Australia urged to adopt new approach to global talks
The future of defence spending, tariffs and Australia's nuclear submarine agreement with the US and UK remain unclear after Foreign Minister Penny Wong's meeting with Secretary of State Marco Rubio in Washington.
Australia's military budget did not even come up in conversation, according to Senator Wong, despite previous US calls for Australia to lift its defence spending.
While the other two topics were discussed, there was little sign negotiations had progressed.
The government needed to outline a clear direction, La Trobe University's international relations emeritus professor Joseph Camilleri said.
"What Australian governments - this one included - struggle with is a lack of coherent foreign policy and that then shows itself in these meetings," he told AAP.
Australia should instead clarify how its relationship with the US relates to its Southeast Asian neighbours on one hand, and with China on the other, and that could trickle through to the position the government takes on issues like the war in Ukraine, conflict in Gaza and tensions between Israel and Iran.
But there were considerable differences in perspectives and views the government hadn't been able to handle coherently, according to Professor Camilleri.
"It just tries to deal with foreign policy as best it can in small pieces," he said.
"They are hemmed in by powerful pressures on different sides and to think through a coherent alternative would require a very bold initiative.
"Most governments, this one included, are not taken to bold initiatives."
There are interests within the US, including intelligence, security and military agencies, and in Australia, such as the coalition, that are committed to the alliance.
"We need a real focus on this alliance - it's crucial to our prosperity, to our security as a country," opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said.
However, Australian voters' declining trust in the US under its Republican president was made clear at the federal election in May, where Donald Trump's volatility appeared to contribute to Labor's landslide win.
When asked if the US remained a reliable partner while led by Mr Trump, Senator Wong said Australia understood he had a "different view of how America is to be in the world".
"We respect that, we also recognise how important our relationship is and we believe that is understood here in Washington," she said.
"(This) is a relationship where the alliance has been in the hands of governments of both political persuasions and it will always be so."
Australia has been told to develop a clear vision for foreign policy as it attempts to navigate an unpredictable relationship with the United States.
The future of defence spending, tariffs and Australia's nuclear submarine agreement with the US and UK remain unclear after Foreign Minister Penny Wong's meeting with Secretary of State Marco Rubio in Washington.
Australia's military budget did not even come up in conversation, according to Senator Wong, despite previous US calls for Australia to lift its defence spending.
While the other two topics were discussed, there was little sign negotiations had progressed.
The government needed to outline a clear direction, La Trobe University's international relations emeritus professor Joseph Camilleri said.
"What Australian governments - this one included - struggle with is a lack of coherent foreign policy and that then shows itself in these meetings," he told AAP.
Australia should instead clarify how its relationship with the US relates to its Southeast Asian neighbours on one hand, and with China on the other, and that could trickle through to the position the government takes on issues like the war in Ukraine, conflict in Gaza and tensions between Israel and Iran.
But there were considerable differences in perspectives and views the government hadn't been able to handle coherently, according to Professor Camilleri.
"It just tries to deal with foreign policy as best it can in small pieces," he said.
"They are hemmed in by powerful pressures on different sides and to think through a coherent alternative would require a very bold initiative.
"Most governments, this one included, are not taken to bold initiatives."
There are interests within the US, including intelligence, security and military agencies, and in Australia, such as the coalition, that are committed to the alliance.
"We need a real focus on this alliance - it's crucial to our prosperity, to our security as a country," opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said.
However, Australian voters' declining trust in the US under its Republican president was made clear at the federal election in May, where Donald Trump's volatility appeared to contribute to Labor's landslide win.
When asked if the US remained a reliable partner while led by Mr Trump, Senator Wong said Australia understood he had a "different view of how America is to be in the world".
"We respect that, we also recognise how important our relationship is and we believe that is understood here in Washington," she said.
"(This) is a relationship where the alliance has been in the hands of governments of both political persuasions and it will always be so."
Australia has been told to develop a clear vision for foreign policy as it attempts to navigate an unpredictable relationship with the United States.
The future of defence spending, tariffs and Australia's nuclear submarine agreement with the US and UK remain unclear after Foreign Minister Penny Wong's meeting with Secretary of State Marco Rubio in Washington.
Australia's military budget did not even come up in conversation, according to Senator Wong, despite previous US calls for Australia to lift its defence spending.
While the other two topics were discussed, there was little sign negotiations had progressed.
The government needed to outline a clear direction, La Trobe University's international relations emeritus professor Joseph Camilleri said.
"What Australian governments - this one included - struggle with is a lack of coherent foreign policy and that then shows itself in these meetings," he told AAP.
Australia should instead clarify how its relationship with the US relates to its Southeast Asian neighbours on one hand, and with China on the other, and that could trickle through to the position the government takes on issues like the war in Ukraine, conflict in Gaza and tensions between Israel and Iran.
But there were considerable differences in perspectives and views the government hadn't been able to handle coherently, according to Professor Camilleri.
"It just tries to deal with foreign policy as best it can in small pieces," he said.
"They are hemmed in by powerful pressures on different sides and to think through a coherent alternative would require a very bold initiative.
"Most governments, this one included, are not taken to bold initiatives."
There are interests within the US, including intelligence, security and military agencies, and in Australia, such as the coalition, that are committed to the alliance.
"We need a real focus on this alliance - it's crucial to our prosperity, to our security as a country," opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said.
However, Australian voters' declining trust in the US under its Republican president was made clear at the federal election in May, where Donald Trump's volatility appeared to contribute to Labor's landslide win.
When asked if the US remained a reliable partner while led by Mr Trump, Senator Wong said Australia understood he had a "different view of how America is to be in the world".
"We respect that, we also recognise how important our relationship is and we believe that is understood here in Washington," she said.
"(This) is a relationship where the alliance has been in the hands of governments of both political persuasions and it will always be so."
Australia has been told to develop a clear vision for foreign policy as it attempts to navigate an unpredictable relationship with the United States.
The future of defence spending, tariffs and Australia's nuclear submarine agreement with the US and UK remain unclear after Foreign Minister Penny Wong's meeting with Secretary of State Marco Rubio in Washington.
Australia's military budget did not even come up in conversation, according to Senator Wong, despite previous US calls for Australia to lift its defence spending.
While the other two topics were discussed, there was little sign negotiations had progressed.
The government needed to outline a clear direction, La Trobe University's international relations emeritus professor Joseph Camilleri said.
"What Australian governments - this one included - struggle with is a lack of coherent foreign policy and that then shows itself in these meetings," he told AAP.
Australia should instead clarify how its relationship with the US relates to its Southeast Asian neighbours on one hand, and with China on the other, and that could trickle through to the position the government takes on issues like the war in Ukraine, conflict in Gaza and tensions between Israel and Iran.
But there were considerable differences in perspectives and views the government hadn't been able to handle coherently, according to Professor Camilleri.
"It just tries to deal with foreign policy as best it can in small pieces," he said.
"They are hemmed in by powerful pressures on different sides and to think through a coherent alternative would require a very bold initiative.
"Most governments, this one included, are not taken to bold initiatives."
There are interests within the US, including intelligence, security and military agencies, and in Australia, such as the coalition, that are committed to the alliance.
"We need a real focus on this alliance - it's crucial to our prosperity, to our security as a country," opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said.
However, Australian voters' declining trust in the US under its Republican president was made clear at the federal election in May, where Donald Trump's volatility appeared to contribute to Labor's landslide win.
When asked if the US remained a reliable partner while led by Mr Trump, Senator Wong said Australia understood he had a "different view of how America is to be in the world".
"We respect that, we also recognise how important our relationship is and we believe that is understood here in Washington," she said.
"(This) is a relationship where the alliance has been in the hands of governments of both political persuasions and it will always be so."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
The Australia-first words that Sussan Ley says are a threat to the US relationship
But with Albanese now unable to secure a face-to-face meeting with US President Donald Trump, even as the AUKUS defence pact is being reviewed by the Pentagon and Australia is lobbying for exemptions to US tariffs, Sussan Ley argued it was the wrong time to inch away from the US. 'At a time of global uncertainty, growing conflict and a growing list of issues in the Australia-United States relationship, now is a time to build our influence in Washington, not diminish it,' she said in a statement. 'Many Australians will wonder whether this speech at this time was in our national interest, given so many things crucial to Australia's future are currently being considered by the US administration.' The AUKUS defence pact is a trilateral agreement with the United States and United Kingdom that will allow Australia to acquire nuclear submarine capabilities. James Laurenceson, director of the Australia-China Relations Institute at the University of Technology Sydney, said that since John Howard it was unusual for Australian prime ministers to speak positively about a more independent foreign policy not tied solely to US interests. Loading 'It's not entirely inconsistent with where Albanese has been headed,' Laurenceson said, pointing to remarks from Trade Minister Don Farrell about growing trade with China following Trump's tariffs. Laurenceson said Albanese would be confident that the Australian public was comfortable with his coming meeting with Xi occurring before a face-to-face with Trump, pointing to polling showing Trump's unpopularity in Australia. Coalition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan said on Sky News on Sunday that 'it is embarrassing' Albanese had not yet met Trump. Sydney University international affairs historian James Curran said there was a contradiction in putting a spotlight on sovereignty at a time when Australia was tying itself more firmly into US military framework through the AUKUS submarine pact. He said Albanese's speech was significant because it came at a time when the US was pressuring allies to boost defence spending and contain a rising power in China. 'While it's not a new strategic doctrine, it is saying that there are times when Australia has to determine its own destiny,' Curran said. 'After the best part of two decades, in which the culture of the alliance has been awash in the sentimental claptrap of '100 years of mateship', it's not necessarily a bad thing for the loose cannons in the Trump administration – who are perhaps getting used to allies capitulating – to hear an Australian PM saying that, from time to time, Australia needs to express itself differently.' During the election campaign, Albanese and his ministers used Trump's haphazard approach to discredit the Peter Dutton-led Coalition, whose policy agenda and style had similarities with the US president's.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
The Australia-first words that Sussan Ley says are a threat to the US relationship
But with Albanese now unable to secure a face-to-face meeting with US President Donald Trump, even as the AUKUS defence pact is being reviewed by the Pentagon and Australia is lobbying for exemptions to US tariffs, Sussan Ley argued it was the wrong time to inch away from the US. 'At a time of global uncertainty, growing conflict and a growing list of issues in the Australia-United States relationship, now is a time to build our influence in Washington, not diminish it,' she said in a statement. 'Many Australians will wonder whether this speech at this time was in our national interest, given so many things crucial to Australia's future are currently being considered by the US administration.' The AUKUS defence pact is a trilateral agreement with the United States and United Kingdom that will allow Australia to acquire nuclear submarine capabilities. James Laurenceson, director of the Australia-China Relations Institute at the University of Technology Sydney, said that since John Howard it was unusual for Australian prime ministers to speak positively about a more independent foreign policy not tied solely to US interests. Loading 'It's not entirely inconsistent with where Albanese has been headed,' Laurenceson said, pointing to remarks from Trade Minister Don Farrell about growing trade with China following Trump's tariffs. Laurenceson said Albanese would be confident that the Australian public was comfortable with his coming meeting with Xi occurring before a face-to-face with Trump, pointing to polling showing Trump's unpopularity in Australia. Coalition trade spokesman Kevin Hogan said on Sky News on Sunday that 'it is embarrassing' Albanese had not yet met Trump. Sydney University international affairs historian James Curran said there was a contradiction in putting a spotlight on sovereignty at a time when Australia was tying itself more firmly into US military framework through the AUKUS submarine pact. He said Albanese's speech was significant because it came at a time when the US was pressuring allies to boost defence spending and contain a rising power in China. 'While it's not a new strategic doctrine, it is saying that there are times when Australia has to determine its own destiny,' Curran said. 'After the best part of two decades, in which the culture of the alliance has been awash in the sentimental claptrap of '100 years of mateship', it's not necessarily a bad thing for the loose cannons in the Trump administration – who are perhaps getting used to allies capitulating – to hear an Australian PM saying that, from time to time, Australia needs to express itself differently.' During the election campaign, Albanese and his ministers used Trump's haphazard approach to discredit the Peter Dutton-led Coalition, whose policy agenda and style had similarities with the US president's.
West Australian
2 hours ago
- West Australian
Benjamin Netanyahu demands Anthony Albanese take stronger action against ‘vile' antisemitic attacks
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has furiously demanded the Albanese Government take stronger action against antisemitism after a series of 'vile' attacks in Melbourne. In the latest act of religious hatred, the East Melbourne Hebrew Congregation was targeted about 8pm Friday while about 20 people, including children, were inside observing Shabbat. The front door of the synagogue was set alight, forcing the worshippers to flee to safety. It came about the same time as protesters stormed a restaurant in Melbourne's CBD chanting 'death to the IDF', terrifying diners as they threw food, smashed chairs against windows, and overturned tables. In a statement, Mr Netanyahu strongly condemned both attacks. 'I view with utmost gravity the antisemitic attacks that occurred last night in Melbourne, which included attempted arson of a synagogue in the city and a violent assault against an Israeli restaurant by pro-Palestinian rioters,' he said. 'The reprehensible antisemitic attacks, with calls of 'death to the IDF' and an attempt to attack a place of worship, are severe hate crimes that must be uprooted. 'The State of Israel will continue to stand alongside the Australian Jewish community, and we demand that the Australian government take all action to deal with the rioters to the fullest extent of the law and prevent similar attacks in the future.' Meanwhile, Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar said there have been 'too many antisemitic attacks in Australia' and also urged the Federal Government to act. 'I strongly condemn last night's vile antisemitic attacks in Melbourne, including the arson attack on the East Melbourne Hebrew Congregation synagogue and the targeted violence at the Israeli restaurant Miznon,' he said. 'Israel stands firmly with the Jewish community in Australia. There have been too many antisemitic attacks in Australia. The Australian government must do more to fight this poisonous disease.' Israeli President Isaac Herzog described the attempted arson as a 'chilling,' warning: 'This must be the last.' Angelo Loras, from Toongabbie in NSW, was arrested in Melbourne's CBD on Saturday night over the synagogue attack. The 34-year-old has been charged multiple offences including reckless conduct endangering life, criminal damage by fire and possession of a controlled weapon. He faced Melbourne Magistrates' Court on Sunday and was remanded in custody until July 22. Police are now investigating the accused man's intent and ideology to determine if the incident was an act of terrorism. It is the latest in a string of antisemitic attacks across the country since the October 7 terror attack. In December, the Adass Israel Synagogue in Melbourne was firebombed, which police labelled an act of terrorism. The following month, a Sydney synagogue and a childcare centre was vandalised with antisemitic graffiti, with several cars vandalised with anti-Israel graffiti and torched. At a press conference on Sunday, Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke condemned the latest synagogue targeting as 'an attack on Australia' and warned people not to 'import hatred'. 'There's been some reporting that no one was physically injured, that doesn't mean no one was harmed,' he said. 'The community here was harmed, the Jewish community in Australia was harmed and we were harmed as a nation. 'There were three attacks that night and none of them belonged in Australia. Arson attacks, the chanting calls for death, other attacks and graffiti, none of it belonged in Australia and they were attacks on Australia.' Mr Burke added: 'Hatred has no place in Australia. Antisemitism has no place in Australia.' 'The dream of this country is no matter where you come from in the world, no matter what your heritage is, we stand together, we welcome each other, and we do not import hatreds and violence from overseas to life in Australia.' Prime Minister Anthony Albanese issued a statement on Saturday also condemning the attack. 'Last night's arson attack on the synagogue in East Melbourne is cowardly, is an act of violence and antisemitism, and has no place in Australian society,' he said. Rabbi Dovid Gutnick said the outcome could have been far worse. 'We were lucky the response was quick,' he said. 'They could have opened the door to a person who clearly had bigger plans. 'There were children playing … it could have been a lot worse because those doors are wooden and there's carpet. You wonder if he had more stuff in that bag to do more harm.' Mark Dreyfus, the nation's most senior Jewish politician, met with members of the synagogue on Sunday and urged the public to unite and 'make sure that this never happens again'. 'This attack on this old synagogue here in the centre of Melbourne is an attack not just on the Jewish community - It's an attack on the entire Australian community,' he said. 'Let's make sure that this never happens again. And that hatred of this kind is banished from our country.' Multicultural Affairs Minister Dr Anne Aly joined Burke in condemning the attack saying antisemitic acts violated the fundamental right to safety. 'All Australians have a right to safety. Acts of antisemitism violate that right and should face the full force of the law,' she said. Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan described the attack as 'disgraceful' and 'abhorrent,' especially as it occurred during Shabbat. 'That this happened on Shabbat makes it all the more abhorrent,' she said in a statement. 'Any attack on a place of worship is an act of hate, and any attack on a Jewish place of worship is an act of antisemitism. 'To our Jewish community: I stand with you in the fight against hate and fear, and the Victorian people stand with you, too.' Shadow Minister for Women Melissa McIntosh on Sunday said that several Liberals — including Leader Sussan Ley — had wrote to the PM three weeks ago, urging him to strengthen the response to antisemitic attacks. 'There's been a letter that's been sitting there for three weeks... imploring the government to protect the Jewish community of more security in light of what's been going on in the Middle East,' she told ABC. 'They have not received a response from the Prime Minister. 'What about National Cabinet? Why isn't he convening National Cabinet and bringing the states together with urgency to address this issue? 'There's a number of things that the Government could be doing yet we're sitting here today discussing another horrible attack where there are kids inside the synagogue.'
