US Supreme Court Upholds Texas Age-Check For Porn Sites
The US Supreme Court on Friday upheld a Texas law requiring pornographic websites to verify visitors' ages, rejecting arguments that this violates free speech and boosting efforts to protect children from online sexual content.
The court's decision will impact a raft of similar laws nationwide and could set the direction for internet speech regulation as concerns about the impact of digital life on society grow.
Texas is one of about 20 US states to institute checks that porn viewers are over 18, which critics argue violate First Amendment free speech rights.
Other countries such as France, Britain and Germany also enforce age-related access restrictions to adult websites, while companies like Meta are lobbying Washington lawmakers for age-based verification to be carried out by smartphone giants Apple and Google on their app stores.
The Texas law was passed in 2023 by the state's Republican-majority legislature but was initially blocked after a challenge by an adult entertainment industry trade association.
A federal district court sided with the trade group, the Free Speech Coalition, saying the law restricted adults' access to constitutionally protected content.
But a conservative-dominated appeals court upheld the age verification requirement, prompting the pornography trade group to take its case to the Supreme Court, where conservatives have a 6-3 supermajority.
Under the law, companies that fail to properly verify users' ages face fines up to $10,000 per day and up to $250,000 if a child is exposed to pornographic content as a result.
To protect privacy, the websites aren't allowed to retain any identifying information obtained from users when verifying ages, and doing so could cost companies $10,000 daily in fines.
During arguments in January before the Supreme Court, a lawyer representing the Free Speech Coalition said the law was "overly burdensome" and that its goal could be accomplished using content filtering programs.
But Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the mother of seven children, took issue with the efficacy of content filtering, saying that from personal experience as a parent, such programs were difficult to maintain across the many types of devices used by kids.
Barrett also asked the lawyer to explain why requesting age verification online is any different than doing so at a movie theater that displays pornographic movies.
The lawyer for the Free Speech Coalition -- which includes the popular website Pornhub that has blocked all access in some states with age verification laws -- said online verification was different as it leaves a "permanent record" that could be a target for hackers.
During the court's hearing of the case in January, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Clarence Thomas, both Republican appointees, seemed to suggest that advances in technology might justify reviewing online free speech cases.
In 1997, the Supreme Court struck down, in an overwhelming 7-2 decision, a federal online age-verification law in what became a landmark free speech case that set a major precedent for the internet age.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
CJI Gavai: Identifying creamy layer in SC/ST was my path-breaking ruling on a PIL
Nagpur: Chief Justice of India Bhushan Gavai on Saturday said one of the most defining moments of his judicial career was Supreme Court's recognition of the need to apply the "creamy layer" principle within Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST), describing it essential to refine the concept of social justice. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now In an exclusive interaction with The Times of India at Raj Bhavan during his Nagpur visit, the CJI said, "Treating children of high-ranking SC/ST officers at par with those from truly disadvantaged families dilutes the purpose of affirmative action. Identifying the creamy layer ensures that benefits reach the most deserving." The observation was part of a PIL-based ruling in which the apex court allowed sub-categorisation within SC/ST groups to ensure equitable distribution of reservation benefits. Justice Gavai, the second Dalit and first Buddhist to serve as CJI, also cautioned against judicial overreach, emphasising that all institutions must function within constitutional boundaries. "Judicial activism will stay, but it should not turn into judicial adventurism or judicial terrorism. Parliament enacts laws, the executive implements them, and the judiciary ensures compliance with the Constitution. Overstepping by any branch disturbs this balance," he said. "The Constitution is not just a legal document, it is a tool for social transformation. It has withstood global and domestic upheavals due to its strong foundation," he said. Appointed as the 52nd Chief Justice on May 14 for a six-month term, Gavai made it clear he will not accept any post-retirement assignments. "It's a matter of personal principle," he said, adding his focus remains on reducing case pendency — over 81,000 in the Supreme Court alone — and improving infrastructure in rural courts to enhance access to justice. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Justice Gavai authored nearly 300 judgments, including landmark rulings on Article 370, electoral bonds, demonetisation, and freedom of speech. He was also part of the five-judge bench that upheld the abrogation of Article 370, which he called consistent with Dr B R Ambedkar's vision of "one nation, one Constitution." He underscored the gravity of another path-breaking ruling in which the court ruled that an arbitration clause in an unstamped or insufficiently stamped contract remains valid — a significant decision for commercial law. Similarly, he was part of the bench that unanimously annulled electoral bonds scheme, calling it inconsistent with transparency in political funding. Justice Gavai also recalled how the apex court under his watch stayed the Allahabad High Court's insensitive remarks in a sexual assault case, calling it "inhuman" and reflective of judicial insensitivity. In another crucial decision, Supreme Court declared the arrest of NewsClick founder Prabir Purkayastha illegal due to procedural lapses by Delhi Police. In his role as judge, Gavai often criticised the controversial practice of "bulldozer justice," where properties of accused individuals are demolished before a conviction. "Such actions go against constitutional protections. Punishment without trial violates every tenet of justice," he said. His views helped guide the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court to stay demolition of properties during the Nagpur riots probe. Gavai also granted bail to former Delhi Deputy CM Manish Sisodia in the liquor policy case and was part of several benches that strengthened environmental law, wildlife conservation, and tree protection. Among the pending matters before the Court under his leadership is the challenge to the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 — a politically sensitive issue with implications for property rights and minority law.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
‘Only one to focus on New York': Republicans laud NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani; contrasts earlier criticism
Marjorie Taylor Greene (left), Zohran Mamdani (ANI,AP) In a surprising departure from usual partisan rhetoric, prominent Republican figures, including Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene and political commentator Tucker Carlson, have extended rare praise to New York City Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, acknowledging his grassroots-focused campaign strategy, even as they continue to oppose his political ideology. Mamdani, a Muslim and Indian-American assemblyman,pulled a surprise victory in the Democratic primary this week, defeating former New York governor Andrew Cuomo. Carlson, on his show, lauded Mamdani's debate performance for staying focused on New York's local issues while other candidates discussed foreign policy. 'That guy was the only person in the New York City mayor's debate to say he wanted to focus on New York City. They were, all the candidates were asked if you could visit a foreign country, what would it be? And they all, of course, all had an answer. I think most said Israel,' Carlson said during the Friday episode of 'The Tucker Carlson Show.' Carlson remarked Mamdani was the only one to say he wouldn't travel abroad, he'd stay in New York and connect with constituents directly. The former Fox News host added about Mamdani's performance in the mayoral debate earlier this month, 'and he said, 'I wouldn't go anywhere. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo I'd stay in New York. And like, if I want to meet Jewish constituents, I go to their synagogues, their homes or whatever, but I'd be here in New York because that's what I'm doing. I'm running New York. That's my job,' adding, 'I totally oppose his program, but at least he's talking about economics and not just foreign affairs. ' Greene, who had earlier shared a doctored image of the Statue of Liberty in a burqa in response to Mamdani's rise, has since revised her stance. Speaking on Steve Bannon's podcast, she said, 'He really ran a campaign where he talked directly to the people… Even though his solutions are insane and socialist, he focused on their problems.' She also took a swipe at Cuomo, labelling him a 'dirty establishment Democrat' and praised Mamdani for offering 'unique and smart' outreach. Both Greene and Carlson have recently criticised the administration's handling of the Israel-Iran conflict, exposing growing rifts within the MAGA movement, between those who favour strong support for Israel and others who fear the US could be drawn into a broader war. Despite the acknowledgment, hostility remains strong in Republican circles. The New York Young Republican Club called for Mamdani's deportation under the Communist Control Act, while representative. Andy Ogles branded him 'antisemitic' and called for denaturalization proceedings. President Trump, writing on Truth Social, referred to Mamdani as a '100% Communist Lunatic,' adding, 'He looks terrible… and he's backed by AOC+3 and Cryin' Chuck Schumer.' Mamdani has responded positively to criticism from Republican lawmakers and even the president, who labeled him a '100% Communist Lunatic' due to his policy agenda. 'You know, this is not the first time that President Trump is going to comment on myself, and I encourage him, just like I encourage every New Yorker, to learn about my actual policies to make the city affordable,' Mamdani told ABC News's Rachel Scott in an interview Wednesday. Mamdani's campaign, which includes proposals such as free buses and rent freezes, continues to draw criticism from conservatives. Still, the recognition of his campaign tactics from unlikely quarters underscores a rare moment of bipartisan acknowledgment in an otherwise divided political landscape.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
CJI terms ‘creamy layer' ruling within SC/STs a milestone
NAGPUR: CJI Bhushan Gavai called Supreme Court's recognition of the need to apply the "creamy layer" principle within SC/STs one of the defining moments of his judicial career, describing it as essential to refining social justice. "Treating children of high-ranking SC/ST officers on a par with those from truly disadvantaged families dilutes affirmative action's purpose. Identifying the creamy layer ensures benefits reach the most deserving," he said in an exclusive interaction with TOI during his Nagpur visit Saturday. His observation came as part of a PIL ruling allowing sub-categorisation within SC/ST groups to ensure equitable distribution of reservation benefits. Gavai, appointed the 52nd CJI on May 14, also warned against judicial overreach. "Judicial activism will stay, but it should not become judicial adventurism or judicial terrorism. Parliament enacts laws, the executive implements them, and the judiciary ensures constitutional compliance. Overstepping disturbs this balance," he said. "The Constitution is not just a legal document, it is a tool for social transformation. " The second Dalit and first Buddhist CJI ruled out accepting post-retirement assignments. "It's a matter of personal principle," he said, adding his focus remains on reducing over 81,000 pending cases in SC and improving infrastructure in rural courts. He authored nearly 300 judgments, including landmark rulings on Article 370, electoral bonds, demonetisation, and freedom of speech. Gavai was part of the five-judge bench that upheld the abrogation of Article 370, calling it consistent with BR Ambedkar's vision of "one nation, one Constitution". He referred to another ruling that upheld arbitration clauses in unstamped or insufficiently stamped contracts, calling it crucial for commercial law. Gavai also helped annul the electoral bonds scheme, calling it inconsistent with transparency in political funding. On his watch, SC stayed Allahabad HC's remarks in a sexual assault case, calling them "inhuman". Gavai declared the arrest of NewsClick founder Prabir Purkayastha illegal due to procedural lapses by Delhi police.
