'too extreme' and that I should've just let it go," she explains. "MIL is now playing the victim, telling everyone that I'm 'keeping her grandson from her over a harmless nickname.' " Some family members think the woman overreacted, while others agree that the mother-in-law's behavior "was bizarre." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Commenters are less split, with many arguing that the mother-in-law was in the wrong for knowingly using the wrong name. "Your feelings are valid. I also find it odd that your husband thinks you overreacted, but you literally just told her to use the correct name or to leave," one commenter wrote. "It sounds like she made her choice and now she's upset with you." Another said the husband was the one in the wrong, suggesting the poster should give him a taste of his own medicine. "I think you should start calling him by another name to see how he likes it," they wrote. Read the original article on People
