The Irish Times view on diaspora voting: broaden the franchise for presidential elections
should be allowed to vote in presidential elections
has lingered for too long in the realm of deferral and indecision. This is despite previous commitments on the matter and the importance of the office for many Irish people who live outside the State but still identify with the nation.
Only citizens ordinarily resident in the jurisdiction may vote in national elections. This excludes over a million Irish-born people living overseas and an even larger number in Northern Ireland who have a right to Irish citizenship. The rationale for this has traditionally rested on the idea that only those who live with the consequences of State policy should have a say in shaping it.
But the presidency is not a policy-making office. It is a symbolic and unifying institution, often acting as a bridge between Ireland and its global citizens. Every president since Mary Robinson has embraced that role. The office embodies not only the State but the wider idea of the Irish nation. There is a strong argument that the franchise should reflect the broader Irish family, including those who have left.
Extending voting rights to Irish citizens living north of the Border would be an act of constitutional generosity consistent with the spirit of the Belfast Agreement. It would recognise them as part of the national community without prejudicing their political preferences.
READ MORE
A referendum on the issue was announced in 2017 with cross-party support. It was delayed by Brexit and then shelved during the pandemic. Since then, political will has quietly dissipated. The Government now appears unwilling to reignite the debate, despite previous commitments and strong support from diaspora organisations.
Minister of State for the Diaspora, Neale Richmond, said this week that the Government was concerned a referendum on the issue could be defeated if there was insufficient debate and consultation in advance of the vote. But it is in the Government's own gift to start that process. It should do so without further delay.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Coalition warned against diluting contentious Occupied Territories Bill
The Government will be warned not to allow the potential for legal challenges to be used as an excuse to water down the legislation known as the Occupied Territories Bill . The Oireachtas foreign affairs committee will this week publish its report on a proposal to ban trade with illegally occupied territories in Palestine. The report, finalised on Friday, is understood to recommend widening the legislation to include a ban on services as well as goods. There have been stark warnings from business lobby groups that such a measure could damage the Republic's trading relationship with the US and cause economic harm to Irish businesses and households. The Occupied Territories Bill is now undergoing pre-legislative scrutiny Listen | 41:13 The committee will tell the Government to model the ban on trade with illegal settlements in Palestine on 2014 trade restrictions with Russia regarding illegally occupied territories in Ukraine. The committee, chaired by Fianna Fáil TD John Lahart , which did not have statistics on the volume of trade in services between the State and illegally occupied territories, will call on Minister for Trade Simon Harris to collate and publish such information. It will also tell Mr Harris to establish what kind of backlash the State would face in terms of trade and diplomacy should it ban trade with the occupied Palestinian territories. [ Republic joins 25 states urging end to Gaza war Opens in new window ] Ministers will also be advised to consider what defences could be available to a business charged with an offence under the proposed law. . It is understood that the committee believes further work is required from the Government before the law could be enacted. And it will ask that Attorney General Rossa Fanning's advice on the complex Bill is 'expedited' so it can move forward as a matter of urgency. During meetings before the Dáil rose for the summer recess, Mr Lahart was critical of 'misinformation' about the Bill and the State's motivation for passing it – much of which was repeated by senior US political figures. Chairwoman of US House Republicans Lisa McClaine described the Bill as a type of 'extreme anti-Semitic hate'. [ How life in the West Bank is deteriorating for Palestinians Opens in new window ] It is understood that the committee's report will call on the Government to explain the motivation behind the Bill to European Union and international colleagues, while also lobbying Brussels for further collective EU action against Israel. The committee will propose a Government-funded public communications campaign for domestic and international audiences to explain the facts of the Bill and to challenge misinformation spread about it.
Irish Examiner
5 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
John Whelan: Tariff-free services exports are key to growth for now
Across the business front, particularly the digital providers, an audible sigh of relief can be noticed as it became clear that the EU's €93bn list of countermeasure tariffs against the US does not include services trade. The EU's countermeasures will automatically click into force on August 7, said the European Commission, should the US fail to drop the Trump-threatened 30% tariff on all EU exports by then. The big worry for Ireland's services companies, which are mainly US multinationals, accounting for €115bn in exports sales in the first three months of the year as reported by the Central Statistics Office earlier in the month, was that the EU countermeasure tariffs on the US would include services. This would have had major implications for the many thousands employed in the sector, likely forcing relocations to other non-EU countries, as well as significantly hitting the Government's corporation tax take. Now the full weight of the EU-US tariff war is set to fall on the wide range of manufactured goods, inclusive of food and drinks products, which could impact on sales output to our largest customer the US, and in the process hitting State funding. The implication of this change in trading relationship with the US is the need to bolster support for Ireland's traders in the services sector, in particular, digital trade providers such as Amazon, Google, Meta, and Microsoft. Foreign-owned enterprises account for 80% of Ireland's services exports, the second highest of the OECD countries, as reported in its Services Trade Restrictiveness Index report 2025. This leaves Ireland more exposed than most countries to US trade pressures, as the vast majority of these Ireland-based multinationals are US-owned. Retaining these global digital players in Ireland must continue to be a priority for the Government, but also there is an urgent need to do more to develop indigenous Irish companies, to ensure more controllable and sustainable growth of the services exports sector. Amazon scraps plan for plant Amazon's scrapping of its plan to build an industrial plant in Dublin, involving a €300m investment which would employ more than 500, because it did not receive the necessary Government guarantees about power supplies the plant would require, is a clear indicator of the challenges faced in retaining the multinationals in Ireland. This Amazon project loss is a critical blow to our attempts to stay up with the global AI tech race, as the now scuttled project involved the creation of an AI testing and manufacturing facility and not a data centre. It would also have enabled the training of a fresh cohort of employees, who could in the future enable the setting up of indigenous AI start-ups. To date, Enterprise Ireland, which supports Irish-owned companies, has failed to significantly grow the service exporting industry. Enterprise Ireland client companies account for under 2% of our total service trade exports. The other 18% of the services exports from Ireland come from entrepreneurs who have built their export businesses without State support. Many of them depend on good access to digital services platforms provided by the likes of Google, Meta, and Microsoft, which again underscores the critical reliance on the connection with the US. Reducing dependence on the US and deepening EU integration in services could be achieved by encouraging more innovation and stimulating much-needed investment. An easy win should be with the UK, which last year imported €314bn in services, but only €12bn from Ireland. Service sector reforms are, of course, not going to be easy, either in their politics or in their execution. The freedom to establish a company in another EU country and the freedom to provide or receive services in another EU country are already established for many services through the EU Services Directive — but implementation has been weak. Services regulations are complex and highly decentralised. In many EU member states, reforms are often implemented by professional associations, who may have a bias against reforms or even a conflict of interest. Many professions and industries thrive on the fees that regulatory constraints generate — and you and I, as service users, are rarely aware of the costs that these regulations impose on us. Read More Trump and von der Leyen set for crunch meeting on EU-US trade talks
Irish Times
13 hours ago
- Irish Times
Bracing for a trade war: the Irish whiskey, cheese and sweet makers sweating Trump's tariff plans
Depending on who you talk to, a trade deal between the European Union and the United States has essentially been agreed or negotiations are on the brink of collapse. The latter outcome could precipitate a nasty and damaging trade war between the two massive economies. The benign scenario, on the other hand, is likely to be greeted by many Irish exporters not with relief but weary resignation. Developments over recent days point not to the 30 per cent tariffs Trump threatened the EU with two weeks ago, but a still painful 15 per cent flat rate for most EU goods entering the US. The agreement Trump's administration struck with Japan last week, will lead to a general 15 per cent tariff applied to Japanese imports. This was secured after the US president had threatened the country with a 25 per cent rate. READ MORE With European negotiators reportedly ready to accept 15 per cent as part of 'the shakedown', carveouts for specific industries and sectors will be crucial in determining whether many Irish businesses can retain access to the United States. The pressures of the last few months have reportedly claimed some victims. Last week, Killarney Brewing and Distilling company went to the wall after a failed examinership process. Laying off 54 workers, the company cited the 'high tariffs on Irish whiskey exports' as one of the reasons why it was unable to continue trading. The precise rates applied to Irish food and drink will be critical to whether many businesses remain competitive. Sarah and Sergio Furno of Cashel Blue cheesemakers Sarah Furno of Co Tipperary cheese maker Cashel Blue describes the mood within the Irish cheese industry as one of 'insecurity, fear and indeed sadness'. She notes that big global cheese players such as Lactalis and Savencia have already rushed to build production in the US to get ahead of the tariffs – an option not available to smaller brands. [ Profits rise at Cashel Blue producer with aims to fund further capital investment Opens in new window ] 'As speciality independent cheesemakers we are at the very opposite end to pharma in terms of scale and ownership,' says Furno. For Cashel Blue, a 30 per cent rate such as the tax Trump threatened would 'price Cashel off the shelf' in the US, she says. As with other blue-cheese producers, the rate applied to Cashel's products has been 15 per cent since Trump's 'Liberation Day', April 2nd, when he announced a broad package of import duties, and that has proven difficult. 'It's hard work at the moment. We are fortunate to be established and to be a team,' says Furno. 'I'm so fortunate to manage our family business with my husband and first cousin and a very stable local team in the cheese rooms – together we stay strong and positive'. Furno says her company has had to refocus on the UK market – where it has some competitive advantages – and expects Australia to grow in importance. However, she is not giving up all hope that things could change again in the US. 'This climate makes you think with agility, makes you realise nothing is stable or constant. It is a time to reach out, to stay in contact with those we know in the US – for this will pass." [ What would a 15% tariff deal mean for Ireland? Opens in new window ] If Europe and the US do indeed plump for 15 per cent across all goods, this might just keep access open, she says. 'At least we could have a good conversation to see how we could make it work ... if the figure is too high, it closes conversations,' she says. For Hazelbrook Confectionery in Newbridge, the idea of exporting to the US has been made unfeasible by the relentless uncertainty around potential tariff rates. This is despite the fact that the US confectionery market is valued at more than $50 billion (€44 billion). Leo Cummins: 'It became clear that there would be uncertainty on US pricing – and given the tight margins in the confectionery industry, we instead transferred our focus to the UK and European markets.' Photograph: Nick Bradshaw Earlier this year, the company made the decision not to wait and see whether Trump was bluffing; its Cleeve's, Urney and Hadji Bey brands will not be appearing on American shelves. 'Back in 2024 we were getting a lot of inquiries on all of the above from the USA,' says founder Leo Cummins, who employs 26 people at Hazelbrook's Co Kildare facility. 'But in early 2025 it became clear that there would be uncertainty on US pricing – and given the tight margins in the confectionery industry, we instead transferred our focus to the UK and European markets.' Having spent the past four years figuring out solutions to the barriers thrown up by Brexit, he describes Hazelbrook's exports to the UK as 'booming'. He says it's much better to focus instead on countries where there are no tariffs. The company has started selling into France and is looking at opportunities in Canada. 'It makes sense in our case to largely ignore the US market for now and instead focus on export markets where we can be immediately competitive'. For those who feel they can no longer remain competitive in the US, the standard advice from State bodies is to diversify and improve competitiveness. But the sheer size of the US market cannot be ignored or easily replaced, no matter how much energy is spent chasing new export opportunities. Then there are those products whose entire selling point is they are uniquely Irish and made nowhere else, such as Irish whiskey. Anything higher than 10 per cent and a lot of Irish whiskey companies will struggle to continue selling into the US – margins will be completely wiped out — Eoin Ó Catháin, Irish Whiskey Association, The industry has endured an agonising period . For much of this year, potentially catastrophic tariffs have loomed over distillers, many of whom had hitched their fortunes to a growing demand for Irish products in the US. Many smaller operators are loath to speak on the record in the current climate. Eoin Ó Catháin, director of the Irish Whiskey Association, says the industry has been reluctant to become 'the face' of the tariff discussion and most Irish whiskey producers have instead opted to quietly focus on navigating the coming months. Recent reports of a carveout for the spirits industry could prove to be a lifesaver for many of them, he says. 'The current 10 per cent tariff is already proving challenging for exporters, compounded with a weaker dollar. Anything higher than 10 per cent and a lot of Irish whiskey companies will struggle to continue selling into the US – margins will be completely wiped out,' he says. Many smaller producers have tried to front-load deliveries to the US in advance of any potential increase on that existing 10 per cent tariff. 'Any complications that exist are far greater for an SME – getting the product from grain to glass is more expensive for a smaller company,' says Ó Catháin. 'What we're hearing is that a lot of companies have tried to ship products ahead of the tariffs – but are now seeing the price of warehousing going way up. 'A return to the zero-for-zero trading deal for spirits such as Irish whiskey would recognise the unique nature of our products. Our supply chains can't be moved – Irish whiskey cannot be made anywhere else.' The whiskey industry would be uniquely vulnerable to potential tit-for-tat measures in any potential trade war. Ó Catháin says European negotiators have, to date, been sensitive to the concerns of spirits manufacturers but 'we need a solution now'. [ Possible tariff deal with US not a win for EU but, crucially, avoids damaging trade war Opens in new window ] North of the border, Irish whiskey producers say they continue to sell into the US, but American buyers have become more cautious. Exports from Northern Ireland fall under the British deal that was struck in May – which comes with a general 10 per cent tariff on goods. Brendan Carty, who runs Killowen Distillery, near Rostrevor in Co Down, showed some of his US distributors around the site during the week. Brendan Carty at Killowen Distillery in Co Down 'There is certainly a more conservative approach – but at the same time there is no stopping of trade between us,' he says. Like other small producers, Carty has identified opportunities in other jurisdictions. 'Doors have instead opened in Canada – as they have removed all their US trade,' he says. The one thing that each of these small producers stresses is the faith they have in the quality of their respective products. Either US consumers will continue to purchase their goods, even if they are forced to increase the price, or, if not, they are confident they can secure a foothold selling into other countries due to the specialised nature of what they offer. So much depends on the exact numbers the EU and the US are able to agree upon. Furno says Cashel has endured Brexit, Trump's first trade war, Covid and Trump's return. 'Our objective is stability in adversity,' she says.
