Parents welcome police probe into Nottingham baby deaths
Wynter's father, Gary Andrews, told the BBC: "We've known for some time that what happened to us and our daughter Wynter shouldn't have happened, but to be explored at a criminal level - that is pretty worrying. "But we're glad the police are taking action."
NUH was fined £800,000 in 2023 after admitting failings in Wynter's care in a criminal prosecution brought by healthcare regulator the Care Quality Commission (CQC).The court heard how a "catalogue of failings" exposed Wynter and her mum Sarah Andrews to a "significant risk of harm". Wynter died from a loss of oxygen flow to her brain which could have been prevented had staff delivered her earlier. Mr and Mrs Andrews - who have previously been critical of regulators like the CQC - added that they hoped the watchdog would acknowledge the seriousness of the police inquiry and "act earlier" within their own capacity in future. A spokesperson for the CQC said it had "repeatedly held the trust to account" and continued to monitor the service closely.They said: "We have been clear with the trust where standards of care have fallen short and clear where action must be taken to ensure a safer service.""The findings from CQC's latest inspection of the trust's maternity services was published in March. "We continue to monitor the service closely and can inspect at any time should we have concerns that people may be at risk."
'Element of justice'
Mrs Wynter added: "There have been so many families harmed and so many babies have died - and for us it's nice to know the police are now going to be investigating."But the Andrews and others, including Sarah and Jack Hawkins - the parents of Harriet Hawkins - believe there should be even further accountability.They have long maintained "individuals need to be held to account". Harriet was delivered nine hours after dying at Nottingham City Hospital in April 2016 and an external review of the case concluded the death was "almost certainly preventable". "We think the investigation is great and it's really positive but it's just one piece of the jigsaw," Ms Hawkins said. However she added there was an "element of justice just getting this investigation". Mr Hawkins called the police inquiry a "huge development", adding: "Can you imagine another industry or business or school or road where there was so much death and harm from proven negligence and neglect in coroners court where it was just allowed to continue?"
In a statement released by police on Monday, Det Supt Matthew Croome, from the investigation team, said: "The offence relates to circumstances where an organisation has been grossly negligent in the management of its activities, which has then led to a person's death."In such an investigation we are looking to see if the overall responsibility lies with the organisation rather than specific individuals and my investigation will look to ascertain if there is evidence that the Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust has committed this offence."It comes months after the trust was fined £1.6m in a second CQC prosecution for maternity failings in connection with the deaths of three babies in 2021. A joint statement from the hospital trust's chair Nick Carver and its chief executive Anthony May said: "We are fully committed to the ongoing police investigation and the Independent Review of Maternity Services, led by Donna Ockenden."We would like to reassure the public that we are determined to improve our maternity services."We know how important the police investigation and independent review are for the affected families, the trust and our local communities. We hope that affected families receive the answers that they deserve."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
33 minutes ago
- The Independent
What has Starmer demanded of Netanyahu ahead of recognition of a Palestinian state?
Sir Keir Starmer has issued an ultimatum to Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, warning he will recognise a Palestinian state in September unless a series of conditions are met. The prime minister 's decision comes after mounting pressure from his backbench MPs, and even cabinet ministers, to recognise Palestine as a state. Sir Keir held an emergency meeting of his cabinet on Tuesday to condemn the 'increasingly intolerable situation' in Gaza and discuss a UK-led peace plan for the region which David Lammy presented to allies in New York. But the PM went further, updating Labour's position on the recognition of a Palestinian state. The Independent looks at what the change of stance means, and what conditions Sir Keir has set out ahead of recognition. What does it mean? Recognition of a Palestinian state is a largely symbolic move given the situation on the ground in Gaza and the rest of the Occupied Palestinian Territories. The Montevideo Convention of 1933 established several criteria which must apply before an entity can be recognised as a sovereign state. These are a permanent population, a defined territory, an effective government and the ability to conduct international relations. But the process would offer tangible benefits to the Palestinians. It involves the establishment of formal diplomatic relations, including the opening of embassies, the exchange of ambassadors, and the signing of bilateral treaties. Recognition also grants the recognised state access to certain rights in international organisations. For Palestinians, such recognition would strengthen their claim to sovereignty and facilitate greater international support. Added to that, the UK recognising a Palestinian state has a special significance because it was Britain which in effect created the modern state of Israel with the Balfour Declaration in 1926, signed by then Foreign Secretary Sir Arthur Balfour. Britain also brings extra influence as the former colonial power and current member of the UN Security Council. Who else has recognised Palestine? France has committed to recognising a Palestinian state in September, when Sir Keir's own promise to do so will take effect if Israel ignores his demands. Emmanuel Macron 's promise put his country on course to be the first in the G7 to recognise Palestine. But already 144 of the 193 UN member states, including Spain, Norway, Ireland, India, Russia and China recognise it as a state. Critics have argued that recognition has not helped resolve the problems on the ground or brought peace. They also note that Palestine does not fulfil the criteria of a state with a permanent population, a defined territory, a stable government, and the ability to enter into relations with other states. What has Keir Starmer called for? Sir Keir has set a series of conditions for the Israeli prime minister, warning that if they are not met, Britain will recognise Palestine alongside France at the UN General Assembly (UNGA) meeting in September. The first is for the Israeli government to take 'substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza', which is seeing thousands of Palestinians starving as aid is unable to get into the strip. The second is for Mr Netanyahu to promise no annexation in the West Bank. And the third is a commitment to a long-term peace process that will deliver a two-state solution between Israel and Palestine. The prime minister has also said the UK and its allies need to see "at least 500 trucks entering Gaza every day" to deliver aid. Notably, Mr Netanyahu and right-wing elements of his government have abandoned the promise of a two-state solution and pushed for a one-state solution. Sir Keir also called for Hamas to release remaining hostages, agree to a ceasefire, disarm themselves and rule themselves out of government in Gaza. But there are concerns that he has not linked Palestinian state recognition to his demands of Hamas. Is either side likely to agree? In short, no. The prime minister's ultimatum is likely to be largely ignored by Mr Netanyahu, leaving recognition of a Palestinian state by Britain looking almost inevitable. Hamas is also unlikely to agree to the prime minister's conditions and will continue to hold on to its hostages. There is a danger that while US president Donald Trump in effect said he would accept the UK recognising a Palestinian state, his US State Department is strongly opposed to the move and it could damage the special relationship. The prime minister promised an assessment of how far both sides have progressed towards meeting his tests before UNGA. But the news about Britain's plans now looks set to dominate the conference.
STV News
33 minutes ago
- STV News
In pictures: Donald Trump's visit to Scotland
Donald Trump has left Scotland after a five-day private visit during which he played golf and met with political leaders. The US President was greeted by large crowds as he landed at Prestwick Airport on Friday evening. On Saturday morning, Trump was surrounded by a major security operation as he teed off at his South Ayrshire golf course. Snipers were perched on sand dunes and vantage points around Turnberry throughout the weekend. Getty Images Police snipers are seen on the roof of the Trump Turnberry. Getty Images The Republican leader spent Saturday playing golf at Turnberry during his visit, which has been described as a working holiday. He also played a round on his brand new 18-hole golf course in Aberdeenshire on Tuesday after he cut the ribbon during an opening ceremony. Getty Images Donald Trump tees off at a new 18-hole course at Trump International Golf Links on July 29. Getty Images Trump met with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer on Monday to discuss progress on the UK-US trade deal, hopes for a ceasefire in the Middle East, and applying pressure on Vladimir Putin to end the war in Ukraine. The pair took questions during a lengthy press conference in a ballroom at Turnberry before they travelled to Trump's second golf resort in Aberdeenshire. Getty Images President Donald Trump and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer at Trump International Golf Links on July 28. Getty Images Trump's visit has also been marked by protests and arrests across the country. A 'festival of resistance' was held near his Aberdeenshire golf course on Monday afternoon, and hundreds of protesters gathered in both Edinburgh and Aberdeen on Saturday to voice their opposition to Trump's visit. Getty Images Demonstrators gather in Aberdeen protesting against the visit of President Trump to Scotland on July 26. Getty Images On Tuesday, Trump's fifth and final day in Scotland, he cut the ribbon and teed off in celebration of the New Course at Trump International Golf Links on the Menie Estate. Later, Trump returned to Washington on Air Force One. Getty Images President Donald Trump cuts the ribbon at the ceremony at a new 18-hole course at Trump International Golf Links on July 29. Getty Images Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Telegraph
34 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Streeting orders LGBT+ health review despite axing women's target
Wes Streeting has ordered an LGBT+ health review despite previously axing a key women's health target. For the first time, the NHS will conduct a six-month review of its 'unequal' treatment of LGBT+ patients. Recommendations on improving the experiences of people who consider themselves LGBT+ will be made to the Government in December, the health service said. It is likely to ignite further criticism from women and campaigners, who accused the Health Secretary of 'sidelining' women after he removed women's health targets in annual NHS planning guidance earlier this year while also setting up a men's health strategy. Dame Lesley Regan, the Government's women's health ambassador, previously told the Telegraph there was 'already a men's health strategy – it's called the NHS'. At the same time, charities and Royal Colleges have criticised the Health Secretary's failure to 'reset the women's health strategy' previously set up by the Conservatives, including through the recent 10-year health plan. Ranee Thakar, the president of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, said the plan 'falls short in pledging to eliminate the gender health gap that is costing women years of life and good health'. The NHS dropped a number of targets from this year's guidance, which included removing the requirement for there to be women's health hubs in all parts of England. The health service said the LGBT review would 'build on significant evidence that LGBT+ people have worse access to healthcare, poorer experience and worse health outcomes than the general population'. It will look at the 'barriers' in accessing care such as therapy, cancer screening and GP appointments. LGBT people are more likely to have mental health conditions and poor experiences of NHS services, including GPs, according to a recent patient experience survey. The review will focus on the care of people aged 16 and older but consider the experiences of children aged 13 to 15 as well. However, it will not look at NHS gender services for children or adults, or social care services, for which there have been or are separate reviews ongoing. Mr Streeting said: 'The NHS is at its best when it serves everyone equally – but evidence shows this hasn't been happening. For too many LGBT+ people, accessing quality healthcare remains a challenge, and one often marked by discrimination, misunderstanding, and mis-education. 'That's why I've commissioned a comprehensive review into LGBT+ health inequalities – because every patient deserves dignity, respect, and excellent care, regardless of who they are or who they love.' Fiona McAnena, the director of campaigns at the human rights charity Sex Matters, said: 'Looking at the particular healthcare needs of population subgroups is commendable. But nothing useful can emerge if the members have little in common. 'LGBT+ is not a homogeneous group. NHS England has previously commissioned work on the healthcare needs of women who sleep with women – its label – and separately for men who sleep with men, recognising that the two groups are quite different. 'Trans-identified individuals range from school-age girls and boys to elderly men, both gay and straight. When it comes to healthcare, each of these subgroups surely has more in common with others of their age and sex. As for the plus in LGBT+, what on earth does it mean?' The review will be led by Dr Michael Brady, NHS England's LGBT+ adviser. He said: 'It's unacceptable that LGBT+ people have a poorer overall experience of health services, which leads to worse health outcomes. 'This is the first review to look in depth at this issue and make recommendations which will help the NHS better meet the health needs of LGBT+ people.' The review is welcoming relevant submissions until the end of August and will look at a range of information and data, including unpublished research. It says it will continue use the 'LGBT+ acronym' but 'we recognise that the LGBT+ community is diverse and intersectional, reflecting gender diversity and a number of minority sexual orientations'.
