logo
Women leaders warn against anti-DEI push, urge unity and inclusion at Mackinac Policy Panel

Women leaders warn against anti-DEI push, urge unity and inclusion at Mackinac Policy Panel

Yahoo29-05-2025
Skillman Foundation President and CEO Angelique Power and U.S. Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Holly) at the Mackinac Policy Conference's Women in Leadership panel on May 28, 2025. | Kyle Davidson
During the annual women in leadership panel at the Mackinac Policy conference, leaders from the public and private sectors spoke out against growing federal efforts opposing diversity, equity and inclusion or practices, emphasizing that diversity remains a value within the state.
The panel, led by Laura Granneman, the executive director of Rocket Community Fund and Gilbert Family Foundation, hosted U.S. Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Holly); Tina Kozak, CEO of the PR firm Franco; and Angelique Power, president and CEO of the Skillman Foundation, which advocates for Detroiters' perspectives in education policy.
Looking across the nation at the push against diversity, Slotkin said there's a narrative circulating that diversity is a bad thing rather than a good thing.
'It's sending shock waves of fear through the system and the conversations I'm having with Michigan organizations is like, 'Please don't over index', right? Don't bend over backwards to, like, go the opposite direction. We're in Michigan. You know diversity is a value,' Slotkin said, warning that organizations are going too far in responding to anti-DEI sentiments and actions.
While the federal government has taken action to end DEI policies in the federal government, the sentiment goes beyond that, Slotkin said, pointing to President Donald Trump blaming diversity initiatives for January's deadly aircraft collision at Washington Reagan National Airport.
'This isn't about DEI, right? This is about saying that in order for me to champion one group of people, I have to put down a whole bunch of other groups of people,' Slotkin said.
'The challenge for us in Michigan, is to say, how do we communicate and call balls and strikes on what we know is right for our state and for our institutions. And you just have to look around at this conference and say, like, there is value in having a different group of voices around a table,' Slotkin said.
Power noted that it had been five years since the murder of George Floyd, and that a tremendous amount of work on diversity, equity and inclusion work followed.
'I don't want us to lose that. That the work that was done was different than the DEI work — or the DI the diversity and inclusion work — that was done before,' Power said.
'These last five years, there was such a introspective lens that institutions took, that individuals took to say, like, 'What can I do differently?' There was a realization that it isn't about solely representation, it was about ownership and agency and voice. It was about creating new tables. And that worked so well that there is this tremendous backlash against it now,' Power said.
The issue now is not about defending an acronym, but rather defending American values, Power said.
'In two years we're going to celebrate the 250th anniversary of our country. 'We the People'. That's our chance to say, when we first said, 'We the People,' it really meant, like, you know, white men. Now we get a chance to say who we really mean by 'We the People',' Power said.
While Kozak said she didn't have much to add, she noted it was frustrating to see a resistance to forward motion.
However, she remained hopeful, arguing that the state and businesses understand the importance of diversity.
'Investing in women is good business. And I believe that, and I believe that corporations know that. I think they're calling it different things to your point, to sort of over-correct and protect, but I'm hopeful,' Kozak.
Later in the panel Power detailed the importance of coalition building in the philanthropic realm, with foundation presidents working in coalitions all across the nation.
However, President Trump's executive order opposing DEI has targeted universities and foundations with more than $500 million in assets, accusing these groups of illegal discrimination in order to strip their nonprofit status and fine them into submission, Power said.
This includes Black Lives Matter-oriented organizations and groups working to support climate justice in low income areas and communities of color who are disproportionately impacted by climate change, she said.
'Truthfully, I think all of us watched the university presidents and we saw what happens when you go it alone, when an attack comes at you and you try to handle it with talking points that were handed to you,' Power said.
'Whether it's nationally, or whether it's locally, whether it's within this current context, or whether it has to do with the education system, we have to solve this together,' Power said. 'And that's actually one of the best things about Michigan. We're a proudly purple state. We are not going to make progress unless we have bipartisan ideas that we move through and that we can sustain.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bill Maher defends Trump's university fight: ‘They became indoctrination factories'
Bill Maher defends Trump's university fight: ‘They became indoctrination factories'

The Hill

time10 hours ago

  • The Hill

Bill Maher defends Trump's university fight: ‘They became indoctrination factories'

Comedian Bill Maher defended President Trump's fight against higher education, saying college campuses have become 'indoctrination factories' in need of a wake-up call. In the latest episode of HBO's 'Real Time with Bill Maher,' the host said he doesn't agree with the president's approach, but he said he agrees with some of the criticism motivating the effort. 'I'm not totally against it. Academia needed a hot poker up the ass,' Maher said. 'I'm not saying— not everything, the way he's doing it, of course, is the right way, You know, to defund scientific research is not the way to do it,' Maher said. 'But, I mean, our universities have been out of control for a long time. They became indoctrination factories,' Maher added. 'There's absolutely no diversity of thought.' Maher pointed to students on some college campuses who celebrated the Oct. 7, 2023, massacre in Israel — before Israel had begun its retaliatory invasion of Gaza. 'You don't have to be Donald Trump to think that there's been something rotten on campuses for quite a long time. When you cannot speak the other side of the coin, when conservative thought — whatever you think of it — is just verboten, which is basically what happened,' Maher said. 'And some of the ideas — I mean, why do you think they erupted, so many of them, in cheers or what happened on Oct. 7? Why do you have professors coming out there and saying they were exhilarated by this mass massacre of people? Okay, that didn't happen overnight,' Maher continued, referring to the institutions as 'ivory towers' that are 'just very anti-America.'

Smithsonian Issues Update on Trump's Impeachment Exhibit Controversy
Smithsonian Issues Update on Trump's Impeachment Exhibit Controversy

Miami Herald

time10 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Smithsonian Issues Update on Trump's Impeachment Exhibit Controversy

The Smithsonian National Museum of American History on Saturday released a statement on its website announcing that it would reinstall President Donald Trump to its exhibit about impeachments, saying that it never intended his removal to be temporary. Newsweek reached out to the White House for comment by email outside of normal business hours on Saturday evening. The museum removed references to Trump's two impeachments from its exhibit on presidential impeachments last month, igniting a debate about historical accuracy and political influence in public institutions. The controversy centered on "The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden" exhibit, which included a temporary label about Trump's impeachments that was added in September 2021. Trump remains the only U.S. president to have been impeached twice. During his second administration, Trump has influenced the museum, which is independent of the government but receives funding from Congress. In March, he signed an executive order to eliminate "anti-American ideology" in the museum and to "restore the Smithsonian Institution to its rightful place as a symbol of inspiration and American greatness." The Smithsonian confirmed the temporary label remained in place until July before being removed during a review of legacy content. In a statement posted to the museum's website, the Smithsonian said the placard "did not meet the museum's standards in appearance, location, timeline and overall presentation." "It was not consistent with other sections in the exhibit and moreover blocked the view of the objects inside its case," the statement continued. "For these reasons, we removed the placard. We were not asked by any Administration or other government official to remove content from the exhibit." The museum assured that the exhibit in the coming weeks would see its impeachment section updated to reflect "all impeachment proceedings in our nation's history." "As the keeper of memory for the nation, it is our privilege and responsibility to tell accurate and complete histories," the museum wrote. The decision to remove the placard stoked concerns in the public about possible government interference, the shaping of public memory, and the integrity of historical curation at America's most prominent museum complex. A Smithsonian spokesperson previously told Newsweek: "In reviewing our legacy content recently, it became clear that the 'Limits of Presidential Power' section in The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden exhibition needed to be addressed. The section of this exhibition covers Congress, The Supreme Court, Impeachment, and Public Opinion. Because the other topics in this section had not been updated since 2008, the decision was made to restore the Impeachment case back to its 2008 appearance. Trump faced two impeachment efforts by Democrats during his first administration: First on December 18, 2019, and then again on January 13, 2021 - just one week before he left office. He was ultimately acquitted both times. The first impeachment charged Trump with abuse of power and obstruction of Congress over his dealings with Ukraine. Both articles passed the House with no support from any Republicans, and some Democrats split from the party. The second effort occurred following the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, with some Republicans in the House - most notably Liz Cheney - breaking from the party and supporting the effort to impeach. What People Are Saying Political analyst Jeff Greenfield wrote on X: "Orwellian is a much-overused phrase; but forcing the Smithsonian to erase the fact of Trump's impeachments is right out of 1984. Did they drop that stuff down the memory hole?" Senator Adam Schiff, a California Democrat, posted images of media coverage about Trump's impeachments on X, writing: "This is what Donald Trump wants you to forget. American never will." Former GOP Congressman and Trump critic Joe Walsh called the Post's report on X: "Despicable. Reprehensible. Dishonest. Cowardly. Trump's 2 impeachments are historical facts. They are both part of American history. He's using the powers of his office to try to rewrite history. I'm done saying 'shame on him.' Shame on us for electing him." A White House spokesperson told NPR: "We are fully supportive of updating displays to highlight American greatness. The Trump administration will continue working to ensure that the Smithsonian removes all improper ideology and once again unites and instills pride in all Americans regarding our great history." The Smithsonian acknowledged the need for a comprehensive update of its presidential impeachment exhibit. The institution stated the impeachment section will be revised in the coming weeks to "ensure it accurately represents all historical impeachment proceedings." No specific timetable was provided for when Trump's impeachments or other new content will be permanently reintroduced. Related Articles Removal of Trump From Smithsonian Impeachment Exhibit Sparks OutrageTiny Flying Reptile Found in Arizona Fills 200-Million-Year Evolutionary GapWho Is Kim Sajet? Donald Trump Fires National Portrait Gallery DirectorHistory-Making Carl Nassib Reflects as His Jersey Heads to the Smithsonian 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.

Americans' perception of discrimination against Black people dropped in last four years
Americans' perception of discrimination against Black people dropped in last four years

Fox News

time11 hours ago

  • Fox News

Americans' perception of discrimination against Black people dropped in last four years

A new report shows that slightly less than half of U.S. adults believe that Black and Hispanic people face "a great deal" or "quite a bit" of discrimination in the United States. According to the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll, the number of people saying Asian people and Black people are experiencing discrimination has dropped since the last time the survey was conducted in April 2021. Four in 10 say that Black and Hispanic people face "quite a bit" or "a great deal" of discrimination. Three in 10 say the same about Asian people, and one in 10 say it about White people, according to the report. The previous Associated Press-NORC poll was conducted a year after the death of George Floyd when protests occurred all across the country calling for an end to racial discrimination in police activities. The last survey showed that 61% of U.S. adults said there was a great deal or quite a bit of discrimination against Black Americans. The new survey also noted that while many groups experience discrimination, the report showed skepticism that diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs are effective at mitigating discrimination. "Many say DEI programs do not make a difference and roughly 3 in 10 think DEI initiatives increase discrimination against most racial and ethnic groups including White people. About a third feel DEI efforts are reducing discrimination against women, Hispanic people, and Asian people while 4 in 10 say the same about Black people," the report stated. The Philadelphia Tribune interviewed Americans to get their reactions to the latest poll. Claudine Brider, a 48-year-old Black Democrat in Compton, California, told the Tribune that "the concept of DEI has made the workplace difficult for Black people and women in new ways." "Anytime they're in a space that they're not expected to be, like seeing a Black girl in an engineering course... they are seen as only getting there because of those factors," Brider said. "It's all negated by someone saying, 'You're only here to meet a quota.'" Gilbert, Arizona resident Pete Parra said that "DEI is making things harder for racial minorities now." He worries about how his two adult Hispanic sons will be treated when they apply for work. "I'm not saying automatically just give it to my sons," said Parra, who leans toward the Democratic Party. But he's concerned that now factors other than merit may take priority. "If they get passed over for something," he said, "they're not going to know (why)." Many proponents of DEI argue that the effort corrects historical injustices and systemic inequities. However, conservatives say that it promotes division instead, leading DEI initiatives to face opposition from conservative groups and state legislatures across the U.S.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store