
'Hug Therapy': How Pope Leo Is Trying To Unify Vatican
"Prudent", "methodical" and "listening" are some of the words used by Vatican insiders who spoke to AFP to describe the approach of the first American pope, who took over on May 8 as head of the world's 1.4 billion Catholics.
Leo was elected by cardinals following the death of Argentina's Pope Francis, a charismatic reformer who sparked worldwide devotion but also internal Church divisions during his 12-year papacy.
Francis shook things up from the outset, eschewing the ornate garb and palaces of his predecessors, but his successor has moved more carefully, emphasising tradition and unity.
On the all-important symbols, Leo has returned to wearing the traditional red mozzetta -- short cape -- and stole over his white papal robes.
He will take a summer break from July 6 to 20 at the papal palace at Castel Gandolfo, outside Rome, a longtime country residence for pontiffs that Francis declined to use.
Leo is also expected to move into the papal apartments of the Vatican's Apostolic Palace in the autumn after extensive renovations, according to a Vatican source.
Francis had rejected the palace in favour of a simple apartment in the Santa Marta guesthouse.
On policy matters, Leo has given numerous speeches but has so far avoided taking positions that might cause offence and has made no major appointments.
In public, he smiles and engages with the crowds who flock to see him in St Peter's Square, from blessing babies to singing along to the chants of the Chicago White Sox, his favourite baseball team.
But the discreet former missionary -- who spent two decades in Peru before joining the Roman Curia, the Catholic Church's governing body, in 2023 -- has so far kept to the script and followed protocol.
"His style is simplicity... He is a presence that does not impose itself on others," said Roberto Regoli, a professor at the Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome.
"With him, rather than looking at appearances, you have to focus on the content," he told AFP.
'Some relief'
Charles Mercier, a professor of contemporary history at the University of Bordeaux, said Leo appeared keen to promote the institution over himself as an individual.
"Francis had a personal charisma that he greatly emphasised through his personality. Leo seems to want to blend into an institution, the papal office, that is more than him," he told AFP.
The approach has won Leo support within the Curia.
Employees who spoke to AFP described a man who was "pragmatic", "impressively calm", "measured and methodical", "thoughtful" and "concerned about balance".
"He is someone who listens a lot, who needs to understand how things work before making decisions," explained one employee of a dicastery, a Vatican government department.
Even those speaking under cover of anonymity offered a broadly positive tone, reflecting how in just two months, Leo has re-engaged with the Curia.
"The Curia was shaken up by Pope Francis, with reforms decided sometimes unilaterally, even in an authoritarian manner, and often badly received," a Vatican source told AFP on condition of anonymity.
The arrival of Leo -- "who has a good reputation", according to the source -- "brought some relief".
"We feel that things will be fluid, less personal," they added.
A phrase Leo uttered during his first meeting with the Curia on May 24 made a lasting impression: "Popes come and go, the Curia remains."
This contrasts sharply with the criticism dealt out by Francis, who accused the Curia early in his papacy of "spiritual Alzheimer's" and a lust for power.
Assurances
"It's clear we're in a phase of hug therapy," commented a European diplomatic source.
Another envoy to the Holy See added that Leo was "pursuing a unifying approach -- exactly what he was elected to do".
Francis was also accused by critics of sidelining doctrine in favour of social issues, notably migration, even if he did not in fact change major tenets of Catholic belief.
In his first few weeks, Leo reaffirmed the celibacy of priests, defined marriage as a union between a man and a woman, and urged bishops to stand firm against sexual abuse, a scandal that still roils the global Church.
Despite criticising US President Donald Trump's migration policy before becoming pope, Leo has barely mentioned the subject since taking office, although he has emphasised the importance of social justice.
On the diplomatic front, Leo has renewed calls for peace in Gaza and in Ukraine.
He discussed the latter conflict with Russia's Vladimir Putin in a telephone call on June 4, where he urged the president to make a "gesture that favours peace".
Francis had not spoken to Putin since before Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
Just as his overtures to the Curia have been well received, Leo's return to the traditional symbols of the papacy has been welcomed by those in the Church who accused Francis of distorting the papal office.
But Mercier noted that this did not rule out change in the future.
Leo is aiming for a "symbolic rebalancing that undoubtedly stems from the desire to unite the Catholic flock, which has given the impression of being polarised under Francis", he said.
But, he added, it could also be a strategy "to provide symbolic assurances to enable continued progress on the substance"

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump spares India tariff threat missive as he unloads on allies Japan and South Korea
Donald Trump TOI correspondent from Washington: US President Donald Trump on Monday said Washington is close to clinching a trade deal with India even as he lowered the boom on more than a dozen countries including close allies, while sparing New Delhi. Trump sounded optimistic about an agreement with New Delhi, telling reporters, "We are close to making a deal with India," while repeating his incessant claim that he had stopped an all-out war between India and Pakistan by threatening to cut off access to US markets. Neither country has attributed their truce to tariff threats, but the US President obsessively cites that to illustrate the use of trade as an instrument of American power. On Monday, Trump, by most accounts, brought a wrecking ball to global trade with a tirade against much of the world, which in his view has been ripping of the USA. Fourteen countries, rich and poor, big and small, allies and adversaries, were slammed with tariff warnings ranging from 40 percent to 25 percent unless they negotiated bilateral deals before August 1. India faces the same deadline without the almost identical sloppily-written letters Trump sent to 14 countries, although that could change any time given the US President's mercurial approach to strategic ties. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is it legal? How to get Internet without paying a subscription? Techno Mag Learn More Undo New Delhi has bought time mainly on account of protracted trade talks that have been going on for several months and are said to be in an advanced state. India has pledged to buy loads of American arms, energy, and other produce to whittle down the $ 45 billion trade deficit while at the same time seeking to protect its fragile agriculture sector that provides a livelihood to more than half its population. While the negotiating window is now narrow, there is no sign that India will throw in the towel, even as Trump prepares to throw the kitchen sink, as he did on Monday with long time allies Japan and South Korea, both slammed with around 25 per cent tariffs. In letters riddled with random capitalisation and poor grammar and syntax, Trump told the prime minister of Japan, a US treaty ally, that the trade surplus Tokyo has run up against Washington constituted a "major threat" to US national security. Identical letters citing threat to US national security was sent to leaders of Bosnia & Herzogovina (whose female President Zeljka Cvijanović was addressed as Mr President), Cambodia and Bangladesh, which have small trade surpluses with Washington with exports in the paltry billions. Trump and his team also dialled down expectations of "90 deals in 90 days" that they had talked up at the start of the tariff war the US President initiated. Having negotiated only a framework for three sketchy agreements, Trump indicated most other countries would simply get a letter intimating them of tariff increases if they don't conclude an agreement by August 1. "It's all done," he maintained, even as aides acknowledged that instead of the White House phones "ringing off the hook" as they anticipated, many countries had not even contacted them.


Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Superman is an immigrant?': Actor Nathan Fillion and cast react to MAGA backlash
It seems immigration is not a term that can be joked about in America anytime soon. The tension and debates over immigrants and immigration in the states is now affecting the lives of fictional characters as well. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now And the proof of it is the recent MAGA uproar over Superman director James Gunn defining the popular DC character as an immigrant. Superman, a film starring David Corenswet and Rachel Brosnahan is set to hit the theatres on July 11. The film is the first of the DCU's Chapter One: Gods and Monsters. Celebrating America's Independence Day on the Fourth of July, the director made an admission which most are aware of yet not ready to acknowledge: 'Superman is an immigrant' The comment had Donald Trump's MAGA supporters in a rage, going as far as to call the movie "Superwoke." This includes not only MAGA netizens but also popular anchors and celebrities, who have been offended by the term 'immigrant' being used for the globally adored character. "Superman isn't an immigrant, he is a refugee, An ACTUAL refugee from krypton. You directed this film, did that not occur to you?" wrote a person on X. "Using politics to promote your movie is a good way to kill people's interest in your movie" added another. 'We don't go to the movie theatre to be lectured to and to have somebody throw their ideology onto us,' said Network anchor Kellyanne Conway. Fox News presenter Laura Ingraham took to Instagram to share Gunn's comment writing, 'Another film we won't be seeing.' Superman team calls off MAGA outrage Image credits: X The team of Superman including the director and actors have called off the MAGA outrage over the 'immigrant' comment. In his Sunday profile in The Times of London, Gun clarified that Superman's story is "the story of America" on a fundamental level. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now 'I mean, 'Superman' is the story of America… An immigrant that came from other places and populated the country, but for me it is mostly a story that says basic human kindness is a value and is something we have lost. ' Reacting to MAGA supporters amplifying his comments across the internet he said to Variety that he doesn't have "anything to say to anybody." 'I'm not here to judge people. This is a movie about kindness and I think that's something everyone can relate to.' Actor Nathan Fillion who plays the role of Guy Gardner aka Green Lantern was asked about the MAGA outrage on Gunn's comment which had him laughing off and responding, "Somebody needs a hug. It's just a movie guys." Gunn's brother Sean Gunn who plays Maxwell Lord also added his thoughts about the same, "My reaction to [the backlash] is that it is exactly what the movie is about. We support our people, you know? We love our immigrants. Yes, Superman is an immigrant, and yes, the people that we support in this country are immigrants and if you don't like that, you're not American. People who say no to immigrants are against the American way. "


India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
"Something which Rahul Gandhi had cautioned": Congress targets Centre over Jane Street's alleged market manipulation, demands accountability
New Delhi [India], July 8 (ANI): Congress leader Supriya Shrinate on Tuesday launched a scathing attack on the Modi government, alleging gross regulatory failure in the wake of accusations against American algo-trading giant Jane Street Group. Speaking to ANI, Shrinate claimed that the firm manipulated Indian stock and derivatives markets between January 2023 and March 2025, earning illegal profits of over Rs 44,000 crore, most of which was allegedly siphoned off to the United States. 'An American algo-trading company, Jane Street, started operations in Indian in 2020. It dealt in both the share market and the derivative market. It was dealing in such a large volume that it was manipulating stock price in share market and was earning illegal profits in F&O market. Between January 2023 and March 2025, it earned a profit of around Rs 44,000 sent this profit to America. SEBI has now issued an order that they are seizing Rs 4400 is suffering due to this? Small investors of this country - something which Rahul Gandhi had cautioned about again and question is that when Jane Street tells US Court that they earned 2.3 billion dollars due to inefficiencies in India, when market investors are writing to you, why did you stay silent? Why did you not do anything?' Shrinate said. The Congress leader further questioned the government's silence, calling for answers from Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah, and demanding that steps be taken to recover the remaining funds from abroad. 'The Government will be questioned now because Narendra Modi and Amit Shah pose as market experts and offer suggestions on the stock market, now when people are losing their money and company is earning profits illegally and sending to the US, what would you do now? You can't be silent. Would you be able to speak with Donald Trump and retrieve the money?' Supriya Shrinate said. On July 3, SEBI in its order noted that the US-based firm used a profit-maximising scheme to manipulate the market and booked substantial profits in index options, while incurring smaller losses in the cash and futures segments. SEBI further stated that Jane Street Group entities, despite caution letters from NSE in February 2025 and their own commitments to refrain from certain trading behaviours, continued to deploy the same high-risk and market-distorting strategies. SEBI sources later said that the interim order against the index manipulation matter concerning Jane Street should not be considered a show-cause notice. The investigations into the US-based investment firm will continue, the sources had added. 'It is difficult to estimate how long all this (probe) could take - the scope is quite large,' the sources had asserted. (ANI)