Bill Clinton shares gift he got (and still has) after his 100th run
Bill Clinton shares gift he got (and still has) after his 100th run
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Bill Clinton and James Patterson talk new political thriller book
Bill Clinton and James Patterson release "The First Gentleman," using Clinton's White House experience to shape their third political thriller.
Like any author, former President Bill Clinton is putting a little bit of himself in his latest novel.
Clinton and bestselling author James Patterson have a new crime thriller out, their third together. "The First Gentleman" follows a president's husband on trial and two journalists determined to find the truth. The first gentleman and former Patriots player being accused of murder also threatens to upend the carefully crafted economic "Grand Bargain" his commander-in-chief wife is nearly ready to announce. It's a twisty thriller with plenty of inside jobs, political sabotage and many, many deaths.
In an interview with USA TODAY, the former president shared the signature Clinton White House details that made it into the book.
Bill Clinton reveals what White House security gifted him on his 100th run
Though there's murder at the heart of this thriller novel, a key theme important to the former president is this: "The president and her husband are people."
"People (in the White House) struggle to maintain some measure of normalcy, however they define it," Clinton says. "Even though you have to be ambitious to be elected president and disciplined to execute the job, you're still a person. We all react differently to different things that happen. So we try to capture that."
Before he's dealing with the trial of the century, the fictional first gentleman just wants to go on his morning run without anyone bothering him. Instead, they have to assign him a Secret Service running partner.
Clinton himself was a morning runner during his eight years as president. On his 100th run, he said his security detail gave him a box of M&M's.
"I went running every morning for years. I still have the M&M's box that I was given by the head of my security detail on my 100th run when I was president," Clinton says. "I loved it."
"Once M&M's get 20 years old, you don't eat them anymore," Patterson joked.
Clinton's running habit was reportedly a headache for the Secret Service, according his former agent Dan Emmett. In his memoir, Emmett writes that Clinton insisted on running outside of the White House for both the mental escape and to connect with the public.
"Secret Service agents are generally fit, but we had to come up with a group of agents who were capable of running with the president. You couldn't just run and look at the ground. We needed people with reserve energy to be able to fight if need be," Emmett said in U.S. News & World Report in 2012.
Clare Mulroy is USA TODAY's Books Reporter, where she covers buzzy releases, chats with authors and dives into the culture of reading. Find her on Instagram, subscribe to our weekly Books newsletter or tell her what you're reading at cmulroy@usatoday.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Son of CT lawmaker arrested in connection with a recent missing person complaint of a 15-year-old girl
The son of a Connecticut state representative has been arrested in connection with a recent missing person complaint in West Haven, police said. The arrest comes after a Silver Alert was issued on June 21 for a 15-year-old girl who was missing from West Haven, police said. But the girl's family announced on Tuesday that she was safely on her way home thanks to the 'outpouring of help' from the private sector, along with local and federal law enforcement. The West Haven Police Department said their investigation led to the arrest of 22-year-old Christopher Aniskovich Jr. of Clinton. Aniskovich Jr. is the son of State Rep. Chris Aniskovich, who represents Connecticut's 35th District, which includes Clinton, Westbrook and Killingworth. Aniskovich Jr. was taken into custody in Clinton on a warrant without incident, police said. He has been charged with custodial interference in the first degree and interfering with an officer. 'This is a sad and upsetting day. I am disappointed in Christopher's actions, but he understands that he must now be held accountable for them. Out of respect for the people involved and the process, I will have no further comment,' Rep. Aniskovich said in a statement to the Courant. Aniskovich Jr. was held on bond and appeared in Milford Superior Court on Friday, June 27. Stephen Underwood can be reached at sunderwood@
Fox News
3 hours ago
- Fox News
Presidents have F---'s to give when it's about Israel's Bibi Netanyahu
What is it about Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin "Bibi" Netanyahu that drives American presidents to profanity? As Iran and Israel were still exchanging salvos after President Donald Trump had declared a ceasefire, Trump complained that these two countries "had been fighting for so long they don't know what the f--- they are doing." Trump's anger came through, and the ceasefire is holding — for now. While Trump is the latest president to send profanity in Netanyahu's direction, he is far from the only one. In fact, presidents have been cursing at Netanyahu for three decades. In the 1990s, Netanyahu and President Bill Clinton had a contentious relationship. In two separate elections, 1996 and 1999, Clinton sent political aides to try and defeat Netanyahu. He succeeded the second time. In the interim, though, they had to work together, and on one visit to the White House, Clinton was annoyed with how Netanyahu comported himself at a joint press conference. Afterward, Clinton reportedly fumed to his aides, "who's the f---ing leader of the free world?," suggesting that Netanyahu had overstepped his boundaries. Due in no small part to Clinton's efforts, Netanyahu was out of office during President George W. Bush's years, but cussing came back with Netanyahu's return during President Barack Obama's time in office. Netanyahu and Obama really disliked each other, and had a number of unpleasant run-ins, including one incident where Obama left Netanyahu and his team to cool their heels in the White House while Obama went to have dinner at the residence. Then, as now, the Iranian nuclear program and the matter of the Palestinians were matters of intense debate. Obama and company felt that Netanyahu was too cowardly on both issues. A senior Obama official, who may have been Obama himself, told The Atlantic that Netanyahu was "a chickensh***." The remark sparked outrage, especially since Netanyahu had been a decorated soldier in the Israeli special forces. Netanyahu pushed back on the comment, saying in a statement that "The attack on me comes because I defend the State of Israel and despite all the attacks, I will continue to defend our country and the citizens of Israel." Trump followed Obama and, by all accounts, they had a far better relationship, punctuated by important milestones such as the moving of the U.S. Embassy in Israel to Jerusalem and the signing of the Abraham Accords peace deals between Israel and four Arab countries. But Bibi also irked Trump by calling President Joe Biden to congratulate him for his 2020 election victory. This move managed to anger both Biden, who felt that Netanyahu had waited too long to make the call, and Trump, who felt that Netanyahu had betrayed him by calling at all. Trump signaled afterward that he was done with Netanyahu, saying starkly, "f--- him." Trump has three more years in office, but it will be hard for him to break the cursing at Netanyahu record set by Biden. Multiple reports have Biden launching streams of profane invective at Netanyahu, including calling Netanyahu and Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas "two of the biggest f---ing a--sholes in the world" ; saying that Netanyahu was "a f---ing liar," and adding, for good measure, that "Eighteen out of 19 people who work for him are f---ing liars."; and barking, "That son of a bitch, Bibi Netanyahu, he's a bad guy. He's a bad f---ing guy!" Biden also was not above cursing at Netanyahu directly. When Israel killed Hezbollah's Fuad Shukur, a fiend who helped kill 241 U.S. Marines in 1983, Biden should have praised Bibi for bringing Shukur to justice. Instead, he screamed at Netanyahu over the phone, "Bibi, what the f---?" With Trump now back in office, the two men have mostly cooperated, with Trump helping to release some of the Israeli hostages from Hamas' Gaza dungeons and striking the Iranian nuclear program, which elated Netanyahu. Yet the "they don't know what the f--- they are doing" incident shows that Netanyahu has the capacity to drive even friendly U.S. presidents to profanity. The question is why. One reason is that Netanyahu, unlike American presidents, lives in a dangerous neighborhood and faces constant existential threats. While some world leaders might acquiesce in a disagreement with the American president, Bibi is more likely to push back. A second reason lies in the way Netanyahu pushes back. His method, which he absorbed from his father's mentor, the Zionist leader Zev Jabotinsky, is to reach over the heads of the presidents and directly to the American people. As the record of profanity sent in his direction suggests, this method tends to annoy presidents. It also appears to have led to a grievous and welcome blow to the Iranian nuclear program.
USA Today
8 hours ago
- USA Today
Few thought airstrikes could ‘obliterate' Iran's nuclear program. Then Trump said they did.
Experts long argued that airstrikes alone would not be capable of permanently ending Iran's nuclear program absent negotiations. WASHINGTON — A highly politicized debate is unfolding over the impact of June 21 U.S. airstrikes against Iran's nuclear facilities, raising questions over the attack's goal and projected impact. President Donald Trump quickly claimed total victory in the strikes' wake, claiming that Iran's 'key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.' Subsequent scrutiny of that claim amid early assessments from intelligence agencies has led Trump and his allies to double down on and even expand on his declarations of success. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth claimed to CNN that the strikes 'obliterated Iran's ability to create nuclear weapons.' Iran itself has acknowledged the impact of the U.S. and Israeli attacks. But in the years since Washington's withdrawal from the 2015 nuclear deal with Tehran, experts and analysts have emphasized that airstrikes alone would merely delay Iran's nuclear ambitions rather than permanently derail them. Rep. Mike Quigley, D-Illinois, reiterated that long-held understanding in a June 26 interview. 'The targets are hard targets, deep targets, mobile targets. So it was never meant to eliminate the program,' Quigley told USA TODAY. 'It was never meant to do anything but slow the program.' The congressman, who is on the House's intelligence committee and has regularly received briefings on Iran, added, 'We've always been told . . . the only way to end this (nuclear) program is with a lot of troops on the ground for a long time. A war.' The former head of the National Nuclear Security Agency's nonproliferation programs, Corey Hinderstein, struck a similar tone. 'The conventional wisdom that you can't destroy the Iranian (nuclear) program through air attack alone has actually held,' said Hinderstein, now a vice president at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 'While some are saying that the airstrikes were tactically and strategically successful, I think that the jury is still out on that, and we don't actually have the information that we need to believe that this program is gone.' Third nuclear site, hidden centrifuges, missing uranium Iran may have another nuclear site that, if equipped with enrichment centrifuges and conversion equipment, could continue the process of preparing uranium for use in a nuclear bomb, if the regime wishes to pursue one. Shortly before Israel began its air campaign against Iran, the regime told the International Atomic Energy Agency that it had a third nuclear enrichment site but did not reveal details. Analysts believe an undisclosed underground facility at Pickaxe Mountain near the Natanz nuclear plant may be even deeper under the surface than the Fordow enrichment plant that was severely damaged in the U.S. strikes. The Pickaxe Mountain facility was first publicly revealed in 2023 by experts who spoke with the Associated Press. And it's unclear how much of Tehran's approximately 880 pounds of highly enriched uranium was destroyed or buried during the strikes — satellite images show cargo trucks parked outside the Fordow enrichment plant in the days before the U.S. attack. U.S. lawmakers briefed June 26 and June 27 on intelligence assessments of the strikes acknowledged the missing uranium and called for a full accounting of the material, according to CNN. Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, told the news agency that the question of the uranium's whereabouts underscores the importance of Iran negotiating 'directly with us, so the (IAEA) can account for every ounce of enriched uranium that's there.' More: Where is Iran's enriched uranium? Questions loom after Trump claims victory. But whether Iran wants to negotiate is another question. Despite the country's obligations as a member of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, Iran's Guardian Council approved a law June 25 halting the country's cooperation with the IAEA and its inspections of Tehran's nuclear sites 'until the safety and security of our nuclear activities can be guaranteed,' the country's foreign minister said on social media. Contributing: Tom Vanden Brook and Cybele Mayes-Osterman, USA TODAY Davis Winkie's role covering nuclear threats and national security at USA TODAY is supported by a partnership with Outrider Foundation and Journalism Funding Partners. Funders do not provide editorial input.
